Intrafraction motion during radiotherapy of breast tumor, breast tumor bed, and individual axillary lymph nodes on cine magnetic resonance imaging.

Background and purpose: In (ultra-)hypofractionation, the contribution of intrafraction motion to treatment accuracy becomes increasingly important. Our purpose was to evaluate intrafraction motion and resulting geometric uncertainties for breast tumor (bed) and individual axillary lymph nodes, and to compare prone and supine position for the breast tumor (bed). Materials and methods: During 1-3 min of free breathing, we acquired transverse/sagittal interleaved 1.5 T cine magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the breast tumor (bed) in prone and supine position and coronal/sagittal cine MRI of individual axillary lymph nodes in supine position. A total of 31 prone and 23 supine breast cine MRI (in 23 women) and 52 lymph node cine MRI (in 24 women) were included. Maximum displacement, breathing amplitude, and drift were analyzed using deformable image registration. Geometric uncertainties were calculated for all displacements and for breathing motion only. Results: Median maximum displacements (range over the three orthogonal orientations) were 1.1-1.5 mm for the breast tumor (bed) in prone and 1.8-3.0 mm in supine position, and 2.2-2.4 mm for lymph nodes. Maximum displacements were significantly smaller in prone than in supine position, mainly due to smaller breathing amplitude: 0.6-0.9 mm in prone vs. 0.9-1.4 mm in supine. Systematic and random uncertainties were 0.1-0.4 mm in prone position and 0.2-0.8 mm in supine position for the tumor (bed), and 0.4-0.6 mm for the lymph nodes. Conclusion: Intrafraction motion of breast tumor (bed) and individual lymph nodes was small. Motion of the tumor (bed) was smaller in prone than in supine position.

Dynamic Contrast-enhanced and Diffusion-weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Response Evaluation After Single-Dose Ablative Neoadjuvant Partial Breast Irradiation.

Purpose: We aimed to evaluate changes in dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) and diffusion-weighted (DW) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans acquired before and after single-dose ablative neoadjuvant partial breast irradiation (NA-PBI), and explore the relation between semiquantitative MRI parameters and radiologic and pathologic responses. Methods and Materials: We analyzed 3.0T DCE and DW-MRI of 36 patients with low-risk breast cancer who were treated with single-dose NA-PBI, followed by breast-conserving surgery 6 or 8 months later. MRI was acquired before NA-PBI and 1 week, 2, 4, and 6 months after NA-PBI. Breast radiologists assessed the radiologic response and breast pathologists scored the pathologic response after surgery. Patients were grouped as either pathologic responders or nonresponders (<10% vs ≥10% residual tumor cells). The semiquantitative MRI parameters evaluated were time to enhancement (TTE), 1-minute relative enhancement (RE1min), percentage of enhancing voxels (%EV), distribution of washout curve types, and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC). Results: In general, the enhancement increased 1 week after NA-PBI (baseline vs 1 week median - TTE: 15s vs 10s; RE1min: 161% vs 197%; %EV: 47% vs 67%) and decreased from 2 months onward (6 months median - TTE: 25s; RE1min: 86%; %EV: 12%). Median ADC increased from 0.83 × 10-3 mm2/s at baseline to 1.28 × 10-3 mm2/s at 6 months. TTE, RE1min, and %EV showed the most potential to differentiate between radiologic responses, and TTE, RE1min, and ADC between pathologic responses. Conclusions: Semiquantitative analyses of DCE and DW-MRI showed changes in relative enhancement and ADC 1 week after NA-PBI, indicating acute inflammation, followed by changes indicating tumor regression from 2 to 6 months after radiation therapy. A relation between the MRI parameters and radiologic and pathologic responses could not be proven in this exploratory study.

