A comparison of the incidence of midline catheter-associated bloodstream infections to that of central line-associated bloodstream infections in 5 acute care hospitals.

In a retrospective study conducted over 12 months in a multi-hospital system, the incidence of bloodstream infections associated with midline catheters was not significantly lower than that associated with central venous catheters (0.88 vs 1.10 infections per 1,000 catheter-days). Additional research is needed to further characterize the infectious risks of midline catheters and to determine optimal strategies to minimize these risks.

Incidence and risk factors for and the effect of a program to reduce the incidence of surgical site infection after cardiac surgery.

BACKGROUND: Surgical site infection (SSI) after cardiac surgery (CS) is a serious complication that increases hospital length of stay (LOS), has a substantial financial impact, and increases mortality. The study described here was done to evaluate the effect of a program to reduce SSI after CS. METHODS: In January 2007, a multi-disciplinary CS infection-prevention team developed guidelines and implemented bundled tactics for reducing SSI. Data for all patients who underwent CS from 2006-2008 were used to determine whether there was: 1) A difference in the incidence of SSI in white patients and those belonging to minority groups; 2) a reduction in SSI after intervention; and 3) a statistically significant difference in the incidence of SSI in the third quarter of each year as compared with the other quarters of the year. RESULTS: Of 3,418 patients who underwent CS; 1,125 (32.9%) were members of minority groups and 2,293 (67.1%) were white. Eighty (2.3%) patients developed SSI. There was no significant difference in the incidence of SSI in non-Hispanic white patients and all others (2.1% vs. 2.8%, p=0. 42). The incidence of SSI decreased significantly from 2006 (3.0%) to 2007 (2.5%) and 2008 (1.4%), (p=0.03). Surgical site infection occurred more often in the third quarter of each of the years of the study than in other quarters of each year (3.3 vs. 2.0%, p=0.038). CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of a program to reduce SSI after CS was associated with a lower incidence of SSI across all racial and ethnic groups and over time, but was not associated with a lower incidence of SSI in the third quarter of each year than in the other quarters.

Evaluation of surgical fellows' laparoscopic performance using Global Operative Assessment of Laparoscopic Skills (GOALS).

BACKGROUND: The acquisition of technical skills is one of the fundamental goals of postgraduate surgical training; however, validation and utilization of objective tools to assess the technical skills of trainees remains elusive. The objectives of this project are to develop models to identify predictive factors for fellow performance, validate the Global Operative Assessment of Laparoscopic Skills (GOALS) as an assessment tool for laparoscopic skills, and to define the learning curve for complex laparoscopic gastrointestinal surgery. METHODS: Using previously recorded data from a centralized database of the Fellowship Council, we analyzed the voluntarily submitted performance scores of surgical fellows for three complex laparoscopic gastrointestinal operations: Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, LapBand placement, and Nissen fundoplication. We analyzed previous experience with complex cases, previous experience with the same type of case, case difficulty, and time of year in the fellowship as potential predictors of performance. Performance scores throughout the fellowship year were graphed to create learning curves for overall performance and each of five domains of performance. RESULTS: Ninety-eight performance assessments were submitted for 31 unique fellows. Overall performance (p < 0.01), bimanual dexterity (p < 0.01), efficiency (p < 0.01), and autonomy (p < 0.01) all improved significantly throughout the course of the fellowship year. Performance in the domains of depth perception and tissue handling improved, but the improvement did not reach statistical significance. Three predictor variables were significantly related to performance scores. CONCLUSIONS: This study documents that GOALS is able to differentiate novice fellows from graduating fellows and established construct validity. Models developed and tested confirmed that previous experience, case difficulty, and length of time as a fellow impacted performance.

The Fellowship Council: a decade of impact on surgical training.

