Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol ; 57(3): 478-487, 2021 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32438461

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To validate prospectively the ADNEX magnetic resonance (MR) scoring system to assess adnexal masses and to evaluate a new, modified ADNEX MR scoring system that incorporates diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) with apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) mapping. METHODS: Between January 2015 and September 2018, 323 consecutive women with adnexal masses diagnosed on transvaginal ultrasound (TVS) underwent standardized MR imaging (MRI) including diffusion and dynamic contrast-enhanced sequences. Of these, 131 underwent subsequent surgery. For interpretation of the MRI examinations, we applied the five-category ADNEX MR scoring system, along with a modified scoring system including DWI with ADC mapping. For both scoring systems, a score was given for all adnexal masses. Histological diagnosis was considered as the gold standard and lesions were classified as benign or malignant. The difference between the predictive values for diagnosing malignancy of the classical and modified scoring systems was assessed on the basis of the areas under the receiver-operating-characteristics (AUC) curves. The sensitivity and specificity for diagnosing malignancy of each score were also calculated. RESULTS: Among the 131 women with adnexal mass(es) diagnosed on TVS who underwent MRI and subsequent surgery, the surgery revealed 161 adnexal masses in 126 women; five women had no mass. Histological examination confirmed 161 adnexal masses, of which all had been detected on MRI: 32 malignant tumors, 15 borderline tumors, which were classified as part of the malignant group (n = 47), and 114 benign lesions. The AUC for prediction of a malignant lesion was 0.938 (95% CI, 0.902-0.975) using the classical ADNEX MR scoring system and 0.974 (95% CI, 0.953-0.996) using the modified scoring system. Pairwise comparison of these AUCs revealed a significant difference (P = 0.0032). The sensitivity and specificity for diagnosing malignancy with an ADNEX MR score of 4 or more were 95.5% and 86.6%, respectively, using the classic scoring system, and 95.7% and 93.3%, respectively, using the modified scoring system. CONCLUSION: DWI with ADC mapping could be integrated into the ADNEX MR scoring system to improve specificity, thereby potentially optimizing clinical management by avoiding unnecessary surgery. © 2020 International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades de los Anexos/diagnóstico por imagen , Imagen de Difusión por Resonancia Magnética/métodos , Detección Precoz del Cáncer/estadística & datos numéricos , Neoplasias de los Genitales Femeninos/diagnóstico por imagen , Procesamiento de Imagen Asistido por Computador/estadística & datos numéricos , Anexos Uterinos/diagnóstico por imagen , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Área Bajo la Curva , Medios de Contraste , Estudios Transversales , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Detección Precoz del Cáncer/métodos , Femenino , Humanos , Procesamiento de Imagen Asistido por Computador/métodos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Estudios Prospectivos , Curva ROC , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Ultrasonografía/métodos , Vagina , Adulto Joven
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA