Knowledge and practices toward COVID-19 preventive measures and symptoms: A case-control study in Benin

Introduction. Following communication and awareness actions related to COVID-19, we assessed the knowledge and practices about COVID-19 in Benin. Methods. A case-control survey was conducted from 14 September to 20 October 2020 in Benin. Questions relatingto knowledge and practices on COVID-19 were collected through a questionnaire survey. A total of 312 respondents (104 cases and 208 controls) were included in the study. Logistic regression and Spearman correlation tests were used to examine the relation between participants knowledge and practice at a 5% significance level. Results. From the survey, 65.4% of cases and 68.3% of controls knew about COVID-19 transmission via air droplets. Most of the cases (67.31%) and control (79.81%) participants reported cough as a symptom of COVID-19. Handwashing with soap and water was the most protective measure known by 87.5% of cases and 90.87% of controls. Concerning practice, the cloth mask was the type mostly worn by cases (54.81%) and controls (58.65%). Wearing a face mask in public areas was significantly associated with the COVID-19 health status of respondents (OR = 2.98, CI95% [1.16-7.67]; p = 0.022). Furthermore, a significantly positive correlation exists between knowledge of the COVID-19 protective measures and hand hygiene practices when leaving a public place (r = 0.184, p=0.001). Conclusion. Through this study, we observed some discrepancies between the knowledge and practices related to COVID-19 among cases and controls surveyed. Therefore, efforts should be directed toward raising awareness about the disease to improve their knowledge and practices

Perception des acteurs de l'approche « Une Seule Santé ¼ de la sécurité sanitaire mondiale au Bénin.

INTRODUCTION: The perception of human resources is essential for their commitment in strengthening health security. The study assessed the perception of the “one health” approach stakeholders on global health security in Benin. METHODS: The study was qualitative, cross-sectional and quantitative. Non-probability sampling method with purposive choice were used to select 55 actors from health, veterinary and environmental sectors, and from community. Individual interviews and three focus groups were used to collect data; The content analysis was used to perform thematic groupings. RESULTS: Respondents had a good knowledge of threats (73%), events (59%) and information mechanisms (68%). The health security environment was characterized by the absence of an integrated mechanism for information sharing, episodic and unbalanced collaboration, a difference between the level of organization of the sectors with health sector perceived as better organized by 92% of respondents. The environment is presented as the sector requiring major reinforcements. Community involvement was also episodic. The sectors were dependent on the partners. The community was not involved in setting priorities and lacked commitment to health security. The regulatory component is insufficient, and no law enshrines the international health regulations as a reference. For 60% of respondents, health security was a reality in Benin and 21% were satisfied with it. Respondents had a good perception of health security and its challenges in Benin. CONCLUSION: The strengthening of legislation and collaboration is necessary for the improvement of global health security in Benin.

Understanding Hand Hygiene Behavior in a Public Hospital in Benin Using the Theoretical Domain Frameworks: The First Step for Designing Appropriate Interventions.

BACKGROUND: Hand Hygiene (HH) is widely recognized to be one of the most successful and cost-effective measures for reducing the incidence of healthcare-associated infections (HAIs). The hand hygiene behavior of hospital healthcare workers (HCWs) is not well-documented in Benin. Therefore, Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) was used to identify the behavioral determinants that may impact HCWs' hand-hygiene compliance in a public hospital. METHODS: A qualitative design comprising face-to-face semi-structured interviews with nine HCWs. The interviews included questions on transmission of infections, hand-hygiene practices, problems with their implementation; and ways to improve hand hygiene compliance. Two pharmacists independently coded interviews into behavioral domains using the TDF and then subdivided them into several themes. Interview transcripts were analyzed following 3-steps approach: coding, generation of specific beliefs, and identification of relevant domains. RESULTS: Almost all interviewees have cited the environmental context and resources (such as lack of water) as a barrier to HH practice. They also believed that role models had a significant impact on the good practices of others HCWs. Fortunately, they were confident of their capabilities to perform appropriate HH behaviors. The majority (7/9) reported having the necessary knowledge and skills and believed they could carry out appropriate HH behavior. In all cases, the participants were motivated to carry out HH behavior, and it was recognized that HH remains the cornerstone to reduce health care associated infections. CONCLUSION: This study identified several behavioral constructs aligned with the TDF that can be targeted and help for the development of new hand-hygiene interventions. These may increase the likelihood of a successful intervention, thereby improving HH compliance and patient safety, especially in hospitals.

