Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Genet Med ; 24(6): 1316-1327, 2022 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35311657

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Retrospective interpretation of sequenced data in light of the current literature is a major concern of the field. Such reinterpretation is manual and both human resources and variable operating procedures are the main bottlenecks. METHODS: Genome Alert! method automatically reports changes with potential clinical significance in variant classification between releases of the ClinVar database. Using ClinVar submissions across time, this method assigns validity category to gene-disease associations. RESULTS: Between July 2017 and December 2019, the retrospective analysis of ClinVar submissions revealed a monthly median of 1247 changes in variant classification with potential clinical significance and 23 new gene-disease associations. Re-examination of 4929 targeted sequencing files highlighted 45 changes in variant classification, and of these classifications, 89% were expert validated, leading to 4 additional diagnoses. Genome Alert! gene-disease association catalog provided 75 high-confidence associations not available in the OMIM morbid list; of which, 20% became available in OMIM morbid list For more than 356 negative exome sequencing data that were reannotated for variants in these 75 genes, this elective approach led to a new diagnosis. CONCLUSION: Genome Alert! (https://genomealert.univ-grenoble-alpes.fr/) enables systematic and reproducible reinterpretation of acquired sequencing data in a clinical routine with limited human resource effect.


Asunto(s)
Bases de Datos Genéticas , Variación Genética , Variación Genética/genética , Genoma Humano/genética , Genómica , Humanos , Fenotipo , Estudios Retrospectivos
3.
BMC Bioinformatics ; 18(1): 428, 2017 Sep 29.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28969586

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The evolution of next-generation sequencing (NGS) technologies has led to increased focus on RNA-Seq. Many bioinformatic tools have been developed for RNA-Seq analysis, each with unique performance characteristics and configuration parameters. Users face an increasingly complex task in understanding which bioinformatic tools are best for their specific needs and how they should be configured. In order to provide some answers to these questions, we investigate the performance of leading bioinformatic tools designed for RNA-Seq analysis and propose a methodology for systematic evaluation and comparison of performance to help users make well informed choices. RESULTS: To evaluate RNA-Seq pipelines, we developed a suite of two benchmarking tools. SimCT generates simulated datasets that get as close as possible to specific real biological conditions accompanied by the list of genomic incidents and mutations that have been inserted. BenchCT then compares the output of any bioinformatics pipeline that has been run against a SimCT dataset with the simulated genomic and transcriptional variations it contains to give an accurate performance evaluation in addressing specific biological question. We used these tools to simulate a real-world genomic medicine question s involving the comparison of healthy and cancerous cells. Results revealed that performance in addressing a particular biological context varied significantly depending on the choice of tools and settings used. We also found that by combining the output of certain pipelines, substantial performance improvements could be achieved. CONCLUSION: Our research emphasizes the importance of selecting and configuring bioinformatic tools for the specific biological question being investigated to obtain optimal results. Pipeline designers, developers and users should include benchmarking in the context of their biological question as part of their design and quality control process. Our SimBA suite of benchmarking tools provides a reliable basis for comparing the performance of RNA-Seq bioinformatics pipelines in addressing a specific biological question. We would like to see the creation of a reference corpus of data-sets that would allow accurate comparison between benchmarks performed by different groups and the publication of more benchmarks based on this public corpus. SimBA software and data-set are available at http://cractools.gforge.inria.fr/softwares/simba/ .


Asunto(s)
Biología Computacional/métodos , Simulación por Computador , Análisis de Secuencia de ARN/métodos , Programas Informáticos , Fusión Génica , Genoma Humano , Secuenciación de Nucleótidos de Alto Rendimiento/métodos , Humanos , Mutación INDEL/genética , Polimorfismo de Nucleótido Simple/genética
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...