The Impact of Preoperative Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction on Postoperative Outcomes in Lumbar Spine Degenerative Disease: 3-Month and 12-Month Results of a Pilot Study.

BACKGROUND: We previously reported inpatient and 30-day postoperative patient-reported outcomes (PROs) of a controlled, noncrossover pilot study using preoperative mindfulness-based stress reduction (MBSR) training for lumbar spine surgery. Our goal here was to assess 3-month and 12-month postoperative PROs of preoperative MBSR in lumbar spine surgery for degenerative disease. METHODS: Intervention group participants were prospectively enrolled in a preoperative online MBSR course. A comparison standard care only group was one-to-one matched retrospectively by age, sex, surgery type, and prescription opioid use. Three-month and 12-month postoperative PROs for pain, disability, quality of life, and opioid use were compared within and between groups. Regression models were used to assess whether MBSR use predicted outcomes. RESULTS: Twenty-four participants were included in each group. At 3 months, follow-up was 87.5% and 95.8% in the comparison and intervention groups, respectively. In the intervention group, mean Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System-Physical Function (PROMIS-PF) was significantly higher, whereas mean Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System-Pain Interference (PROMIS-PI) and Oswestry Disability Index were significantly lower. The change from baseline in mean PROMIS-PF and PROMIS-PI was significantly greater than in the comparison group. At 12 months, follow-up was 58.3% and 83.3% in the comparison and intervention groups, respectively. In the intervention group, mean PROMIS-PI was significantly lower and change in mean PROMIS-PI from baseline was significantly greater. MBSR use was a significant predictor of change in PROMIS-PF at 3 months and in PROMIS-PI at 12 months. No adverse events were reported. CONCLUSIONS: Three-month and 12-month results suggest that preoperative MBSR may have pain control benefits in lumbar spine surgery.

Vitamin D status in cervical spondylotic myelopathy: comparison of fusion rates and patient outcome measures.

BACKGROUND: Patients undergoing elective spinal fusion have an alarming rate of vitamin D deficiency, but its impact on bone fusion and patient outcomes is unclear. We investigated the association of perioperative vitamin D levels, fusion rates, and patient-reported outcome in patients undergoing spinal fusion for cervical spondylotic myelopathy. METHODS: In this one-year, prospective, single-center observational study, serum 25-OH vitamin D levels were measured perioperatively in adult patients. Serum vitamin D levels <30 ng/mL were considered abnormal. The primary outcome measures were postoperative patient-reported outcomes (Neck Disability Index, Visual Analog Scale, EuroQol EQ-5D-3L, EQ-VAS). Secondary outcome measures were the presence of and time to solid bony fusion, controlling for Body Mass Index (BMI), age, and number of motion segments. RESULTS: Forty-one of 58 patients (71%) had laboratory-confirmed abnormal vitamin D levels. Patients with low vitamin D were younger (P<0.05) and had a higher BMI (P<0.05) than patients with adequate vitamin D, but the groups were otherwise similar. There were no differences in mean time to fusion between the two groups, but patients with low vitamin D reported more postoperative disability (P<0.05). Multivariate model analysis demonstrated an independent, significant association between normal vitamin D and lower postoperative neck disability index (P=0.05) and EQ-5D-3L (P=0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Vitamin D deficiency (<30 ng/mL) is highly prevalent in patients undergoing elective spinal fusion for cervical myelopathy. Low vitamin D levels were associated with worse patient-reported outcomes and were an independent predictor of greater disability, which suggests vitamin D supplementation may offer some benefit in these patients.

The Impact of Preoperative Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction on Postoperative Patient-Reported Pain, Disability, Quality of Life, and Prescription Opioid Use in Lumbar Spine Degenerative Disease: A Pilot Study.

