Impact of food and the proton pump inhibitor rabeprazole on the pharmacokinetics of GDC-0941 in healthy volunteers: bench to bedside investigation of pH-dependent solubility.

GDC-0941 is an orally administered potent, selective pan-inhibitor of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinases (PI3Ks) with good preclinical antitumor activity in xenograft models and favorable pharmacokinetics and tolerability in phase 1 trials, and it is currently being investigated in phase II clinical trials as an anti-cancer agent. In vitro solubility and dissolution studies suggested that GDC-0941, a weak base, displays significant pH-dependent solubility. Moreover, preclinical studies conducted in famotidine-induced hypochlorhydric dog suggested that the pharmacokinetics of GDC-0941 may be sensitive to pharmacologically induced hypochlorhydria. To investigate the clinical significance of food and pH-dependent solubility on GDC-0941 pharmacokinetics a four-period, two-sequence, open-label, randomized, crossover study was conducted in healthy volunteers. During the fasting state, GDC-0941 was rapidly absorbed with a median Tmax of 2 h. The presence of a high-fat meal delayed the absorption of GDC-0941, with a median Tmax of 4 h and a modest increase in AUC relative to the fasted state, with an estimated geometric mean ratio (GMR, 90% CI) of fed/fasted of 1.28 (1.08, 1.51) for AUC0-∞ and 0.87 (0.70, 1.06) for Cmax. The effect of rabeprazole (model PPI) coadministration on the pharmacokinetics of GDC-0941 was evaluated in the fasted and fed state. When comparing the effect of rabeprazole + GDC-0941 (fasted) to baseline GDC-0941 absorption in a fasted state, GDC-0941 median Tmax was unchanged, however, both Cmax and AUC0-∞ decreased significantly after pretreatment with rabeprazole, with an estimated GMR (90% CI) of 0.31 (0.21, 0.46) and 0.46 (0.35, 0.61), respectively for both parameters. When rabeprazole was administered in the presence of the high-fat meal, the impact of food did not fully reverse the pH effect; the overall effect of rabeprazole on AUC0-∞ was somewhat attenuated by the high-fat meal (estimate GMR of 0.57, with 90% CI, 0.50, 0.65) but unchanged for the Cmax (estimate of 0.43, with 90% CI, 0.37, 0.50). The results of the current investigations emphasize the complex nature of physicochemical interactions and the importance of gastric acid for the dissolution and solubilization processes of GDC-0941. Given these findings, dosing of GDC-0941 in clinical trials was not constrained relative to fasted/fed states, but the concomitant use of ARAs was restricted. Mitigation strategies to limit the influence of pH on exposure of molecularly targeted agents such as GDC-0941 with pH-dependent solubility are discussed.

Prevalence of acid-reducing agents (ARA) in cancer populations and ARA drug-drug interaction potential for molecular targeted agents in clinical development.

Acid-reducing agents (ARAs) are the most commonly prescribed medications in North America and Western Europe. There are currently no data describing the prevalence of their use among cancer patients. However, this is a paramount question due to the potential for significant drug-drug interactions (DDIs) between ARAs, most commonly proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), and orally administered cancer therapeutics that display pH-dependent solubility, which may lead to decreased drug absorption and decreased therapeutic benefit. Of recently approved orally administered cancer therapeutics, >50% are characterized as having pH-dependent solubility, but there are currently no data describing the potential for this ARA-DDI liability among targeted agents currently in clinical development. The objectives of this study were to (1) determine the prevalence of ARA use among different cancer populations and (2) investigate the prevalence of orally administered cancer therapeutics currently in development that may be liable for an ARA-DDI. To address the question of ARA use among cancer patients, a retrospective cross-sectional analysis was performed using two large healthcare databases: Thomson Reuters MarketScan (N = 1,776,443) and the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA, N = 1,171,833). Among all cancer patients, the total prevalence proportion of ARA use (no. of cancer patients receiving an ARA/total no. of cancer patients) was 20% and 33% for the MarketScan and VA databases, respectively. PPIs were the most commonly prescribed agent, comprising 79% and 65% of all cancer patients receiving a prescription for an ARA (no. of cancer patients receiving a PPI /no. of cancer patients receiving an ARA) for the MarketScan and VA databases, respectively. To estimate the ARA-DDI liability of orally administered molecular targeted cancer therapeutics currently in development, two publicly available databases, (1) Kinase SARfari and (2) canSAR, were examined. For those orally administered clinical candidates that had available structures, the pKa's and corresponding relative solubilities were calculated for a normal fasting pH of 1.2 and an "ARA-hypochlorhydric" pH of 4. Taking calculated pKa's and relative solubilities into consideration, clinical candidates were classified based on their risk for an ARA-DDI. More than one-quarter (28%) of the molecules investigated are at high risk for an ARA-DDI, and of those high risk molecules, nearly three-quarters (73%) are being clinically evaluated for at least one of five cancer types with the highest prevalence of ARA use (gastrointestinal, pancreatic, lung, glioblastoma multiforme, gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST)). These data strongly suggest that with the clinical development of ARA-DDI-susceptible cancer therapeutics will come continued challenges for drug-development scientists, oncologists, and regulatory agencies in ensuring that patients achieve safe and efficacious exposures of their cancer therapeutics and thus optimal patient outcomes.

