Associations between maternal periconceptional alcohol consumption and risk of omphalocele among offspring, National Birth Defects Prevention Study, 1997-2011.

OBJECTIVE: Previous studies of alcohol consumption during pregnancy and omphalocele have produced mixed results. We updated an earlier analysis of National Birth Defects Prevention Study (NBDPS) data, adding six years of participants, to examine associations between maternal alcohol consumption and omphalocele. METHODS: NBDPS was a multi-site, population-based case-control study in the United States. Cases were identified from birth defect surveillance programs in 10 states; controls were liveborn infants without a birth defect randomly selected from the same catchment areas. Mothers self-reported alcohol consumption during the periconceptional period (one month before through the third gestational month) via telephone interview. Our study included mothers of 410 omphalocele cases and 11,219 controls with estimated dates of delivery (EDDs) during 1997-2011. We used logistic regression to estimate adjusted odds ratios (AORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for periconceptional alcohol consumption and omphalocele. We performed a probabilistic bias analysis to evaluate the impact of alcohol exposure misclassification on our results. RESULTS: Overall, 44% of case and 38% of control mothers reported periconceptional alcohol consumption; 22% and 17%, respectively, reported binge drinking. Any maternal periconceptional alcohol consumption was associated with modestly increased odds of omphalocele (AOR 1.35, 95% CI 1.09, 1.68), as was binge drinking (AOR 1.47, 95% CI 1.08, 2.01). Our bias analysis yielded estimates further from the null. CONCLUSIONS: We observed modest associations between maternal periconceptional alcohol consumption and omphalocele. Based on our bias analysis, studies of alcohol and birth defects not accounting for exposure misclassification may underestimate associations.

Antifungal medication use during early pregnancy and the risk of congenital heart defects in the National Birth Defects Prevention Study, 1997-2011.

BACKGROUND: Fungal infections are common among pregnant people. Recent studies suggest positive associations between oral antifungals used to treat fungal infections and congenital heart defects (CHDs). METHODS: We estimated associations between first trimester antifungal use and 20 major, specific CHDs using data from the National Birth Defects Prevention Study (NBDPS), a multi-site, case-control study that included pregnancies with estimated delivery dates from October 1997 through December 2011. Infants with CHDs ("cases") were ascertained from 10 birth defect surveillance programs. Live born infants without major birth defects ("controls") were randomly selected from birth records or hospital discharge lists. First trimester antifungal use was self-reported via maternal interview. We estimated adjusted odds ratios (AORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) using logistic regression with Firth's penalized likelihood. RESULTS: First trimester antifungal use was reported by 148/11,653 (1.3%) case and 123/11,427 (1.1%) control participants. We estimated AORs for 12 CHDs; six had AORs >1.5 (tetralogy of Fallot, double outlet right ventricle with transposition of the great arteries [DORV-TGA], atrioventricular septal defect, hypoplastic left heart syndrome, pulmonary atresia, muscular ventricular septal defect), and one (pulmonary valve stenosis) had an AOR <0.7. All CIs included the null, except for DORV-TGA. CONCLUSIONS: First trimester antifungal use was rare. We observed some positive associations for several specific CHDs in our analysis, although the CIs largely included the null. Results do not support a large increase in risk, but smaller increases in risk for certain CHD cannot be ruled out.

Fever and antibiotic use in maternal urinary tract infections during pregnancy and risk of congenital heart defects: Findings from the National Birth Defects Prevention Study.

