Assessing Medial Olivocochlear Reflex Strengths via Auditory Brainstem Response: Measurement and Variability in Normal-Hearing Individuals.

PURPOSE: Optimal measurement settings to measure the medial olivocochlear reflex (MOCR) in humans have not yet been defined. The purpose of this study was to advance the representation of the MOCR in auditory brainstem response (ABR) as an addition to the current diagnostic portfolio. PARTICIPANTS AND METHOD: Twelve female and 14 male normal-hearing adults participated in the study. Potential effects of a contralateral acoustic stimulus (CAS) on amplitude changes were investigated by recording ABR waveform profiles on the left side at click intensities of 50/60/70 dB nHL with and without CAS (60 dB SPL). Secondly, to detect potential chronological order influences, measurement settings were rearranged on the right side and measurements were repeated. Additionally, ABR thresholds were recorded with and without a CAS in 10 patients. RESULTS: When the effect of contralateral suppression was analyzed on the basis of amplitude changes, there was a change under administration of the CAS signal that was statistically significant. Interestingly, the order of recordings affected the degree of amplitude change. In three out of 10 patients, reproducible suppression effects on ABR thresholds were detectable upon CAS presentation. CONCLUSIONS: To our knowledge, this is the largest study dealing with the recording of the MOCR elicited by a contralateral noise via ABR in normal-hearing individuals. Effects of MOCR are measurable via amplitude changes upon CAS administration. Chronological orders influence the impact of this effect on amplitude changes. Optimal measurement settings have not yet been defined. However, experiments such as this study may help to further improve measurements, and thus advance the representation of the MOC reflex in ABR as an addition to the current diagnostic portfolio.

Visualizing Contralateral Suppression of Hearing Sensitivity via Acoustic and Electric Brainstem Audiometry in Bimodal Cochlear Implant Patients: A Feasibility Study.

INTRODUCTION: The medial olivocochlear reflex (MOCR) is a part of the binaural processing strategies and influences the efferent auditory pathway in normal-hearing individuals. Patients with asymmetric hearing loss often benefit from a bimodal hearing solution with a cochlear implant (CI) and a hearing aid (HA). However, hearing performances may vary with some surprisingly high- or low-performing CI/HA users. A potential role of the MOCR among these patients warrants further investigation. Otoacustics emissions are an established method to visualize the reflex; however, this technique implies some disadvantages. To visualize the MOCR via auditory brainstem response (ABR) could be a promising alternative. METHODS: Twenty-three bimodal CI/HA users were enrolled. Experimental setup was as follows: I. electrical ABR on the CI side was recorded with and without simultaneous contralateral noise signal at the HA side, II. acoustic ABR was recorded on the HA side with and without simultaneous contralateral noise at the CI side. Brainstem thresholds and amplitudes of waveforms I-V with and without contralateral noise were compared. Potential correlations of patient-related factors and hearing performances were analysed. RESULTS: In four individuals, a reduction of brainstem audiometry thresholds could be observed at the acoustic brainstem audiometry. In these cases, results could be reproduced. Summarizing ABR measurements at the HA side of all individuals, no relevant changes of ABR thresholds (dB nHL) or waveform amplitude reductions (nV) could be observed irrespective of the presence or absence of a contralateral suppression signal. CONCLUSION: Threshold changes of acoustic ABR upon presentation of a contralateral suppression signal could not generally be measured in bimodal CI users. However, in a subgroup, a highly reproducible effect was demonstrated if a contralateral suppression signal was applied. A reactivated rather than rehabilitated MOCR may have accounted for this effect in this subgroup. One could speculate that in these patients, bimodal fitting could be affected by the MOCR efferents.

Transimpedance Matrix Measurements Reliably Detect Electrode Tip Fold-over in Cochlear Implantation.

OBJECTIVE: During cochlear implantation, electrophysiological tests are performed to document safe technical functioning of implant and electrodes. In rare cases, the apical part of the electrode folds over during insertion. The data from transimpedance matrix (TIM) measurements enable the generation of a heat map or TIM profile measuring the spatial distribution of voltage. The aim of this study was to determine the accuracy of heat-map TIM profiles and compare them with spread of excitation (SOE) measurements and intraoperative imaging for prediction of electrode malposition. STUDY DESIGN: Non-randomized study. SETTING: Tertiary referral center. PATIENTS AND INTERVENTIONS: One hundred patients who underwent cochlear implantation with completed TIM measurements, SOE data and perioperative imaging met the inclusion criteria and were enrolled. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: The electrophysiological data on the electrode array positioning was compared with temporal bone imaging. RESULTS: In seven cases, TIM measurements showed irregular results. In two cases, irregular TIM profiles were registered, but SOE data and 3D x-ray of the temporal bone didn't display deviated electrode positioning. A 3D x-ray of the skull displayed electrode tip fold-over in four cases and electrode buckling in one case. Sensitivity of TIM measurements and SOE data was 100%, specificity of TIM measurements was 97.89%, and specificity of SOE data was 98.93%. CONCLUSION: Out of 100 patients using TIM measurements for detection of electrode malpositioning, no false negative cases were detected. TIM measurements successfully detect electrode malposition in an intraoperative setting. Different heat map patterns may be observed depending on location and type of malposition.

Aligning Hearing Aid and Cochlear Implant Improves Hearing Outcome in Bimodal Cochlear Implant Users.

OBJECTIVE: Patients with unilateral deafness and residual hearing on the contralateral ear can benefit from a cochlear implant (CI) on one side and a hearing aid (HA) on the other. However, hearing improvement among these patients is heterogenous. Interindividual differences in bimodal benefit may be caused by a mismatch of CI and HA. The aim of this study was to clinically apply a HA fitting strategy and to evaluate hearing outcome with and without a dedicated bimodal fitting formula. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective non-randomized study. SETTING: Tertiary referral center. PATIENTS: Twelve patients using a CI processor and a conventional HA were enrolled. Before and after the new HA had been adjusted to the patient and linked to the CI, pure-tone audiometry and localization tests were performed. Speech perception was determined in quiet and noise. Tests were repeated after 6 and 12 weeks. To evaluate the subjective listening comfort two questionnaires (Oldenburg Inventory and HISQUI19) were assessed. INTERVENTION: Therapeutic. RESULTS MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Word recognition in quiet, sentence recognition in noise. Speech perception in noise improved significantly: directed suppression of noise helped to segregate the target speech signal from a mixture of sounds or competing speakers. Evaluation of the questionnaires revealed a positive subjective hearing experience compared with patients' initial settings of the devices. CONCLUSION: By linking CI and HA hearing and speech perception can be improved. However, good counselling at the outset is essential to obtain enhanced outcome.