Experience in the management of patients older than 80 years with vulval cancer.

INTRODUCTION: Vulval cancer is a disease of an increasing elderly population and consequently comorbidities are common. These conditions may preclude the application of standard therapy. OBJECTIVE: To review the outcome of women with vulval cancer older than 80 years comparing those who received recommended treatment (protocol-adherent) with those who did not (protocol-violated). METHODS: A retrospective chart review of a consecutive series of patients discussed over a 6-year period at our Multidisciplinary Team meeting. Treatment was deemed protocol-adherent if the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists guidelines were followed and protocol-violated if not. Outcome data were retrieved from case notes, primary care input, cancer registry database, and reviewed in terms of survival and recurrence. RESULTS: Twenty-three cases of squamous cell carcinoma of the vulva were identified between 1999 and 2005 at Portsmouth Oncology Centre. Eight women were protocol-adherent and 15 women were not. Treatment decisions were made after individual discussion in conjunction with performance status. Protocol adherence was associated with a 25% recurrence rate and violation with a 53% recurrence rate. Median survival was shorter in the protocol-violated group compared with the adherent group (18 months vs 43.5 months respectively). CONCLUSION: These data imply that this issue arises not infrequently, perhaps every 3 to 4 months at each gynecological oncology Multidisciplinary Team meeting in the UK. The higher recurrence rate and shorter median survival among the protocol-violated group supports the validity of the current Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists treatment guidelines in this elderly age group. A prospective scoring system should be evolved to ensure a more objective approach to such patients with considerable co-morbidities.

Influence of omental biopsy on adjuvant treatment field in clinical Stage I endometrial carcinoma.

In this study to assess the role of omental biopsy in the diagnosis of extrapelvic disease, data from 100 consecutive women with clinical Stage I endometrial cancer undergoing primary surgical treatment in our institution were analysed: 80 women had an omental biopsy, 20 did not, and six had adenocarcinoma in the omentum. No obvious morbidity attributable to this rapid and easily performed surgical procedure was recorded. We conclude that visual inspection and palpation of the omentum at the time of abdominal surgery for endometrial carcinoma is worthwhile and advisable. In addition, adopting a protocol of histological assessment upstaged a further two cases of this series. These data suggest that this technique might influence the prescription of adjuvant pelvic radiation in approximately one in 10 women currently considered for such therapy, as disease can be easily documented as having extended beyond the conventional radiotherapy field.