BACKGROUND: Prescription opioid medications negatively affect postoperative outcomes after lumbar spine surgery. Furthermore, opioid-related overdose death rates in the United States increased by 200% between 2000 and 2014. Thus, alternatives are imperative. Mindfulness-based stress reduction (MBSR), a mind-body therapy, has been associated with improved activity and mood in opioid-using patients with chronic pain. This study assessed whether preoperative MBSR is an effective adjunct to standard postoperative care in adult patients undergoing lumbar spine surgery for degenerative disease. METHODS: The intervention group underwent a preoperative online MBSR course. The comparison group was matched retrospectively in a 1:1 ratio by age, sex, type of surgery, and preoperative opioid use. Prescription opioid use during hospital admission and at 30 days postoperatively were compared with preoperative use. Thirty-day postoperative patient-reported outcomes for pain, disability, and quality of life were compared with preoperative patient-reported outcomes. Dose-response effect of mindfulness courses was assessed using Mindful Attention Awareness Scale scores. RESULTS: In this pilot study, 24 participants were included in each group. Most intervention patients (70.83%) completed 1 session, and the mean Mindful Attention Awareness Scale score was 4.28 ± 0.71 during hospital admission. At 30 days, mean visual analog scale back pain score was lower in the intervention group (P = 0.004) but other patient-reported outcomes did not differ. CONCLUSIONS: During hospital admission, no significant dose-response effect of mindfulness techniques was found. At 30 days postoperatively, MBSR use was associated with less back pain. Further research is needed to assess the effectiveness of preoperative MBSR on postoperative outcomes in lumbar spine surgery for degenerative disease.

Comparing clinical outcomes of repeat discectomy versus fusion for recurrent disc herniation utilizing the N2QOD.

OBJECTIVE Recurrent lumbar disc herniation (RLDH) is a significant cause of morbidity in patients undergoing lumbar discectomy and has been reported to occur in up to 18% of cases. While repeat discectomy is often successful in treating these patients, concern over repeat RLDH may lead surgeons to advocate instrumented fusion even in the absence of instability. The authors' goal was to compare clinical outcomes for patients undergoing repeat discectomy versus instrumented fusion for RLDH. METHODS The authors used the National Neurosurgery Quality and Outcomes Database (N2QOD) to assess outcomes of patients who underwent repeat discectomy versus instrumented fusion at a single institution from 2012 to 2015. Primary outcomes included Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) score, visual analog scale (VAS) score, and quality-adjusted life year (QALY) measures. Secondary outcomes included hospital length of stay, discharge status, and hospital charges. RESULTS The authors identified 25 repeat discectomy and 12 instrumented fusion patients with 3- and 12-month follow-up records. The groups had similar ODI and VAS scores and QALY measurements at 3 and 12 months. Patients in the instrumented fusion group had significantly longer hospitalizations (3.7 days vs 1.0 days, p < 0.001) and operative times (229.6 minutes vs 82.7 minutes, p < 0.001). They were also more likely to be female (p = 0.020) and to be discharged to inpatient rehabilitation instead of home (p = 0.036). Hospital charges for the instrumented fusion group were also significantly higher ($54,458.29 vs $11,567.05, p < 0.001). Rates of reoperation were higher in the repeat discectomy group (12% vs 0%), but the difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.211). CONCLUSIONS Repeat discectomy and instrumented fusion result in similar clinical outcomes at short-term follow-up. Patients undergoing repeat discectomy had significantly shorter operative times and length of stay, and they incurred dramatically lower hospital charges. They were also less likely to require acute rehabilitation postoperatively. Further research is needed to compare these two management strategies.

Comparison of Clinical Outcomes in the National Neurosurgery Quality and Outcomes Database for Open Versus Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion.

STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective database review. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare data on various pain and functional outcomes for patients who underwent minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MiTLIF) and those who had open TLIF to better delineate which patients may benefit from each procedure. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: TLIF is a highly successful technique for the treatment of patients with degenerative instability or deformity. Minimally invasive approaches have been developed in an effort to improve outcomes by reducing tissue trauma and minimizing surgical time and blood loss. Although these approaches have been compared in the literature, there continues to be a debate about which patients may benefit from each procedure, and there is a dearth of information regarding short-term outcomes such as disposition status. METHODS: We used the National Neurosurgery Quality and Outcomes Database (N2QOD) to assess outcomes of patients who underwent open or MiTLIF at a single institution from 2012 to 2014. Primary outcomes included Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scores, and secondary outcomes included hospital length of stay, blood loss, discharge status, and return to work. RESULTS: We identified 98 patients with 3- and 12-month follow-up records. The open and MiTLIF groups had similar improvements in ODI and VAS at 3 and 12 months. MiTLIF patients had a significantly longer hospital stay (5.0 vs. 3.8 days for open TLIF, P < 0.001) and were more likely to discharge to a location other than home (P < 0.021). Open TLIF patients had shorter mean operative time (235 vs. 329 minutes for MiTLIF, P < 0.001) and more blood loss (307 vs. 120.2 mL for MiTLIF, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Although each approach demonstrated advantages and disadvantages, outcome measures at short-term follow-up were largely equivalent, suggesting that the selection of procedure should be based on which approach will offer the superior individual outcome. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4.

