Activation of the interleukin-23/Th17 axis in major depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

The interleukin-23/Th17 axis is a promising modifiable target for depression. However, its association with depression has not been systematically evaluated. We systematically searched four databases (EMBASE, Web of Science, Pubmed and PsycINFO) for studies comparing patients with major depression and healthy controls for plasma/serum levels of Th17 cells and their canonical cytokines (interleukin-17A [IL-17A], IL-22, granulocyte macrophage colony stimulating factor [GM-CSF]). We also compared counts of Th1, Th2 and Th9 cells between depressed/non-depressed patients and their respective canonical cytokines. We performed random-effects meta-analysis of the standardised mean difference (SMD) in immune measures between groups. Risk of bias was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. Of 3154 studies screened, 36 studies were included in meta-analysis. Patients with depression had elevated IL-17A compared to controls (SMD = 0.80 [95% CI 0.03 to 1.58], p = 0.042), an association moderated by antidepressant use (Z = 2.12, p = 0.034). Patients with depression had elevated GM-CSF (SMD = 0.54 [95% CI 0.16 to 0.91], p = 0.0047), and a trend towards higher Th17 counts (SMD = 0.44 [- 0.01 to 0.88], p = 0.052). Whilst the Th2-associated cytokine IL-5 was elevated in depression (SMD = 0.36 [95% CI 0.05 to 0.66], p = 0.02), Th2 cell counts (p = 0.97), Th1 cell counts (p = 0.17) and interferon-γ (p = 0.22) were not. Data for Th9 cells, IL-9 and IL-22 were insufficient for meta-analysis. Respectively, 22, 25 and 5 studies were good, fair and poor in quality. Patients with major depression show peripheral over-activation of the IL-23/Th17 axis. Future interventional studies should test whether this is a modifiable target for depression.

Cognitive Impairment in Adult Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: People living with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) are exposed to multiple risk factors for cognitive impairment and frequently report cognitive difficulties. However, the presence of cognitive impairment in IBD has not been systematically reviewed. METHODS: Following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, we performed a systematic multidatabase search for cross-sectional and longitudinal studies comparing adults with IBD versus healthy controls for domain-specific cognitive function or scores on multidomain cognitive screening tools. For any domain reported by 3 or more studies, we conducted random-effects meta-analysis to calculate the standardized mean difference between groups; lower scores reflected poorer performance. Between-study heterogeneity was assessed using the I2 statistic and study quality assessed using an IBD-modified Newcastle-Ottawa scale. RESULTS: Of 8302 articles screened, 12 studies (n = 687) were included in the qualitative synthesis and 11 in meta-analyses. All studies were cross-sectional. Studies generally excluded people with active IBD and older adults. Despite no significant differences on multidomain screening tools such as the Mini Mental State Examination (-0.27 [95% confidence interval -0.68, 0.08], P = 0.14), people with IBD showed significant deficits compared with healthy controls in attention (standardized mean difference -0.36 [-0.60, -0.12], P = 0.003, I2 = 0%), executive function (standardized mean difference -0.45 [-0.77, -0.13, P = 0.005, I2 = 42.5%), and specifically in working memory (standardized mean difference -0.58 [-0.85, -0.30], P < 0.001, I2 = 0%). Deficits in learning and recall were nonsignificant (P = 0.089) and other domains insufficient for meta-analysis. CONCLUSIONS: People with IBD show deficits in attention and executive function, particularly in working memory, suggesting that cognitive impairment is a potential extraintestinal manifestation of IBD.

The Association Between Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors and Glycemia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

OBJECTIVE: Individual studies have reported conflicting effects of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) on glycemia. We systematically reviewed the effects of SSRIs on glycemia and whether metabolic and psychological factors moderated these effects. METHODS: We systematically searched for placebo-controlled randomized controlled trials investigating the effect of SSRIs on glycemia (fasting blood glucose or HbA1c) as a primary or secondary outcome. Random effects meta-analysis was conducted to compute an overall treatment effect. Meta-regression tested whether depression, type 2 diabetes, insulin resistance, treatment duration, and weight loss moderated treatment effects. RESULTS: Sixteen randomized controlled trials (n = 835) were included and glycemia was usually a secondary outcome. Overall, SSRIs improved glycemia versus placebo (pooled effect size (ES) = -0.34, 95% confidence interval (CI) = -0.48 to -0.21; p < .001, I = 0%). Individually, fluoxetine (ES = -0.29, 95% CI = -0.54 to -0.05; p = .018) and escitalopram/citalopram (ES = -0.33, 95% CI = -0.59 to -0.07; p = .012) outperformed placebo, but paroxetine (ES = -0.19, 95% CI = -0.58 to 0.19; p = .33) did not. Results were similar in populations selected for depression as those not. Across studies, baseline insulin resistance (p = .46), treatment duration (p = .47), diabetes status (p = .41), and weight loss (p = .93) did not moderate changes. Heterogeneity for all analyses was nonsignificant. CONCLUSIONS: SSRIs seem to have an association with improvement in glycemia, which is not moderated by depression status, diabetes status, or change in weight across studies. Future powered trials with longer treatment duration are needed to confirm these findings. REGISTRATION: PROSPERO ID: CRD4201809239.

Repositioning of diabetes treatments for depressive symptoms: A systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical trials.

Depression is a common comorbidity in diabetes but conventional antidepressant treatments do not consistently improve outcomes. We tested whether established diabetes treatments can also improve depressive symptoms and examined biological correlates of response. We performed a multi-database systematic search of all clinical trials, which measured the effect of licensed diabetes treatments on depressive symptoms using a validated questionnaire. Results of randomised controlled trials (RCT's) were pooled for meta-analysis. Data were also collected on insulin resistance (HOMA-IR), C-reactive protein (CRP) and fasting blood glucose (FBG) as correlates of response. Nineteen studies (n = 3369 patients) were included in the qualitative synthesis, 9 testing thiazolidenediones, 5 metformin, 2 thiazolidenediones against metformin, 2 incretin-based therapies and 1 insulin. Most studies were of good quality. In random-effects meta-analysis of RCT's, pioglitazone improved depressive symptoms compared to controls (pooled effect size = -0.68 (95% C.I. -1.12 to -0.24), p = .003, Nstudies = 8, I2 = 83.2%). Conversely, metformin was comparable to controls overall (pooled effect size = +0.32 (95% C.I. -0.23 to 0.88), p = .25, Nstudies = 6, I2 = 94.2%), although inferior to active controls (pooled effect size = +1.32 (95% C.I. 0.31-2.34), p < 0.001, Nstudies = 3, I2 = 90.1%). In random-effects meta-regression, female sex (ß = -0.023, (95% C.I.-0.041 to -0.0041), p = .016, Nstudies = 8) predicted reduction in depressive symptoms with pioglitazone, but baseline HOMA-IR, FBG and severity of depressive symptoms did not. In conclusion, pioglitazone was associated with improvement in depressive symptoms, an effect more marked in women and poorly explained by effects on glycaemia and insulin resistance. Metformin had no consistent benefit on depressive symptoms. Further mechanistc trials of diabetes treatments as potential antidepressants are needed, stratified by sex and including serial measures of innate inflammation.