BACKGROUND: The objective of this project is to document the history of the Fellowship Council (FC) and report its current impact on surgical training. The need for advanced training in laparoscopic surgery resulted in the rapid development of fellowships for which there was no oversight. Fellowship program directors began meeting in the 1990s and formally created the FC in 2004 to provide that oversight. METHODS: To obtain information with which to create a narrative of the history of the FC, the authors performed a detailed review of all available minutes from the meetings of the various iterations of the council and its committees between 2001 and 2012. Information about fellowships and meetings of the directors of fellowships prior to 2001 are based on information included in minutes of meetings after 2001. RESULTS: Minimally invasive surgery fellowship program directors in collaboration with surgical societies created the FC to bring order to the application process for residents and program directors. It has evolved into an organization with mature, reliable processes for application, matching, curriculum development, accreditation, and reporting. It now receives applications from more than 30 % of graduating chief residents in general surgery. It has 223 accredited fellowship positions in the following disciplines: Minimally invasive surgery, bariatric/metabolic surgery, Flexible endoscopy, hepato-pancreato-biliary Surgery, colorectal surgery, and Thoracic surgery. CONCLUSIONS: The FC provides a reliable, fair process for matching residents with fellowship programs and has successfully expanded its oversight of such programs with mature processes for accreditation, curriculum development, and reporting.

Limiting PGY 1 residents to 16 hours of duty: review and report of a workshop.

BACKGROUND: In 2003, the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) instituted limits on duty hours. Residents were restricted to working 80 hours/week and limited to 24 hours of continuous patient care. Effective July 2011, an additional restriction will be instituted for PGY 1 residents limiting continuous duty to 16 hours maximum. OBJECTIVE: Prospective evaluation of the impact of the upcoming work shift limitations for PGY 1 residents. DESIGN/SETTING/PARTICIPANTS: Review of literature and discussions among program directors, program coordinators, and residents on the effects of prior limitations of duty hours, as a point of reference, to manage the changes of duty hours for PGY 1 residents during a workshop at the Association of Program Directors in Surgery Annual Meeting. RESULTS: Work-hour restrictions necessitate a change from the traditional 24-hour on-duty call schedule for PGY 1 residents. The benefits to patients of being treated by less tired doctors working in shifts may be offset by communication failures from poor handoffs, rendering the system prone to adverse events/near misses. With additional work-hour restrictions, it is imperative to anticipate problems and deal with them effectively. Continued reevaluation of the handoff system and efforts made to decrease the number of preventable adverse events that typically occur during periods of cross coverage should be undertaken. Labor costs to carry out these new restrictions are predictably high but can be made budget neutral if improvement in patient care leads to reduction in the costs of corrective actions. CONCLUSIONS: Residency programs have adapted to the 2003 work-hour restrictions without apparent ill effect. We must study the effects of the July 2011 requirements prospectively as the traditional frontline physicians (PGY 1 residents) will no longer be available for 24-hour duty shifts.

Assessing the value of the SimPraxis laparoscopic cholecystectomy trainer.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Our aim was to determine whether the SimPraxis Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Trainer is an effective adjunct for training both junior and senior surgical residents. METHODS: During the 2009-2010 academic year, 20 of 27 surgical residents at our institution completed training with the SimPraxis Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Trainer. These 20 residents took an identical 25-question pre- and posttest prepared in-house by a senior laparoscopic surgeon, based on the SimPraxis Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy program content. Included within the SimPraxis program is a multiple data point scoring system. For our reporting purposes, we divided the residents into 2 groups, junior (PGY 1-2; n = 11) and senior (PGY 3-5; n = 9). RESULTS: The junior residents demonstrated a statistically significant improvement in their post-test scores (P = .001). On the contrary, the senior residents showed nonstatistically significant minor improvement in their examination scores (P = .09). While, the pretest scores were significantly higher for the senior residents compared with the junior residents (P = .003), the post-test scores were nonsignificantly different between the senior vs. the junior residents (P = .07). There was no significant difference between the time it took junior and senior residents to complete the SimPraxis program. CONCLUSION: Our data demonstrate that junior residents benefitted the most from the SimPraxis training program. Requiring junior surgical residents to complete both skills and cognitive training programs may be an effective adjunct in preparation for participation in laparoscopic cholecystectomy procedures.

