CYP11B2 inhibitor dexfadrostat phosphate suppresses the aldosterone-to-renin ratio, an indicator of sodium retention, in healthy volunteers.

AIMS: High aldosterone is a key driver of hypertension and long-term negative sequelae. We evaluated the safety and efficacy of dexfadrostat phosphate (DP13), a novel aldosterone synthase (CYP11B2) inhibitor, in healthy participants. METHODS: This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study was conducted in two parts. In part A, a single-ascending dose escalation, 16 participants received oral DP13 1-16 mg. Part B was a multiple-ascending dose, sequential group study in which 32 participants received oral DP13 4, 8 or 16 mg once daily for 8 days. Safety and tolerability were monitored throughout. An adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) stimulation test at maximal blood drug concentrations defined the dose range for multiple dosing. RESULTS: DP13 was well tolerated at all doses, with no serious adverse events. In part B, all DP13 doses (4, 8 and 16 mg) over 8 days effectively suppressed aldosterone production, increased the urinary sodium/potassium ratio, decreased plasma sodium and increased plasma potassium and renin levels compared with placebo, resulting in potent suppression of the aldosterone-to-renin ratio (ARR). Endocrine counter-regulation resulted in the 4 mg dose no longer sustaining 24-h aldosterone suppression after 8 days of treatment, unlike the 8- and 16 mg doses. There was no evidence of drug-induced adrenal insufficiency (ACTH stress challenge). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with excess aldosterone and ensuing sodium retention driving hypertension, managing sodium balance is critical. A CYP11B2 inhibitor like DP13, whose effectiveness can be monitored by a reduction in ARR, may prove valuable in managing aldosterone-dependent hypertension and primary aldosteronism.

Changes in Biomarkers of Exposure on Switching From a Conventional Cigarette to Tobacco Heating Products: A Randomized, Controlled Study in Healthy Japanese Subjects.

BACKGROUND: Smoking is a leading cause of numerous human disorders including pulmonary disease, cardiovascular disease, and cancer. Disease development is primarily caused by exposure to cigarette smoke constituents, many of which are known toxicants. Switching smokers to modified risk tobacco products (MRTPs) has been suggested as a potential means to reduce the risks of tobacco use, by reducing such exposure. METHODS: This randomized, controlled study investigated whether biomarkers of toxicant exposure (BoE) were reduced when smokers switched from smoking combustible cigarettes to using a novel (glo™/THP1.0) or in-market comparator (iQOS/THS) tobacco heating product (THP). One hundred eighty Japanese smokers smoked combustible cigarettes during a 2-day baseline period, followed by randomization to either continue smoking cigarettes, switch to using mentholated or non-mentholated variants of glo™, switch to using a non-mentholated variant of iQOS, or quit nicotine and tobacco product use completely for 5 days. Baseline and post-randomization 24-h urine samples were collected for BoE analysis. Carbon monoxide was measured daily in exhaled breath (eCO). RESULTS: On day 5 after switching, urinary BoE (excluding for nicotine) and eCO levels were significantly (p < .05) reduced by medians between 20.9% and 92.1% compared with baseline in all groups either using glo™ or iQOS or quitting tobacco use. Between-group comparisons revealed that the reductions in the glo™ groups were similar (p > .05) to quitting in many cases. CONCLUSIONS: glo™ or iQOS use for 5 days reduced exposure to smoke toxicants in a manner comparable to quitting tobacco use. THPs are reduced exposure tobacco products with the potential to be MRTPs. IMPLICATIONS: This clinical study demonstrates that when smokers switched from smoking combustible cigarettes to using tobacco heating products their exposure to smoke toxicants was significantly decreased. In many cases, this was to the same extent as that seen when they quit smoking completely. This may indicate that these products have the potential to be reduced exposure and/or reduced risk tobacco products when used by smokers whose cigarette consumption is displaced completely. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATIONS: ISRCTN14301360 and UMIN000024988.

