Prospective serial diagnostic study: the effects of position and provocative tests on the diagnosis of oesophageal motility disorders by high-resolution manometry.

BACKGROUND: Standard high-resolution manometry (HRM) protocols are based on 10 single water swallows acquired in the supine position. AIMS: To assess the impact of position, rapid drink challenge and solid test meal on the diagnosis of oesophageal motility disorders. METHODS: Seventy-two healthy volunteers (20-76 years) and 366 consecutive patients (18-90 years) completed HRM with 10 single water swallows in the supine and upright positions. Rapid drink challenge was performed twice, before and after the solid test meal. Diagnosis based on single water swallows in the supine position (Chicago Classification v3.0) was compared with results in the upright position and with provocative tests. RESULTS: Overall, diagnostic agreement in the supine and upright positions was present in 296/438 (67.6%) subjects. This increased to 90.0% when ineffective oesophageal motility was considered with normal motility. Integrated relaxation pressure was 4 mm Hg higher in the supine position. There was a higher prevalence of inconsistent, likely false positive, diagnoses of outlet obstruction in the supine compared to the upright position (16/20 vs 1/4 patients, P = 0.0007). Similarly, the difference in concordance for the diagnosis of oesophago-gastric junction obstruction or achalasia between single water swallows in the supine and upright positions with solid test meal was significant (12/29 (41.4%) vs 12/14 (85.7%), P = 0.0087). CONCLUSION: Diagnostic agreement for oesophageal motility disorders based on single water swallows in the upright and supine positions was moderate, with frequent discordant findings for ineffective motility and outlet obstruction. HRM studies can be performed in either position, using appropriate reference values. Rapid drink challenge or solid test meal can resolve diagnostic discrepancies.

Abnormal esophageal motility during a solid test meal in systemic sclerosis-detection even in very early disease and association with disease progression.

OBJECTIVE: This study assessed whether high-resolution manometry (HRM) with a test meal can detect clinically relevant, abnormal motility already in very early systemic sclerosis (SSc) and whether this finding is associated with subsequent disease progression. METHODS: This prospective, longitudinal cohort study recruited 68 consecutive SSc patients (group #1: 32 established disease (ACR, American College of Rheumatology /EULAR, The European League against Rheumatism 2013 and ACR 1980 criteria fulfilled); group #2: 24 early disease (only ACR/EULAR 2013 fulfilled); group #3: 12 very early disease (clinical expert diagnosis of SSc) and 72 healthy controls. HRM evaluated esophageal motility for water swallows and a solid test meal. RESULTS: Systemic sclerosis patients had less frequent effective esophageal contractions during the test meal compared to healthy controls even in very early disease (0.15, 1.0, 2.1 per minute for groups #1, #2, and #3, vs 2.5 per minute in health; P < 0.001, P < 0.001, and P < 0.0085, respectively). Ineffective motility at HRM was associated with a higher modified Rodnan skin score at baseline. Moreover, at mean 18 (10-31) months of follow-up, the presence of ineffective motility at baseline was associated with progression of skin disease (P = 0.01). Cox proportional hazard regression analysis identified hypotensive peristalsis in the test meal (<15% effective solid swallows) and low distal contractile integral (DCI; <400 mm Hg·cm·s) as predictors for skin aggravation, but not for new organ involvement. CONCLUSION: Ineffective motility during a test meal is present already in patients with very early SSc. Findings on HRM studies are associated with disease severity at baseline, and low percentage of effective swallows in test meal and low mean DCI are both predictors of skin progression during follow-up.

Pharyngeal swallowing and oesophageal motility during a solid meal test: a prospective study in healthy volunteers and patients with major motility disorders.