BACKGROUND: Previous studies report an association between prenatal maternal urinary tract infections (UTI) and specific congenital heart defects (CHDs); however, the role of fever and antibiotic use on this association is poorly understood. Using data from the National Birth Defects Prevention Study, we examined whether the relationship between maternal UTIs during the periconceptional period and occurrence of CHDs is modified by the presence of fever due to UTI and corresponding antibiotic use among 11,704 CHD case infants and 11,636 live-born control infants. METHODS: Information on UTIs, fever associated with UTI and antibiotic use (sulfonamides, nitrofurantoin, cephalosporins, penicillin, macrolides, and quinolones) during pregnancy were obtained using a computer-assisted telephone interview. Using unconditional multivariable logistic regression, we calculated adjusted odds ratios (ORs) to determine the association between maternal UTIs and subtypes of CHDs. Analyses were stratified by the presence of fever and medication use associated with UTI. RESULTS: The prevalence of UTIs during the periconceptional period was 7.6% in control mothers, and 8.7% in case mothers. In the absence of fever, UTI was associated with secundum atrial septal defects (ASD) (OR 1.3; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.1-1.5) and in the absence of antibiotics, UTI was associated with conotruncal defects as a group and for four specific CHDs. When fever and UTI occurred concomitantly, no significantly elevated odds ratios were noticed for any subtypes of CHD. Among women with UTIs who used antibiotics, an elevated but statistically non-significant estimate was observed for secundum ASD (OR 1.4; 95% CI 1.0-2.0). CONCLUSION: Findings in the present study suggest that fever due to UTI and corresponding maternal antibiotic use do not substantially modify the association between maternal UTIs and specific CHDs in offspring. Further studies with larger sample sizes are warranted to guide clinical management of UTIs during the periconceptional period.

Maternal exposure to zolpidem and risk of specific birth defects.

Zolpidem is a non-benzodiazepine agent indicated for treatment of insomnia. While zolpidem crosses the placenta, little is known about its safety in pregnancy. We assessed associations between self-reported zolpidem use 1 month before pregnancy through to the end of the third month ("early pregnancy") and specific birth defects using data from two multi-site case-control studies: National Birth Defects Prevention Study and Slone Epidemiology Center Birth Defects Study. Analysis included 39,711 birth defect cases and 23,035 controls without a birth defect. For defects with ≥ 5 exposed cases, we used logistic regression with Firth's penalised likelihood to estimate adjusted odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals, considering age at delivery, race/ethnicity, education, body mass index, parity, early-pregnancy antipsychotic, anxiolytic, antidepressant use, early-pregnancy opioid use, early-pregnancy smoking, and study as potential covariates. For defects with three-four exposed cases, we estimated crude odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals. Additionally, we explored differences in odds ratios using propensity score-adjustment and conducted a probabilistic bias analysis of exposure misclassification. Overall, 84 (0.2%) cases and 46 (0.2%) controls reported early-pregnancy zolpidem use. Seven defects had sufficient sample size to calculate adjusted odds ratios, which ranged from 0.76 for cleft lip to 2.18 for gastroschisis. Four defects had odds ratios > 1.8. All confidence intervals included the null. Zolpidem use was rare. We could not calculate adjusted odds ratios for most defects and estimates are imprecise. Results do not support a large increase in risk, but smaller increases in risk for certain defects cannot be ruled out.

Antifungal medication use during pregnancy and the risk of selected major birth defects in the National Birth Defects Prevention Study, 1997-2011.

PURPOSE: Recent studies suggest increased birth defect risk associated with maternal use of specific oral antifungals. We estimated associations between first-trimester antifungal use and selected non-cardiac birth defects using National Birth Defects Prevention Study (NBDPS) data. METHODS: Participants with a pregnancy affected by a study-eligible birth defect ("cases") were ascertained from 10 birth defect surveillance programs; participants who delivered livebirths without a major birth defect ("controls") were randomly selected from birth records or hospital discharge lists. First-trimester antifungal use was self-reported via maternal interview. We estimated adjusted odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for birth defects with ≥5 exposed cases using logistic regression. We estimated crude ORs and exact 95% CIs for birth defects with 3-4 exposed cases. Additionally, we conducted a probabilistic bias analysis of exposure misclassification. RESULTS: Our analysis included 19 624 cases and 11 427 controls; 257 (1.3%) cases and 123 (1.1%) controls reported first-trimester antifungal use. Of those who reported antifungals, 62.6% of cases and 64.2% of controls reported topical antifungals; 10.1% of cases and 4.9% of controls reported oral antifungals. We observed the strongest associations for encephalocele and Dandy-Walker malformation and modestly elevated estimates for several other defects. Bias-adjusted estimates were similar to the main analysis. CONCLUSION: First-trimester antifungal use was positively associated with several birth defects in our analysis, although CIs were imprecise. Further study is warranted to investigate associations between antifungal use and birth defects, including potential bias due to confounding by indication.

Factors associated with infant sex and preterm birth status for selected birth defects from the National Birth Defects Prevention Study, 1997-2011.