Vitamin D Levels and 1-Year Fusion Outcomes in Elective Spine Surgery: A Prospective Observational Study.

STUDY DESIGN: Prospective observational study. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the association of perioperative vitamin D levels and nonunion rates and time to fusion in patients undergoing elective spine fusion. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Although there is a clear link between bone mineral density and the risk of osteoporosis, it is unclear whether low vitamin D levels affect rates and timing of spinal fusion. METHODS: Serum 25-OH vitamin D levels were measured perioperatively in adults undergoing elective spinal fusion between 2011 and 2012. Vitamin D levels <20 ng/mL were considered deficient. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression were performed to identify independent predictors of pseudarthrosis/nonunion within a minimum follow-up period of 12 months. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to compare time to fusion between groups. RESULTS: Of the 133 patients, 31 (23%) demonstrated vitamin D deficiency. Mean patient age was 57 ± 13 years; 44% were female and 94% were Caucasian. The cervical spine was fused in 49%, the lumbar spine in 47%, and the thoracic spine in 4%. Mean construct length was 2 levels (range 1-16). At 12-month follow-up, 112/133 (84%) patients demonstrated fusion (median time to fusion 8.4 mo). Nonunion at 12 months was associated with vitamin D deficiency (20% of patients with adequate vitamin D level vs. 38% of vitamin D-deficient patients, P = 0.063). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis demonstrated time to fusion was significantly longer in the vitamin D-deficient group (12 vs. 6 mo, P = 0.001). On multivariate analysis, vitamin D deficiency was an independent predictor of nonunion (odds ratio 3.449, P = 0.045) when adjusted for age, sex, obesity, fusion length, location, graft type, smoking, and bone morphogenetic protein use. CONCLUSION: Vitamin D levels may affect nonunion rate and time to fusion. These results offer insight into the importance of the metabolic milieu for bony fusion as well as a potential avenue for therapeutic intervention. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.

Prevalence of Vitamin D Deficiency in Patients Undergoing Elective Spine Surgery: A Cross-Sectional Analysis.

OBJECTIVE: Decreased bone density secondary to osteoporosis and osteomalacia represents a significant risk factor for bony fracture and spinal instrumentation failure. We evaluated the incidence of vitamin D deficiency in patients undergoing elective spinal instrumentation to investigate which patient-level risk factors are associated with deficient vitamin D levels. METHODS: Serum 25-OH vitamin D levels were evaluated postoperatively (<72 hours) in patients undergoing elective spinal fusion from 2011 through 2012. Patients >18 years with a diagnosis of degenerative spinal spondylosis or spinal instability treated with spinal fusion were included. Risk factors for vitamin D deficiency (<20 ng/mL) were analyzed using univariate and multiple logistic regression to identify independent predictors of deficiency. RESULTS: The mean preoperative neck and Oswestry disability indexes of the 230 consecutive patients (mean, 57 ± 13.9 years) were 21.0 ± 9.8 and 22.2 ± 8.5, respectively. Mean 25-OH vitamin D level was 25.9 ± 12.4 ng/mL (range, 6-77 ng/mL). Sixty-nine (30.0%) patients had laboratory-confirmed vitamin D deficiency and 89 (38.9%) had laboratory-confirmed vitamin D insufficiency (20-30 ng/mL). The risk of vitamin D deficiency was greater in men (odds ratio [OR] 2.53; P = 0.009), patients aged 40-60 years (OR 2.45; P = 0.018), and those who had body mass index >40 (OR 7.55; P = 0.004), an existing diagnosis of diabetes (OR 3.29; P = 0.019), or no vitamin D supplementation (OR 4.96; P = 0.043). CONCLUSIONS: Vitamin D deficiency was common in patients with degenerative spondylosis undergoing spinal fusion. Middle-aged patients, men, the morbidly obese, those with a history of diabetes, and those with no history of supplementation had a higher incidence of vitamin D deficiency.