Completion of a novel, virtual-reality-based, advanced laparoscopic curriculum improves advanced laparoscopic skills in senior residents.

INTRODUCTION: Virtual reality simulators contribute to basic laparoscopic skill acquisition. These trainers have not yet been shown to contribute to the acquisition of more advanced laparoscopic skills as measured by the Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery (FLS). We have customized novel basic and advanced curricula for the LapSim trainer (Surgical Science, Göteborg, Sweden). Successful completion of these programs is required of our residents. We hypothesize that the successful completion of our advanced curriculum will result in the significant improvement of our residents' advanced laparoscopic skills as measured by the FLS skills scores. METHODS: In all, 23 surgical residents (PGY 1-4), who had already passed our basic skills curriculum, completed our advanced LapSim curriculum. All individuals underwent FLS skills testing before and after completing the training. Laparoscopic case experience during the training period was documented for all trainees. FLS scores were analyzed by t test and controlled for case experience. RESULTS: Posttraining FLS scores demonstrate a significant increase for all residents from a mean of 57-66 (p < 0.02), especially for seniors (PGY 3-4): 56-68 (p < 0.01). The operative laparoscopic case volume ranged from 1-90 (mean, 30) for juniors (PGY 1-2) and 12-76 (mean 50) for seniors during the training period. Junior resident FLS improvement was dependent on case volume during the period of training; residents with less than 30 cases had a mean improvement of 0, whereas those with at least 30 cases had a 15 point improvement (p < 0.01). Senior resident FLS score improvement was independent of case numbers during the training period. CONCLUSIONS: Completion of our advanced LapSim curriculum results in improved advanced laparoscopic skills in senior residents as measured by FLS scores. This skill improvement is independent of laparoscopic case experience. Continuing to mandate the use of this skills curriculum should improve our residents' performance in advanced laparoscopic surgical procedures.

Initial trial of a stereoscopic, insertable, remotely controlled camera for minimal access surgery.

BACKGROUND: Although video-laparoscopy has enabled successful minimal access surgery, the nature of the technology causes many troublesome limitations: (1) the fulcrum effect of the insertion site through the abdominal wall limits the angle of view, (2) the camera operator must use counterintuitive movements, (3) the laparoscope occupies an incision which otherwise could be used for an instrument, and (4) the laparoscope provides a two-dimensional image. METHODS: A stereoscopic, insertable, remotely controlled camera was developed to overcome the limitations imposed by traditional video-laparoscopy. Additional functionality included digital zoom, picture-in-picture (PIP), and tracking capability for autonomous function of the camera. Four surgical tasks were performed twice in a porcine model, once using the insertable camera and once using a standard video-laparoscope setup for visualization. Running the bowel, simulated laparoscopic appendectomy, laparoscopic nephrectomy, and laparoscopic suturing and tying were measured for time, blood loss, and complications. Digital zoom, PIP, and the ability of the computer to move the camera to track a marked instrument were subjectively evaluated. RESULTS: The tasks were aborted in one animal because a new three-dimensional (3D) display could not be synchronized with the camera and in another animal because a motor in the camera failed. The tasks were all completed twice in two animals. The mean time was less for all procedures using the insertable camera. There was no significant blood loss and there were no complications. Digital zoom and PIP displaying both a close-up and a panoramic view were subjectively felt to improve visualization by all observers. The computer could reliably move the camera to track a marked instrument to keep it in the center of the field of view. CONCLUSIONS: This preliminary proof-of-concept study suggests that a stereoscopic, insertable, remotely controlled camera may provide better visualization during minimal access surgery by overcoming many of the limitations of video-laparoscopy.

Does training novices to criteria and does rapid acquisition of skills on laparoscopic simulators have predictive validity or are we just playing video games?