BACKGROUND: Birth defects and preterm birth co-occur, with some overlapping risk factors. Many birth defects and preterm births tend to have a male preponderance. We explored potential risk factors impacting sex and preterm (<37 weeks of gestation) birth differences among infants with selected birth defects delivered from 1997 to 2011 using data from the National Birth Defects Prevention Study (NBDPS). METHODS: The NBDPS was a large multisite, population-based case-control study. Using random forests, we identified important predictors of male preterm, female preterm, and male term, each compared with female term births for each birth defect. Using logistic regression, we estimated odds ratios for associations between important predictors and sex-preterm birth status by birth defect. RESULTS: We examined 11,379 infants with nine specific birth defects. The top 10 most important predictors of sex-preterm birth status from the random forests varied greatly across the birth defects and sex-preterm comparisons within a given defect group, with several being novel factors. However, one consistency was that short interpregnancy interval was associated with sex-preterm birth status for many of the studied birth defects. Although obesity has been identified as a risk factor for preterm birth and birth defects in other research, it was not associated with sex-preterm birth status for any of the examined defects. CONCLUSIONS: We confirmed expected associations for sex-preterm birth status differences and found new potential risk factors for further exploration among the studied birth defects.

Bias analyses to investigate the impact of differential participation: Application to a birth defects case-control study.

BACKGROUND: Certain associations observed in the National Birth Defects Prevention Study (NBDPS) contrasted with other research or were from areas with mixed findings, including no decrease in odds of spina bifida with periconceptional folic acid supplementation, moderately increased cleft palate odds with ondansetron use and reduced hypospadias odds with maternal smoking. OBJECTIVES: To investigate the plausibility and extent of differential participation to produce effect estimates observed in NBDPS. METHODS: We searched the literature for factors related to these exposures and participation and conducted deterministic quantitative bias analyses. We estimated case-control participation and expected exposure prevalence based on internal and external reports, respectively. For the folic acid-spina bifida and ondansetron-cleft palate analyses, we hypothesized the true odds ratio (OR) based on prior studies and quantified the degree of exposure over- (or under-) representation to produce the crude OR (cOR) in NBDPS. For the smoking-hypospadias analysis, we estimated the extent of selection bias needed to nullify the association as well as the maximum potential harmful OR. RESULTS: Under our assumptions (participation, exposure prevalence, true OR), there was overrepresentation of folic acid use and underrepresentation of ondansetron use and smoking among participants. Folic acid-exposed spina bifida cases would need to have been ≥1.2× more likely to participate than exposed controls to yield the observed null cOR. Ondansetron-exposed cleft palate cases would need to have been 1.6× more likely to participate than exposed controls if the true OR is null. Smoking-exposed hypospadias cases would need to have been ≥1.2 times less likely to participate than exposed controls for the association to falsely appear protective (upper bound of selection bias adjusted smoking-hypospadias OR = 2.02). CONCLUSIONS: Differential participation could partly explain certain associations observed in NBDPS, but questions remain about why. Potential impacts of other systematic errors (e.g. exposure misclassification) could be informed by additional research.

Maternal dietary caffeine consumption and risk of birth defects in the National Birth Defects Prevention Study, 1997-2011.

BACKGROUND: Caffeine consumption is common during pregnancy, but published associations with birth defects are mixed. We updated estimates of associations between prepregnancy caffeine consumption and 48 specific birth defects from the National Birth Defects Prevention Study (NBDPS) for deliveries from 1997 to 2011. METHODS: NBDPS was a large population-based case-control study conducted in 10 U.S. states. We categorized self-reported total dietary caffeine consumption (mg/day) from coffee, tea, soda, and chocolate as: <10, 10 to <100, 100 to <200, 200 to <300, and ≥ 300. We used logistic regression to estimate adjusted odds ratios (aORs [95% confidence intervals]). Analyses for defects with ≥5 exposed case children were adjusted for maternal race/ethnicity, age at delivery, body mass index, early pregnancy cigarette smoking and alcohol use, and study site. RESULTS: Our analysis included 30,285 case and 11,502 control children, with mothers of 52% and 54%, respectively, reporting consuming <100 mg caffeine, and 11% of mothers of both cases and controls reported consuming ≥300 mg per day. Low (10 to <100 mg/day) levels of prepregnancy caffeine consumption were associated with statistically significant increases in aORs (1.2-1.7) for 10 defects. Associations with high (≥300 mg/day) levels of caffeine were generally weaker, except for craniosynostosis and aortic stenosis (aORs = 1.3 [1.1-1.6], 1.6 [1.1-2.3]). CONCLUSIONS: Given the large number of estimates generated, some of the statistically significant results may be due to chance and thus the weakly increased aORs should be interpreted cautiously. This study supports previous observations suggesting lack of evidence for meaningful associations between caffeine consumption and the studied birth defects.