Social Engagement in the Fight Against COVID-19 in the Urban and Peri-Urban Areas of Cotonou (Benin, Sub-saharan Africa): Acceptability of the Vaccination and Tracking Program.

Introduction: This article aims at investigating social engagement in the fight against the COVID-19 pandemic in low-resource settings (LRSs). In particular, it focuses on Benin (Sub-Saharan Africa), and reports the results of a field study that investigated the local people's acceptance of the vaccine and the tracking program. Methods: This project is the product of a collaboration between the ABSPIE (Applied Biomedical and Signal Processing E-Health) Lab of the University of Warwick (UK) and the LAMA (Laboratoire d'Antropologie Medical Appliqué) of the University of Abomey Calavi (Benin). This international multidisciplinary collaboration brought together engineers, sociologists, anthropologists, and bioethicists. In light of the aims of the project, a qualitative methodology was deemed appropriate. The research team prepared two questionnaires that provided the basis for semi-structured interviews that took place between June and August 2021. Results: The research team interviewed 34 Beninese respondents, comprising people aged 60+ (with multiple comorbidities), who were primarily healthcare workers and/or traditional therapists. The results of this work highlight the fact that there is widespread reticence about the vaccination program in Benin, both due to local beliefs and uncertainty about governmental management. In this study, we uncovered several local reasons interfering with the involvement of the population in the vaccination campaign against COVID-19, e.g., the existence of traditional medical practices considered as valid alternatives to vaccines, and many beliefs showing a fear of neo-colonialism hidden in the pandemic threat. Yet, another hindrance can be traced to shortcomings in the management of the vaccination campaign which resulted in obstacles to the implementation of the program. Conclusions: This work does not intend to denounce any governmental effort or foster a regressive mindset, but shows how the overall confusion (defined by the World Health Organization as infodemic) linked to the pandemic and its management has caused even more dramatic consequences in LRSs. In addition, the paper proposes a specific framework for the interpretation and management of bioethical and biomedical issues in LRSs that the authors are validating in their current research.

The economic impact of the switch from single- to multi-dose PCV13 vial in Benin.

BACKGROUND: Little is known on the economic implications of multi-dose 13 valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV13) introduction in expanded program on immunization (EPI). Based on evidence of PCV13's reduced pressure on vaccine cold chain, Benin, a third world country in West Africa, introduced the multi-dose PCV13 starting in April 2018 in its EPI program in replacement of the single-dose presentation. The objective of this study was to conduct a rapid assessment of the costs and economic impact of switching from single- to multi-dose PCV13 vial in Benin. METHODS: The data collected retrospectively between January 1 and February 16, 2019 using a quantitative questionnaire was analyzed using Excel 2010 and Stata 13. Resources consumed from April 1st to September 30th, 2017 for the single-dose PCV13 and from April 1st to September 30th, 2018 for multi-dose were analyzed. For both presentations, costs analyzed included vaccines, injections supplies, waste management, cold chain, personnel (salaries and per diems), supervision and monitoring, training, social mobilization and overheads. Moreover, additional costs incurred for the introduction of multi-dose PCV13 were also collected. Costs were estimated for each presentation of PCV13 vaccine by calculating the half-year value of recurrent and capital costs, discounted at a rate of 3% for capital items. To enable comparisons, costs pertaining to 2017 were converted to 2018 equivalent values taking inflation in US$ into account. RESULTS: The economic costs of the single-dose PCV13 exceeded that of the multi-dose: US$ 3,708,795 versus US$ 3,698,795, respectively. Three cost items, including costs of vaccines, injection supplies, and cold chain appeared to be the main drivers of the observed reduction in costs of multi-dose PCV13. Moreover, the cost per infant vaccinated was lower with the single-dose PCV13 than the multi-dose, respectively US$ 6.28 versus US$ 10.92, and costs of vaccines wasted higher for the multi-dose PCV13. CONCLUSIONS: This evaluation seemed to show that the switch from single- to multi-dose PCV13 resulted in reduced economic costs of PCV13. Vaccinating more infants together with a rigorous application of vaccine open vial policy could lead to the change being more cost-effective.

Introduction of multi-dose PCV 13 vaccine in Benin: from the decision to vaccinators experience.

