A multicenter evaluation of a new therapeutic plasma exchange procedure.

BACKGROUND: The AMICUS (Fenwal, Inc.) was cleared in the United States for platelet (PLT) and plasma collection in 1996 with subsequent clearances for the collection of other blood products. Although not previously used for therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE), new disposables, software, and hardware were developed to enable TPE on the AMICUS. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: A multicenter, randomized, nonblinded, crossover paired treatment protocol was performed. Thirty patients with orders for at least two TPE procedures were randomly assigned to the AMICUS or the COBE Spectra (TerumoBCT) for the first treatment. Each patient was crossed over to the other device using the same procedure settings from the first procedure. The primary objective compared efficiency of plasma removal (EPR) with secondary objectives of comparing PLT and hemoglobin (Hb) waste plasma content, coagulation factor and complement activation, fluid balance tracking accuracy, procedure length, and adverse events. RESULTS: The EPR for the AMICUS (81.9 ± 7.62%) was superior to that of the COBE Spectra (75.2 ± 6.29%; p = 0.00001). The AMICUS also demonstrated statistically higher fluid balance accuracy (99.84%) compared to that of the COBE Spectra (98.83%; p < 0.0001) and a statistically shorter procedure time (103.9 ± 30.8 vs. 110.5 ± 27.1 min, p < 0.001). No significant differences with regard to PLT and Hb content in the waste plasma, change in patient PLT count, or changes in markers of coagulation and complement cascade activation were seen. Frequency and severity of adverse reactions were similar. CONCLUSION: The AMICUS separator can effectively perform TPE. The AMICUS demonstrated superior plasma removal efficiency compared to the COBE Spectra with no evidence of significant differences in PLT removal, hemolysis, and coagulation or complement activation.

Validation of a microbial detection system for use with ACD-A platelets with PAS III platelet additive solution.

BACKGROUND: The BacT/ALERT microbial detection system (BTA) is used for testing leukoreduced apheresis platelets (LR-AP) in plasma. Platelet additive solutions (PASs) such as InterSol (PAS III) may be used to reduce the amount of plasma transfused in LR-AP. This study evaluated the performance of the two-bottle BTA testing scheme in the recovery of seeded microorganisms from LR-AP in InterSol-plasma compared to a reference plate culture method. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Hyperconcentrated, double LR-AP were collected from healthy donors; InterSol was added (65% Intersol:35% plasma), equally divided into two containers, and then inoculated with an isolate of 1 of 10 clinically relevant index organisms at two levels. Aerobic (BPA) and anaerobic (BPN) BTA bottles were inoculated with 4 mL each of the inoculated LR-AP, and blood agar plates (BAPs) for aerobic and anaerobic culture (0.5 mL each). RESULTS: Zero false-positives from 103 bottle pairs were observed. All 400 two-bottle BTA tests were positive within 24 hours, except for Propionibacterium acnes (maximum time-to-detection of 86.4 hr) and 13 of 20 pairs of Streptococcus viridans (maximum time-to-detection of 31.7 hr). Thirteen of 400 BAP two-plate tests were negative for starting bacterial concentrations of 10 colony-forming units (CFUs)/mL or less. At 40 CFUs/mL or less, BTA was 100% positive while BAP was 94% positive. CONCLUSION: Seeded organism recovery was superior in the two-bottle BTA test system compared to the two-plate BAP system using InterSol platelets (PLTs). This performance is comparable to previously published results for PLTs in plasma. The use of InterSol does not appear to have a detrimental effect on the performance of the two-bottle BTA system.

Bacterial growth kinetics in ACD-A apheresis platelets: comparison of plasma and PAS III storage.

