RESUMEN
Background: We aim to obtain clinical trial data regarding the safety, efficacy, and usefulness of invasive laser acupuncture (ILA) for non-specific chronic low back pain (NSCLBP) through a randomized placebo-controlled trial. Methods: Our clinical trial will be an assessor- and patient-blinded, prospective, parallel-arm, multi-center, randomized placebo-controlled clinical trial. One hundred and six participants with NSCLBP will be allocated evenly to the 650 ILA or control group. All participants will receive education on exercise and self-management. The 650 ILA group will undergo 650 nm ILA for 10 min, and the control group will undergo sham ILA for 10 min per visit, twice a week for 4 weeks, at bilateral GB30, BL23, BL24, and BL25. The primary outcome will be the proportion of responders (≥30% reduction in pain visual analogue scale [VAS] without increased use of painkillers) at 3 days after the intervention ends. The secondary outcomes will include changes in the scores of the VAS, European Quality of Life Five Dimension Five Level scale, and Korean version of the Oswestry Disability Index at 3 days after the intervention ends and 8 weeks after the intervention ends. Discussions: The results of our study will provide clinical evidence concerning the safety and efficacy of 650 nm ILA for the management of NSCLBP. Clinical trial registration: https://cris.nih.go.kr/cris/search/detailSearch.do?search_lang=E&focus=reset_12&search_page=M&pageSize=10&page=undefined&seq=21591&status=5&seq_group=21591, identifier KCT0007167.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Low back pain (LBP) is a common symptom that affects almost 80% of the global population. LBP manifests as diverse pathologies and has different causes. The focus of this paper is nonspecific chronic low back pain (NSCLBP) wherein the pain lasts for more than 12 weeks, and for which there is no definite cause. Although there are various treatment options for NSCLBP, including medication and exercise, each option has its own limitations. Although electroacupuncture (EA) has been known to have useful analgesic effects on chronic LBP, there is no systematic review (SR) on EA in the literature. Therefore, this study aims to systematically review and validate the effectiveness and safety of EA for NSCLBP. METHODS: We will search for randomized controlled trials on the use of EA for NSCLBP in multiple electronic databases, manual searches, and contacting authors. We will screen and select studies according to the predefined criteria and extract the data needed for this SR. The primary outcome will be the pain index (Visual Analog Scale and Numeric Rating Scale), and the secondary outcomes will be the functional status (Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire), patient-centered outcomes, and adverse events. We will perform a meta-analysis using Review Manager software (Version 5.3; Copenhagen; The Nordic Cochrane Center, The Cochrane Collaboration, 2014) and assess the risk of bias using Cochrane Collaboration "risk of bias" tools and the quality of evidence using the Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation. RESULTS: Our SR will investigate the effectiveness and safety of EA on NSCLBP. CONCLUSION: Our SR will support the published clinical evidence of the usage of EA for NSCLBP to assess the effectiveness and safety of EA. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: INPLASY; INPLASY2020120039.
Asunto(s)
Dolor Crónico/terapia , Electroacupuntura/métodos , Dolor de la Región Lumbar/terapia , Adolescente , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Metaanálisis como Asunto , Dimensión del Dolor , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Proyectos de Investigación , Revisiones Sistemáticas como Asunto , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Low back pain is a very common disease. Many patients with chronic low back pain (CLBP) have been treated by complementary and alternative medicine such as acupuncture (AT) treatment. A type of AT, thread embedding acupuncture (TEA), consists of a thread that can continually stimulate at the AT points and has mechanical and chemical effects. Although TEA was widely used in clinical practice, there was little evidence of its efficacy and safety for CLBP. METHODS: This clinical trial was randomized, controlled, assessor-blinded, two-armed, parallel, and conducted in multiple centers. Four Korean medical institutions recruited 38 outpatients with CLBP. The participants were randomly allocated to a treatment group (TEA combined with AT) or a control group (only AT) in a 1:1 ratio. All participants received conventional AT twice a week for 8 weeks (16 sessions) at 15 AT points (GV3 and bilateral BL23, BL24, BL25, BL26, BL40, BL60, and EX-B5) and the treatment group participants additionally received TEA once a week for 8 weeks (8 sessions) on 10 AT points in the multifidus, spinal erector, and lumbar quadrate muscles. The primary outcome measure of this study was the change of visual analog scale (VAS) from baseline (0 week) to the end of intervention (8 weeks). Secondary outcome measures included clinically relevant improvement (minimal clinically important difference) and 3% to 50% decrease on VAS, disability level (Korean version of Roland and Morris disability questionnaire), quality of life (Korean version of European quality of life 5dimension), global assessment (patient global impression of change), economic analysis, credibility test, and safety assessment. RESULTS: The treatment group showed a significant reduction in VAS scores when compared with the control group (-33.7â±â25.1 vs -15.6â±â17.0, Pâ=â.013). As for the secondary outcome measures, the treatment group showed significant difference in 50% decrease on VAS and patient global impression of change. There was no serious adverse event associated with TEA and AT. CONCLUSION: This clinical trial documents the efficacy and safety of TEA combined with AT for the management of CLBP.
