Why Are Corneal Specialists Resistant to Treating Patients Who Have Severe Ocular Surface Disease With Limbal Stem Cell Deficiency?

PURPOSE: To highlight the paucity of surgeons performing ocular surface stem cell transplantation with systemic immunosuppression (OSSTx with SI) for limbal stem cell deficiency (LSCD) patients, suboptimal treatments for LSCD, and obstacles to adoption. METHODS: A review of the Eye Bank Association of America annual reports and the authors' case volume for OSSTx with SI was performed. Examination of the published literature on corneal surgeries, especially for LSCD, was completed. These findings were combined with our clinical observations to develop this editorial. RESULTS: Despite techniques and protocols for OSSTx with SI published more than 30 years ago for the treatment of severe bilateral LSCD, only a small number of corneal specialists have adopted these techniques. There is a paucity of attention to this population of patients, with minimal publications to advance this area of our field. We are too often referred patients with LSCD and severe ocular surface disease that have had suboptimal treatments such as penetrating keratoplasties or primary keratoprostheses. Hesitancy for adopting OSSTx with SI is likely due to a lack of exposure to these procedures during training and fear of systemic immunosuppression. Corneal surgeons are likely unaware of the safety of systemic immunosuppression with appropriate monitoring especially when comanaging these patients with an organ transplant specialist. CONCLUSION: There is a large unmet need for the treatment of corneal blindness secondary to conjunctival and LSCD. For the vast majority of patients, OSSTx should be the first surgical choice to treat these eyes. We hope major ophthalmology centers will meet this need by building programs, and groups of corneal surgeons should collaborate to create regional centers to make this treatment more accessible to help this population.

Allogeneic Ocular Surface Stem Cell Transplantation Outcomes With Decreased or No Systemic Immunosuppression in the Elderly.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to report outcomes after allogeneic ocular surface stem cell transplantation (OSST) for limbal stem cell deficiency in the setting of decreased or no systemic immunosuppression (SI) in the elderly. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was performed of all eyes that underwent OSST for limbal stem cell deficiency between 2005 and 2020 at CVP Physicians. Inclusion criteria included patients who were (1) at least 70 years at the time of (2) allogeneic OSST. Postoperative SI regimens were assessed. Outcome measures included improvement in visual acuity, ocular surface stability, and adverse effects. RESULTS: There were 14 eyes of 14 patients that met the inclusion criteria with mean follow-up of 3.0 (range 0.4-7.0) years. SI was run at a lower level for 6 patients, and 8 patients did not receive any SI. Nine eyes underwent keratolimbal allograft, 1 had a living-related conjunctival limbal allograft, and 4 had combined OSST. Most eyes (85.7%) attained improvement in visual acuity during their follow-up. At the last follow-up, 57.1% maintained a stable ocular surface. Six eyes developed acute rejection or late failure. Minimal adverse events were noted. CONCLUSIONS: Elderly patients administered less or no SI exhibit overall favorable outcomes after allogeneic OSST. Although not significantly different, surface stability and duration of improved vision was greater with low SI. No SI may be an option that still achieves improved vision in a high proportion for at least part of their follow-up. Decreasing SI after OSST in this population can improve quality of life while minimizing adverse effects.

Comparison of Persistent Epithelial Defect Treatment With Sutureless Cryopreserved and Dehydrated Amniotic Membrane.

PURPOSE: To compare cryopreserved sutureless amniotic membrane (C-SAM) and dehydrated SAM (D-SAM) outpatient treatment outcomes for persistent epithelial defects (PEDs), analyze risk factors for treatment failure, and identify adverse events. DESIGN: Retrospective, interventional comparative clinical study. METHODS: This study was a multicenter retrospective interventional cohort from 2 tertiary corneal referral practices from 2016 to 2020. The inclusion criteria were as follows: (1) PEDs treated (2) outpatient with (3) either C-SAM or D-SAM. PEDs were defined as epithelial defects present for ≥7 days after failing prior conservative therapy. The primary outcome measure was the resolution or improvement of a PED. The secondary outcomes included analysis of treatment failures and identification of adverse events. A total of 220 PEDs from 204 eyes (197 patients) treated with either C-SAM or D-SAM met the inclusion criteria. RESULTS: A total of 100 PEDs (45.5%) resolved after single amniotic membrane administration, 46.5% (59 of 127) in the C-SAM group and 44.1% (41 of 93) in the D-SAM group (P = .727). Forty-nine PEDs neither improved nor resolved without a significant difference between the C-SAM (21.3%) and D-SAM groups (23.7%, P = .673). There was no statistically significant difference for PED resolution, PED improvement, PEDs that did not resolve/improve, or those requiring surgery between the 2 groups for initial SAM. CONCLUSIONS: C-SAM and D-SAM were both effective for treating PEDs with comparable outcomes for resolution, improvement, and need for additional surgical intervention. Specific differences in adverse events may help dictate clinical use. Inflammatory disease was a risk factor for nonresolution of all PEDs.