PURPOSE: To determine whether LapSim training (version 3.0; Surgical Science Ltd, Göteborg, Sweden) to criteria for novice PGY1 surgical residents had predictive validity for improvement in the performance of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. METHODS: In all, 21 PGY1 residents performed laparoscopic cholecystectomies in pigs after minimal training; their performance was evaluated by skilled laparoscopic surgeons using the validated tool GOALS (global operative assessment of laparoscopic operative skills: depth perception, bimanual dexterity, efficiency, tissue handling, and overall competence). From the group, 10 residents trained to competency on the LapSim Basic Skills Programs (camera navigation, instrument navigation, coordination, grasping, lifting and grasping, cutting, and clip applying). All 21 PGY1 residents again performed laparoscopic cholecystectomies on pigs; their performance was again evaluated by skilled laparoscopic surgeons using GOALS. Additionally, we studied the rate of learning to determine whether the slow or fast learners on the LapSim performed equivalently when performing actual cholecystectomies in pigs. Finally, 6 categorical residents were tracked, and their clinical performance on all of the laparoscopic cholecystectomies in which they were "surgeon, junior" was prospectively evaluated using the GOALS criteria. RESULTS: We found a statistical improvement of depth perception in the operative performance of cholecystectomies in pigs in the group trained on the LapSim. In the other 4 domains, a trend toward improvement was observed. No correlation between being a fast learner and the ultimate skill was demonstrated in the clinical performance of laparoscopic cholecystectomies. We did find that the fast learners on LapSim all were past or current video game players ("gamers"); however, that background did not translate into better clinical performance. CONCLUSIONS: Using current criteria, we doubt that the time and effort spent training novice PGY1 Surgical Residents on the basic LapSim training programs is justified, as such training to competence lacks predictive validity in most domains of the GOALS program. We are investigating 2 other approaches: more difficult training exercises using the LapSim system and an entirely different approach using haptic technology (ProMis; Haptica Ltd., Ireland), which uses real instruments, with training on realistic 3-dimensional models with real rather than simulated cutting, sewing, and dissection. Although experienced video gamers achieve competency faster than nongamers on LapSim programs, that skill set does not translate into improved clinical performance.

Comparison of monoscopic insertable, remotely controlled imaging device with a standard laparoscope in a porcine model.

Laparoscopic imaging has remained relatively unchanged since the introduction of the rod-lens system. The intent here is to improve imaging by designing and building sensors and effectors placed directly into the body and controlled remotely. An 11-mm monoscopic insertable pan/tilt endoscopic imaging device with an integrated light source was studied. In vivo testing included simulated appendectomy, nephrectomy, suturing, and running the bowel in a porcine model (n = 6). Subjective impression and time for each procedure were compared using each imaging modality. The insertable imaging device seemed easier and more intuitive to use than a standard laparoscope. Time to perform procedures was better than or equivalent to a standard laparoscope. The insertable camera was subjectively preferred, and times for completion of complex tasks were shorter using the insertable camera. The insertable imaging device has the potential to be an integral part of surgical system platforms.

High definition in minimally invasive surgery: a review of methods for recording, editing, and distributing video.

The use of high-definition cameras and monitors during minimally invasive procedures can provide the surgeon and operating team with more than twice the resolution of standard definition systems. Although this dramatic improvement in visualization offers numerous advantages, the adoption of high definition cameras in the operating room can be challenging because new recording equipment must be purchased, and several new technologies are required to edit and distribute video. The purpose of this review article is to provide an overview of the popular methods for recording, editing, and distributing high-definition video. This article discusses the essential technical concepts of high-definition video, reviews the different kinds of equipment and methods most often used for recording, and describes several options for video distribution.

In vivo pan/tilt endoscope with integrated light source, zoom and auto-focusing.