Maternal cyclobenzaprine exposure and risk of birth defects in the National Birth Defects Prevention Study (1997-2011) and Birth Defects Study to Evaluate Pregnancy exposureS (2014-2018).

PURPOSE: Cyclobenzaprine is a muscle relaxant indicated for acute pain. Little is known about cyclobenzaprine's safety during pregnancy. We explored the association between maternal cyclobenzaprine exposure and risk of birth defects among offspring. METHODS: We combined data from two large, multi-site, population-based case-control studies in the United States. Cases were identified from birth defects registries across 10 states; controls were liveborn infants without birth defects randomly selected from the same catchment areas. Participants reported cyclobenzaprine use during the month before conception through the third month of pregnancy ("periconception") via computer-assisted telephone interview. We used logistic regression to assess associations between periconceptional cyclobenzaprine exposure and selected structural birth defects. We calculated crude odds ratios (OR) with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI). RESULTS: Our study included 33 615 cases and 13 110 controls. Overall, 51 case (0.15%) and 9 control (0.07%) participants reported periconceptional cyclobenzaprine use. We observed increased risk for all seven defects with ≥3 exposed cases: cleft palate (OR = 4.79, 95% CI 1.71-13.44), cleft lip (OR = 2.50, 95% CI 0.89-7.02), anorectal atresia/stenosis (OR = 6.91, 95% CI 1.67, 28.65), d-transposition of the great arteries (OR = 6.97, 95% CI 2.17-22.36), coarctation of the aorta (OR = 5.58, 95% CI 1.88-16.58), pulmonary valve stenosis (OR = 4.55, 95% CI 1.10-18.87), and secundum atrial septal defect (OR = 3.08, 95% CI 0.83-11.45). CONCLUSIONS: Even in our large sample, cyclobenzaprine use was rare. Our estimates are unadjusted and imprecise so should be interpreted cautiously. These hypothesis-generating results warrant confirmation and further research to explore possible mechanisms.

Agreement between maternal report and medical records on use of medications during early pregnancy in New York.

BACKGROUND: Studies evaluating associations between medication use in pregnancy and birth outcomes rely on various sources of exposure information. We sought to assess agreement between self-reported use of medications during early pregnancy and medication information in prenatal medical records to understand the reliability of each of these information sources. METHODS: We compared self-reported prescription medication use in early pregnancy to medical records from 184 New York women with deliveries in 2018 who participated in the Birth Defects Study To Evaluate Pregnancy exposureS. We assessed medications used chronically and episodically, and medications within 12 therapeutic groups. We calculated agreement using kappa (κ) coefficients, sensitivity, and specificity. We assessed differences by case/control status, maternal age, education, time to interview, and interview language. RESULTS: Medications used chronically showed substantial agreement between self-report and medical records (κ = 0.75, 0.61-0.88), with agreement for therapeutic groups used chronically ranging from κ = 0.61 for antidiabetics to κ = 1.00 for antihypertensives. Prescription medications used episodically showed worse agreement (κ = 0.40, 0.25-0.54), with the lowest agreement for opioid analgesics (κ = 0.20) and anti-infectives (κ = 0.33). Agreement did not differ by the characteristics examined, although we observed potential differences by interview language. CONCLUSIONS: Among our sample, we observed good agreement between self-report and medical records for medications used chronically and substantially less agreement for medications used episodically. Differences by source may be due to poor recall in self-reports, non-adherence with prescribed medications and lack of complete prescription information within medical records. Limitations should be considered when assessing prescription medication exposures during early pregnancy in epidemiologic studies.