A phase 1 study of weekly dosing of trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) in patients with advanced human epidermal growth factor 2-positive breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: We conducted a phase 1, multicenter, open-label, dose-escalation study (TDM3569g) to assess the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of single-agent trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) administered weekly and once every 3 weeks in patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer previously treated with trastuzumab. The weekly dose results are described here. METHODS: Patients were administered escalating doses of T-DM1 weekly, starting at 1.2 mg/kg. Additional patients were enrolled at the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) to better characterize tolerability and pharmacokinetics. RESULTS: Twenty-eight patients received weekly T-DM1, and the MTD was determined to be 2.4 mg/kg. In general, T-DM1 was well tolerated, requiring few dose modifications or discontinuations because of adverse events (AEs). Grade ≥ 3 AEs were reported in 19 patients (67.9%); treatment-related AEs occurred in 25 (89.3%) patients. Exposure to weekly T-DM1 was dose-proportional at ≥ 1.2 mg/kg, and accumulation of T-DM1 and total trastuzumab was observed. Objective partial tumor responses were reported in 13 (46.4%) patients; the median duration of response was 18.6 months, and the 6-month clinical benefit rate was 57.1%. CONCLUSION: The results suggest that a weekly dose of T-DM1 2.4 mg/kg has antitumor activity and is well tolerated in patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer.

Trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1): a novel agent for targeting HER2+ breast cancer.

Increased understanding of the molecular mechanisms of tumorigenesis has led to the development of novel agents that target tumor cells with minimal effects on normal cells. The success of this approach is exemplified by the development of monoclonal antibodies directed toward antigens expressed selectively by tumor cells. The conjugation of these monoclonal antibodies with potent cytotoxic drugs has the potential to further improve efficacy while retaining a favorable safety profile. Trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) is an antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) currently in clinical development. It combines the humanized antibody trastuzumab, which targets the human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) receptor on cancer cells, and the potent antimicrotubule agent DM1 using a unique highly stable linker. When T-DM1 binds to HER2, a proportion of the receptors are thought to be internalized by the process of receptor endocytosis, followed by the intracellular release of an active form of DM1, which in turn kills the tumor cell. This review presents the rationale for the development of T-DM1 and summarizes the preclinical and clinical data for this novel agent for the treatment of breast cancer.

Phase I study of trastuzumab-DM1, an HER2 antibody-drug conjugate, given every 3 weeks to patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer.

PURPOSE: Trastuzumab-DM1 (T-DM1) is an antibody-drug conjugate that uses trastuzumab to specifically deliver the maytansinoid antimicrotubule agent DM1 to HER2-positive cells. This first-in-human study of T-DM1 evaluated safety, pharmacokinetics, and preliminary activity of T-DM1 in patients with advanced HER2-positive breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Successive cohorts of patients who had progressed on trastuzumab-based therapy received escalating doses of T-DM1. Outcomes were assessed by standard solid-tumor phase I methods. RESULTS: Twenty-four patients who had received a median of four prior chemotherapeutic agents for metastatic disease received T-DM1 at 0.3 mg/kg to 4.8 mg/kg on an every-3-weeks schedule. Transient thrombocytopenia was dose-limiting at 4.8 mg/kg; the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) was 3.6 mg/kg. The half-life of T-DM1 at the MTD was 3.5 days, with peak DM1 levels < 10 ng/mL. Clearance at doses < 1.2 mg/kg was faster than at higher doses. Common drug-related adverse events (AEs) included grade < or = 2 thrombocytopenia, elevated transaminases, fatigue, nausea, and anemia. No grade > 1 nausea, vomiting, alopecia, or neuropathy events and no cardiac effects requiring dose modification were reported. The clinical benefit rate (objective response plus stable disease at 6 months) among 15 patients treated at the MTD was 73%, including five objective responses. The confirmed response rate in patients with measurable disease at the MTD (n = 9) was 44%. CONCLUSION: At the MTD of 3.6 mg/kg every 3 weeks, T-DM1 was associated with mild, reversible toxicity and substantial clinical activity in a heavily pretreated population. Phase II and III trials in patients with advanced HER2-positive breast cancer are under way.