We describe a surgical imaging device with pan, tilt, zoom and integrated LED light source. It can be fully inserted into the abdomen, leaving the insertion port free for tooling. Using a porcine model we have tested the device and performed surgical procedures including cholecystectomy, appendectomy, running (measuring) the bowel, suturing, and nephrectomy. The tests show that the new device is: * Easier and more intuitive to use than a standard laparoscope. * Joystick operation requires no specialized operator training. * Field of view and access to relevant regions of the body were superior to a standard laparoscope using a single port. * Time to perform procedures was better or equivalent to a standard laparoscope. We believe these insertable platforms will be an integral part of future surgical systems.

Do the laparoscopic skills of trainees deteriorate over time?

INTRODUCTION: Without ongoing practice, acquired motor skills may deteriorate over time. The purpose of this study is to document the level of retention of laparoscopic skills over time. METHODS: Thirty-three general-surgery PGY 1, 2, and 3 residents trained to established criteria and passed an exam for each of seven technical skills (camera navigation, instrument navigation, camera/instrument coordination, grasping, lifting and grasping, cutting, and clip applying) on a virtual simulator (LapSim Surgical Science Ltd., Göteborg, Sweden). Six months later, the residents again completed the exam for each of the seven skills. During the 6 months, the simulators were available, but additional practice was not required. The retesting process consisted of three attempts, the first of which was acclimatization. The results of the subsequent two exams were compared with baseline data. RESULTS: At retest, the number of residents who passed clip applying (7, 21%) and cutting tasks (18, 55%) was significantly lower than for the other five tasks (p < 0.05). In failed tests, instrument wandering and tissue damage were more common than increases in task time. Upper-level residents were significantly more likely to pass than first-year residents were (p < 0.01). Time of day did not influence passing rates. CONCLUSION: Six months after training to criteria, instrument and tissue-handling skills deteriorated more than the speed with which a task is completed. Evidence of skill retention was present for some but not all tasks. Fine motor skills, required to perform more difficult tasks, deteriorated more than skills needed for easier tasks.

Multimedia article: Transvaginal laparoscopic cholecystectomy: laparoscopically assisted.

Natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) is considered the new frontier for minimally invasive surgery. NOTES procedures such as peritoneoscopy, splenectomy, and cholecystectomy in animal models have been described. The aim of our experiment was to determine the feasibility and technical aspects of a new endoluminal surgical procedure. After approval from Columbia's IACUC, a transvaginal laparoscopically assisted endoscopic cholecystectomy was performed on four 30 kg Yorkshire pigs. The first step was to insert a 1.5 cm endoscope into the vagina under direct laparoscopic vision. Then the gallbladder was reached and, with the help of a laparoscopic grasper to hold up the gallbladder, the operation was performed. At the end of the procedure the gallbladder was snared out through the vagina attached to the endoscope. There were no intraoperative complications such as bleeding, common bile duct or endo-abdominal organ damage. Total operative time ranged between 110 and 155 min. Based on our experience in the porcine model, we believe that a transvaginal endoscopic cholecystectomy is feasible in humans.

Documenting a learning curve and test-retest reliability of two tasks on a virtual reality training simulator in laparoscopic surgery.

BACKGROUND: Virtual reality simulators are a component of the armamentarium for training surgical residents. No one knows exactly how to incorporate virtual reality simulators into a curriculum. The purpose of this study was to document and show the learning curve and test-retest reliability of 2 tasks on a virtual reality-training simulator (LapSim; Surgical Science, Göteborg, Sweden) in laparoscopic surgery. METHODS: Twenty-nine medical students participated in 8 iterations of 7 virtual reality tasks ("camera navigation" (CN), "instrument navigation," "coordination," "grasping," "lifting and grasping" (LG), "cutting," and "clip applying") Learning curves for each outcome variable of the CN and LG tasks were generated. Using ANOVA, we evaluated the differences between each score from attempt number 7 to attempt number 8 to document test-retest reliability. RESULTS: A plateau in the learning curve occurred within 8 sessions for CN misses, CN tissue damage, CN maximum damage, and LG maximum damage. Over the course of 8 sessions, a plateau in the learning curve was nearly reached for CN time, CN drift, CN path, CN angular path, and LG left and right path. The following variables had a downward trend to the mean learning curve over 8 sessions, but they did not reach a plateau: LG time, LG left and right miss, LG left and right angular path, and LG tissue damage. CONCLUSION: Using the LapSim virtual reality simulator, we documented a learning curve and test-retest reliability for each outcome variable for CN and LG for rank novices. The modeling of the general learning curve is useful in designing training program. These results may be important in developing standards for technical evaluation in a surgical training curriculum.

