Femoral Neck Fractures in Children: Issues, Challenges, and Solutions.

Femoral neck fractures in children are rare injuries resulting from high-energy trauma. Different methods of treatment, lack of standard management protocols, and the high risk of complications make this injury one of the biggest challenges that an orthopaedic surgeon can face. This review focuses on the general aspects of the pediatric femoral neck fracture management as well as its complications and possible solutions.

Is "Early Total Care" a Safe and Effective Alternative to "Staged Protocol" for the Treatment of Schatzker IV-VI Tibial Plateau Fractures in Patients Older Than 50 Years?

OBJECTIVES: To compare "Early Total Care" (ETC) with "Staged Protocol" (SP) for the treatment of Schatzker IV-VI tibial plateau fractures in patients older than 50 years regarding safety and effectiveness. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: An academic level 1 US trauma center. PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS: Eighty-one patients older than 50 years with Schatzker grade IV-VI tibial plateau fractures were included. INTERVENTION: Fifty-three patients were treated under SP with immediate external fixation followed by definitive internal fixation. Twenty-eight patients were treated under ETC with immediate internal fixation. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Comparison of perioperative findings, time to bony and clinical union, soft-tissue and bony complications, radiological outcome, and secondary procedures. RESULTS: The 2 groups were comparable without significant difference regarding age, sex, side of involvement, body mass index, smoking status, American Society of Anesthesiologist classification, associated injuries, comorbidities, follow-up duration, and fracture classification. No statistically significant difference was found regarding the perioperative complications, quality of reduction, time to union, Rasmussen score at union or at the final follow-up, soft-tissue/bony complications, and the rate of the secondary procedures. CONCLUSION: ETC seems to be a safe, efficacious, and effective alternative to the SP for the treatment of some Schatzker IV-VI fractures in patients older than 50 years. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Nail Length in the Management of Intertrochanteric Fracture of the Femur.

Intramedullary devices are used increasingly to treat intertrochanteric femur fractures, especially those with unstable patterns. In spite of the considerable use of nails in the management of these fractures, opinions differ about the correct length of intramedullary nail. Long nails were developed to address the risk of diaphyseal fracture associated with earlier short nail designs and to extend the indications for use to include diaphyseal and subtrochanteric fractures. Several recent studies, however, have found no differences between modern short nails and long nails with regard to union and complication rates. In the absence of existing guidelines, the treating surgeon's preference and fracture characteristics continue to influence the decision of whether to use short nails or long nails. The surgeon needs to consider the fracture configuration and related factors, including whether osteoporosis is present and the cost and risk of revision surgery, when selecting the appropriate nail length.

Role of Sonication for Detection of Infection in Explanted Orthopaedic Trauma Implants.

OBJECTIVES: Sonication is a new technology that uses high-frequency sound waves to mechanically dislodge bacteria adherent in biofilms. Unlike arthroplasty, its role in orthopaedic trauma has not been described. The goal of this study was to explore the utility of sonication in orthopaedic trauma. DESIGN: Retrospective review. SETTING: Level I trauma center. PATIENTS: One hundred forty-six sonicated metallic orthopaedic devices from September 2010 to May 2013 were included. Patients were divided into 3 groups: clinically infected, elective implant removals, and nonunion. INTERVENTION: Sonication culture results were retrospectively reviewed for all patients undergoing implant removal. OUTCOMES: Sonication results were the primary study outcome and were considered positive for culture growth if equal to or greater than 20 colony-forming units per plate. RESULTS: In 32 patients with clinical infection, tissue cultures were positive in 30 (94%) and negative in 2 (6%). In contrast, sonication cultures were positive in 19 patients (59%) and did not identify additional organisms. Of the 72 patients who underwent elective implant removal, 52 had pain. Sonication cultures were positive in 5 of these 52 patients (10%) and in 0 of 20 patients with no pain. Sonication culture results were negative in all 42 patients who underwent nonunion surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Sonication of orthopaedic trauma implants in patients with clinically apparent infection or "aseptic" nonunion offered negligible additional information. Sonication demonstrated a positive microbiologic yield in a subset of patients with painful implants; further research is required to better establish the frequency of subclinical infection and to determine the diagnostic role of traditional cultures and sonication. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Diagnostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Percutaneous and Mucocutaneous Exposure Among Orthopaedic Surgeons: Immediate Management and Compliance With CDC Protocol.

