Dietary Intake of Pregnant Women with and without Inflammatory Bowel Disease in the United States.

BACKGROUND: Pregnancy is a vulnerable time where the lives of mother and baby are affected by diet, especially high-risk pregnancies in women with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Limited research has examined diet during pregnancy with IBD. AIMS: Describe and compare the diet quality of pregnant women with and without IBD, and examine associations between dietary intake and guidelines during pregnancy. METHODS: Three 24 h recalls were utilized to assess the diets of pregnant women with IBD (n = 88) and without IBD (n = 82) during 27-29 weeks of gestation. A customized frequency questionnaire was also administered to measure pre- and probiotic foods. RESULTS: Zinc intake (p = 0.02), animal protein (g) (p = 0.03), and ounce equivalents of whole grains (p = 0.03) were significantly higher in the healthy control (HC) group than the IBD group. Nutrients of concern with no significant differences between groups included iron (3% IBD and 2% HC met the goals), saturated fat (only 1% of both groups met the goals), choline (23% IBD and 21% HC met the goals), magnesium (38% IBD and 35% HC met the goals), calcium (48% IBD and 60% HC met the goals), and water intake (49% IBD and 48% HC met the goals). CONCLUSIONS: Most pregnant women in this cohort fell short of the dietary nutrients recommended in pregnancy, especially concerning for women with IBD.

Breastfeeding Duration Is Inversely Associated with Postpartum Allostatic Load: A Possible Mechanism for Improved Maternal Health.

Background: Allostatic load, a multisystem composite measure of chronic stress reflecting the cumulative wear and tear on the body, has utility in explaining maternal and child health disparities and predicting future health when measured during the peripartum period. Research using cross-sectional data has demonstrated an inverse association between concurrent breastfeeding status and maternal postpartum allostatic load. However, the relationship between breastfeeding duration and postpartum allostatic load has not been determined. Objective: This study aimed to examine the association between breastfeeding duration and postpartum allostatic load using prospective data, and to compare the association by race/ethnicity to better understand etiologies of health inequities. Materials and Methods: A secondary analysis of a data sample of 1,791 postpartum women from the Community Child Health Research Network was conducted. Multiple linear regression tested the association between and breastfeeding duration and allostatic load (range 0-10, calculated from 10 biomarkers) at 6 and 12 months postpartum, adjusting for race/ethnicity, maternal age, education, poverty level, study center, smoking, marital status, and prepregnancy body mass index. Stratified analyses examined differences in associations by race/ethnicity. Results: Breastfeeding duration was inversely associated with maternal allostatic load. In adjusted models, mothers who breastfed ≥6 months had 0.41 points lower allostatic load at 6 months (95% CI: -0.71 to -0.11) and 0.36 points lower allostatic load at 12 months postpartum (95% CI: -0.69 to -0.036) compared with mothers who never breastfed. Effect sizes varied in strength and significance across race/ethnic groups. Conclusions: Study findings suggest that extended breastfeeding for at least 6 months is linked with reduced chronic stress load in mothers during the first year postpartum. The inconsistency of findings across race/ethnic groups signals the importance of adjusting for prepregnancy allostatic load in future studies.

Breastfeeding Is Inversely Associated with Allostatic Load in Postpartum Women: Cross-Sectional Data from Nationally Representative US Women.

BACKGROUND: The postpartum period is a critical transition period when exposures to protective factors such as breastfeeding can have long-lasting health impact. Studies have suggested downregulating effects of breastfeeding on stress biomarkers such as cortisol but have not explored the way breastfeeding interacts with allostatic load, a multisystem indicator of chronic stress. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to examine the association between breastfeeding and maternal allostatic load among women within 2 y postpartum using nationally representative data. METHODS: A cross-sectional analysis of 10 waves of data from the NHANES (1999-2018) was conducted in a sample of 1302 women aged ≥18 y who provided information on breastfeeding through the reproductive health questionnaire. Clinical and empirical allostatic load scores (range: 0-10; higher numbers associated with increased risk) were derived for each participant based on 10 biomarkers reflecting metabolic, cardiovascular, and immune health. Multiple linear regression tested associations between breastfeeding and allostatic load, adjusting for maternal age, race and ethnicity, education, poverty level, and survey wave. RESULTS: Breastfeeding had a significant inverse association with allostatic load in unadjusted and adjusted models. Controlling for age, race and ethnicity, education, poverty level, and survey wave, breastfeeding women had a 0.36-point lower clinical allostatic load score than nonbreastfeeding women (ß = -0.36, SE = 0.11; 95% CI: -0.59, -0.14; P = 0.002) and a 0.44-point lower empirical allostatic load score (ß = -0.44, SE = 0.15; 95% CI: -0.74, -0.14; P = 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests that breastfeeding is protective of maternal stress and provides a more comprehensive picture of breastfeeding's influence on multiple body systems, exemplifying physiological benefits beyond effects on single biomarkers. However, limitations of cross-sectional data and non-classification of breastfeeding duration, mode, and intensity should be considered when interpreting these findings, and further research to address the role of breastfeeding and allostatic load is needed.