Reliable assessment of laparoscopic performance in the operating room using videotape analysis.

The Global Operative Assessment of Laparoscopic Skills (GOALS) is a valid assessment tool for objectively evaluating the technical performance of laparoscopic skills in surgery residents. We hypothesized that GOALS would reliably differentiate between an experienced (expert) and an inexperienced (novice) laparoscopic surgeon (construct validity) based on a blinded videotape review of a laparoscopic cholecystectomy procedure. Ten board-certified surgeons actively engaged in the practice and teaching of laparoscopy reviewed and evaluated the videotaped operative performance of one novice and one expert laparoscopic surgeon using GOALS. Each reviewer recorded a score for both the expert and the novice videotape reviews in each of the 5 domains in GOALS (depth perception, bimanual dexterity, efficiency, tissue handling, and overall competence). The scores for the expert and the novice were compared and statistically analyzed using single-factor analysis of variance (ANOVA). The expert scored significantly higher than the novice did in the domains of depth perception (p = .005), bimanual dexterity (p = .001), efficiency (p = .001), and overall competence ( p = .001). Interrater reliability for the reviewers of the novice tape was Cronbach alpha = .93 and the expert tape was Cronbach alpha = .87. There was no difference between the two for tissue handling. The Global Operative Assessment of Laparoscopic Skills is a valid, objective assessment tool for evaluating technical surgical performance when used to blindly evaluate an intraoperative videotape recording of a laparoscopic procedure.

Evaluation of resident laparoscopic performance using global operative assessment of laparoscopic skills.

BACKGROUND: The Global Operative Assessment of Laparoscopic Skills (GOALS), developed by Vassiliou and colleagues, has construct validity in the assessment of surgical residents' laparoscopic skills in dissection of the gallbladder from the liver bed. We hypothesized that GOALS would have construct validity for the entire laparoscopic cholecystectomy procedure and also for laparoscopic appendectomy. METHODS: Using GOALS, attending surgeons evaluated PGY1 through PGY5 surgical resident performance during laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC, n = 51) and laparoscopic appendectomy (LA, n = 43). Scores for five domains (depth perception, bimanual dexterity, efficiency, tissue handling, and autonomy) were recorded on a Web-based operative report generator at the conclusion of all cases. Domain scores were recorded using a 5-point Likert scale. Difficulty of the case was similarly rated on a 5-point scale. For analysis, residents were divided into two groups: novice (PGY1 to 3) and experienced (PGY4 to 5). Biostatistical analysis was performed using a two-sample t-test. Paired t-test was used to compare mean scores of residents who performed both LA and LC. RESULTS: For both LC and LA, the experienced group scored higher than novices did in all five domains. The differences were significant in all domains. Using the mean of the scores from all 5 domains for both LC and LA, the experienced residents scored significantly better than novices did (LC 3.93 versus 2.76, p < 0.001) (LA 4.22 versus 2.75, p < 0.001). No significant differences were noted in difficulty of the cases (p = 0.060 for LC and p = 0.19 for LA). CONCLUSIONS: This study provides additional evidence in support of GOALS as an assessment tool for objectively measuring technical skills in laparoscopic surgery.

Efficacy of novel robotic camera vs a standard laparoscopic camera.