Maternal exposure to heparin products and risk of birth defects in the National Birth Defects Prevention Study.

BACKGROUND: Heparin and low-molecular-weight heparin are the preferred anticoagulants during pregnancy as they do not cross the placenta. Although research on the safety of heparin products has been reassuring, previous studies have considered birth defects as a single outcome or by larger organ system and have not examined associations with specific birth defects. METHODS: We analyzed data from the National Birth Defects Prevention Study, a multisite, population-based case-control study from 1997 to 2011. We used unconditional logistic regression with Firth's penalized likelihood to calculate adjusted odds ratios (ORs) and profile likelihood 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for defects with at least five exposed cases. For defects with 3-4 exposed cases, we estimated crude ORs and exact 95% CIs. RESULTS: Of the 42,743 women in our analysis, 117 (0.4%) case and 44 (0.4%) control mothers reported using a heparin product in early pregnancy. The adjusted ORs ranged from 0.9 to 3.9 and were elevated for anorectal atresia (OR = 2.0, 95% CI = 0.8-4.3), longitudinal limb deficiency (3.5, 1.3-7.8), transverse limb deficiency (1.8, 0.6-4.3), atrioventricular septal defect (3.9, 1.4-9.0), and secundum atrial septal defect (2.2, 1.2-3.8). CONCLUSIONS: We observed elevated associations for some birth defects, although heparin is a rare exposure, which limited our ability to evaluate many associations. Future studies that can explore specific birth defects and adequately control for confounding by indication are needed. Given that women with an indication for heparin products during pregnancy often need to take medication, one must remain mindful of the underlying risk of a birth defect that exists regardless of medication use.

Risk of birth defects by pregestational type 1 or type 2 diabetes: National Birth Defects Prevention Study, 1997-2011.

BACKGROUND: Previous studies found consistent associations between pregestational diabetes and birth defects. Given the different biological mechanisms for type 1 (PGD1) and type 2 (PGD2) diabetes, we used National Birth Defects Prevention Study (NBDPS) data to estimate associations by diabetes type. METHODS: The NBDPS was a study of major birth defects that included pregnancies with estimated delivery dates from October 1997 to December 2011. We compared self-reported PGD1 and PGD2 for 29,024 birth defect cases and 10,898 live-born controls. For case groups with ≥5 exposed cases, we estimated adjusted odds ratios (aORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the association between specific defects and each diabetes type. We calculated crude ORs (cORs) and 95% CIs with Firth's penalized likelihood for case groups with 3-4 exposed cases. RESULTS: Overall, 252 (0.9%) cases and 24 (0.2%) control mothers reported PGD1, and 357 (1.2%) cases and 34 (0.3%) control mothers reported PGD2. PGD1 was associated with 22/26 defects examined and PGD2 was associated with 29/39 defects examined. Adjusted ORs ranged from 1.6 to 70.4 for PGD1 and from 1.6 to 59.9 for PGD2. We observed the strongest aORs for sacral agenesis (PGD1: 70.4, 32.3-147; PGD2: 59.9, 25.4-135). For both PGD1 and PGD2, we observed elevated aORs in every body system we evaluated, including central nervous system, orofacial, eye, genitourinary, gastrointestinal, musculoskeletal, and cardiac defects. CONCLUSIONS: We observed positive associations between both PGD1 and PGD2 and birth defects across multiple body systems. Future studies should focus on the role of glycemic control in birth defect risk to inform prevention efforts.

Patterns of multiple congenital anomalies in the National Birth Defect Prevention Study: Challenges and insights.