A phase I study of gefitinib, capecitabine, and celecoxib in patients with advanced solid tumors.

This phase I study was designed to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and toxicity profile of the combination of gefitinib, capecitabine, and celecoxib in patients with advanced solid tumors. Patients were treated with escalating doses of gefitinib once daily, capecitabine twice daily (14 of 28 days), and celecoxib twice daily. Plasma samples for biomarkers were obtained at baseline and weekly for the first 2 cycles. Pharmacokinetic variables were correlated with toxicity and presence of biological effect. Tumor biopsies from 5 patients were analyzed for changes in tumor metabolic activity by nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy. [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography was done as a correlate in 6 patients at the MTD. Thirty-nine patients received 168 cycles of therapy. The dose-limiting toxicities observed included nausea, dehydration and nausea, diarrhea, and stomatitis. The MTD was 250 mg/d gefitinib (days 1-14) and 2,000 mg/m2/d capecitabine divided twice daily (days 8-21) every 28 days. Celecoxib was eliminated due to concerns of increased risk for cardiovascular toxicity, although no patients in this study had cardiac events. One patient with cholangiocarcinoma had a confirmed partial response. Fourteen of 39 (36%) patients maintained prolonged stable disease for a median of 4 months (range, 3-24 months). [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography scan and metabolomic analyses revealed differences in metabolic response to gefitinib versus capecitabine. The combination of gefitinib and capecitabine is well tolerated and appears to have activity against certain advanced solid tumors, providing a rationale for further evaluation in advanced solid malignancies.

A phase I pharmacological and biological study of PI-88 and docetaxel in patients with advanced malignancies.

PURPOSE: This study evaluated the safety, toxicity, pharmacological properties and biological activity of PI-88, a heparanase endoglycosidase enzyme inhibitor, with fixed weekly docetaxel in patients with advanced solid malignancies. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: This was a phase I study to determine the maximal-tolerated dose of escalating doses of PI-88 administered subcutaneously for 4 days per week, along with docetaxel 30 mg/m(2) given on days 1, 8, 15 of a 28-day schedule. RESULTS: Sixteen patients received a total of 42 courses of therapy. No dose-limiting toxicities were observed despite escalation to the highest planned dose level of PI-88 (250 mg/day). Frequent minor toxicities included fatigue (38%), dysgeusia (28.5%), thrombocytopenia (12%), diarrhea (14%), nausea (12%), and emesis (10%) in the 42 courses. No significant bleeding complications were observed. One patient developed a positive anti-heparin antibody test/serotonin releasing assay with positive anti-platelet factor 4/PI-88 antibodies and grade 1 thrombocytopenia in cycle 5, and was withdrawn from the study without any sequelae. PI-88 plasma concentrations (mirrored by APTT) and urinary elimination were linear and dose-proportional. Docetaxel did not alter the pharmacokinetic (PK) profile of PI-88, nor did PI-88 affect docetaxel PK. No significant relationship was determined between plasma or urine FGF-2, or plasma VEGF levels and PI-88 dose/response. Although no objective responses were observed; 9 of the 15 evaluable patients had stable disease for greater than two cycles of therapy. CONCLUSION: PI-88 administered at 250 mg/day for 4 days each week for 3 weeks with docetaxel 30 mg/m(2) on days 1, 8 and 15, every 28 days, was determined to be the recommended dose level for phase II evaluation. This combination was well tolerated without severe toxicities or PK interactions.

A phase I safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetic study of enzastaurin combined with capecitabine in patients with advanced solid tumors.