To improve visualization during minimal access surgery, a novel robotic camera has been developed. The prototype camera is totally insertable, has 5 degrees of freedom, and is remotely controlled. This study compared the performance of laparoscopic surgeons using both a laparoscope and the robotic camera. The MISTELS (McGill Inanimate System for the Training and Evaluation of Laparoscopic Skill) tasks were used to test six laparoscopic fellows and attending surgeons. Half the surgeons used the laparoscope first and half used the robotic camera first. Total scores from the MISTELS sessions in which the laparoscope was used were compared with the sessions in which the robotic camera was used and then analyzed with a paired t test (P < .05 was considered significant). All six surgeons tested showed no significant difference in their MISTELS task performance on the robotic camera compared with the standard laparoscopic camera. The mean MISTELS score of 963 for all subjects who used a laparoscope and camera was not significantly different than the mean score of 904 for the robotic camera (P = .17). This new robotic camera prototype allows for equivalent performance on a validated laparoscopic assessment tool when compared with performance using a standard laparoscope.

Therapeutic efficacy of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the treatment of biliary dyskinesia.

BACKGROUND: The outcome of laparoscopic cholecystectomy for patients who present with "classic" biliary colic without evidence of cholelithiasis or acute inflammation (biliary dyskinesia) is not well documented. This study evaluates whether a cholecystokinin dimethyl iminodiacetic acid (CCK-HIDA) scan can predict relief of symptoms in this group of patients. METHODS: Patients who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy after a normal ultrasound and with an abnormal dimethyl iminodiacetic acid scan were retrospectively reviewed. Symptomatic improvement was correlated with degree of dyskinesia, histologic findings, sex, and age. RESULTS: One hundred seventy-six patients were studied and 69% were available for followup at a mean interval of 16 months. One hundred fourteen patients (94%) had complete or partial relief of symptoms. No correlation was found between degree of relief and degree of impaired ejection (31% to 50% versus <30%), the histologic findings, sex, or age. CONCLUSIONS: Abnormal cholecystokinin dimethyl iminodiacetic acid scan effectively predicts relief of symptoms in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy for biliary dyskinesia.

Bedside diagnostic minilaparoscopy in the intensive care patient.

BACKGROUND: The diagnosis of acute abdominal conditions in the critically ill patient remains difficult. The goal of this study is to demonstrate the use of bedside minilaparoscopy as a diagnostic aid in the intensive care unit (ICU) in patients with possible intra-abdominal catastrophic condition. METHODS: Between February 1998 and May 1999, intensive care patients with abdominal pain, unexplained acidosis or sepsis, or suspected mesenteric ischemia were eligible for bedside diagnostic minilaparoscopy (3.3-mm laparoscope and instruments). The procedure was performed at bedside in the ICU with the patient under local anesthesia and intravenous sedation. Pneumoperitoneum was established with nitrous oxide (N(2)O) to a pressure of 8 to 10 mm Hg. Hemodynamics and ventilatory parameters were monitored before, during, and after the procedure. RESULTS: Nineteen patients underwent bedside diagnostic minilaparoscopy, including 1 patient who underwent 2 diagnostic laparoscopies. Total procedure time was 9 to 68 minutes (mean, 21 minutes). Three patients were found to have extensive mesenteric ischemia and did not undergo laparotomy. One patient found to have questionably viable bowel at laparoscopy underwent a nontherapeutic formal laparotomy. One patient had a gangrenous gallbladder, and another had a small ischemic segment of bowel; each underwent later open laparotomy and resection. The remaining laparoscopic examinations either showed a nonsurgical cause for the patient's condition or were normal. Nontherapeutic laparotomy was avoided in 19 of 20 patients. One gallbladder perforation occurred during laparoscopy in a patient with a necrotic gallbladder. CONCLUSIONS: Bedside minilaparoscopy can be a safe and accurate method to evaluate critically ill patients in whom the possibility of mesenteric ischemia or other intra-abdominal process is entertained. Nontherapeutic laparotomy can be avoided in many critically ill patients. Bedside diagnostic laparoscopy can be a useful replacement for diagnostic laparotomy in the operating room. It should be included in the diagnostic algorithm in the evaluation of the unstable patient in the ICU with a suspected acute intra-abdominal process.