[Does Inpatient Equivalent Home Treatment lead to higher satisfaction? Results on satisfaction of persons involved in treatment within the Multi-center AKtiV Study]. / Stößt die Behandlung zu Hause auf größere Zufriedenheit? Ergebnisse zur Zufriedenheit der an der Behandlung beteiligten Personengruppen im Rahmen der multizentrischen AKtiV-Studie.

This part of the AKtiV Study focuses on treatment satisfaction of patients and their relatives within Inpatient Equivalent Home Treatment (IEHT) and regular treatment. Stress of relatives and job satisfaction and workload of employees in IEHT is also considered. Relevant Parameters were collected via established as well as newly adapted questionnaires at the end of treatment. Patients and relatives in IEHT are significantly more satisfied. The stress experienced by relatives is reduced in both forms of treatment. Employees in IEHT are generally very satisfied, although there is no correlation with the satisfaction of relatives and patients. Known limitations of satisfaction surveys must be taken into account. In general these results encourage the expansion and continuous development of this new form of treatment in Germany.

Premature termination, satisfaction with care, and shared decision-making during home treatment compared to inpatient treatment: A quasi-experimental trial.

BACKGROUND: Inpatient equivalent home treatment (IEHT), implemented in Germany since 2018, is a specific form of home treatment. Between 2021 and 2022, IEHT was compared to inpatient psychiatric treatment in a 12-months follow-up quasi-experimental study with two propensity score matched cohorts in 10 psychiatric centers in Germany. This article reports results on the treatment during the acute episode and focuses on involvement in decision-making, patient satisfaction, and drop-out rates. METHODS: A total of 200 service users receiving IEHT were compared with 200 matched statistical "twins" in standard inpatient treatment. Premature termination of treatment as well as reasons for this was assessed using routine data and a questionnaire. In addition, we measured patient satisfaction with care with a specific scale. For the evaluation of patient involvement in treatment decisions, we used the 9-item Shared Decision Making Questionnaire (SDM-Q-9). RESULTS: Patients were comparable in both groups with regard to sociodemographic and clinical characteristics. Mean length-of-stay was 37 days for IEHT and 28 days for inpatient treatment. In both groups, a similar proportion of participants stopped treatment prematurely. At the end of the acute episode, patient involvement in decision-making (SDM-Q-9) as well as treatment satisfaction scores were significantly higher for IEHT patients compared to inpatients. CONCLUSIONS: Compared to inpatient care, IEHT treatment for acute psychiatric episodes was associated with higher treatment satisfaction and more involvement in clinical decisions.

[IEHT or inpatient treatment? - First results of the multicenter AKtiV study on inpatient-equivalent home treatment regarding the study population and index treatment]. / StäB oder Station? ­ Erste Ergebnisse zur Studienpopulation und zur Behandlung im Rahmen der multizentrischen AKtiV-Studie zur stationsäquivalenten Behandlung.

AIM: The quasi-experimental AKtiV study investigates the effects inpatient-equivalent home treatment (IEHT). This paper describes the study population based on demographic and clinical parameters at baseline and compares the index treatment. METHODS: Over a period of 12 months 200 IEHT users were included in the intervention group (IG) and 200 inpatients were included in the control group (CG). The comparability of the two groups was ensured by propensity score matching (PSM). RESULTS: In addition to the PSM variables, IG and CG did not differ significantly from each other variables at study inclusion. The duration of the index treatment was significantly longer in the IG (M=37.2 days) compared to the CG (M=27.9 days; p<0.001). CONCLUSION: The similarity of the two groups enables comparisons over 12 months, investigating IEHT effects on long-term outcomes.

[Inpatient-Equivalent Treatment - How does it Work? Implementation Strategies from Eight Specialised Psychiatric Hospitals and Departments in Germany]. / Stationsäquivalente Behandlung ­ Wie geht das? Umsetzungsstrategien aus acht psychiatrischen Fachkliniken und -abteilungen in Deutschland.

To get information about different ways inpatient equivalent treatment (IET) is implemented and organized eight specialized psychiatric hospitals and departments in Germany were asked to report on implementation details. OUTCOME: Organization and treatment processes depend on local conditions and existing structures. Legal barriers complicate the implementation process, however patients as well as team members report very positive experiences.Current data only give first hints but aren't sufficient to draw viable conclusions. Consequential issues will be picked up within the AKtiV-Study of the Innovationsfonds.

[Outsourcing of nursing staff costs in psychiatry? : A secondary data analysis of possible effects on the remuneration system in psychiatry]. / Ausgliederung der Pflegekosten in der Psychiatrie? : Eine Sekundärdatenanalyse möglicher Auswirkungen auf das PEPP-System.