A Systematic Review of Mobile Produce Markets: Facilitators and Barriers to Use, and Associations with Reported Fruit and Vegetable Intake.

BACKGROUND: Diet-related chronic diseases are a major public health burden. There is growing awareness that disparities in healthful food access contribute to disparities in health. Mobile produce markets (MPMs) have emerged as a strategy to improve fruit and vegetable access and consumption, particularly among low-income, minority, and other vulnerable populations (eg, older adults and children) in food desert neighborhoods. OBJECTIVE: This review examined research on MPMs in the United States and specifically aimed to assess the relationship between MPM use and fruit and/or vegetable intake, and facilitators and barriers related to MPM use within a social ecological framework. METHODS: A systematic review of the literature consistent with PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines was conducted. Articles published through December 2017 were identified using the following databases: Web of Science, PubMed, Agricola, and CAB Abstracts. MPM studies published in English and in peer-reviewed journals were eligible for inclusion if they were based on primary research of MPMs in the United States, included results, and if MPMs were analyzed separately from other market venues and sold predominantly fruits and/or vegetables. A total of 24 studies were identified for inclusion, which varied in study types as follows: quantitative (n=15), qualitative (n=3), and mixed methods (n=6). RESULTS: An association was found between MPM use and higher reported fruit and/or vegetable intake, although existing studies that measured fruit and vegetable intake were not rigorous in study design (eg, lack of control group, use of convenience sample, small sample size). MPM location was the most commonly cited facilitator of MPM use. Other institutional factors (eg, nutrition education), as well as policy factors (eg, food-assistance programs), community factors (eg, market site liaisons), interpersonal factors (eg, socializing at market), and intrapersonal factors (eg, awareness of the benefits of fruit and/or vegetable intake) were identified. CONCLUSIONS: MPMs offer a promising strategy to improve access to fruits and vegetables and may further support healthful-food purchasing and consumption through food-assistance incentives and enticements for consumers (eg, opportunities for social networking and nutrition education). Future research on MPMs would benefit from more rigorous experimental designs, such as including a control group, and examining multiple levels within a social ecological framework.

Mobile produce market influences access to fruits and vegetables in an urban environment.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the influence of a mobile produce market (MPM) on fruit and vegetable access. DESIGN: Novel application of a structured assessment (five dimensions of access framework) to examine fruit and vegetable access through self-administered surveys on shopping behaviours, and perceptions and experiences of shopping at the MPM. SETTING: Low-income neighbourhoods with limited access to fruits and vegetables. SUBJECTS: Older (≥60 years) and younger (18-59·9 years) shoppers. RESULTS: Participants were more likely to be women and non-White, one-third lived alone and nearly half were older adults. Compared with younger, older participants had different shopping behaviours: tended to purchase food for one person (P < 0·001), be long-term shoppers (P=0·002) and use electronic benefit transfer (EBT) cards (P=0·012). Older adults were more likely to like the market location (P=0·03), while younger adults were more likely to want changes in location (P=0·04), more activities (P=0·04), taste sampling (P=0·05) and nutritional counselling (P=0·01). The MPM captured all dimensions of access: availability, indicated by satisfaction with the produce variety for nearly one-third of all participants; accessibility, indicated by participants travelling <1 mile (<1·6 km; 72·2 %) and appreciation of location (72·7 %); affordability, indicated by satisfaction with price (47·6 %); acceptability, indicated by appreciation of produce quality (46·2 %); and accommodation, indicated by satisfaction with safety of location (30·1 %) and high EBT use among older adults (41·8 %). CONCLUSIONS: MPM may influence fruit and vegetable access in low-income urban neighbourhoods by facilitating the five dimensions of access and may especially benefit older adults and individuals living alone.