Presence of Panel-reactive Antibodies after Penetrating Keratoplasty.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the relationship between penetrating keratoplasty (PK) and postoperative PRA level and number of unacceptable antigens. METHODS: A cross-sectionalstudy was performed on patients with history of PK. Patients with prior solid organ transplantation, pregnancy, or blood transfusion were excluded. These findings were combined with a retrospective review. Patients were grouped by single or multiple PKs. The primary outcome was postoperative PRA level. RESULTS: Incidence of postoperative PRA elevation and mean peak PRA was higher in the multiple PK group (p = .08 and p = .010, respectively). Mean number of unacceptable antigens was elevated in the multiple PK group (p = .024). There was a moderately positive correlation between number of PK grafts and PRA level (r = 0.629, p = .0002). CONCLUSIONS: PRA level may be influenced by PKs, with higher PRA associated with increased prior PKs. Further studies are necessary to determine the potential prognostic value.Abbreviations: PK: penetrating keratoplasty; PRA: panel reactive antibodies; OSST: ocular surface stem cell transplantation; LSCD: limbal stem cell deficiency.

Phase 2, Randomized, Open-Label Parallel-Group Study of Two Dosing Regimens of Netarsudil for the Treatment of Corneal Edema Due to Fuchs Corneal Dystrophy.

Background: This phase 2 study evaluated the therapeutic potential of netarsudil to reduce corneal edema and to improve vision in patients with Fuchs corneal dystrophy (FCD). Methods: Patients (N = 40) with baseline central corneal thickness (CCT) of ≥600 µm and best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) of 70-20 letters (20/40-20/400 Snellen equivalent) were randomized 1:1 to receive netarsudil once a day (QD) or twice a day (BID) for 8 weeks. Primary endpoint was mean CCT change from baseline at week 4. Results: Netarsudil QD and BID significantly reduced CCT at week 4 [mean change (standard error of mean), 28.4 (7.99) µm, P = 0.0021; and 20.1 (8.75) µm, P = 0.0335, respectively]. Five (12.5%) patients achieved complete resolution of corneal edema at week 4. BCVA improved by 3.2 (2.76) letters with QD and 1.5 (2.84) letters with BID, and 10 (25%) patients [5 with QD (P = 0.0078) and 5 with BID (P = 0.0096)] gained ≥10 letters at week 4. Improvements in CCT and vision were observed at week 2 and persisted at week 8, without significant differences between the 2 doses at any time point. Netarsudil QD significantly improved visual acuity and glare factor scores on the Visual Function and Corneal Health Status (V-FUCHS) questionnaire at weeks 4 and 8 (mean change, -0.4 to -0.3; P ≤ 0.0200). Netarsudil was well tolerated. Reticular edema developed in one (2.5%) patient with BID, which resolved with treatment discontinuation. Conclusions: Netarsudil QD led to significant reductions in corneal edema as well as improvements in vision and patient-reported symptoms of glare and visual impairment in patients with FCD. Clinical Trial Registration Number: NCT04498169.

A Comparison of TearCare and Lipiflow Systems in Reducing Dry Eye Disease Symptoms Associated with Meibomian Gland Disease.

