Similarity judgments predict N400 amplitude differences between taxonomic category members and thematic associates.

Human similarity judgments do not reliably conform to the predictions of leading theories of psychological similarity. Evidence from the triad similarity judgment task shows that people often identify thematic associates like dog and bone as more similar than taxonomic category members like dog and cat, even though thematic associates lack the type of featural or relational similarity that is foundational to theories of psychological similarity. This specific failure to predict human behavior has been addressed as a consequence of education and other individual differences, an artifact of the triad similarity judgment paradigm, or a shortcoming in psychological accounts of similarity. We investigated the judged similarity of semantically-related concepts (taxonomic category members and thematic associates) as it relates to other task-independent measures of semantic knowledge and access. Participants were assessed on reading and language ability, then event-related potentials (ERPs) were collected during a passive, sequential word reading task that presented pseudowords and taxonomically-related, thematically-related, and unrelated word sequences, and, finally, similarity judgments were collected with the classic two-alternative forced-choice triad task. The results uncovered a correspondence between ERP amplitude and triad-based similarity judgments-similarity judgment behavior reliably predicts ERP amplitude during passive word reading, absent of any instruction to consider similarity. It was also found that individual differences in reading and language ability independently predicted ERP amplitude. This evidence suggests that similarity judgments are driven by reliable patterns of thought that are not solely rooted in the interpretation of task goals or reading and language ability.

Sorting out the problem of inert knowledge: Category construction to promote spontaneous transfer.

A fundamental goal in the study of human cognition is to understand the transfer of knowledge. This goes hand-in-hand with the translational goal of promoting such transfer via instructional techniques. Despite a rich history of research using the analogical problem-solving paradigm, no study activity has been found to produce a robust rate of successful spontaneous transfer-even when the test is immediate. We propose the category status hypothesis as an explanation of the difficulty of transfer and as motivation for a novel approach to promoting transfer. We report a set of experiments evaluating a category construction technique based on a sorting task. In Experiment 1a, we found category construction to be significantly more effective than the "gold standard" of schema abstraction through comparison of 2 analogous cases. In Experiment 1b, we explored a variation of the category construction technique that did not reliably differ in effectiveness from comparison-based schema abstraction-we also verified that both study tasks were superior to a baseline task of separate summarization of 2 cases. In Experiment 2, we conducted a replication of the initial design with higher power and confirmed the significant advantage for category construction over schema abstraction via comparison. In Experiment 3, we compared category construction to an information-consistent reading comprehension control to evaluate competing interpretations of the category construction advantage found in Experiments 1 and 2. We discuss theoretical and applied implications of these findings. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).

Similarity is as similarity does? A critical inquiry into the effect of thematic association on similarity.

Leading theories of psychological similarity are based on the degree of match in semantic content between compared cases (i.e., shared features, low dimensional distance, alignable relations). Broader forms of semantic relatedness such as the degree of association between cases (e.g., egg and spatula) are generally not considered to contribute to similarity judgments. However, empirical work has demonstrated a behavioral tendency to choose associated pairs over proximal pairs (i.e., high semantic content overlap) in similarity judgement tasks. As a result, models have been proposed that combine thematic integration and content match as component processes of similarity. The present experiments investigate the thematic association effect in similarity in order to more clearly determine whether such a theoretical redirection is warranted. An alternative viewpoint is that confusion between similarity and association is the cause of the reported thematic bias. Experiment 1 introduces a modified similarity judgement task and addresses the impact of task instructions as a potential causal factor underlying the thematic association effect on similarity. Experiment 2 specifically compares the novel similarity task to a traditional two-alternative, forced choice triad task. Experiment 3 addresses the possibility of bias in the stimulus sets used in Experiments 1 and 2. Across the experiments we find association-based responding to be much less prevalent than in previous demonstrations: the traditional finding of a thematic preference only occurred when participants were specifically asked to select based on associativity ("goes with"). Modifications to conventional methodology that minimize biasing factors clearly attenuate the effect of association on similarity. We interpret these findings as evidence that that the thematic association effect derives from intrusions on psychological similarity, not from an additional component intrinsic to psychological similarity.

Rapid Learning in a Children's Museum via Analogical Comparison.

We tested whether analogical training could help children learn a key principle of elementary engineering-namely, the use of a diagonal brace to stabilize a structure. The context for this learning was a construction activity at the Chicago Children's Museum, in which children and their families build a model skyscraper together. The results indicate that even a single brief analogical comparison can confer insight. The results also reveal conditions that support analogical learning.