BACKGROUND: The factors that determine how people eat when they are healthy or have disease have not been defined. We used high resolution manometry (HRM) to assess pharyngeal swallowing and oesophageal motility during ingestion of a solid test meal (STM) in healthy volunteers and patients with motility disorders. METHODS: This study was based at University Hospital Zurich (Zürich, Switzerland). Healthy volunteers who responded to an advertisement completed HRM with ten single water swallows (SWS) in recumbent and upright positions followed by a 200 g rice STM in the upright position. Healthy volunteers were stratified for age and sex to ensure a representative population. For comparison, consecutive patients with major motility disorders on SWS and patients with dysphagia but no major motility disorders on SWS (disease controls) were selected from a database that was assembled prospectively; the rice meal data were analysed retrospectively. During STM, pharyngeal swallows were timed and oesophageal contractions were classified as representing normal motility or different types of abnormal motility in accordance with established metrics. Factors that could potentially be associated with eating speed were investigated, including age, sex, body-mass index, and presence of motility disorder. We compared diagnoses based on SWS findings, assessed with the Chicago Classification v3.0, with those based on STM findings, assessed with the Chicago Classification adapted for solids. These studies are registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, numbers NCT02407938 and NCT02397616. FINDINGS: Between April 2, 2014, and May 13, 2015, 72 healthy volunteers were recruited and underwent HRM. Additionally, we analysed data from 54 consecutive patients with major motility disorders and 53 with dysphagia but no major motility disorders recruited between April 2, 2013, and Dec 18, 2014. We found important variations in oesophageal motility and eating speed during meal ingestion in healthy volunteers and patients. Increased time between swallows was accompanied by more effective oesophageal contractions (in healthy volunteers, 20/389 [5%] effective swallows at <4 s between swallows vs 586/900 [65%] effective swallows at >11 s between swallows, p<0·0001). Obstructive, spastic, or hypercontractile swallows were rare in healthy volunteers (total <1%). Patients with motility disorders ate slower than healthy volunteers (14·95 g [IQR 11-25] per min vs 32·9 g [25-40] per min, p<0·0001) and pathological oesophageal motility were reproduced when patients consumed the STM. In healthy volunteers, eating speed was associated only with frequency of swallows (slope 2·5 g per min per pharyngeal swallow per min [95% CI 1·1-4·0], p=0·0009), whereas in patients with dysphagia, it was correlated with frequency of effective oesophageal contractions (6·4 g per min per effective contraction per min [4·3-8·5], p<0·0001). Diagnostic agreement was good between the HRM with SWS and rice STM (intra-class correlation coefficient r=0·81, 95% CI 0·74-0·87, p<0·0001). INTERPRETATION: Our results show normative values for pharyngeal swallowing and oesophageal motility in healthy volunteers. Detailed analysis of HRM data acquired during an STM shows that the rate-limiting factor for intake of solids in health is the frequency of pharyngeal swallowing and not oesophageal contractility. The reverse is true in patients with oesophageal motility disorders, in whom the frequency of effective oesophageal contractions determines eating speed. FUNDING: University Hospital Zurich.

Diagnostic yield of high-resolution manometry with a solid test meal for clinically relevant, symptomatic oesophageal motility disorders: serial diagnostic study.

BACKGROUND: The use of high-resolution manometry (HRM) to diagnose oesophageal motility disorders is based on ten single water swallows (SWS); however, this approach might not be representative of oesophageal function during the ingestion of normal food. We tested whether inclusion of a standardised solid test meal (STM) to HRM studies increases test sensitivity for major motility disorders. Additionally, we assessed the frequency and cause of patient symptoms during STM. METHODS: Consecutive patients who were referred for investigation of oesophageal symptoms were recruited at Nottingham University Hospitals (Nottingham, UK) in the development study and at University Hospital Zürich (Zürich, Switzerland) in the validation study. HRM was done in the upright, seated position with a solid-state assembly. During HRM, patients ingested ten SWS, followed by a standardised 200 g STM. Diagnosis of oesophageal motility disorders was based on the Chicago Classification validated for SWS (CCv3) and with STM (CC-S), respectively. These studies are registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, numbers NCT02407938 and NCT02397616. FINDINGS: The development cohort included 750 patients of whom 360 (48%) had dysphagia and 390 (52%) had reflux or other symptoms. The validation cohort consisted of 221 patients, including 98 (44%) with dysphagia and 123 (56%) with reflux symptoms. More patients were diagnosed with a major motility disorder by use of an STM than with SWS in the development set (321 [43%] patients diagnosed via STM vs 163 [22%] via SWS; p<0·0001) and validation set (73 [33%] vs 49 [22%]; p=0·014). The increase was most evident in patients with dysphagia (241 [67%] of 360 patients on STM vs 125 [35%] patients on SWS in the development set, p<0·0001), but was also present in those referred with reflux symptoms (64 [19%] of 329 patients vs 32 [10%] patients in the development set, p=0·00060). Reproduction of symptoms was reported by nine (1%) of 750 patients during SWS and 461 (61%) during STM (p<0·0001). 265 (83%) of 321 patients with major motility disorders and 107 (70%) of 152 patients with minor motility disorders reported symptoms during the STM (p=0·0038), compared with 89 (32%) of 277 patients with normal motility as defined with CC-S (p<0·0001). INTERPRETATION: The diagnostic sensitivity of HRM for major motility disorders is increased with use of the STM compared with SWS, especially in patients with dysphagia. Observations made during STM can establish motility disorders as the cause of oesophageal symptoms. FUNDING: None.