Enzastaurin, an oral inhibitor of protein kinase Cbeta, affects signal transduction associated with angiogenesis, proliferation, and survival. Capecitabine is converted to 5-fluoruracil by thymidine phosphorylase, a putative angiogenic factor. The all-oral combination of the two drugs offers the potential for targeting angiogenesis in capecitabine-sensitive tumors with nonoverlapping toxicities. Patients with advanced cancer initially received single-agent enzastaurin to achieve steady-state concentrations (cycle 1). In subsequent 21-day cycles, enzastaurin was given orally, once daily, on days 1-21 and capecitabine orally, twice daily (b.i.d.), on days 1-14 in three dose-level cohorts. Three dose-escalation cohorts were studied: cohort 1 (n=8), 350 mg of enzastaurin +capecitabine (750 mg/m2 b.i.d.); cohort 2 (n=7), enzastaurin (350 mg)+capecitabine (1000 mg/m2 b.i.d.); cohort 3 (n=12), 525-mg capsules or 500-mg enzastaurin+capecitabine (1000 mg/m2 b.i.d.). Further dose escalation was not pursued because of emerging data that enzastaurin systemic exposure did not increase at doses above 525 mg. Although a traditional toxicity-based maximum tolerated dose was not achieved, the highest dosing cohort represented a biologically relevant dose of enzastaurin, on the basis of preclinical data and correlative pharmacodynamic biomarker assays of protein kinase Cbeta inhibition in peripheral blood mononucleocytes, in combination with a standard dose of capecitabine. For the 500/525-mg dose, ratios of total enzastaurin analyte geometric means (i.e. enzastaurin alone versus enzastaurin with capecitabine) reflected a trend toward decreased enzastaurin exposure, but did not reach statistical significance. The pharmacokinetic parameters of capecitabine with enzastaurin were similar to those previously reported for single-agent capecitabine. The regimen was well tolerated, without any consistent pattern of drug-related grade 3 or grade 4 toxicities being observed. Although no objective tumor responses were documented, five patients maintained stable disease for >or=6 months (range: 6-9.7 months). The recommended phase II dose of this combination, based on the results of this study, is enzastaurin at a daily dose of 500 mg (tablet formulation) and capecitabine (1000 mg/m2, b.i.d.) on days 1-14 every 21 days. Further disease-directed studies are warranted, such as in malignancies in the treatment of which both capecitabine and inhibitors of angiogenesis have previously been benchmarked as being effective.

Arterial thromboembolic events in patients with metastatic carcinoma treated with chemotherapy and bevacizumab.

BACKGROUND: Although combination treatment with bevacizumab (humanized monoclonal antibody against vascular endothelial growth factor) and chemotherapy improves survival of patients with various metastatic carcinomas, an increased risk of arterial thromboembolic events has been observed in some trials. We characterized this risk by performing post hoc analyses of randomized controlled trials that evaluated combination treatment with bevacizumab and chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone. Low-dose aspirin was permitted in these trials, and its safety was also analyzed. METHODS: Data were pooled from five randomized controlled trials that included a total of 1745 patients with metastatic colorectal, breast, or non-small-cell lung carcinoma. The risk of an arterial or venous thromboembolic event was assessed by simple incidence rates, rates per 100 person-years, and/or hazard ratios (HRs). The association between patient characteristics and risk of an arterial thromboembolic event was investigated primarily by Cox proportional hazards regression. The relationship between low-dose aspirin and bleeding was explored by incidence rates and rates per 100 person-years. RESULTS: Combined treatment with bevacizumab and chemotherapy, compared with chemotherapy alone, was associated with increased risk for an arterial thromboembolic event (HR = 2.0, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.05 to 3.75; P = .031) but not for a venous thromboembolic event (HR = 0.89, 95% CI = 0.66 to 1.20; P = .44). The absolute rate of developing an arterial thromboembolism was 5.5 events per 100 person-years for those receiving combination therapy and 3.1 events per 100 person-years for those receiving chemotherapy alone (ratio = 1.8, 95% CI = 0.94 to 3.33; P = .076). Development of an arterial thromboembolic event was associated with a prior arterial thromboembolic event (P<.001) or age of 65 years or older (P = .01). Baseline or on-study aspirin use was associated with modest increases in grade 3 and 4 bleeding events in both treatment groups, from 3.6% to 4.7% for bevacizumab-treated patients and from 1.7% to 2.2% for control subjects. CONCLUSIONS: Combination treatment with bevacizumab and chemotherapy, compared with chemotherapy alone, was associated with an increased risk of arterial thromboembolism but not venous thromboembolism.