Prone vs. supine accelerated partial breast irradiation on an MR-Linac: A planning study.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) may benefit from the MR-Linac for target definition, patient setup, and motion monitoring. In this planning study, we investigated whether prone or supine position is dosimetrically beneficial for APBI on an MR-Linac and we evaluated patient comfort. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-patients (9 postoperative, 11 preoperative) with a DCIS or breast tumor <3 cm underwent 1.5 T MRI in prone and supine position. The tumor or tumor bed was delineated as GTV and a 2 cm CTV-margin and 0.5 cm PTV-margin were added. 1.5 T MR-Linac treatment plans (5 × 5.2 Gy) with 11 beams were created for both positions in each patient. We evaluated the number of plans that achieved the planning constraints and performed a dosimetric comparison between prone and supine position using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test (p-value <0.01 for significance). Patient experience during scanning was evaluated with a questionnaire. RESULTS: All 40 plans met the target coverage and OAR constraints, regardless of position. Heart Dmean was not significantly different (1.07 vs. 0.79 Gy, p-value: 0.027). V5Gy to the ipsilateral lung (4.4% vs. 9.8% median, p-value 0.009) and estimated delivery time (362 vs. 392 s, p-value: 0.003) were significantly lower for prone position. PTV coverage and dose to other OAR were comparable between positions. The majority of patients (13/20) preferred supine position. CONCLUSION: APBI on the MR-Linac is dosimetrically feasible in prone and supine position. Mean heart dose was similar in both positions. Ipsilateral lung V5Gy was lower in prone position.

Optimizing MR-Guided Radiotherapy for Breast Cancer Patients.

Current research in radiotherapy (RT) for breast cancer is evaluating neoadjuvant as opposed to adjuvant partial breast irradiation (PBI) with the aim of reducing the volume of breast tissue irradiated and therefore the risk of late treatment-related toxicity. The development of magnetic resonance (MR)-guided RT, including dedicated MR-guided RT systems [hybrid machines combining an MR scanner with a linear accelerator (MR-linac) or 60Co sources], could potentially reduce the irradiated volume even further by improving tumour visibility before and during each RT treatment. In this position paper, we discuss MR guidance in relation to each step of the breast RT planning and treatment pathway, focusing on the application of MR-guided RT to neoadjuvant PBI.

Consensus on Contouring Primary Breast Tumors on MRI in the Setting of Neoadjuvant Partial Breast Irradiation in Trials.

PURPOSE: Our purpose was to present and evaluate expert consensus on contouring primary breast tumors on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the setting of neoadjuvant partial breast irradiation in trials. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Expert consensus on contouring guidelines for target definition of primary breast tumors on contrast-enhanced MRI in trials was developed by an international team of experienced breast radiation oncologists and a dedicated breast radiologist during 3 meetings. At the first meeting, draft guidelines were developed through discussing and contouring 2 cases. At the second meeting 6 breast radiation oncologists delineated gross tumor volume (GTV) in 10 patients with early-stage breast cancer (cT1N0) according to draft guidelines. GTV was expanded isotropically (20 mm) to generate clinical target volume (CTV), excluding skin and chest wall. Delineations were reviewed for disagreement and guidelines were clarified accordingly. At the third meeting 5 radiation oncologists redelineated 6 cases using consensus-based guidelines. Interobserver variation of GTV and CTV was assessed using generalized conformity index (CI). CI was calculated as the sum of volumes each pair of observers agreed upon, divided by the sum of encompassing volumes for each pair of observers. RESULTS: For the 2 delineation sessions combined, mean GTV ranged between 0.19 and 2.44 cm3, CI for GTV ranged between 0.28 and 0.77, and CI for CTV between 0.77 and 0.94. The largest interobserver variation in GTV delineations was observed in cases with extended tumor spiculae, blood vessels near or markers within the tumor, or with increased enhancement of glandular breast tissue. Consensus-based guidelines stated to delineate all visible tumors on contrast enhanced-MRI scan 1 to 2 minutes after contrast injection and if a marker was inserted in the tumor to include this. CONCLUSIONS: Expert-based consensus on contouring primary breast tumors on MRI in trials has been reached. This resulted in low interobserver variation for CTV in the context of a uniform 20 mm GTV to CTV expansion margin.

A single neural network for cone-beam computed tomography-based radiotherapy of head-and-neck, lung and breast cancer.