Purpose: To compare TearCare and Lipiflow systems in the ability to reduce the symptoms of dry eye disease (DED) associated with meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD). Methods: In this multicenter, masked, randomized-controlled trial, 235 subjects received a single TearCare treatment (n = 115) or a single LipiFlow treatment (n = 120) and were followed for 1-month post-treatment. DED symptoms were assessed using the Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI), Symptom Assessment in Dry Eye (SANDE), and Eye Dryness (ED) questionnaires at baseline and at 1 month. Post-hoc subgroup analysis was conducted on subjects with less severe and more severe gland obstruction determined by baseline meibomian gland secretion score (MGSS). Results: TearCare system significantly improved total OSDI, SANDE, and ED scores from baseline (p < 0.0001) at 1-month follow-up. Subjects with more severe disease (MGSS <7) achieved statistically greater reduction with TearCare compared to LipiFlow in total OSDI score (30.4 ± 2.53 and 21.9 ± 2.37, respectively, p ANCOVA = 0.0160), OSDI Section B score for quality of vision (5.1 ± 0.48 and 3.6 ± 0.45, respectively, p ANCOVA= 0.0206), and SANDE frequency score (51.9 ± 3.70 and 41.5 ± 3.45, respectively, p ANCOVA = 0.0455). Conclusion: TearCare provides significant DED symptom relief at 1 month after a single treatment. Outcomes were consistent in OSDI, SANDE, and ED assessments. In subjects with more severe gland dysfunction, TearCare performed significantly better than LipiFlow in improving quality of vision and overall DED symptom frequency determined by OSDI and SANDE. Clinical Trial Registration Number: NCT03857919.

TearCare for the Treatment of Meibomian Gland Dysfunction in Adult Patients With Dry Eye Disease: A Masked Randomized Controlled Trial.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to demonstrate the safety and effectiveness of a single TearCare procedure compared with a single LipiFlow procedure in treatment of the dry eye disease associated with meibomian gland dysfunction. METHODS: In a multicenter, masked, randomized controlled trial, 135 subjects received a single TearCare (TC) treatment (n = 67) or a single LipiFlow (LF) treatment (n = 68) at baseline and were followed up for 1 month posttreatment. Tear film breakup time, meibomian gland function, and corneal and conjunctival staining scores were assessed as dry eye signs at baseline, 2 weeks, and 1 month; dry eye symptoms were assessed using the Ocular Surface Disease Index, Symptom Assessment in Dry Eye, and eye dryness questionnaires at baseline and 1 month. RESULTS: At 1 month posttreatment, both groups demonstrated significant improvements (P < 0.0001) in mean tear film breakup time and meibomian gland secretion score to 3.0 ± 4.4 and 11.2 ± 11.1 in the TC group and 2.6 ± 3.3 and 11.0 ± 10.4 in the LF group, respectively. The mean eye dryness, Symptom Assessment in Dry Eye, and Ocular Surface Disease Index scores were significantly reduced (P < 0.0001) by 35.4 ± 34.1, 38.2 ± 31.0, and 27.9 ± 20.5 in the TC group and 34.9 ± 26.9, 38.0 ± 25.9, and 23.4 ± 17.7 in the LF group, respectively. There were no statistically significant differences for any result between the groups. However, the TC group demonstrated numerically greater improvements consistently in all signs and symptoms. Device-related ocular adverse events were reported in 3 patients in the TC group (superficial punctate keratitis, chalazion, and blepharitis) and 4 patients in the LF group (blepharitis, 2 cases of foreign body sensation, and severe eye dryness). CONCLUSIONS: A single TearCare treatment significantly alleviates the signs and symptoms of dry eye disease in patients with meibomian gland dysfunction and is equivalent in its safety and effectiveness profile to LipiFlow treatment as shown in this 1-month follow-up study.

Anterior Scleral and Limbal Inflammatory Necrosis After Adjuvant Miltefosine for Recalcitrant Acanthamoeba Keratitis.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to report a retrospective case series of anterior scleral and limbal inflammatory necrosis after adjuvant miltefosine for recalcitrant Acanthamoeba keratitis (AK). METHODS: A case series and literature review. RESULT: Four eyes of 3 patients with recalcitrant AK developed anterior scleral and limbal inflammatory necrosis with significant scleral-limbal thinning after treatment with miltefosine. The average age was 38 years, and the average duration of infection before miltefosine treatment was 239 days. All cases required urgent surgical intervention to either prevent or mitigate corneal-limbal perforation. CONCLUSIONS: Miltefosine has been observed to result in the resolution of AK when used as an adjunctive therapy. It may also lead to a consecutive inflammatory necrosis of the anterior sclera and limbus. This inflammatory response may be significant enough to cause rapid scleral-limbal thinning with subsequent perforation.