BACKGROUND: Our objective was to determine the growth kinetics of bacteria in leukoreduced apheresis platelets (LR-AP) in a platelet (PLT) additive solution (PAS; InterSol, Fenwal, Inc.) compared to LR-AP stored in plasma. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Hyperconcentrated, double-dose LR-AP were collected from healthy donors with a separator (AMICUS, Fenwal, Inc.). LR-AP were evenly divided, InterSol was added to half (65% InterSol:35% plasma [PAS]), and PLTs in autologous plasma were used for a paired control (PL). Bacteria were inoculated into each LR-AP PAS/PL pair (0.5-1.6 colony-forming units [CFUs]/mL), and bacterial growth was followed for up to 7 days. Time to the end of the lag phase, doubling times, maximum concentration (conc-max), and time to maximum concentration (time-max) were estimated. RESULTS: Streptococcus viridans did not grow to detectable levels in either PAS or PL units. The other bacteria had no significant overall difference in the conc-max (p = 0.47) or time-max (p = 0.7) between PL and PAS LR-AP; PL had a 0.14 hours faster doubling rate (p = 0.023); and PAS had a 4.7 hours shorter lag time (p = 0.016). CONCLUSION: We observed that five index organisms will grow in LR-AP stored in a 35%:65% ratio of plasma to InterSol where initial bacterial concentrations are 0.5 to 1.6 CFUs/mL. The more rapid initiation of log-phase growth for bacteria within a PAS storage environment resulted in a bacterial concentration up to 4 logs higher in the PAS units compared to the plasma units at 24 hours, but with no difference in the conc-max. This may present an early bacterial detection advantage for PAS-stored PLTs.

In vitro and in vivo evaluation of apheresis platelets stored for 5 days in 65% platelet additive solution/35% plasma.

BACKGROUND: In the United States, apheresis platelets (PLTs) are suspended in autologous plasma. PLT additive solutions, long used in Europe, decrease recipient allergic reactions and may reduce the risk of transfusion-related acute lung injury. We evaluated Amicus-collected PLTs stored in platelet additive solution (PAS) III (InterSol) for 5 days. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: In Study 1, 71 subjects donated two products on a single day-one each stored in 100% plasma or 65% PAS III/35% plasma. Products underwent standard in vitro testing on Days 1 and 5. In Study 2, 43 additional subjects provided Amicus products stored for 5 days in 65% PAS III/35% plasma for in vivo radiolabeled recovery and survival determinations. The effect of approximately 2500cGy Day 1 gamma irradiation was evaluated in a subset of products. RESULTS: PAS III PLTs (n=70) had a median Day 5 pH(22°C) of 7.2 (lower 95%, 95% tolerance limit, 6.9). Mean Day 5 recovery and survival of radiolabeled PAS III PLTs (n=33) were, respectively, 80.5 and 72.1%, of fresh autologous PLTs. With 95% confidence, these values were at least 66% of fresh PLT recovery and 58% of survival. All in vitro variables remained within ranges seen in licensed products for irradiated and nonirradiated PAS III PLTs. CONCLUSION: Leukoreduced Amicus PLTs stored in 65% PAS III/35% plasma in PL-2410 containers maintained pH ≥6.9 throughout 5 days' storage. Radiolabeled PLT recovery and survival values met US Food and Drug Administration statistical criteria. Gamma-irradiated PAS III PLTs demonstrated no significant adverse effects due to irradiation in in vitro testing.

Screening of single-donor apheresis platelets for bacterial contamination: the PASSPORT study results.

BACKGROUND: The PASSPORT study was an FDA-mandated surveillance of outdated 7-day apheresis platelets (APs) to assess the bacterial culture release test (RT) performance and the chance of transfusing APs containing viable bacteria compared to untested 5-day APs. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Aerobic and anaerobic culture bottles were inoculated with 4 to 5 mL from APs 24 to 36 hours postcollection. APs were released after 24 hours if no growth was observed. Released APs were recalled for RT positives, and clinical services were notified. Day 8 APs were recultured (surveillance test [ST]). Initially positive RTs and STs were confirmed by AP reculture. RESULTS: A total of 388,903 RTs were accrued September 2005 through January 2008 from 52 regional blood centers: RT-positive APs interdicted before transfusion, 76 true positive (TP; 195/million; 95% confidence interval [CI], 154-244/million) and 57 indeterminate (IN); and RT-positive APs transfused, 14 TP and 242 IN. There were 14 reported septic transfusion reactions (STRs) from 13 AP collections (23 units) transfused on Days 3 through 7; three STRs were from Day 6 or 7 APs. There were two false-negative RTs causing STRs in three patients. No deaths were reported. STs had four TPs of 6039 tested (662/million; 95% CI, 180-1695/million). CONCLUSIONS: RT culturing prevents issuance of some bacterially contaminated APs. ST culture data and clinical reports suggest that this screening fails to detect all contaminated units. No fatalities were reported related to AP transfusion. Additional actions or testing may be required to further reduce the residual STR risk of RT APs, even with a 5-day storage limitation.