Background and purpose Adaptive radiotherapy based on cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) requires high CT number accuracy to ensure accurate dose calculations. Recently, deep learning has been proposed for fast CBCT artefact corrections on single anatomical sites. This study investigated the feasibility of applying a single convolutional network to facilitate dose calculation based on CBCT for head-and-neck, lung and breast cancer patients. Materials and Methods Ninety-nine patients diagnosed with head-and-neck, lung or breast cancer undergoing radiotherapy with CBCT-based position verification were included in this study. The CBCTs were registered to planning CT according to clinical procedures. Three cycle-consistent generative adversarial networks (cycle-GANs) were trained in an unpaired manner on 15 patients per anatomical site generating synthetic-CTs (sCTs). Another network was trained with all the anatomical sites together. Performances of all four networks were compared and evaluated for image similarity against rescan CT (rCT). Clinical plans were recalculated on rCT and sCT and analysed through voxel-based dose differences and γ -analysis. Results A sCT was generated in 10 s. Image similarity was comparable between models trained on different anatomical sites and a single model for all sites. Mean dose differences < 0.5 % were obtained in high-dose regions. Mean gamma (3%, 3 mm) pass-rates > 95 % were achieved for all sites. Conclusion Cycle-GAN reduced CBCT artefacts and increased similarity to CT, enabling sCT-based dose calculations. A single network achieved CBCT-based dose calculation generating synthetic CT for head-and-neck, lung, and breast cancer patients with similar performance to a network specifically trained for each anatomical site.

Tumor Response After Neoadjuvant Magnetic Resonance Guided Single Ablative Dose Partial Breast Irradiation.

PURPOSE: To assess the pathologic and radiologic response in patients with low-risk breast cancer treated with magnetic resonance (MR) guided neoadjuvant partial breast irradiation (NA-PBI) and to evaluate toxicity and patient-reported outcomes (PROs). METHODS AND MATERIALS: For this single-arm prospective trial, women with unifocal, non-lobular tumors with a maximum diameter of 20 mm (age, 50-70 years) or 30 mm (age, ≥70 years) and tumor-negative sentinel node(s) were eligible. Patients were treated with a single ablative dose of NA-PBI followed by breast-conserving surgery after an interval of 6 to 8 months. Target volumes were defined on radiation therapy planning computed tomography scan and additional magnetic resonance imaging. Prescribed doses to gross tumor volume and clinical target volume (gross tumor volume plus 20 mm margin) were 20 Gy and 15 Gy, respectively. Primary outcome was pathologic complete response (pCR). Secondary outcomes were radiologic response (on magnetic resonance imaging), toxicity (Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events), PROs (European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-BR23, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale), and cosmesis (assessed by patient, radiation oncologist, and BCCT.core software). RESULTS: Thirty-six patients were treated with NA-PBI, and pCR was reported in 15 patients (42%; 95% confidence interval, 26%-59%). Radiologic complete response was observed in 15 patients, 10 of whom had pCR (positive predictive value, 67%; 95% confidence interval, 39%-87%). After a median follow-up of 21 months (range, 12-41), all patients experienced grade 1 fibrosis in the treated breast volume. Transient grade 2 and 3 toxicity was observed in 31% and 3% of patients, respectively. Local recurrences were absent. No deterioration in PROs or cosmetic results was observed. CONCLUSIONS: NA-PBI has the potential to induce pCR in a substantial proportion of patients, with acceptable toxicity. This treatment seems a feasible alternative to standard postoperative irradiation and could even result in postponement or omission of surgery if pCR can be accurately predicted in selected low-risk patients.