Acute Corneal Epithelial Rejection of LR-CLAL After SARS-CoV-2 Vaccination.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to report a case of acute corneal epithelial rejection of living-related conjunctival limbal allograft (LR-CLAL) after severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) vaccination. OBSERVATIONS: A 27-year-old woman developed acute epithelial rejection of LR-CLAL 2 weeks after receiving the SARS-CoV-2 vaccine. She received the LR-CLAL transplant 4 years and 7 months previously and had a stable clinical course with no history of rejection. She had an ABO blood group and human leukocyte antigen compatible donor, no systemic comorbidities, and no rejection risk factors. CONCLUSIONS: The novel SARS-CoV-2 vaccine upregulates the immune system to produce an adaptive immune response. The SARS-CoV-2 vaccine may potentially be associated with increased risk of rejection in those with ocular surface transplants.

Use of Cenegermin in the Presence of Bandage Contact Lenses.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to characterize the outcomes of eyes with neurotrophic keratitis (NK) treated with a course of cenegermin-bkbj in the presence of a bandage contact lens (BCL). METHODS: A retrospective chart review of all eyes with a clinical diagnosis of NK treated with cenegermin-bkbj was performed between 2018 and 2020. Inclusion criteria included cenegermin-bkbj treatment with a BCL in place. Demographics, etiology, visual acuity, pretreatment and posttreatment corneal sensation, and treatment outcomes were assessed. RESULTS: There were 18 eyes of 16 patients (69% female) with NK treated with cenegermin-bkbj while having a BCL in place. After cenegermin-bkbj treatment, presence of corneal sensation significantly increased from 7% of eyes to 79% of eyes (P < 0.0001). There was also a significant increase in the number of quadrants with corneal sensation (mean of 0.1 quadrants increased to 1.6 quadrants, P =0.0005). Six of 10 eyes (67%; P = 0.004) with a persistent epithelial defect (PED) experienced complete resolution at the conclusion of treatment, while 3 additional eyes experienced a decrease in the defect size. Despite all 18 eyes necessitating a chronic BCL before cenegermin-bkbj treatment, 4 were able to maintain their epithelium without a BCL after treatment for at least some period. CONCLUSIONS: Cenegermin-bkbj treatment for NK with a BCL in place demonstrated improvement in corneal sensation, epithelial defect size, and fluorescein staining. In eyes demonstrating previous ocular surface decompensation with discontinuation of a BCL, maintenance of BCL use during treatment with cenegermin-bkbj may be considered.

Efficacy of Lifitegrast Ophthalmic Solution, 5.0%, in Patients With Moderate to Severe Dry Eye Disease: A Post Hoc Analysis of 2 Randomized Clinical Trials.

IMPORTANCE: An investigation of the treatment effect of lifitegrast ophthalmic solution, 5.0%, in different subgroups by severity of dry eye disease (DED) seems warranted. OBJECTIVE: To explore the heterogeneity across different subgroups of DED and identify which participants were most likely to achieve clinically meaningful benefit with lifitegrast treatment. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This post hoc responder analysis was performed using the data from the phase 3 OPUS-2 and OPUS-3 studies, which were 12-week, prospective, double-masked, multicenter, placebo-controlled, randomized, parallel-arm clinical trials that previously demonstrated the efficacy of lifitegrast in DED. Pooled data were stratified into 4 subgroups based on severity of inferior corneal staining score (ICSS; ≤1.5 vs >1.5) and eye dryness score (EDS; <60 or ≥60) at baseline. Data were collected from December 7, 2012, to October 5, 2015, and post hoc analysis was performed from April 14, 2020, to July 30, 2021. INTERVENTIONS: Lifitegrast or placebo twice daily for 84 days. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Proportion of participants with (1) a clinically meaningful improvement in signs (ICSS or total corneal staining score [TCSS]) and symptoms (EDS or global visual analog scale [VAS]) and (2) a composite response for a given sign and symptom end point pair at day 84 were measured. Clinically meaningful improvement was defined as at least 30% improvement in symptoms (EDS or global VAS) and either at least a 1-point improvement in ICSS or at least a 3-point improvement in TCSS. For the composite responder analysis, the end point pairs were defined as at least a 30% reduction in EDS and at least a 1-point improvement in ICSS; at least a 30% reduction in EDS and at least a 3-point improvement in TCSS; at least a 30% improvement in global VAS and at least a 1-point improvement in ICSS; and at least a 30% improvement in global VAS and at least a 3-point improvement in TCSS. RESULTS: In total, 1429 participants (716 in the placebo group and 713 in the lifitegrast group) were analyzed (1087 women [76.1%]; mean [SD] age, 58.7 [14.3] years). For the overall pooled population, responder and composite responder rates favored lifitegrast vs placebo (odds ratio range, 1.29 [95% CI, 1.05-1.59] to 2.10 [95% CI, 1.68-2.61]; P ≤ .02). In the composite analysis, the subgroup with ICSS of greater than 1.5 and EDS of at least 60 at baseline (ie, moderate to severe DED) demonstrated a 1.70- to 2.11-fold higher odds of achieving clinically meaningful improvement with lifitegrast across all sign and symptom end point pairs (P ≤ .001). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: These post hoc findings suggest that lifitegrast ophthalmic solution, 5.0%, treatment may be associated with a response in participants with moderate to severe signs and symptoms of DED. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02284516.

