Evaluation of the sensitivity of pulmonary arterial pressure to elevation using a reaction norm model in Angus Cattle.

Pulmonary arterial pressure (PAP) is a diagnostic measure used to determine an individual's susceptibility to developing high-altitude disease. The importance of PAP measures collected at elevations lower than the intended breeding elevation of the bulls (i.e., ≥1,520 m) is unknown. Therefore, the objective of this study was to determine the genetic relationship between PAP measures collected in a range of elevations using reaction norm models. A total of 9,177 PAP and elevation observations on purebred Angus cattle, which averaged 43.49 ± 11.32 mmHg and 1,878.6 ± 296.8 m, respectively, were used in the evaluation. The average age of the individuals in the evaluation was 434.04 ± 115.9 d. A random regression model containing the effects of sex, a linear covariate of age, a quadratic fixed covariate of elevation, and random effects consisting of a contemporary group and a linear regression of PAP on elevation was used for the evaluation of PAP. Two forms of PAP were evaluated with this model. First, to address the non-normality of the data, PAP was raised to the power of -2.6 (ptPAP) based on the results of a Box-Cox analysis. Second, raw PAP (rPAP) phenotypes were evaluated to compare the results to those obtained from the transformed data. For ptPAP, heritability ranged from 0.25 to 0.37 corresponding to elevations of 1,900 and 1,215 m, respectively. For rPAP, heritability ranged from 0.22 to 0.41 corresponding to elevations of 1,700 and 2,495 m, respectively. Generally, lower elevations corresponded to decreased heritabilities while higher elevations corresponded to increased heritability estimates. For ptPAP, genetic correlations ranged from 0.18 (elevation: 1,215 and 2,495 m) to 1.00. For rPAP, genetic correlations ranged from 0.08 (elevation: 1,215 and 2,495 m) to 1.00. In general, the closer the elevations in which PAP was measured, the greater the genetic relationship. The greater the difference in elevation between PAP measures resulted in lower genetic correlations. The rank correlation between expected progeny differences (EPD) for 1,215 and 2,495 m was 0.65 and 0.49 for the ptPAP and rPAP, respectively. These results suggested that PAP measures collected in lower elevations may be used as an indicator of high-altitude adaptability. In the estimation of EPD to rank sires for their suitability for use in high-elevation production systems, it is important to account for the relationships among varied altitudes.

Evaluation of moderate to high elevation effects on pulmonary arterial pressure measures in Angus cattle1.

Altitude-induced pulmonary hypertension is a disease once thought to only occur at extremely high elevations (>1,600 m), but recently, it has been observed at moderate elevations of 1,200 to 1,600 m. Pulmonary arterial pressure (PAP) has been used as an indicator of tolerance to high altitude in mountainous beef production systems for over 30 yr. The trait is typically measured on yearling bulls and heifers with values ≤ 41 mmHg being favorable. These observations were historically only considered valid when they were recorded at elevations ≥ 1,600 m; however, if observations from lower (i.e., moderate) elevations were reliable indicators, a greater number of cattle records could be used in genetic improvement programs for high-altitude beef systems. The objectives of this study were to evaluate the relationship between PAP and elevation, as well as to determine whether PAP measures obtained at moderate elevations (ME) less than 1,600 m have a genetic relationship with PAP observations obtained at high elevations (HE) 1,600 m or greater. Elevation and PAP data from purebred Angus cattle (n = 14,665) from 349 contemporary groups were used in the analyses. Elevation and PAP averaged 1,887 ± 1.8 m and 43.0 ± 0.1 mm Hg, respectively. A univariate model containing the effects of sex, age, elevation category (HE vs. ME), elevation (continuous), and elevation category by elevation interaction along with a random direct genetic effect was utilized to determine the relationship between PAP and elevation. In this model, all main effects were found to be significant contributors of variation in PAP (P < 0.001). The interaction between elevation category and elevation was not a significant contributor to variability of PAP (P > 0.05). A bivariate animal model was then used to evaluate the relationship between PAP observations obtained between HE and ME groups. Heritability estimates for these 2 groups were 0.34 ± 0.03 and 0.29 ± 0.09, respectively, and their genetic correlation was 0.83 ± 0.15. Even though this is a strong genetic relationship, results of this study support the hypothesis that PAP observations collected at HE and ME are not perfectly, genetically related. Results suggest that PAP measures collected from 1,219 to 1,600 m may be useful as a correlated trait in a multitrait genetic evaluation to produce EPD useful for selection of animals with reduced susceptibility to pulmonary hypertension.