Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
PLoS One ; 15(2): e0229071, 2020.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32069317

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Intrauterine Contraceptive Device (IUCD) is a highly effective and reversible modern contraceptive, which is still significantly underutilized in Ethiopia. The aim of this study was to identify factors affecting the use of IUCDs among women of reproductive age group in Addis Ababa. METHODS: Facility-based, unmatched case-control study was employed among randomly selected cases and controls in selected health centers in Addis Ababa from August to October 2017. The cases (n = 128) were women of reproductive age group who were IUCD users and controls (n = 256) were women of reproductive age group who were users of oral or injectable contraceptives during the study period. After randomly selecting two health center from each sub-city the number of cases and controls were equally allocated to each of the selected health centers. In each selected health center, all eligible cases were enrolled consecutively until the sample size was achieved. Two consecutive controls were selected for each case. Data was collected face-to-face by trained nurses by using structured questionnaire. Factors associated with IUCD use were identified by multi-variable binary logistic regression models using the backward conditional stepwise method. RESULTS: In the multi-variable analysis, IUCD use was strongly associated with husbands/partners being supportive of IUCD use (Adjusted OR = 13.24, 95% CI; 5.30-33.02), being literate women (Adjusted OR = 5.31, 95% CI; 1.05-26.93), women having a perception of IUCD does not cause infection (Adjusted OR = 4.38, 95% CI; 1.45-13.26) and the source of information about IUCD being mass-media (Adjusted OR = 3.81, 95% CI; 1.49-9.74). CONCLUSIONS: The findings of the study reinforce the need of husbands/partners involvement in the interventions to enhance utilization of IUCD. Moreover, due attention should also be provided for delivering IUCD-related messages in the public mass-media.


Asunto(s)
Dispositivos Intrauterinos , Cumplimiento y Adherencia al Tratamiento/estadística & datos numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Etiopía/epidemiología , Femenino , Encuestas de Atención de la Salud , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Oportunidad Relativa , Cumplimiento y Adherencia al Tratamiento/psicología , Adulto Joven
2.
J Diabetes Res ; 2019: 8564879, 2019.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31950066

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Determining the glycemic index and load of foods has significant impact on meal planning for diabetes. However, there is no data on the glycemic index (GI) and glycemic load (GL) of Ethiopian foods. Therefore, the aim of this study was to analyze the glycemic index and glycemic load of Teff Injera, Corn Injera, and White Wheat Bread. METHODS: Experimental study design was conducted among selected healthy adults. Teff Injera, Corn Injera, and White Wheat Bread were selected as test foods for the study, and glucose was used as the reference food. The postprandial glucose concentrations in the blood were recorded at 0, 15, 30, 45, 90, and 120 minutes. The relative glycemic index of each food was calculated, and the presence of statistical difference in glycemic index among the three foods was analyzed. RESULTS: The mean age of the participants was 23 years (±1.6 years). The glycemic indexes of Teff Injera, White Wheat Bread, and Corn Injera were 36 (low), 46 (low), and 97 (high), respectively, and the glycemic loads were 7 (low), 14 (moderate), and 22 (high), respectively. There was a significant difference in glycemic index and load among the three food items (p < 0.001). Teff Injera had a much lower glycemic index and load compared with Corn Injera (p < 0.001) and White Wheat Bread (p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Teff Injera and White Wheat Bread have low glycemic index and are recommended to be consumed by diabetic patients, whereas Corn Injera has high glycemic index and is not recommended for diabetic patients. Therefore, Teff Injera should be considered globally in the dietary modification programs for diabetes.


Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus/dietoterapia , Índice Glucémico , Carga Glucémica , Adulto , Glucemia/análisis , Carbohidratos de la Dieta/administración & dosificación , Etiopía , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Adulto Joven
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...