A phase I biological and pharmacologic study of the heparanase inhibitor PI-88 in patients with advanced solid tumors.

PURPOSE: PI-88 is a mixture of highly sulfated oligosaccharides that inhibits heparanase, an extracellular matrix endoglycosidase, and the binding of angiogenic growth factors to heparan sulfate. This agent showed potent inhibition of placental blood vessel angiogenesis as well as growth inhibition in multiple xenograft models, thus forming the basis for this study. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: This study evaluated the toxicity and pharmacokinetics of PI-88 (80-315 mg) when administered s.c. daily for 4 consecutive days bimonthly (part 1) or weekly (part 2). RESULTS: Forty-two patients [median age, 53 years (range, 19-78 years); median performance status, 1] with a range of advanced solid tumors received a total of 232 courses. The maximum tolerated dose was 250 mg/d. Dose-limiting toxicity consisted of thrombocytopenia and pulmonary embolism. Other toxicity was generally mild and included prolongation of the activated partial thromboplastin time and injection site echymosis. The pharmacokinetics were linear with dose. Intrapatient variability was low and interpatient variability was moderate. Both AUC and C(max) correlated with the percent increase in activated partial thromboplastin time, showing that this pharmacodynamic end point can be used as a surrogate for drug exposure. No association between PI-88 administration and vascular endothelial growth factor or basic fibroblast growth factor levels was observed. One patient with melanoma had a partial response, which was maintained for >50 months, and 9 patients had stable disease for >or=6 months. CONCLUSION: The recommended dose of PI-88 administered for 4 consecutive days bimonthly or weekly is 250 mg/d. PI-88 was generally well tolerated. Evidence of efficacy in melanoma supports further evaluation of PI-88 in phase II trials.

Impact of vascular endothelial growth factor-A expression, thrombospondin-2 expression, and microvessel density on the treatment effect of bevacizumab in metastatic colorectal cancer.

PURPOSE: Bevacizumab is a monoclonal antibody to vascular endothelial growth factor-A (VEGF). In the pivotal trial in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), addition of bevacizumab to first-line irinotecan, fluorouracil, and leucovorin (IFL) significantly prolonged median survival. The aim of these retrospective subset analyses was to evaluate VEGF, thrombospondin-2 (THBS-2), and microvessel density (MVD) as prognostic factors and/or predictors of benefit from bevacizumab. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In the pivotal trial, 813 patients with untreated mCRC were randomly assigned to receive IFL plus bevacizumab or placebo. Of 312 tissue samples collected (285 primaries, 27 metastases), outcome data were available for 278 (153 bevacizumab, 125 placebo). Epithelial and stromal VEGF expression were assessed by in situ hybridization (ISH) and immunohistochemistry on tissue microarrays and whole sections. Stromal THBS-2 expression was examined by ISH on tissue microarrays. MVD was quantified by Chalkley count. Overall survival was associated with these variables in retrospective subset analyses. RESULTS: In all subgroups, estimated hazard ratios (HRs) for risk of death were < 1 for bevacizumab-treated patients regardless of the level of VEGF or THBS-2 expression or MVD. Patients with a high THBS-2 score showed a nonsignificant improvement in survival following bevacizumab treatment (HR = 0.11; 95% CI, 0.02 to 0.51) compared to patients with a low score (HR = 0.65; 95% CI, 0.41 to 1.02); interaction analysis P = .22. VEGF or THBS-2 expression and MVD were not significant prognostic factors. CONCLUSION: These exploratory analyses suggest that in patients with mCRC addition of bevacizumab to IFL improves survival regardless of the level of VEGF or THBS-2 expression, or MVD.

Association of k-ras, b-raf, and p53 status with the treatment effect of bevacizumab.

