A novel negative pressure isolation device reduces aerosol exposure: A randomized controlled trial.

Background and aim: The COVID-19 pandemic has led to a proliferation of intubation barriers designed to protect healthcare workers from infection. We developed the Suction-Assisted Local Aerosol Containment Chamber (SLACC) and tested it in the operating room. The primary objectives were to determine the ease and safety of airway management with SLACC, and to measure its efficacy of aerosol containment to determine if it significantly reduces exposure to health care workers. Methods: In this randomized clinical trial, adult patients scheduled to undergo elective surgery with general endotracheal anesthesia were screened and informed consent obtained from those willing to participate. Patients were randomized to airway management either with or without the SLACC device. Patients inhaled nebulized saline before and during anesthesia induction to simulate the size and concentration of particles seen with severe symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection. Results: 79 patients were enrolled and randomized. Particle number concentration (PNC) at the patients' and healthcare workers' locations were measured and compared between the SLACC vs. control groups during airway management. Ease and success of tracheal intubation were recorded for each patient. All intubations were successful and time to intubation was similar between the two groups. Healthcare workers were exposed to significantly lower particle number concentrations (#/cm3) during airway management when SLACC was utilized vs. control. The particle count outside SLACC was reduced by 97% compared to that inside the device. Conclusions: The SLACC device does not interfere with airway management and significantly reduces healthcare worker exposure to aerosolized particles during airway management.

Minimally Invasive Bilateral Stellate Ganglionectomy for Refractory Ventricular Tachycardia.

Cardiac sympathetic denervation (CSD) for refractory ventricular tachycardia (VT) has been shown to decrease VT recurrence and defibrillator shocks in patients with ischemic and nonischemic cardiomyopathy. Here and in the accompanying Video, we demonstrate the technique for minimally invasive CSD, highlight important technical points, and report surgical outcomes. CSD is accomplished through bilateral resection of the inferior one-third to one-half of the stellate ganglion en bloc with T2-T4 sympathectomy. Despite the high potential for perioperative risk, most patients do not have serious complications. We find that surgical CSD can be performed safely in an attempt to liberate patients from refractory VT.

Minimally Invasive Bilateral Stellate Ganglionectomy for Refractory Ventricular Tachycardia.

Cardiac sympathetic denervation (CSD) for refractory ventricular tachycardia (VT) has been shown to decrease VT recurrence and defibrillator shocks in patients with ischemic and nonischemic cardiomyopathy. Here and in the accompanying Video, we demonstrate the technique for minimally invasive CSD, highlight important technical points, and report surgical outcomes. CSD is accomplished through bilateral resection of the inferior one-third to one-half of the stellate ganglion en bloc with T2-T4 sympathectomy. Despite the high potential for perioperative risk, most patients do not have serious complications. We find that surgical CSD can be performed safely in an attempt to liberate patients from refractory VT.

A Novel Negative Pressure Isolation Device for Aerosol Transmissible COVID-19.

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic creates a need to protect health care workers (HCWs) from patients undergoing aerosol-generating procedures which may transmit the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2). Existing personal containment devices (PCDs) may protect HCWs from respiratory droplets but not from potentially dangerous respiratory-generated aerosols. We describe a new PCD and its aerosol containment capabilities. The device ships flat and folds into a chamber. With its torso drape and protective arm sleeves mounted, it provides contact, droplet, and aerosol isolation during intubation and cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). Significantly improved ergonomics, single-use workflow, and ease of removal distinguish this device from previously published designs.

A Comparison of the Haider Tube-Guard® Endotracheal Tube Holder Versus Adhesive Tape to Determine if This Novel Device Can Reduce Endotracheal Tube Movement and Prevent Unplanned Extubation.

BACKGROUND: Endotracheal tube security is a critical safety issue. We compared the mobility of an in situ endotracheal tube secured with adhesive tape to the one secured with a new commercially available purpose-designed endotracheal tube-holder device (Haider Tube-Guard). We also observed for the incidence of oropharyngeal or facial trauma associated with the 2 tube fixation methods. METHODS: Thirty adult patients undergoing general anesthesia with neuromuscular blockade were prospectively enrolled. Immediately after intubation, a single study author positioned the endotracheal tube tip in the distal trachea using a bronchoscope. Anesthesiologists caring for patients secured the tube in their normal fashion (always with adhesive tape). A force transducer was used to apply linear force, increasing to 15 N or until the principal investigator deemed that the force be aborted for safety reasons. The displacement of the endotracheal tube was measured with the bronchoscope. Any tape was then removed and the endotracheal tube secured with the Haider Tube-Guard device. The linear force was reapplied and the displacement of the endotracheal tube measured. The Haider Tube-Guard device was left in place for the duration of the case. The patient's face and oropharynx were examined for any evidence of trauma during surgery and in the recovery room. On discharge from the postanesthesia care unit, the patient answered a brief survey assessing for any subjective evidence of minor facial or oropharyngeal trauma. RESULTS: Under standardized tension, the endotracheal tube withdrew a mean distance of 3.4 cm when secured with adhesive tape versus 0.3 cm when secured with the Haider Tube-Guard (P <0.001). Ninety-seven percent of patients (29/30) experienced clinically significant endotracheal tube movement (>1 cm) when adhesive tape was used to secure the tube versus 3% (1/30) when the Haider Tube-Guard was used (P <0.001). Thirty percent of patients (9/30) were potentially deemed a high extubation risk (endotracheal tube movement >4 cm) when the endotracheal tube was secured with tape versus 0% (0/30) when secured with the Haider Tube-Guard (P = 0.004). Six patients with taped endotracheal tubes required the traction to be aborted before 15 N of force was achieved to prevent potential extubation as the tape either separated from the face or stretched to allow excessive endotracheal tube movement. None of the patients appeared to sustain any injury from the Haider Tube-Guard device. CONCLUSIONS: The Haider Tube-Guard significantly reduced the mobility of the endotracheal tube when compared with adhesive tape and was well tolerated in our observations.

Diagnosis of unintentional subdural anesthesia/analgesia: analyzing radiographically proven cases to define the clinical entity and to develop a diagnostic algorithm.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: : Subdural injection is a well-known but often poorly recognized complication of neuraxial anesthesia/analgesia. This report aims to further describe the clinical presentation of subdural injection by analyzing radiographically proven cases. A new diagnostic algorithm is then proposed. METHODS: : A literature search identified 70 radiographically confirmed cases of subdural injection. The prevalence of numerous presenting characteristics and their relationship to the volume of injected local anesthetics were examined. The ability of 2 previously published diagnostic paradigms to detect proven subdural injection was compared with that of a newly proposed algorithm. RESULTS: : The dermatomal distribution of sensory blockade was excessive in 74% of cases, restricted in 17%, and neither in 9%. Motor blockade and respiratory depression were associated with larger local anesthetic injection volumes (median volume = 14 vs. 8 mL [P <.009] and 15 vs. 10 mL [P <.035], respectively), but segmental spread and cardiovascular depression were not. Only 33% of cases were positive for 2 or more of Collier's criteria; Lubenow et al.'s diagnostic paradigm detected 71% of cases. We propose a diagnostic algorithm structured as a "roadmap," whereby the clinician inputs the assumed neuraxial block (epidural vs. subarachnoid), and distribution of sensory blockade (excessive, restricted, neither). Specific minor criteria are then applied to diagnose subdural injections. This algorithm detected 93% of subdurals with excessive sensory block distribution, and all of those with restricted and normal distribution. CONCLUSIONS: : Radiographically proven subdural injections were used to further define the clinical presentation of subdural analgesia/analgesia and a new diagnostic algorithm is proposed.