BACKGROUND: Orthopaedic surgeons are at a high risk of sustaining a percutaneous or mucocutaneous exposure to blood and body fluids. The Center for Disease Control and Prevention recommends a wash with soap and water and notification of the concerned hospital authorities after any percutaneous/mucocutaneous exposure, but a systematic amenability with these guidelines is not always seen. This cross-sectional study was undertaken to determine current knowledge and practices of orthopaedic surgeons in case of a percutaneous sharp injury exposure, emphasizes the immediate first aid steps taken after an exposure, the degree of reporting, and to explore the reasons for noncompliance. Finally, we sought to create awareness about the prevailing Center for Disease Control and Prevention guidelines after any exposure to blood or body fluids. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional survey using an anonymous prepared questionnaire. The study population included exclusively orthopaedic surgeons, including residents, fellows, and attending physicians at 4 US institutions. The questionnaire was also available online on the OTA Web site as a part of survey monkey. The questionnaire comprised 9 multiple choice questions, and more than 1 response could be given for some questions. The questions addressed previous needle stick/sharp injury exposure, number of times that had happened, whether reported to the hospital administration, reason for nonreporting, and risk perception for transmission of blood-borne pathogens (human immunodeficiency virus, HBsAg, and hepatitis C virus). The questions were also asked based on what should be done in four different clinical settings based on respondents risk perception. RESULTS: Of fifty eight attendings, 7 fellows, 45 residents, and 7 respondents who did not indicate their position participated in the survey for a total of 117 respondents. Out of 99, 24 had sustained it once, 18 twice, 11 three times, and 35 at least 4 times. When questioned about informing the incident to the hospital administration, 38% had always reported the incident, 33% had never reported the incident, and the remaining 29% had not reported it every time. Of note, 87% gave the correct response about the risk of transmission of human immunodeficiency virus after an exposure. On questioning about the risk of hepatitis B transmission, from an HBsAg- and HBeAg-positive source, 13% gave the correct response, whereas from HBsAg-positive and HBeAg-negative source, 30% gave the correct response. Regarding transmission of hepatitis C virus from a positive source, 36% responded correctly. The surgeons seemingly attempted to risk stratify their exposure, and they were more likely to report their exposure in the higher risk scenarios. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that orthopaedic surgeons of all levels of training are at high risk of occupational exposure to blood-borne pathogens. Moreover, despite the level of training, the majority of surgeons do not follow the recommended steps, although we do not know the reasons for such behavior. Also, there is a low awareness of the significant risk of hepatitis transmission among orthopaedic surgeons treating a population with a high prevalence of undiagnosed hepatitis.

What makes an intertrochanteric fracture unstable in 2015? Does the lateral wall play a role in the decision matrix?

Intertrochanteric (IT) fractures pose a tremendous burden to the healthcare system. Although consistently good results are obtained while treating stable IT fractures, treatment failure rates with unstable fractures are much higher, and hence, it is imperative to identify unstable patterns. Presently, the conventionally classified unstable configurations (fracture with posteromedial comminution, reverse oblique, IT with subtrochanteric extension) and the recently added fracture patterns (IT fractures with avulsed greater trochanter and lateral wall breach) qualify as unstable IT fractures; however, the list is certainly not exhaustive. Disruption of lateral wall converts an IT fracture into a reverse oblique fracture equivalent and should be given a strong consideration in the decision matrix.

Intramedullary nailing of tibial shaft fractures distal to total knee arthroplasty.

Tibial shaft fractures distal to total knee arthroplasty are rare, but they are likely to become more common with the increasing number of arthroplasty procedures being performed. These fracture patterns have been treated in the past either with closed reduction and casting/bracing or with open reduction internal fixation using plates. Weight-bearing precautions in the elderly patient population can affect patient disposition, and weight bearing on extramedullary fixation can lead to early hardware failure. We present a series of nailing techniques that can be used for tibial fractures distal to a well-fixed total knee arthroplasty that avoids the tibial baseplate, provides stable fracture fixation, and allows for early weight bearing.

Natural history of anterior chest wall numbness after plating of clavicle fractures: educating patients.