SELECT-3: a phase I study of selumetinib in combination with platinum-doublet chemotherapy for advanced NSCLC in the first-line setting.

BACKGROUND: We investigated selumetinib (AZD6244, ARRY-142886), an oral, potent, and highly selective, allosteric MEK1/2 inhibitor, plus platinum-doublet chemotherapy for patients with advanced/metastatic non-small cell lung cancer. METHODS: In this Phase I, open-label study (NCT01809210), treatment-naïve patients received selumetinib (50, 75, 100 mg BID PO) plus standard doses of gemcitabine or pemetrexed plus cisplatin or carboplatin. Primary objectives were safety, tolerability, and determination of recommended Phase II doses. RESULTS: Fifty-five patients received treatment: selumetinib 50 or 75 mg plus gemcitabine/cisplatin (n=10); selumetinib 50 mg plus gemcitabine/carboplatin (n=9); selumetinib 50, 75 or 100 mg plus pemetrexed/carboplatin (n=21); selumetinib 75 mg plus pemetrexed/cisplatin (n=15). Most frequent adverse events (AEs) were fatigue, nausea, diarrhoea and vomiting. Grade ⩾3 selumetinib-related AEs were reported in 30 (55%) patients. Dose-limiting toxicities (all n=1) were Grade 4 anaemia (selumetinib 75 mg plus gemcitabine/cisplatin), Grade 4 thrombocytopenia/epistaxis and Grade 4 thrombocytopenia (selumetinib 50 mg plus gemcitabine/carboplatin), Grade 4 febrile neutropenia (selumetinib 100 mg plus pemetrexed/carboplatin), and Grade 3 lethargy (selumetinib 75 mg plus pemetrexed/cisplatin). Partial responses were confirmed in 11 (20%) and unconfirmed in 9 (16%) patients. CONCLUSIONS: Standard doses of pemetrexed/carboplatin or pemetrexed/cisplatin were tolerated with selumetinib 75 mg BID. The selumetinib plus gemcitabine-containing regimens were not tolerated.

A randomised, controlled, two-Centre open-label study in healthy Japanese subjects to evaluate the effect on biomarkers of exposure of switching from a conventional cigarette to a tobacco heating product.

BACKGROUND: Smoking is a leading cause of numerous human disorders including lung cancer, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. The development of modified risk tobacco products (MRTPs) has been suggested as a possible way to reduce the risks of tobacco smoking by reducing exposure to cigarette smoke toxicants. This study is designed to investigate whether biomarkers of such exposure are reduced when smokers switch from smoking commercial cigarettes to using either a novel or a commercially-available tobacco heating product (THP). DESIGN AND METHODS: This study will assess biomarkers of exposure in current smokers who either remain smoking, switch to THP use, or quit all tobacco use completely, for 5 days. The study is an in-clinic (confinement) two-centre, randomised controlled clinical study with a forced-switching design. Subjects of either gender will be aged 23-55 years (minimum legal smoking age plus 3 years), of Japanese origin and with a verified smoking status (assessed by exhaled breath carbon monoxide and urinary cotinine levels). Subjects will have a usual brand cigarette within the International Organisation for Standardisation (ISO) tar band of 6-8 mg and will be judged to be healthy by medical history, physical examination, vital signs, electrocardiography (ECG), clinical biochemistry and lung function tests. The primary objective of this study is to assess changes within groups in selected biomarkers of exposure (BoE) and of biological effect (BoBE) after a forced switch from a commercial control cigarette to either a menthol or a non-menthol THP. Secondary objectives are to assess between-group differences, to determine nicotine pharmacokinetics for cigarettes and THPs, to assess subject's satisfaction with the study products, and to monitor additional endpoints related to safety and product use. DISCUSSION: Data from this study will advance our scientific understanding of the changes in exposure to cigarette smoke toxicants in smokers who switch to using a THP. TRIAL REGISTRATIONS: UMIN000024988 (25th November 2016); ISRCTN14301360 (14th December 2016).