Auditing local methods for quality assurance in radiotherapy using the same set of predefined treatment plans.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Local implementation of plan-specific quality assurance (QA) methods for intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) treatment plans may vary because of dissimilarities in procedures, equipment and software. The purpose of this work is detecting possible differences between local QA findings and those of an audit, using the same set of treatment plans. METHODS: A pre-defined set of clinical plans was devised and imported in the participating institute's treatment planning system for dose computation. The dose distribution was measured using an ionisation chamber, radiochromic film and an ionisation chamber array. The centres performed their own QA, which was compared to the audit findings. The agreement/disagreement between the audit and the institute QA results were assessed along with the differences between the dose distributions measured by the audit team and computed by the institute. RESULTS: For the majority of the cases the results of the audit were in agreement with the institute QA findings: ionisation chamber: 92%, array: 88%, film: 76% of the total measurements. In only a few of these cases the evaluated measurements failed for both: ionisation chamber: 2%, array: 4%, film: 0% of the total measurements. CONCLUSION: Using predefined treatment plans, we found that in approximately 80% of the evaluated measurements the results of local QA of IMRT and VMAT plans were in line with the findings of the audit. However, the percentage of agreement/disagreement depended on the characteristics of the measurement equipment used and on the analysis metric.

Image Distortions on a Plastic Interstitial Computed Tomography/Magnetic Resonance Brachytherapy Applicator at 3 Tesla Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Their Dosimetric Impact.

PURPOSE: To quantify magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) distortions on a plastic intracavitary/interstitial applicator with plastic needles at a field strength of 3 T and to determine the dosimetric impact, using patient data. METHODS AND MATERIALS: For 11 cervical cancer patients, our clinical MRI protocol was extended with 3 scans. From the first scan, a multi-echo acquisition, a map of the magnetic field (B0) was calculated and used to quantify the field inhomogeneity. The expected displacements of the applicator were quantified for the clinical sequence using the measured field inhomogeneity and the clinical sequence's bandwidth. The second and third scan were our routine clinical sequence (duration: <5 minutes each), acquired consecutively using opposing readout directions. The displacement of the applicator between these scans is approximately twice the displacement due to B0 inhomogeneity. The impact of the displacement on the dose was determined by reconstructing the applicator on both scans. The applicator was then shifted and rotated the same distance as the observed displacement to create a worst-case scenario (ie, twice the actual displacement due to B0 inhomogeneity). Next, the dose to 98%/90% (D98/D90) of the clinical target volume at high risk, as well as the dose to the most irradiated 2 cm3 for bladder and rectum, were calculated for the original plan as well as the shifted plan. RESULTS: For a volume of interest containing the intrauterine device and the ovoids the 95th percentile of the absolute displacement ranged between 0.2 and 0.75 mm, over all patients. For all patients, the difference in D98/D90 in the opposing readout scans with the original plan was at most 4.7%/4.3%. For the dose to the most irradiated 2 cm3 of bladder/rectum, the difference was at most 6.0%/6.3%. CONCLUSIONS: The dosimetric impact of distortions on this plastic applicator with plastic needles is limited. Applicator reconstruction for brachytherapy planning purposes is feasible at 3 T MRI.

Non-rigid CT/CBCT to CBCT registration for online external beam radiotherapy guidance.

Image-guided external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) allows radiation dose deposition with a high degree of accuracy and precision. Guidance is usually achieved by estimating the displacements, via image registration, between cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) and computed tomography (CT) images acquired at different stages of the therapy. The resulting displacements are then used to reposition the patient such that the location of the tumor at the time of treatment matches its position during planning. Moreover, ongoing research aims to use CBCT-CT image registration for online plan adaptation. However, CBCT images are usually acquired using a small number of x-ray projections and/or low beam intensities. This often leads to the images being subject to low contrast, low signal-to-noise ratio and artifacts, which ends-up hampering the image registration process. Previous studies addressed this by integrating additional image processing steps into the registration procedure. However, these steps are usually designed for particular image acquisition schemes, therefore limiting their use on a case-by-case basis. In the current study we address CT to CBCT and CBCT to CBCT registration by the means of the recently proposed EVolution registration algorithm. Contrary to previous approaches, EVolution does not require the integration of additional image processing steps in the registration scheme. Moreover, the algorithm requires a low number of input parameters, is easily parallelizable and provides an elastic deformation on a point-by-point basis. Results have shown that relative to a pure CT-based registration, the intrinsic artifacts present in typical CBCT images only have a sub-millimeter impact on the accuracy and precision of the estimated deformation. In addition, the algorithm has low computational requirements, which are compatible with online image-based guidance of EBRT treatments.