The corneal endothelium: clinical review of endothelial cell health and function.

The endothelial cell is a critical structure within the cornea and is responsible for maintaining corneal clarity through its pump function. Endothelial cells are lost over time naturally but can be injured medically, surgically, or as a part of various dystrophies. Monitoring of endothelial cells can be performed clinically or more formally with specular microscopy. In cases of significant compromise, endothelial cells can be transplanted by various endothelial keratoplasty techniques. The future pipeline is bright for possible endothelial cell regeneration and rehabilitation. This article reviews these topics in depth to provide a comprehensive look at the structure and function of the endothelial cell, etiologies of endothelial cell damage, detailed review of iatrogenic causes of endothelial cell loss, and management strategies.

Dry eye disease flares: A rapid evidence assessment.

PURPOSE: Characteristics of periodic flares of dry eye disease (DED) are not well understood. We conducted a rapid evidence assessment to identify evidence for and characteristics of DED flares. METHODS: Literature searches were performed in Embase® via Ovid®, MEDLINE®, and PubMed®. Clinical trials and observational studies published 2009-2019 were included if they investigated patients aged ≥18 years with clinically diagnosed DED who experienced a flare, defined as a temporary or transient episode of increased ocular discomfort, typically lasting days to a few weeks. Triggers of flares, patient-reported outcomes (symptoms), clinician-measured outcomes (signs), and changes in tear molecules were captured. RESULTS: Twenty-one publications that included 22 studies met inclusion criteria. Five observational studies described evidence of DED flares in daily life, 5 studies reported changes following cataract/refractive surgery in patients with preoperative DED, and 12 studies employed controlled environment (CE) models. Real-world triggers of DED flares included air conditioning, wind, reading, low humidity, watching television, and pollution. CE chambers (dry, moving air) and surgery also triggered DED flares. Exacerbations of symptoms and signs of DED, assessed through varied measures, were reported during flares. Across studies, matrix metalloproteinase-9 and interleukin-6 increased and epidermal growth factor decreased during DED flares. CONCLUSIONS: Evidence from 22 studies identified triggers and characteristics of DED flares. Further research is needed to assist clinicians in early diagnosis and treatment of patients experiencing flares.

Limbal Stem Cell Deficiency: Demographics and Clinical Characteristics of a Large Retrospective Series at a Single Tertiary Referral Center.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to characterize a large cohort of patients presenting to a single referral center for limbal stem cell deficiency (LSCD). METHODS: A retrospective chart review of all patients with a clinical diagnosis of LSCD from 2002 to 2015 was performed. Demographics, etiology, previous ocular surgeries, visual acuity, and treatment were assessed. RESULTS: Seven hundred thirty-eight eyes of 434 patients (51.4% male subjects) were diagnosed with LSCD. The mean presenting age was 42.9 years, 70% presented with bilateral disease, and overall vision was poor. The most common etiologies were congenital aniridia (30.9%), chemical or thermal injuries (20.6%), contact lens (16.8%), Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS, 10.4%), and iatrogenic (7.3%). Congenital aniridia had a significantly increased association with glaucoma or ocular hypertension (P < 0.0001). Chemical or thermal injuries (P = 0.0007), SJS (P < 0.0001), and mucous membrane pemphigoid (P < 0.0001) had a significantly increased association with eyelid pathology. The mean logMAR best corrected visual acuity (analysis excluded eyes with light perception and no light perception) at presentation was 1.145 (∼20/280). Keratoplasty performed (before presentation at our center) without first addressing the LSCD was seen in 80 eyes; all keratoplasties failed due to recurrence of the LSCD. CONCLUSIONS: Patients presenting with LSCD were on average middle aged without sex predominance. LSCD was most commonly bilateral, comprised a wide range of etiologies, and decreased vision substantially. Ocular comorbidities may need to be treated before treating the LSCD surgically. Finally, not addressing the LSCD (primary issue) first can result in keratoplasty failure.