OBJECTIVES: Improved patient outcomes after plating of displaced clavicle fractures have been demonstrated by recent clinical studies. Many of these patients, however, complain of anterior chest wall numbness after this procedure; we hypothesize that numbness likely persists long term for many patients, but without effect on shoulder function. DESIGN: Prospective observational cohort. SETTING: Level 1 trauma center. PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS: Adult patients undergoing plating of a displaced middle third diaphyseal clavicle fracture. INTERVENTION: Open reduction and internal fixation with superior clavicle plating. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: The primary outcome is anterior chest wall numbness size (in square centimeters) and location as measured with a numbness transparency grid. Secondary outcomes include Visual Analog scale, Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand, and Constant scores 1 year postoperatively. RESULTS: Twenty-five of 27 consecutive patients met inclusion/exclusion criteria, with 92% 1-year follow-up. Numbness at 2 weeks is very common, involving 83% of patients, with a mean area of 44 cm. Numbness at 1 year remains relatively common, involving 52% of patients, with a mean area of 15 cm (66% decrease in area from 2 weeks, P = 0.009). Numbness at 2 weeks predicted a 63% chance of continued 1-year numbness (37% resolved); Constant, Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand, and Visual Analog scale pain scores remained excellent in all patients at final follow-up, without correlation between numbness and outcome measures (r < 0.170). CONCLUSIONS: Anterior chest wall numbness after open reduction internal fixation of displaced clavicle fractures is very common in the early postoperative period and may remain high 1 year postoperatively. Numbness 1 year after surgery is not associated with poor clinical outcome measures. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic level IV. See instructions for authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

The effect of preoperative counseling on duration of postoperative opiate use in orthopaedic trauma surgery: a surgeon-based comparative cohort study.

OBJECTIVE: The prudent use of prescription opiates is a central aspect of current postsurgical pain management, but surgeons have no guidelines on appropriate duration of opiate treatment. Furthermore, there are no established data on the effect of physician counseling on the duration of opiate use postoperatively. DESIGN: Retrospective surgeon-controlled cohort study. SETTING: Level I regional academic trauma center. PATIENTS: All Utah residents admitted to the orthopaedic trauma service with isolated operative musculoskeletal injury. INTERVENTION: One group of patients was instructed at the time of index procedure that they would receive prescription opiates for a maximum of 6 weeks. The remaining patients were not counseled preoperatively on duration of opiate use postoperatively. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The presence and frequency of prescription opiate use before injury, cessation of opiate use by 6 weeks postoperatively, cessation of opiates by 12 weeks postoperatively, and continuation of prescription opiates greater than 12 weeks postoperatively. RESULTS: Six hundred thirteen patients met inclusion criteria. Those counseled preoperatively to cease opiate use by 6 weeks were significantly more likely to do so than those who did not receive counseling (73% and 64%, respectively; P = 0.012). By 12 weeks, this effect was no longer seen, and patients were just as likely to have stopped (80% and 80%, respectively; P = 0.90). CONCLUSIONS: The orthopaedic trauma population is significantly more likely than the general population to be using prescription opiates before injury. Physician discussion of 6-week opiate prescription limitation at the time of injury seems to lead to a lower rate of use at the 6-week postoperative mark but has no effect on rates of longer-term use. Twenty percent of patients in either group will continue to use opiates after 12 weeks, compared with 15% before injury. Given the scope of prescription opiate use in the United States, surgeons may want to consider preoperative discussion of this issue, but it may not have any effect on usage rates at longer intervals. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

The reporting of functional outcome instruments in the Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma over a 5-year period.

OBJECTIVES: Orthopaedic journals, such as the Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma, frequently publish studies reporting functional outcome instruments, but little information has been provided regarding the validity and overall strength of these instruments. This study analyzes the trends in reported functional outcome instruments in articles published in the Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma over a 5-year period and examines the utilization rate, "overall" strength, and validity of these functional outcome instruments for the populations being studied. METHODS: Articles that were published in the Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma from January 2006 to December 2010 were reviewed, and each article was assigned to 1 of 4 different categories, based on the subspecialty focus and body region. The total number of articles reporting the use of functional outcome instruments, articles with at least 1 functional outcome instrument found in the AO Handbook, and the total number of functional outcome instruments reported were recorded. Each functional outcome instrument was assigned to 1 of 3 categories (generic, nonvalidated, validated), and each validated instrument was also examined to determine whether the category of interest for which it was used was one in which it was previously validated in. RESULTS: A total of 171 articles (34%) of the articles initially reviewed met the inclusion criteria. The average number of articles per year that reported functional outcome instruments was 56% (range, 47%-65%), and the average number of articles that reported at least 1 validated outcome instrument was 51% (range, 44%-61%). The average percentage of validated scores that were appropriately used within the category of interest was 23% (range, 13%-41%). CONCLUSIONS: Even though the 56% utilization rate of functional outcome instruments in The Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma is much higher than other journals, it is still low given the importance of measuring and attaining excellent functional outcomes. It is clear that future effort should be given to validating outcome measures for correct evaluation of orthopaedic trauma patients.