Dosimetric effects of anatomical changes during fractionated photon radiation therapy in pancreatic cancer patients.

Pancreatic tumors show large interfractional position variation. In addition, changes in gastrointestinal gas volumes and body contour take place over the course of radiation therapy. We aimed to quantify the effect of these anatomical changes on target dose coverage, for the clinically used fiducial marker-based patient position verification and, for comparison, also for simulated bony anatomy-based position verification. Nine consecutive patients were included in this retrospective study. To enable fraction dose calculations on cone-beam CT (CBCT), the planning CT was deformably registered to each CBCT (13-15 per patient); gas volumes visible on CBCT were copied to the deformed CT. Fraction doses were calculated for the clinically used 10 MV VMAT treatment plan (with for the planning target volume (PTV): D98% = 95%), according to fiducial marker-based and bony anatomy-based image registrations. Dose distributions were rigidly summed to yield the accumulated dose. To evaluate target dose coverage, we defined an iCTV+5 mm volume, i.e., the internal clinical target volume (iCTV) expanded with a 5 mm margin to account for remaining uncertainties including delineation uncertainties. We analyzed D98% , Dmean , and D2% for iCTV+5 mm and PTV (i.e., iCTV plus 10 mm margin). We found that for fiducial marker-based registration, differences between fraction doses and planned dose were minimal. For bony anatomy-based registration, fraction doses differed considerably, resulting in large differences between planned and accumulated dose for some patients, up to a decrease in D98% of the iCTV+5 mm from 95.9% to 85.8%. Our study shows that fractionated photon irradiation of pancreatic tumors is robust against variations in body contour and gastrointestinal gas, with dose coverage only mildly affected. However, as a result of interfractional tumor position variations, target dose coverage can severely decline when using bony anatomy for patient position verification. Therefore, the use of intratumoral fiducial marker-based daily position verification is essential in pancreatic cancer patients.

Structure-based deformable image registration: Added value for dose accumulation of external beam radiotherapy and brachytherapy in cervical cancer.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Structure-based deformable image registration (DIR) can be used to calculate accumulated brachytherapy (BT) and external-beam radiation therapy (EBRT) dose-volume histogram (DVH) parameters in cervical cancer. Since direct parameter addition does not take dose non-uniformity into account, the added value of DIR over addition methods was investigated for bladder and rectum. MATERIALS AND METHODS: For twelve patients (EBRT: 46Gy, EBRT+BT: D90 85-90GyEQD2 in equivalent dose in 2Gy fractions) the EBRT planning CT and BT planning MRI were registered using DIR. Affected lymph nodes, located far from the BT boost region, received an EBRT boost (9.2Gy) not contributing to the BT boost dose. Cumulative bladder/rectum D2cm3/D1cm3 were calculated and compared to direct addition methods, assuming uniform EBRT doses (UD), or overlapping high dose volumes (OHD). RESULTS: Between the three methods, the maximum differences in the cumulative DVH parameters were 3.2GyEQD2 (bladder) and 3.3GyEQD2 (rectum). The difference between DIR and UD was <1.8GyEQD2 for both organs. CONCLUSIONS: The UD method provides a better estimate of D2cm3/D1cm3 than the OHD method. There is no added value of DIR since differences with direct addition methods are clinically insignificant. EBRT dose distributions can be considered uniform in bladder and rectum for the evaluated dose parameters.

Comparing the dosimetric impact of interfractional anatomical changes in photon, proton and carbon ion radiotherapy for pancreatic cancer patients.