BACKGROUND: About 20%-30% of children with birth defects have multiple major birth defects in more than one organ system, often referred to as multiple congenital anomalies (MCAs). Evaluating the patterns of MCAs can provide clues to the underlying causes, pathogenic mechanisms, and developmental pathways. We sought to explore selected patterns of MCAs within the National Birth Defects Prevention Study (NBDPS), a population-based, case-control study that excluded cases attributed to known chromosomal or single-gene abnormalities. METHODS: We defined MCAs as having two or more NBDPS-eligible birth defects and calculated the adjusted observed-to-expected ratio for all observed MCA patterns using co-occurring defect analysis. RESULTS: Of the 50,186 case infants eligible for NBDPS, 2,734 (3.7%) had at least two eligible birth defects. We observed 209 distinct 2-way combinations of birth defects, 297 distinct 3-way combinations, 179 distinct 4-way combinations, and 69 distinct 5-way combinations. Sacral agenesis had the largest proportion of cases with MCAs (70%), whereas gastroschisis had the lowest (3%). Among the cases with MCAs, 63% had a heart defect, 23% had an oral cleft, and 21% had anorectal atresia/stenosis. Of the patterns with adjusted observed-to-expected ratios in the top 20%, most were consistent with the known associations or syndromes, including VATER/VACTERL association and CHARGE syndrome. CONCLUSIONS: Most but not all patterns that had the highest adjusted observed-to-expected ratios were instances of known syndromes or associations. These findings highlight the importance of considering birth defect combinations that suggest syndromic patterns in the absence of a formal syndromic diagnosis. New approaches for screening for sequences and associations, and VATER/VACTERL in particular, in surveillance systems with limited resources for manual review may be valuable for improving surveillance system quality. The observed MCA patterns within NBDPS may help focus future genetic studies by generating case groups of higher yield.

Delayed entry into prenatal care among women with pre-pregnancy health conditions, National Birth Defects Prevention Study, 1997-2011.

First trimester entry into prenatal care is recommended for all women, and especially women with pre-pregnancy conditions. Our objective was to determine whether women with pre-pregnancy conditions were at lower risk of entry after the first trimester (delayed entry) into prenatal care than women without a pre-pregnancy health condition. We used data from 10,890 participants in the National Birth Defects Prevention Study who delivered liveborn infants without birth defects. Women reported pre-pregnancy conditions and timing of entry into prenatal care during a computer-assisted telephone interview. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were conducted to evaluate whether having a pre-pregnancy condition was associated with delayed entry into prenatal care compared to women without pre-pregnancy conditions. Approximately 13% of women reported delayed entry into prenatal care, and 18% of women reported a pre-pregnancy condition. Delayed entry into prenatal care was not associated with pre-pregnancy cardiometabolic or neurologic conditions. Women with thyroid conditions were less likely to report delayed entry into prenatal care (prevalence odds ratio (OR), 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.55 [0.32, 0.94]), but women with hematologic and respiratory conditions were more likely to report delayed entry into prenatal care (OR: 1.95 [1.00, 3.82] and 1.27 [0.95, 1.72], respectively), compared to those without any chronic conditions. Future research investigating the success of early prenatal care among women with thyroid conditions could identify ways to reduce delayed prenatal care among women with other pre-pregnancy conditions.

Maternal periconceptional alcohol consumption and gastroschisis in the National Birth Defects Prevention Study, 1997-2011.

BACKGROUND: Gastroschisis is particularly prevalent among offspring of young women and has increased over recent decades. Although previous studies suggest that maternal alcohol consumption is associated with increased gastroschisis risk, none have explored whether maternal age modifies that association. OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to evaluate associations between self-reported maternal periconceptional alcohol consumption (1 month prior through the third month after conception) and risk of gastroschisis among offspring, by maternal age. METHODS: We used data from the National Birth Defects Prevention Study (NBDPS), a multi-site population-based case-control study. The analysis included 1450 gastroschisis cases and 11,829 unaffected liveborn controls delivered during 1997-2011 in ten US states. We estimated adjusted odds ratios (aOR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for the individual and joint effects of alcohol consumption and young maternal age at delivery (<25 years vs ≥25 years) on gastroschisis risk. We estimated the relative excess risk due to interaction (RERI) to quantify additive interaction. RESULTS: Periconceptional alcohol consumption was common regardless of maternal age (women <25 years: cases 38.8%, controls 29.3%; women ≥25: cases 43.5%, controls 39.5%). Compared with women ≥25 years who did not consume alcohol, we observed increased risk of gastroschisis among women <25 years, with higher estimates among those who consumed alcohol (women <25 years who did not consume alcohol. aOR 5.90, 95% CI 4.89, 7.11; women <25 years who did consume alcohol: aOR 8.21, 95% CI 6.69, 10.07). Alcohol consumption among women ≥25 years was not associated with gastroschisis (aOR 1.12, 95% CI 0.88, 1.42). This suggests super-additive interaction between alcohol consumption and maternal age (RERI -2.19, 95% CI 1.02, 3.36). CONCLUSIONS: Periconceptional alcohol consumption may disproportionately increase risk of gastroschisis among young mothers. Our findings support public health recommendations to abstain from alcohol consumption during pregnancy.

