RESUMEN
Background: Pain management physicians are increasingly focused on limiting prescription opioid abuse, yet existing tools for monitoring adherence have limited accuracy. Medication event monitoring system (MEMS) is an emerging technology for tracking medication usage in real-time but has not been tested in chronic pain patients on long-term opioid regimens. Objective: We conducted a pilot clinical trial to investigate the utility of MEMS for monitoring opioid adherence and compared to traditional methods including self-report diaries, urine drug screen (UDS), and physicians' opinions. Methods: Opioid-maintained chronic pain patients were recruited from a pain management clinic. Participants (n=28) were randomly assigned to either receive MEMS bottles containing their opioid medication for a 90-day period or to continue using standard medication bottles. MEMS bottles were configured to record and timestamp all bottle openings and the number of pills that were removed from the bottle (via measurement of weight change). Results: Participants who received MEMS demonstrated highly heterogenous dosing patterns, with a substantial number of patients rapidly removing excessive amounts of medication and/or "stockpiling" medication. By comparison, physicians rated all participants as either "totally compliant" or "mostly compliant". UDS results did not reveal any illicit drug use, but 25% of participants (n=7) tested negative for their prescribed opioid metabolite. MEMS data did not correlate with physician-rated adherence (P=0.24) and UDS results (P=0.77). MEMS data consistently revealed greater non-adherence than self-report data (P<0.001). Conclusion: These results highlight the limits in our understanding of naturalistic patterns of daily opioid use in chronic pain patients as well as support the use of MEMS for detecting potential misuse as compared to routine adherence monitoring methods. Future research directions include the need to determine how MEMS could be used to improve patient outcomes, minimize harm, and aid in clinical decision-making. Trial Registration: This study was preregistered on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03752411).
RESUMEN
Background and Aims: Gastrointestinal (GI) dysmotility is a common and debilitating clinical manifestation in patients with mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA)-related disease with no curative and few effective symptomatic therapies. A low-residue diet (LRD) has been shown to be effective at reducing bowel urgency, pain, and distension in functional GI-related conditions. We assessed tolerability and effects of an LRD on bowel habits in patients with mtDNA-related disease. Methods: This was a 12-week single-arm pilot study in patients with genetically determined primary mtDNA-related disease, meeting the ROME III constipation criteria. The co-primary outcomes were tolerability of an LRD (<10 g fiber per day) assessed by food diaries and changes in stool frequency and consistency. The secondary outcomes included GI symptoms, disease burden, laxatives, physical activity levels, colonic transit time using radiopaque markers, gut microbiome (patients and controls), and metabolomics. The gut microbiome of the mtDNA-related disease patients was compared against controls for observational purpose only. Results: Twenty-eight patients were enrolled, and 24 completed the LRD intervention. The LRD was well tolerated with a mean fold change of -34% in dietary fiber (5.3 ± 10.4 grams) per day (P = .03, confidence interval = 0.7-9.9) with no adverse events. The proportion of stool samples with normal stool consistency increased from 36% to 49% (P = .01); GI symptoms and laxative use were reduced. However, the LRD did not change stool frequency, stool output, and colonic transit time. The gut microbiome was significantly different between patients and controls but was not modulated by the dietary intervention. Conclusion: The LRD in patients with mtDNA-related mitochondrial disease and significant constipation is well tolerated and a promising treatment for alleviating GI symptoms. These positive findings should be confirmed in a randomized controlled trial.ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03388528.