Safety, Pharmacokinetics, and Pharmacodynamics Study in Healthy Subjects of Oral NEO6860, a Modality Selective Transient Receptor Potential Vanilloid Subtype 1 Antagonist.

Most previous transient receptor potential vanilloid subtype 1 (TRPV1) antagonist programs have been put on hold, mainly because of on-target adverse events: hyperthermia and impaired noxious heat sensation. NEO6860 is a TRPV1 antagonist, blocking capsaicin activation of the target, with little or no effect against pH or heat activation. The hypothesis is that this pharmacological profile will translate into analgesia without undesired effects on the body temperature or heat-pain threshold. This phase I, double blind, placebo controlled, ascending dose study, included 64 subjects. Pharmacodynamics (intradermal capsaicin test) was explored. The study was comprised of 6 dose levels (50, 100, 200, 400, 800, and 1,200 mg) and 2 doses of 500 mg, 12 hours apart. NEO6860 was rapidly absorbed and systemic exposure increases were less than dose proportional. Median time of maximum observed plasma concentration values ranged from 2 to 3 hours. The mean apparent plasma terminal elimination half-life was between 4 and 8 hours. No significant food-effect or gender-effect was observed. The most frequently reported events were feeling hot, headache, paresthesia, nausea, and dizziness. Single oral doses of up to 800 mg and two 500-mg doses administered 12 hours apart of NEO6860 were well tolerated in this study. Unlike other TRPV1 antagonists, no clinically significant increase in temperature or heat pain threshold/tolerance was noted despite thorough and specific monitoring of these parameters. At all doses, most subjects reported a sensation of "feeling hot," with a rapid onset and transient. NEO6860 showed an improvement in the pharmacodynamics parameters (evoked pain and secondary hyperalgesia) at 3 and 8 hours post NEO6860 dosing. PERSPECTIVE: This first in human study on NEO6860, showed that an antagonist of TRPV1, blocking only the activation by capsaicin has been identified. This finding paves the way for the development of a new powerful analgesic for many pain conditions, without the fear of the side effects observed with previous TRPV1 antagonists.

Randomized clinical trial: pharmacokinetics and safety of multimatrix mesalamine for treatment of pediatric ulcerative colitis.

BACKGROUND: Limited data are available on mesalamine (5-aminosalicylic acid; 5-ASA) use in pediatric ulcerative colitis (UC). AIM: To evaluate pharmacokinetic and safety profiles of 5-ASA and metabolite acetyl-5-ASA (Ac-5-ASA) after once-daily, oral administration of multimatrix mesalamine to children and adolescents with UC. METHODS: Participants (5-17 years of age; 18-82 kg, stratified by weight) with UC received multi-matrix mesalamine 30, 60, or 100 mg/kg/day once daily (to 4,800 mg/day) for 7 days. Blood samples were collected pre-dose on days 5 and 6. On days 7 and 8, blood and urine samples were collected and safety was evaluated. 5-ASA and Ac-5-ASA plasma and urine concentrations were analyzed by non-compartmental methods and used to develop a population pharmacokinetic model. RESULTS: Fifty-two subjects (21 [30 mg/kg]; 22 [60 mg/kg]; 9 [100 mg/kg]) were randomized. On day 7, systemic exposures of 5-ASA and Ac-5-ASA exhibited a dose-proportional increase between 30 and 60 mg/kg/day cohorts. For 30, 60, and 100 mg/kg/day doses, mean percentages of 5-ASA absorbed were 29.4%, 27.0%, and 22.1%, respectively. Simulated steady-state exposures and variabilities for 5-ASA and Ac-5-ASA (coefficient of variation approximately 50% and 40%-45%, respectively) were similar to those observed previously in adults at comparable doses. Treatment-emergent adverse events were reported by ten subjects. Events were similar among different doses and age groups with no new safety signals identified. CONCLUSION: Children and adolescents with UC receiving multimatrix mesalamine demonstrated 5-ASA and Ac-5-ASA pharmacokinetic profiles similar to historical adult data. Multimatrix mesalamine was well tolerated across all dose and age groups. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01130844.

A phase 1 randomized study evaluating the effect of omeprazole on the pharmacokinetics of a novel 5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 4 agonist, revexepride (SSP-002358), in healthy adults.

BACKGROUND: About 30% of patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease continue to experience symptoms despite treatment with proton pump inhibitors. The 5-hydroxytryptamine 4 receptor agonist revexepride (SSP-002358) is a novel prokinetic that stimulates gastrointestinal motility, which has been suggested as a continued cause of symptoms in these patients. The aim of this study was to assess whether revexepride pharmacokinetics were affected by co-administration of omeprazole, in preparation for a proof-of-concept evaluation of revexepride added to proton pump inhibitor treatment. METHODS: In this phase 1, open-label, randomized, two-period crossover study, healthy adults aged 18-55 years were given a single dose of revexepride 1 mg or revexepride 1 mg + omeprazole 40 mg. Pharmacokinetic parameters were assessed for up to 48 hours after administration of the investigational product. Adverse events, clinical chemistry and hematology parameters, electrocardiograms, and vital signs were monitored. RESULTS: In total, 42 participants were enrolled and 40 completed the study. The median age was 24 years (18-54 years), 55% were women and 93% were white. The pharmacokinetic parameters of revexepride were similar without or with omeprazole co-administration. The mean area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time 0 to infinity (AUC0-∞) was 23.3 ng · h/mL (standard deviation [SD]: 6.33 ng · h/mL) versus 24.6 ng · h/mL (SD: 6.31 ng · h/mL), and maximum plasma concentrations (Cmax) were 3.89 ng/mL (SD: 1.30 ng/mL) and 4.12 ng/mL (SD: 1.29 ng/mL) in participants without and with omeprazole, respectively. For AUC0-∞ and Cmax, the 90% confidence intervals for the ratios of geometric least-squares means (with:without omeprazole) were fully contained within the pre-defined equivalence limits of 0.80-1.25. Mean apparent terminal phase half-life was 9.95 hours (SD: 2.06 hours) without omeprazole, and 11.0 hours (SD: 3.25 hours) with omeprazole. CONCLUSION: Co-administration of the 5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 4 agonist revexepride with omeprazole did not affect the pharmacokinetics of revexepride in healthy adults.

Assessment of pharmacodynamic equivalence and tolerability of lanthanum carbonate oral powder and tablet formulations: a single-center, randomized, open-label, 2-period crossover study in healthy subjects.

BACKGROUND: Phosphate binders are commonly used in tablet form to help patients with hyperphosphatemia limit their absorption of dietary phosphate. These patients frequently have a heavy tablet burden so alternative formulations provide choice and may support adherence. Lanthanum carbonate (LC) is a phosphate binder currently available as a chewable tablet. This study was conducted to support an application for marketing authorization for the oral powder formulation within the European Union. OBJECTIVE: The goal of this study was to examine the pharmacodynamics, pharmacokinetics, and tolerability of an oral powder formulation of LC compared with the reference chewable tablet formulation. METHODS: A Phase I, single-center, randomized, open-label, 2-period, crossover study to assess pharmacodynamic equivalence of the 2 formulations was conducted in healthy adults aged 18 to 55 years receiving a diet standardized for phosphate content. Individuals were randomized to receive a different formulation in each period, taking 10 doses of 1000-mg LC at 3000 mg/d per period with an intervening washout of ≥14 days. The primary pharmacodynamic variable was mean daily excretion of urinary phosphorus over 3 days while receiving LC. Pharmacodynamic equivalence was confirmed if the 90% CI for the difference between formulations in least squares (LS) mean excreted urinary phosphorus was within ±20% of the LS mean value for the tablet formulation. Secondary end points included determination of pharmacokinetic parameters and assessment of tolerability by recording of adverse events. RESULTS: In total, 72 individuals entered the study. They were predominantly men (72.2%), with a mean (SD) age of 31.4 (8.26) years and a BMI of 25.8 (2.45) kg/m(2). The LS mean (SE) excreted urinary phosphorus was 16.8 (0.48) mmol/d during administration of LC tablets (±20% = ±3.35 mmol/d). The corresponding value during administration of LC oral powder was 15.2 (0.48) mmol/d; 90% CI for the difference between formulations was -2.38 to -0.82 mmol/d, confirming pharmacodynamic equivalence. The most common adverse events were gastrointestinal, and no serious adverse events were recorded. CONCLUSIONS: In this multiple-dose study, the oral powder and tablet formulations of LC were well tolerated and met the regulatory criteria for pharmacodynamic equivalence in these healthy volunteers. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00880750.