Maternal hereditary hemolytic anemia and birth defects in the National Birth Defects Prevention Study.

OBJECTIVES: Hereditary hemolytic anemia (HHA) results from genetic mutations that cause red blood cell abnormalities. Little research exists on the relationship between HHA and birth defects. Using data from the National Birth Defects Prevention Study (NBDPS), we described characteristics of HHA-exposed women and estimated associations between HHA during pregnancy and specific birth defects. METHODS: The NBDPS was a population-based, case-control study of major birth defects and included pregnancies with estimated delivery dates from October 1997 through December 2011. Participants were ascertained from hospital discharge lists or birth defect registries at 10 sites. Trained interviewers collected information about pregnancy exposures via telephone questionnaire. We described characteristics among HHA-exposed women and calculated crude odds ratios and exact 95% confidence intervals for defects with ≥3 exposed cases. RESULTS: Among 31 HHA-exposed women (28 cases/3 controls), 13 (42%) reported sickle cell anemia, 17 (55%) reported thalassemia, and one (3%) reported hereditary spherocytosis. The average age at delivery for HHA-exposed case women was 27.3 years (range: 17-38). The majority (82%) of HHA-exposed case women reported additional conditions during pregnancy, including hypertension, genitourinary infections, and respiratory illnesses. Additionally, 93% of case women reported using medication during pregnancy. Among the 28 cases, 18 (64%) had isolated birth defects. The defects with ≥3 exposed cases were anencephaly, atrial septal defect, gastroschisis, and cleft palate. Except for anencephaly, the 95% confidence intervals for all estimates were close to or included the null. CONCLUSION: This hypothesis-generating study adds to the sparse literature on the association between HHA and birth defects.

Descriptive and risk factor analysis of infantile cataracts: National Birth Defects Prevention Study, 2000-2011.

Using National Birth Defects Prevention Study (NBDPS) data, we sought to estimate birth prevalence, describe clinical characteristics, and examine risk factors for infantile cataracts. We calculated birth prevalence using the numbers of NBDPS-eligible cataract cases and live births in the study area. We described case infants by the presence of associated ipsilateral eye defects (IEDs) and non-eye-related major birth defects. Using maternal exposure information collected via telephone interview, we conducted logistic regression analyses among the interviewed cases and controls. Birth prevalence of infantile cataracts was 1.07/10,000 live births. Unilateral cataracts were more often associated with IEDs, while infants with bilateral cataracts were more often preterm, full-term with low birth weight, or had non-eye-related major birth defects. Unilateral cataracts were positively associated with maternal nulliparity (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 1.61, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.18, 2.20; reference: multiparity), whereas bilateral cataracts were positively associated with maternal education <12 years (aOR = 2.08, 95% CI = 1.13, 3.82; reference: education >12 years), and foreign-born nativity (aOR = 1.92, 95% CI = 1.04, 3.52; reference: U.S.-born nativity). The current analysis can inform future epidemiological studies aimed at identifying mechanisms underlying the associations between infantile cataracts and complex maternal exposures, such as lower levels of education and foreign-born nativity.

Characteristics of Women with Urinary Tract Infection in Pregnancy.

Background: Urinary tract infection (UTI) is the most common bacterial infection in pregnancy. Known risk factors for UTI in pregnancy include diabetes and certain urologic conditions. Other maternal characteristics might also be associated with risk and could provide clues to the etiology of UTI in pregnancy. Our objective was to identify maternal characteristics associated with UTI in pregnancy. Materials and Methods: We used data from pregnant women participating in the National Birth Defects Prevention Study, a population-based study of risk factors for major structural birth defects in 10 U.S. sites, from 1997 to 2011. In cross-sectional analyses, we used multivariable log-binomial regression to estimate prevalence ratios (PRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for associations between self-reported maternal characteristics and UTI in pregnancy. Results: In our sample of 41,869 women, the overall prevalence of reported UTI in pregnancy was 18%, but ranged from 11% to 26% between study sites. In adjusted models, diabetes was moderately associated with higher UTI prevalence (PR 1.39, 95% CI: 1.24-1.57). Higher UTI prevalence was associated even more strongly with low educational attainment (PR 2.06, 95% CI: 1.77-2.40 for some high school vs. graduate school), low household income (PR 1.64, 95% CI: 1.46-1.84 for <$10,000 vs. ≥$50,000), and race/ethnicity (PR 1.45, 95% CI: 1.13-1.80 for American Indian or Alaska Native vs. White women). Conclusions: About one in six women reported UTI in pregnancy but the prevalence varied markedly by geography and maternal characteristics. This variability could provide clues to the causes of UTI in pregnancy.

