Altered Visual Reliance Induced by Stroboscopic Glasses during Postural Control.

Little is known about how disrupted vision affects visual reliance during postural control. postural control. Twenty-four physically active adults volunteered to participate in the study. Static postural control was quantified with center of pressure measures during a one-legged balance test with four different visual inputs (eyes-open (EO), high frequency of strobe vision (HSV), low frequency of strobe vision (LSV), and eyes-closed (EC)) and on two different surfaces (firm and foam). Dynamic postural control was calculated by the dynamic postural stability index and the Y-Balance test for three different visual inputs (EO, HSV, and LSV) and the two different surfaces. Romberg ratios (HSV/EO, LSV/EO, and EC/EO) were then calculated and used for statistical analysis to assess visual contribution during postural control. In the results, Romberg ratios were higher when people were on the foam surface than the firm surface in center of pressure total path in medial-lateral and anterior-posterior directions (p < 0.05, both directions). Similarly, Romberg ratios were higher on the foam surface than the firm surface in dynamic stability index in medial-lateral and anterior-posterior directions (p < 0.05, both directions). Stroboscopic glasses could alter visual reliance when the somatosensory system is disturbed by a foam pad during both static and dynamic postural control. Clinicians could use the glasses to manipulate visual reliance during dynamic balance training for patients with musculoskeletal injuries.

Altered movement strategies during jump landing/cutting in patients with chronic ankle instability.

Centrally mediated changes in sensorimotor function have been reported in patients with chronic ankle instability (CAI). However, little is known regarding supraspinal/spinal adaptations during lower-extremity dynamic movement during a multiplanar, single-leg landing/cutting task. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of CAI on landing/cutting neuromechanics, including lower-extremity kinematic, electromyography (EMG) activation, and ground reaction force (GRF) characteristics. One hundred CAI patients and 100 matched healthy controls performed five trials of a jump landing/cutting task. Sagittal- and frontal-plane ankle, knee and hip kinematics, EMG activation in eight lower-extremity muscles, and 3D GRF were collected during jump landing/cutting. Functional analyses of variance (FANOVA) were used to evaluate between-group differences for dependent variables throughout the entire ground contact of the task. Relative to the control group, the CAI group revealed (a) reduced dorsiflexion, increased knee and hip flexion angles, (b) increased inversion and hip adduction angles, (c) increased EMG activation of medial gastrocnemius, peroneus longus, adductor longus, vastus lateralis, gluteus medius, and gluteus maximus, and (d) increased posterior and vertical GRF during initial landing, and reduced medial, posterior, and vertical GRF during mid-landing and mid-cutting. CAI patients demonstrated alterations in landing/cutting movement strategies as demonstrated by a higher susceptibility of foot placement for lateral ankle sprains, and more flexed positions of the knee and hip with higher EMG activation of knee and hip extensors to modulate GRF to compensate for the unstable ankle. This apparent compensation may be due to mechanical (limited dorsiflexion angle) and/or sensorimotor deficits in the ankle.

EMG activity during positive-pressure treadmill running.

Success has been demonstrated in rehabilitation from certain injuries while using positive-pressure treadmills. However, certain injuries progress even with the lighter vertical loads. Our purpose was to investigate changes in muscle activation for various lower limb muscles while running on a positive-pressure treadmill at different amounts of body weight support. We hypothesized that some muscles would show decreases in activation with greater body weight support while others would not. Eleven collegiate distance runners were recruited. EMG amplitude was measured over 12 lower limb muscles. After a short warm-up, subjects ran at 100%, 80%, 60%, and 40% of their body weight for two minutes each. EMG amplitudes were recorded during the final 30s of each stage. Most muscles demonstrated lower amplitudes as body weight was supported. For the hip adductors during the swing phase and the hamstrings during stance, no significant trend appeared. Positive-pressure treadmills may be useful interventions for certain injuries. However, some injuries, such as hip adductor and hamstring tendonitis or strains may require alternative cross-training to relieve stress on those areas. Runners should be careful in determining how much body weight should be supported for various injuries to return to normal activity in the shortest possible time.