BACKGROUND: Nursing staff were excluded from the German DRG system for somatic hospital treatment and will be funded separately in the future. In psychiatry and psychosomatic medicine, binding personnel requirements have been defined but there has been no regulation of how these personnel requirements are adequately financed. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to analyze the costs of inpatient psychiatry and psychosomatic medicine and to evaluate possible effects of funding nursing staff separately. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This analysis is based on aggregated daily treatment costs of selected hospitals (data year 2018), which annually submit their performance and cost data to the Institute for the Hospital Remuneration System (InEK) for the empirical further development of the remuneration system. RESULTS: Nursing staff represent the largest cost factor in inpatient psychiatry and psychosomatic medicine. Excluding nursing staff drastically reduces the variance of psychiatric DRG renumeration and even exceeds its proportion of the total costs. After outsourcing nursing costs, psychiatric DRGs achieve only a very limited cost separation. CONCLUSION: The binding personnel requirements necessitate adequate financing of nursing staff. This raises the debate about the further development of psychiatric remuneration. The question arises as to whether the effort associated with using the psychiatric DRG system justifies its usefulness as an instrument for budgeting when core functions such as cost separation are only given to a limited extent. Alternative approaches to budgeting should also be examined for putting costs and benefits in a better ratio.

Implementation, efficacy, costs and processes of inpatient equivalent home-treatment in German mental health care (AKtiV): protocol of a mixed-method, participatory, quasi-experimental trial.

BACKGROUND: Over the last decades, many high-income countries have successfully implemented assertive outreach mental health services for acute care. Despite evidence that these services entail several benefits for service users, Germany has lagged behind and has been slow in implementing outreach services. In 2018, a new law enabled national mental health care providers to implement team-based crisis intervention services on a regular basis, allowing for different forms of Inpatient Equivalent Home Treatment (IEHT). IEHT is similar to the internationally known Home Treatment or Crisis Resolution Teams. It provides acute psychiatric treatment at the user's home, similar to inpatient hospital treatment in terms of content, flexibility, and complexity. METHODS/DESIGN: The presented naturalistic, quasi-experimental cohort study will evaluate IEHT in ten hospitals running IEHT services in different German regions. Within a multi-method research approach, it will evaluate stakeholders' experiences of care, service use, efficacy, costs, treatment processes and implementation processes of IEHT from different perspectives. Quantitative surveys will be used to recruit 360 service users. Subsequently, 180 service users receiving IEHT will be compared with 180 matched statistical 'twins' receiving standard inpatient treatment. Assessments will take place at baseline as well as after 6 and 12 months. The primary outcome is the hospital re-admission rate within 12 months. Secondary outcomes include the combined readmission rate, total number of inpatient hospital days, treatment discontinuation rate, quality of life, psycho-social functioning, job integration, recovery, satisfaction with care, shared decision-making, and treatment costs. Additionally, the study will assess the burden of care and satisfaction with care among relatives or informal caregivers. A collaborative research team made up of researchers with and without lived experience of mental distress will conduct qualitative investigations with service users, caregivers and IEHT staff teams to explore critical ingredients and interactions between implementation processes, treatment processes, and outcomes from a stakeholder perspective. DISCUSSION: By integrating outcome, process and implementation research as well as different stakeholder perspectives and experiences in one study, this trial captures the various facets of IEHT as a special form of home treatment. Therefore, it allows for an adequate, comprehensive evaluation on different levels of this complex intervention. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Trial registrations: 1) German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS), DRKS000224769. Registered December 3rd 2020, https://www.drks.de/drks_web/setLocale_EN.do ; 2) ClinicalTrials.gov, Identifier: NCT0474550 . Registered February 9th 2021.

[Advanced Nursing Practice in the Psychiatric and Mental Health Context - Overview and Comparison of the Different Advanced Psychiatric Nursing Roles]. / Advanced Nursing Practice im psychiatrisch-psychosozialen Kontext.

OBJECTIVES: Informative and insightful overview of the concept of Advanced Nursing Practice (ANP) and its specific facets with a focus on the psychiatric and mental health care context. METHODS: Systematic literature search in specific electronic databases (PubMed, CINAHL, Google and GoogleScholar) and synthesis of identified sources based on Mayring's structuring content analysis. RESULTS: In the psychiatric and mental health context, the Clinical Nurse Specialist and Nurse Practitioner are the classic roles of Advanced Nursing Practice. Their educational training, tasks and activities as well as their field of work show many similarities. In addition to the core elements of the ANP roles, there are strong individual characteristics depending on the work setting and patient population. CONCLUSIONS: It is important that the international experience of role development and implementation as well as the specific fields of action are integrated into the German-speaking area. This will allow specialized, expanded and advanced psychiatric care to be established effectively and on a long-term basis in German-speaking countries.

[Tasks and Activities of Nurses in Inpatient General Psychiatry - Results of a Delphi-Study]. / Aufgaben und Tätigkeiten der Pflege in der stationären Allgemeinpsychiatrie ­ Ergebnisse einer Delphi-Studie.

OBJECTIVES: To find a consensus of tasks and activities of nursing in inpatient general psychiatry. METHODS: Delphi survey for consensus finding with n = 235 (round 1) and n = 193 (round 2) experts of psychiatric nursing. RESULTS: Overall, a consensus based on expert opinion regarding the tasks and activities of nursing in inpatient general psychiatry, consisting of 79 items, was generated. CONCLUSIONS: Further research is needed regarding to the tasks and activities of nursing in special psychiatric and mental health settings and to the minimum qualification requirements of psychiatric nurses.