Radiotherapy using charged particles is characterized by a low dose to the surrounding healthy organs, while delivering a high dose to the tumor. However, interfractional anatomical changes can greatly affect the robustness of particle therapy. Therefore, we compared the dosimetric impact of interfractional anatomical changes (i.e. body contour differences and gastrointestinal gas volume changes) in photon, proton and carbon ion therapy for pancreatic cancer patients. In this retrospective planning study, photon, proton and carbon ion treatment plans were created for 9 patients. Fraction dose calculations were performed using daily cone-beam CT (CBCT) images. To this end, the planning CT was deformably registered to each CBCT; gastrointestinal gas volumes were delineated on the CBCTs and copied to the deformed CT. Fraction doses were accumulated rigidly. To compare planned and accumulated dose, dose-volume histogram (DVH) parameters of the planned and accumulated dose of the different radiotherapy modalities were determined for the internal gross tumor volume, internal clinical target volume (iCTV) and organs-at-risk (OARs; duodenum, stomach, kidneys, liver and spinal cord). Photon plans were highly robust against interfractional anatomical changes. The difference between the planned and accumulated DVH parameters for the photon plans was less than 0.5% for the target and OARs. In both proton and carbon ion therapy, however, coverage of the iCTV was considerably reduced for the accumulated dose compared with the planned dose. The near-minimum dose ([Formula: see text]) of the iCTV reduced with 8% for proton therapy and with 10% for carbon ion therapy. The DVH parameters of the OARs differed less than 3% for both particle modalities. Fractionated radiotherapy using photons is highly robust against interfractional anatomical changes. In proton and carbon ion therapy, such changes can severely reduce the dose coverage of the target.

The impact of interfractional anatomical changes on the accumulated dose in carbon ion therapy of pancreatic cancer patients.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: We evaluated the robustness of carbon ion therapy for pancreatic cancer patients by investigating the impact of interfractional anatomical changes on the accumulated dose when using bony anatomy- and fiducial marker-based position verification. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Carbon ion treatment plans were created for 9 patients in this retrospective planning study. The planning CT was deformably registered to each daily cone-beam CT (CBCT). The gastrointestinal gas volume visible on each CBCT was copied to these deformed CT images. Subsequently, the fraction doses were calculated by aligning the treatment plan according to a bony anatomy- and a fiducial marker-based registration. We compared the accumulated fraction doses with the planned dose using dose-volume histograms (DVHs) of the internal gross tumour volume (iGTV), internal clinical target volume (iCTV), duodenum, stomach, liver, spinal cord and kidneys. RESULTS: iCTV coverage (D98%) was on average reduced from 98.6% as planned to 81.9% and 88.6% for the bony anatomy- and marker-based registrations, respectively. DVHs of the duodenum showed large differences between the planned and accumulated dose. CONCLUSIONS: Severe reductions in dose coverage of the target due to interfractional anatomical changes were observed in both position verification methods.

Visibility and artifacts of gold fiducial markers used for image guided radiation therapy of pancreatic cancer on MRI.

PURPOSE: In radiation therapy of pancreatic cancer, tumor alignment prior to each treatment fraction is improved when intratumoral gold fiducial markers (from here onwards: markers), which are visible on computed tomography (CT) and cone beam CT, are used. Visibility of these markers on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) might improve image registration between CT and magnetic resonance (MR) images for tumor delineation purposes. However, concomitant image artifacts induced by markers are undesirable. The extent of visibility and artifact size depend on MRI-sequence parameters. The authors' goal was to determine for various markers their potential to be visible and to generate artifacts, using measures that are independent of the MRI-sequence parameters. METHODS: The authors selected ten different markers suitable for endoscopic placement in the pancreas and placed them into a phantom. The markers varied in diameter (0.28-0.6 mm), shape, and iron content (0%-0.5%). For each marker, the authors calculated T2 (∗)-maps and ΔB0-maps using MRI measurements. A decrease in relaxation time T2 (∗) can cause signal voids, associated with visibility, while a change in the magnetic field B0 can cause signal shifts, which are associated with artifacts. These shifts inhibit accurate tumor delineation. As a measure for potential visibility, the authors used the volume of low T2 (∗), i.e., the volume for which T2 (∗) differed from the background by >15 ms. As a measure for potential artifacts, the authors used the volume for which |ΔB0| > 9.4 × 10(-8) T (4 Hz). To test whether there is a correlation between visibility and artifact size, the authors calculated the Spearman's correlation coefficient (Rs) between the volume of low T2 (∗) and the volume of high |ΔB0|. The authors compared the maps with images obtained using a clinical MR-sequence. Finally, for the best visible marker as well as the marker that showed the smallest artifact, the authors compared the phantom data with in vivo MR-images in four pancreatic cancer patients. RESULTS: The authors found a strong correlation (Rs = 1.00, p < 0.01) between the volume of low T2 (∗) and the volume with high |ΔB0|. Visibility in clinical MR-images increased with lower T2 (∗). Signal shift artifacts became worse for markers with high |ΔB0|. The marker that was best visible in the phantom, a folded marker with 0.5% iron content, was also visible in vivo, but showed artifacts on diffusion weighted images. The marker with the smallest artifact in the phantom, a small, stretched, ironless marker, was indiscernible on in vivo MR-images. CONCLUSIONS: Changes in T2 (∗) and ΔB0 are sequence-independent measures for potential visibility and artifact size, respectively. Improved visibility of markers correlates strongly to signal shift artifacts; therefore, marker choice will depend on the clinical purpose. When visibility of the markers is most important, markers that contain iron are optimal, preferably in a folded configuration. For artifact sensitive imaging, small ironless markers are best, preferably in a stretched configuration.