Maternal exposure to hydroxychloroquine and birth defects.

BACKGROUND: Hydroxychloroquine is a treatment for rheumatic disease and considered safe during pregnancy. Interest in hydroxychloroquine has increased as it is being examined as a potential treatment and prophylaxis for coronavirus disease 2019. Data on the risks of specific birth defects associated with hydroxychloroquine use are sparse. METHODS: Using data from two case-control studies (National Birth Defects Prevention Study and Slone Epidemiology Center Birth Defects Study), we described women who reported hydroxychloroquine use in pregnancy and the presence of specific major birth defects in their offspring. Cases had at least one major birth defect and controls were live-born healthy infants. Women self-reported medication use information in the few months before pregnancy through delivery. RESULTS: In total, 0.06% (19/31,468) of case and 0.04% (5/11,614) of control mothers in National Birth Defects Prevention Study, and 0.04% (11/29,838) of case and 0.05% (7/12,868) of control mothers in Birth Defects Study reported hydroxychloroquine use. Hydroxychloroquine users had complicated medical histories and frequent medication use for a variety of conditions. The observed birth defects among women taking hydroxychloroquine were varied and included nine oral cleft cases; the elevated observed:expected ratios for specific oral cleft phenotypes and for oral clefts overall had 95% confidence intervals that included 1.0. CONCLUSION: While teratogens typically produce a specific pattern of birth defects, the observed birth defects among the hydroxychloroquine-exposed women did not present a clear pattern, suggesting no meaningful evidence for the risk of specific birth defects. The number of exposed cases is small; results should be interpreted cautiously.

Asthma Medication Use and Risk of Birth Defects: National Birth Defects Prevention Study, 1997-2011.

BACKGROUND: Evidence regarding associations between maternal asthma medication use and birth defects is mixed. OBJECTIVE: Estimate associations between asthma medciation use and 52 birth defects using National Birth Defects Prevention Study data from 1997 to 2011. METHODS: We compared self-reported maternal asthma medication use for 28,481 birth defect cases and 10,894 nonmalformed controls. We calculated adjusted odds ratios (95% CIs) to estimate the risk of birth defects associated with early pregnancy asthma medication use (the month before through the third month of pregnancy), controlling for maternal age, race/ethnicity, body mass index, smoking, folic acid-containing supplement use, and parity. We calculated risks by medication groupings: bronchodilators, anti-inflammatories, and both. RESULTS: Overall, 1304 (5%) case and 449 (4%) control women reported early pregnancy asthma medication use. We observed an association between asthma medication use and longitudinal limb deficiency (1.81; 95% CI, 1.27-2.58). Early pregnancy bronchodilator-only use was associated with cleft palate (1.50; 95% CI, 1.11-2.02), cleft lip (1.58; 95% CI, 1.12-2.23), longitudinal limb deficiency (2.35; 95% CI, 1.55-3.54), and truncus arteriosus (2.48; 95% CI, 1.13-5.42). Although early pregnancy anti-inflammatory-only use was not associated with the birth defects studied, use of both medications was associated with biliary atresia (3.60; 95% CI, 1.55-8.35) and pulmonary atresia (2.50; 95% CI, 1.09-5.78). CONCLUSIONS: Consistent with previous National Birth Defects Prevention Study analyses, asthma medication use was not associated with most birth defects examined, but we observed modest risks for bronchodilator use and several birth defects. Our findings support maintaining adequate asthma treatment during pregnancy, because early pregnancy asthma exacerbations have been associated with adverse birth outcomes, including birth defects.