BACKGROUND: A recent phase III trial showed that the addition of bevacizumab, a monoclonal antibody to vascular endothelial growth factor-A, to first-line irinotecan, 5-fluorouracil, and leucovorin (IFL) prolonged median survival in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. We carried out a retrospective analysis of patients in the trial to evaluate whether mutation status of k-ras, b-raf, or p53 or P53 expression could predict which patients were more likely to respond to bevacizumab. METHODS: Microdissected tumors from 295 patients (274 primary tumors, 21 metastases) were subject to DNA sequence analysis to identify mutations in k-ras, b-raf, and p53. Nuclear P53 expression was determined by immunohistochemistry. Hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for overall survival were estimated using Cox regression analysis. RESULTS: In all biomarker subgroups, estimated hazard ratios for risk of death were less than 1 for bevacizumab-treated patients as compared with those for placebo-treated patients. Mutations in k-ras and/or b-raf were observed in 88 of 213 patients (41%). Hazard ratios for death among patients with tumors with wild-type k-ras/b-raf status, as compared with those of patients with mutations in one or both genes, were 0.51 (95% CI = 0.28 to 0.95) among those treated with IFL plus bevacizumab and 0.66 (95% CI = 0.37 to 1.18) among those treated with IFL plus placebo. Mutations in p53 were found in 139 of 205 patients (68%), and P53 was overexpressed in 191 of 266 patients (72%); neither p53 mutation nor P53 overexpression was statistically significantly associated with survival. CONCLUSIONS: We did not find a statistically significant relationship between mutations of k-ras, b-raf, or p53 and the increase in median survival associated with the addition of bevacizumab to IFL in metastatic colorectal cancer.

Safety and pharmacokinetic study of RPI.4610 (ANGIOZYME), an anti-VEGFR-1 ribozyme, in combination with carboplatin and paclitaxel in patients with advanced solid tumors.

PURPOSE: RPI.4610 (ANGIOZYME) is a chemically stabilized ribozyme targeting vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 1. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and pharmacokinetics of RPI.4610 in combination with carboplatin and paclitaxel in patients with advanced solid tumors. METHODS: The study used a sequential treatment design evaluating a single dose level for all three drugs: paclitaxel 175 mg m-2 and carboplatin AUC=6 on day 1 of a 21-day cycle, and RPI.4610 100 mg m-2 day-1 beginning on day 8 and continuing daily thereafter. Pharmacokinetic samples were drawn on day 1 of courses 1 (chemotherapy alone) and 2 (chemotherapy+RPI.4610), and on day 8 of course 1 (RPI.4610 alone). Ratios were generated by comparing the pharmacokinetic parameters for the combination of carboplatin with paclitaxel when administered alone or together with RPI.4610. RESULTS: Twelve patients were enrolled in this trial and received two to six courses of treatment each. The most common grade 3-4 toxicities were neutropenia (three patients), thrombocytopenia (three patients), pain (three patients), anemia (two patients) and fatigue (two patients). The ratio of the mean maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) for carboplatin when administered with paclitaxel alone versus when administered with paclitaxel and RPI.4610 was 1.07 (90% confidence interval, 0.77-1.37). Similarly, the ratio of the mean AUC0-last for carboplatin was 1.04 (0.73-1.35). For paclitaxel the ratio of the mean Cmax when administered with carboplatin alone versus with carboplatin and RPI.4610 was 1.17 (1.03-1.31), and the ratio of the mean AUC0-last was 1.17 (1.04-1.30). Objective tumor responses were observed and included one patient with a complete response (bladder cancer) and one patient with a partial response (esophageal cancer). CONCLUSIONS: These results indicate that RPI.4610, carboplatin, and paclitaxel can be administered safely in combination without substantial pharmacokinetic interactions.

A phase I and pharmacokinetic study of exisulind and docetaxel in patients with advanced solid tumors.