BACKGROUND: In 2011, Benin introduced the 13-valent pneumococcal conjugated vaccine (PCV13), in a single-dose vial, into its Expanded Programme for Immunisation (EPI) with support from Gavi. In April 2018, with the support of the Agence de Médecine Préventive Afrique (AMP) and other technical and financial partners, the single-dose vial was transitioned to a four-dose vial. Here we describe the decision-making process and the experience of the vaccinators during the change. METHODS: We carried out semi-structured, individual interviews with 61 participants individuals involved in the EPI: 7 from central level, 5 from regional level, 7 from township level and 42 from district level. The interviews were recorded and transcribed, and the information categorised, using Nvivo software, and then analysed. RESULTS: The Inter-agency Coordination Committee (ICC), the Benin National Advisory Committee for Vaccines and Vaccination, (BNACVV) and the World Health Organisation (WHO) (i.e., the traditional governance structures involved in vaccination decisions) were not involved in the decision to change to the four-dose vial for PCV13. The decision was taken by the EPI, supported by Gavi. The vaccination errors observed in the first months following the change in presentation were due to the absence of guidelines for changes in vaccine presentation and the central-level actors' perception that it was 'only a change in the vial', and therefore that the communication and training for a new vaccine were not required since the vaccine itself and its administration mode were unchanged. CONCLUSIONS: It is important that the other countries eligible for Gavi support that are about to change to the multi-dose vial PCV13 presentation learn from Benin's experience. The main lessons learned are that changes in the presentation of an established vaccine should follow the same process as the introduction of a new vaccine, and that all stakeholders involved in vaccines and vaccination should participate in the decision-making process and implementation.

[Understanding failure of obstetric referral to the Cotonou University gynaecology and obstetrics clinic]. / Comprendre le renoncement à la référence obstétricale à la Clinique universitaire de gynécologie et d?obstétrique de Cotonou.

INTRODUCTION: Since 2000, in the context of the Millennium development goals, Benin has reinforced its obstetric referral system in order to reduce maternal mortality. However, structural, sociocultural and economic problems continue to affect this strategy. The Cotonou University gynaecology and obstetrics clinic (CUGO), at the top of the health pyramid, is emblematic of this situation. This study was designed to elucidate the stakes involved in referral to this hospital based on analysis of the perceptions and experiences of referral personnel. METHODS: Essentially qualitative data collection was conducted by means of in-depth semi-structured interviews from July to December 2015 involving 37 people, including referred women, healthcare personnel and caregivers. RESULTS: The poor quality of information given to women concerning the reasons for referral, the fear of caesarean section, considered to be inevitable, and the difficult relationships with health workers contribute to failure to comply with referral. Rumours concerning reception, waiting times and hospitalization conditions are other factors that must be taken into account. Finally, the distance from the woman's home is a decisive element in acceptance of referral by women and their families. CONCLUSION: Referral is generally perceived as necessary in the case of complications during pregnancy, by both referred women and healthcare personnel. However, differences in points of view are observed when the woman is referred to CUGO.

Reports of long-lasting insecticidal bed nets catching on fire: a threat to bed net users and to successful malaria control?

BACKGROUND: One of the control tools to reduce malaria transmission is the use of LLINs. However, several studies show that household bed net use is quite low. A study was developed to better understand the cultural factors that might explain these gaps in Benin. One reason mentioned is that bed nets can catch on fire and cause harm. This paper presents a summary of these findings, their analysis and the ensuing issues. METHODS: This anthropological study is based on an inductive qualitative approach, including 91 semi-structured interviews conducted from July 2011 to March 2012 in a health district in Southern Benin. RESULTS: Fifty-six persons stated that bed nets can catch on fire but do not always refer to specific facts. However, 34 of the 56 people narrate specific events they heard or experienced. 39 accounts were geographically located and situated in time, with various details. In 27 situations, people were burned, for which 12 people reportedly died. DISCUSSION: The disparity between these results and the dearth of bibliographic documentation in the initial search prompted a more in-depth literature review: 16 contributions between 1994 and 2013 were found. Bed net fires were noted in 10 countries, but it is impossible to ascertain the frequency of such events. Moreover, bodily harm can be significant, and several cases of death attributed to bed net fires were noted. CONCLUSIONS: Indisputably, the use of bed nets to reduce the impact of this terrible disease is an optimal control method. However, the perception that LLINs have a potentially negative effect hinders the use rate in the real world, at least for some. If some people fear the risk of fires, this possibility must be addressed during information and prevention sessions on malaria, with a communication strategy tailored to specific social contexts. Moreover, all possible measures should be taken to limit the harm suffered by individuals and their families.