PET motion compensation for radiation therapy using a CT-based mid-position motion model: methodology and clinical evaluation.

PURPOSE: Four-dimensional positron emission tomography (4D PET) imaging of the thorax produces sharper images with reduced motion artifacts. Current radiation therapy planning systems, however, do not facilitate 4D plan optimization. When images are acquired in a 2-minute time slot, the signal-to-noise ratio of each 4D frame is low, compromising image quality. The purpose of this study was to implement and evaluate the construction of mid-position 3D PET scans, with motion compensated using a 4D computed tomography (CT)-derived motion model. METHODS AND MATERIALS: All voxels of 4D PET were registered to the time-averaged position by using a motion model derived from the 4D CT frames. After the registration the scans were summed, resulting in a motion-compensated 3D mid-position PET scan. The method was tested with a phantom dataset as well as data from 27 lung cancer patients. RESULTS: PET motion compensation using a CT-based motion model improved image quality of both phantoms and patients in terms of increased maximum SUV (SUV(max)) values and decreased apparent volumes. In homogenous phantom data, a strong relationship was found between the amplitude-to-diameter ratio and the effects of the method. In heterogeneous patient data, the effect correlated better with the motion amplitude. In case of large amplitudes, motion compensation may increase SUV(max) up to 25% and reduce the diameter of the 50% SUV(max) volume by 10%. CONCLUSIONS: 4D CT-based motion-compensated mid-position PET scans provide improved quantitative data in terms of uptake values and volumes at the time-averaged position, thereby facilitating more accurate radiation therapy treatment planning of pulmonary lesions.

FDG-PET and diffusion-weighted MRI in head-and-neck cancer patients: implications for dose painting.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to investigate if FDG-PET and DWI identify the same or different targets for dose escalation in the GTV of HN cancer patients. Additionally, the dose coverage of DWI-targets in an FDG-PET-based dose painting plan was analyzed. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eighteen HN cancer patients underwent FDG-PET and DWI exams, which were converted to standardized uptake value (SUV)- and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC)-maps. The correspondence between the two imaging modalities was determined on a voxel-level using Spearman's correlation coefficient (ρ). Dose painting plans were optimized based on the 50% isocontour of the maximum SUV ( SUV(50%max)). Dose coverage was analyzed in three different SUV- and three different ADC-targets using the mean dose and the near-minimum and near-maximum doses. RESULTS: The average maximum SUV was 13.9 and the mean ADC was 1.17 · 10(-3) mm(2)/s. The average ρ between SUV and ADC was -0.2 (range: -0.6 to 0.4). The ADC-targets were only partly overlapping the SUV(50%max)-target and the dose parameters were significantly smaller in the ADC-targets compared to the SUV(50%max)-target. CONCLUSIONS: FDG-PET and DWI contain different information, resulting in different targets. Further information about failure patterns and dose relations can be obtained by adding DWI to currently ongoing dose painting trials.