What to eat and drink in the festive season: a pan-European, observational, cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND: Digestive discomfort after meals is common in the community, especially during the festive season. It is uncertain whether this is related to intake of either high-calorie or high-fat foods or, alternatively, intake of specific foods. This prospective, cross-sectional study tested the hypothesis that the risk of reflux or dyspepsia is associated with the fat content of the meal independent of caloric load in a 'real-life' setting. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Four festive meals were served to delegates attending a conference on four consecutive days. Test meals had the same volume, but varied in calorie and fat content. Study procedures and symptoms were monitored using a mobile application (SymTrack). The effect of alcoholic compared with nonalcoholic drinks was also assessed. Primary outcome was the occurrence of reflux or dyspeptic symptoms. Fullness was documented by a visual analogue scale. RESULTS: A total of 84/120 (70%) delegates aged 22-69 years consented to participate. At screening, 22 (31%) participants reported at least mild symptoms on the Leuven Dyspepsia Questionnaire. Specific ingredients did not appear to impact on postprandial symptoms. All high-calorie dinners [British, German, Italian (with alcohol)] induced more symptoms than the low-fat, low-calorie Czech dinner [odds ratio: 2.6, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.97-6.9 (P=0.058), 1.5 (0.3-3.8), and 2.8 (0.7-10.5), respectively]. Self-reported fullness after the high-fat, high-calorie British dinner was higher by 23/100 (95% CI: 4-42, P=0.016) with respect to low-fat, low-calorie Czech and German dinners. CONCLUSION: Study participants tolerated a range of food and drink well. Reflux or dyspeptic symptoms were least likely after the low-fat, low-calorie meal. Fullness was increased after the high-fat, high-calorie dinner, but not low-fat meals. These results will help the public to make evidence-based dietary choices during the carnival season!

[Prevalence of incidental findings of the Axial skeleton on computed tomograph of severely injured patients]. / Prävalenz von Zufallsbefunden des Achsenskeletts in computertomographischen Untersuchungen polytraumatisierter Patienten.

Computed tomography has become an important component in the initial assessment of severely injured patients over the last years. The liberal use coupled with advances in imaging technology often result in incidental findings. In our present investigation, the prevalence incidence of incidental findings of the spine and skull amounted to 58% of all patients with trauma. Degenerative changes were most commonly found, followed by congenital defects and neoplasms. Within the latter, further investigation was necessary in six cases, of which two findings proved to be malignant neoplasms. The high incidence of incidental findings calls for a uniform documentation, handling and clarification of responsibility in treatment and insurance-related competence.

La tomodensitométrie est devenue un examen important dans la salle d'urgence au cours de ces dernières années. Parallèlement aux blessures causées par accidents, d'autres résultats sont apparus par hasard et sans lien direct avec l'accident. Dans ce travail, l'incidence sur le crâne et la colonne vertèbrale se chiffre à 58%. En majorité sont découverts des changements dégénératifs, suivis par des anomalies congénitales et des néoplasies. Six cas ont nécessité d'être clarifiés et deux cas se sont avérés malins. Suite à la répercution de ces découvertes fortuites, il s'est avéré nécessaire d'établir des critères uniformes afin de clarifier la nécessité d'intervention ainsi que pour des questions d'assurance.