PURPOSE: Exisulind (sulindac sulfone, FGN-1, Aptosyn) is a sulindac metabolite that induces apoptosis via inhibition of cyclic GMP-phosphodiesterase. This agent demonstrated tumor growth inhibition in rodent models of colon, breast, prostate, and lung carcinogenesis. In an orthotopic model of human non-small-cell lung cancer, the combination of exisulind and docetaxel prolonged survival in athymic nude rats, forming the basis of this phase I combination study. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: This study evaluated the toxicity and pharmacokinetics of combining exisulind (150-250 mg) given orally twice daily and docetaxel (30-36 mg/m2) administered intravenously on days 1, 8, and 15 of a 4-week cycle. RESULTS: Twenty patients with a range of advanced solid tumors (median age, 59 years; age range, 35-77 years; median performance status, 1) received a total of 70 courses. Observed adverse events were mild to moderate, and there was no dose-limiting toxicity at any level. Grade 3 gastrointestinal toxicities were present in 10 of the 70 cycles (10%) and included nausea, vomiting, dyspepsia, and elevated alkaline phosphatase. Neutropenia was present in four cycles in patients treated with a docetaxel dose of 36 mg/m2. Pharmacokinetic analysis did not demonstrate a clear effect of exisulind on docetaxel pharmacokinetics and vice versa. Relationships were evident between the plasma concentration of exisulind and the development of grade 2 or greater toxicities. One third of patients maintained stable disease for 3 to 12 cycles, but no objective responses were observed. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of docetaxel (36 mg/m2, weekly) and exisulind (500 mg/d) was reasonably well tolerated, and it is undergoing phase II testing in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer.

Analysis of docetaxel pharmacokinetics in humans with the inclusion of later sampling time-points afforded by the use of a sensitive tandem LCMS assay.

PURPOSE: Docetaxel is a semisynthetic taxane derived from the needles of the European yew ( Taxus baccata) and it is an important chemotherapeutic agent in the treatment of recurrent ovarian, breast and non-small-cell lung cancers. Traditional dosing regimens with docetaxel involve doses of 60-100 mg/m(2) by infusion every 3 weeks. Now weekly low-dose (30-36 mg/m(2)) regimens are being evaluated in phase I trials. Such low-dose studies require a more sensitive, specific and rapid assay of docetaxel in biological fluids for the determination of pharmacokinetic parameters. Because docetaxel is primarily metabolized by CYP3A4 and is highly protein-bound in the plasma, there is potential for drug-drug interactions and high interpatient variability in pharmacokinetics. Therefore, pharmacokinetic studies are an important component to understanding the therapeutic variability of docetaxel-containing chemotherapeutic regimens. METHODS: To this end, we developed an analytical assay for docetaxel based upon tandem LCMS and paclitaxel as an internal standard. The sensitivity of the new assay allowed us to monitor plasma levels of docetaxel out to 48 h after the end of the infusion in patients enrolled in a phase I trial of exisulind (orally, twice daily) receiving weekly docetaxel doses of 30 or 36 mg/m(2) where plasma docetaxel levels are below the lower limit of quantitation for traditional HPLC/UV-based assays at later time-points. RESULTS: The inclusion of the 48-h time-point had significant effects on the calculated pharmacokinetic parameters when using either a three-compartment or non-compartmental analysis. The terminal half-life was significantly increased when the 48-h time-point was included in the pharmacokinetic analysis, and the use of model parameters derived with the inclusion of the 48-h time-point were able to more accurately predict plasma levels at later times. CONCLUSIONS: The results reflect the importance of accurate and sensitive analytical methods for the determination of pharmacokinetic parameters and the effect of this later time-point on docetaxel pharmacokinetic modeling. Further, with the increased use of weekly docetaxel in combination with other agents, the inclusion of these later sampling time-points and sensitive methods for drug level determinations are important components in the description of pharmacokinetic drug interactions.

Angiogenesis inhibitors in clinical development for lung cancer.

The use of tumor angiogenesis as a therapeutic target is based on extensive literature showing the dependence of tumors on the process of angiogenesis for growth, invasion, and metastasis. Seminal work performed by Folkman three decades ago determined that tumors beyond the size of approximately 2 mm require angiogenesis for subsequent growth and development. This basic hypothesis stimulated research in the field of angiogenesis and has resulted in the identification of factors that both enhance and inhibit this "angiogenic switch." The intent of this article is to present data on several angiogenesis inhibitors that are currently undergoing clinical evaluation in cancer patients. These agents may be particularly useful in the treatment of lung cancer, both as adjunctive therapy in early-stage or locally advanced disease, as well as in combination strategies with platinum-based therapy in metastatic disease. Although angiogenesis inhibitors have been in clinical trials for the past decade, there has been a shift in recent years towards the development of more mechanism-based and receptor-targeted agents. Interestingly, no antiangiogenic agent has been approved as such for use in cancer, perhaps because of the challenges involved in the clinical development of these novel agents. These include the potential requirement for long-term administration, difficulties in deriving biologically efficacious doses in early clinical trials, and the inability to use tumor regression as a primary endpoint in phase II trials.