Asunto(s)
Terapia por Acupuntura/métodos , Dolor de la Región Lumbar/terapia , Adulto , Anciano , Dolor Crónico , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Dimensión del Dolor , Calidad de Vida , República de Corea , Método Simple Ciego , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Low back pain is a common symptom and continuous or recurrent pain results in chronic low back pain (CLBP). While many patients with CLBP have tried various treatments, complementary and alternative medicine including acupuncture and herbal medicine is one of the commonly used treatments. Palmijihwang-hwan is a herbal medicine used frequently in clinical practice but there has been no report of the efficacy, safety, or cost-effectiveness analysis of Palmijihwang-hwan for CLBP. METHODS: This study is a randomized, assessor-blinded, multicenter, clinical trial with two parallel groups. Four Korean medicine hospitals will recruit 84 participants and randomly allocate them into the control or treatment group in a 1:1 ratio. The control group will receive acupuncture treatment at 11 local and 4 distal acupuncture points for 20 min twice a week for 6 weeks. The treatment group will receive the same acupuncture treatment as the control group and also take Palmijihwang-hwan for 6 weeks. The primary outcome will be the change in visual analog scale (VAS) score between baseline (visit 1) and completion of the intervention (visit 12), and secondary outcomes will be pain-related clinical relevance (minimal clinical important difference or the proportion of the participants who decrease more than 30, or 50% on VAS), disability (Roland and Morris Disability Questionnaire), quality of life (EuroQol-5D), global assessment (Patient Global Impression of Change), and economic analysis (cost-effectiveness and cost-utility analysis). Additionally, safety will be assessed. DISCUSSION: The results of our study will provide the clinical evidence about the efficacy, safety, and cost-effectiveness analysis of Palmijihwang-hwan for CLBP. There will be a chance to provide multiple subdivided influence of this treatment with various outcome measures, but lack of placebo is our limitation. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical Research Information Service, KCT0002998. Registered on 12 July 2018.
Asunto(s)
Dolor Crónico , Dolor de la Región Lumbar , Medicina Tradicional Coreana/métodos , Fitoterapia/métodos , Calidad de Vida , Terapia por Acupuntura/métodos , Adulto , Dolor Crónico/diagnóstico , Dolor Crónico/psicología , Dolor Crónico/terapia , Humanos , Dolor de la Región Lumbar/diagnóstico , Dolor de la Región Lumbar/psicología , Dolor de la Región Lumbar/terapia , Estudios Multicéntricos como Asunto , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud , Manejo del Dolor/métodos , Dimensión del Dolor/métodos , Plantas Medicinales , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como AsuntoRESUMEN
We present an experimental method to determine color appearance shifts under high-dynamic-range conditions. A couple of light booths with variable luminance provide high-dynamic-range luminance conditions, and a perceptual color shift between the two booths is determined using color appearance matching. For red, green, yellow, and blue groups of four surface color samples, color shifts were measured for nine subjects under a dual illumination at background luminance levels of $100\,\,{{\rm cd/m}^2}$100cd/m2 and $4700\,\,{{\rm cd/m}^2}$4700cd/m2. We observed significant perceptual hue shifts toward blue with magnitudes of 2.5 to 3.9 and 5.0 to 6.9 CIELAB units, for the red and green samples, respectively, and decreases in chroma for most samples when changed from low to high luminances.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Back pain is one of the most common diseases, and many patients with recurrent pain seek alternative treatment strategies. Thread embedding acupuncture involves thread insertion at the acupuncture point for continuous physical and chemical stimulation. Although thread embedding is widely used in clinical practice, there is no sound evidence of its efficacy for chronic back pain. We describe the protocol for a randomized controlled trial for investigation of the efficacy and safety of thread embedding acupuncture combined with conventional acupuncture for chronic low back pain. METHODS: This randomized, controlled, assessor-blinded, 2-armed, parallel, multicenter clinical trial will include 38 outpatients with chronic low back pain recruited from 4 traditional Korean Medicine hospitals. The patients will be randomly allocated to a treatment group (conventional acupuncture + thread embedding acupuncture) and a control group (only conventional acupuncture) in a 1:1 ratio. The treatment group patients will receive thread embedding acupuncture treatment at 10 acupuncture points (multifidus muscle, 4 points; spinal erector muscles, four points; lumbar quadrate muscle, 2 points) once a week for 8 weeks (8 sessions). In addition, all patients will receive conventional acupuncture treatment at 14 acupuncture points (GV3, EX-B5, and bilateral BL23, BL24, BL25, BL26, BL40, and BL60) twice a week for 8 weeks (16 sessions). The primary outcome will be the change in the visual analog scale score from visit 1 to visit 16, analyzed by independent t tests, in both groups. The groups will also be compared with regard to the clinical relevance (minimal clinically important difference), quality of life (3-level version of Euroqol-5D), disability level (Roland and Morris Disability Questionnaire), global assessment (patient global impression of change), and safety. Cost data for cost-benefit and cost-effectiveness analyses will be collected. DISCUSSION: Our study results will provide evidence of the efficacy and safety of thread embedding acupuncture combined with conventional acupuncture for the management of chronic low back pain. Even though the assessors will be blinded, the patients will not be blinded to treatment because of the lack of a sham embedding acupuncture group; this is a limitation of our study. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical Research Information Service: KCT0002666.