The effect of sevelamer carbonate and lanthanum carbonate on the pharmacokinetics of oral calcitriol.

BACKGROUND: Lanthanum carbonate and sevelamer carbonate are non-calcium-based phosphate binders used to manage hyperphosphataemia in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). Patients with CKD may require intravenous or oral active vitamin D. We investigated the effects of lanthanum carbonate and sevelamer carbonate on the bioavailability of oral calcitriol. METHODS: This was a three-period, crossover study in healthy volunteers. Forty-one individuals were randomized to one of six possible sequences, each consisting of three treatment periods separated by washouts. The treatments were calcitriol (1 µg at lunch), calcitriol with lanthanum carbonate (3000 mg/day) and calcitriol with sevelamer carbonate (7200 mg/day). Serum calcitriol levels were assessed at baseline and throughout the study. RESULTS: Co-administration of lanthanum carbonate with calcitriol had no significant effect on area under the curve over 48 h (AUC(0-48)) for serum exogenous calcitriol [least-squares (LS) mean, calcitriol with lanthanum carbonate vs calcitriol alone: 429 pg h/mL vs 318 pg h/mL, respectively; P = 0.171]. Similarly, there was no significant effect on maximum concentration (C(max)). In contrast, co-administration with sevelamer was associated with a significant reduction in bioavailability parameters for calcitriol (calcitriol with sevelamer carbonate vs calcitriol alone, LS mean AUC(0-48): 137 pg h/mL vs 318 pg h/mL, respectively; P = 0.024; LS mean C(max): 40.1 pg/mL vs 49.7 pg/mL, respectively; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Sevelamer carbonate significantly reduces serum concentrations of exogenous calcitriol when administered concomitantly with oral calcitriol, whereas lanthanum carbonate has no significant effect. This should be considered when treating CKD patients who require phosphate binders and oral vitamin D.

A solid-state approach to enable early development compounds: selection and animal bioavailability studies of an itraconazole amorphous solid dispersion.

A solid-state approach to enable compounds in preclinical development is used by identifying an amorphous solid dispersion in a simple formulation to increase bioavailability. Itraconazole (ITZ) was chosen as a model crystalline compound displaying poor aqueous solubility and low bioavailability. Solid dispersions were prepared with different polymers (PVP K-12, K29/32, K90; PVP VA S-630; HPMC-P 55; and HPMC-AS HG) at varied concentrations (1:5, 1:2, 2:1, 5:1 by weight) using two preparation methods (evaporation and freeze drying). Physical characterization and stability data were collected to examine recommended storage, handling, and manufacturing conditions. Based on generated data, a 1:2 (w/w) ITZ/HPMC-P dispersion was selected for further characterization, testing, and scale-up. Thermal data and computational analysis suggest that it is a possible solid nanosuspension. The dispersion was successfully scaled using spray drying, with the materials exhibiting similar physical properties as the screening samples. A simple formulation of 1:2 (w/w) ITZ/HPMC-P dispersion in a capsule was compared to crystalline ITZ in a capsule in a dog bioavailability study, with the dispersion being significantly more bioavailable. This study demonstrated the utility of using an amorphous solid form with desirable physical properties to significantly improve bioavailability and provides a viable strategy for evaluating early drug candidates.