Posterior lamellar keratoplasty: techniques, outcomes, and recent advances.

Over the past 2 decades, posterior lamellar keratoplasty (PLK) has emerged as an alternative to penetrating keratoplasty in the treatment of corneal endothelial disorders. The reasons for this trend include the search for a safer procedure to replace diseased endothelium that provides faster and better visual rehabilitation and reduces the need for postoperative care. Different surgical techniques, surgical instruments, devices, and lasers have been introduced to overcome technical difficulties, thus improving clinical outcomes. Yet, surgeons and eye banks must address the complications and limitations that arise during the transition to these new techniques. This review discusses the most significant aspects of the evolution of PLK, including a detailed description of current techniques and the direction of future treatment for corneal endothelial disease with the use of laser-assisted surgery, bioengineered corneas, cell therapy, and new pharmacologic therapy.

Safety and efficacy of nepafenac punctal plug delivery system in controlling postoperative ocular pain and inflammation after cataract surgery.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of a nepafenac punctal plug delivery system (N-PPDS) after cataract surgery. SETTING: Three U.S. clinical sites. DESIGN: Prospective, multicenter, randomized (2:1), parallel-arm, double-masked, placebo-controlled, phase II pilot study. METHODS: Fifty-six subjects (aged older than 22 years) with expected postcataract correctable distance vision of 20/30 or better and lower puncta allowing dilation up to 1.0 mm received either the nepafenac (N-PPDS group; n = 38 eyes) or a placebo punctal plug delivery system (p-PPDS group; n = 18 eyes). All eyes underwent routine unilateral cataract surgery with intraocular lens implantation. The primary and secondary efficacy measures were postoperative ocular pain and inflammation, respectively. RESULTS: There were 38 patients in the experimental N-PPDS group and 18 patients in the control group. The N-PPDS group had a significantly higher percentage of pain-free patients than that in the p-PPDS group (22/32 [69%] vs 6/16 [38%] at 3 days, P = .038; and 24/36 [67%] vs 5/16 [31%] at 7 days, P = .018). A higher percentage of patients in the N-PPDS group (15/29 [52%] vs 0/14 [0%] in p-PPDS) was pain free at all visits (P = .001). Anterior chamber cell scores were better in the N-PPDS group (patients with no anterior chamber cells: 18/36 [50%] vs 3/16 [19%] in p-PPDS; P = .034) at 7 days. The plug retention rate was 98% (55/56) at 14 days. Adverse events having a suspected relationship with the punctal plug treatment occurred in 1 case of the N-PPDS group having to do with placement and zero in the p-PPDS group. CONCLUSIONS: The N-PPDS was safe and effective for the management of ocular pain and inflammation after cataract surgery.

Clinical Outcomes of Allogeneic Ocular Surface Stem Cell Transplantation in Pediatric Patients.

PURPOSE: To describe the outcomes of allograft ocular surface stem cell transplantation (OSST) and the complication profile of systemic immunosuppression (SI) in pediatric patients with limbal stem cell deficiency. METHODS: This was a retrospective interventional case series from a single tertiary referral institution of 20 eyes from 13 patients who 1) underwent allograft OSST surgery, 2) were 18 years or less at time of OSST, and 3) received SI with 4) a minimum of 12-months follow-up. The main outcome measures were ocular surface stability, visual acuity, and SI adverse events. RESULTS: The mean age of patients was 15.1 ± 3.2 years (range 9-18 years). The mean follow-up was 5.6 ± 5.0 years after OSST. At the last follow-up, 15 eyes (75%) had a stable ocular surface, 1 eye (5%) developed partial failure, and 4 eyes (20%) developed total surface failure. Preoperative mean logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution visual acuity 1.5 improved to 1.1 at the last follow-up (P = 0.1); when 4 eyes of 3 nonadherent patients were excluded, the results were more pronounced and statistically significant (1.5 improved to 1.0, P = 0.002). SI was tolerated well by all patients with minimal adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: OSST provides a stable ocular surface and is a successful treatment option for pediatric patients with limbal stem cell deficiency. SI is well-tolerated with a minimal complication profile.