Functional MRI for radiotherapy dose painting.

Modern radiation therapy techniques are exceptionally flexible in the deposition of radiation dose in a target volume. Complex distributions of dose can be delivered reliably, so that the tumor is exposed to a high dose, whereas nearby healthy structures can be avoided. As a result, an increase in curative dose is no longer invariably associated with an increased level of toxicity. This modern technology can be exploited further by modulating the required dose in space so as to match the variation in radiation sensitivity in the tumor. This approach is called dose painting. For dose painting to be effective, functional imaging techniques are essential to identify regions in a tumor that require a higher dose. Several techniques are available in nuclear medicine and radiology. In recent years, there has been a considerable research effort concerning the integration of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) into the external radiotherapy workflow motivated by the superior soft tissue contrast as compared to computed tomography. In MRI, diffusion-weighted MRI reflects the cell density of tissue and thus may indicate regions with a higher tumor load. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI reflects permeability of the microvasculature and blood flow, correlated to the oxygenation of the tumor. These properties have impact on its radiation sensitivity. New questions must be addressed when these techniques are applied in radiation therapy: scanning in treatment position requires alternative solutions to the standard patient setup in the choice of receive coils compared to a diagnostic department. This standard positioning also facilitates repeated imaging. The geometrical accuracy of MR images is critical for high-precision radiotherapy. In particular, when multiparametric functional data are used for dose painting, quantification of functional parameters at a high spatial resolution becomes important. In this review, we will address these issues and describe clinical developments in MRI-guided dose painting.

MRI to quantify early radiation-induced changes in the salivary glands.

PURPOSE: We investigated radiation-induced changes in the salivary glands, 6 weeks after RT, using MRI. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eighteen oropharyngeal cancer patients were treated with salivary gland sparing IMRT. All patients received a 3T MRI exam before and 6 weeks after the end of RT, including a T(1)-weighted (T(1)w), a T(2)-weighted (T(2)w), and a dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI. For both time points separately, the parotid and submandibular glands were delineated on the MR images. Differences in median signal intensity and signal variation within the glands were tested for significance. Correlations were studied between the MR changes and the planned RT dose. RESULTS: The volume of the glands reduced significantly by 25%. The T(1)w signal decreased by 10% and the T(2)w signal increased by 23%. The k(ep) value decreased, while the v(e) increased. A correlation of the changes in T(2)w signal with the mean dose was found in both glands. CONCLUSIONS: Overall radiation-induced changes and volume loss were observed in the parotid and submandibular gland using MR. The observed differences indicated an increased water content such as found in oedema. The overall changes could be related to the mean dose, with a slightly greater impact in the high dose area.

Magnetic resonance imaging at 3.0T for submandibular gland sparing radiotherapy.

PURPOSE: Besides sparing the parotid gland, sparing the submandibular gland is considered to be important in preventing xerostomia in head-and-neck cancer patients. Delineation of the submandibular gland at CT, and even on T(1)- and T(2)-weighted MR images, is difficult, due to low contrast with the surrounding tissues. MR sialography might be used for delineation. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Sixteen oropharyngeal cancer patients received a CT and MRI exam as part of the standard treatment imaging protocol. Patients were scanned in their five-point RT immobilization mask. The MRI exam included T(1)- and T(2)-weighted MRI scans and an MR sialography scan. Thirty submandibular glands were delineated on only CT, on the combined CT and T(1)- and T(2)-weighted MRI scans and on all MR images. A Wilcoxon signed-rank test was performed to test if the delineated volumes were significantly different. RESULTS: The delineated volume of the submandibular gland was 7.3mL in the CT-delineation, 7.1mL in the CT/MRI-delineation and 8.1mL in the MRI-delineation. The MRI-delineation was significantly larger than the other delineations (p<0.001). The differences were mainly located in the cranial direction. CONCLUSION: The delineation of the submandibular gland was improved in the cranial direction by using T(1)- and T(2)-weighted MRI and MR sialography, compared to the other delineations.