Resuscitative Endovascular Balloon Occlusion of the Aorta for Traumatic Cardiopulmonary Arrest in the Emergency Department: The First Case With Successful Return of Spontaneous Circulation in Taiwan.

Exsanguinating torso hemorrhage is a leading cause of death in trauma patients. Bleeding leads to hypothermia, acidosis, and coagulopathy, the so-called "lethal triad," and creates a vicious cycle. Therefore, bleeding control tops the priority list in the management of trauma patients. Placement of resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) in patients with traumatic non-compressible torso hemorrhage is a developing technique in the emergency departments (EDs) in Taiwan, and it is a possible solution for abdominal and pelvic trauma patients with hemodynamic instability. It not only temporarily controls bleeding below the inflation site but also increases cerebral and coronary circulation. It can create a bridge for definitive care such as an operation or an embolization, possibly preventing death. Compared to thoracotomy followed by an aortic cross clamp, REBOA is a less invasive and possibly, a more efficient way to control the hemorrhage and may lead to better overall survival. The use of REBOA has been proven to be associated with improved survival-to-discharge in severely injured trauma patients. We report a case of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest caused by penetrating injury wherein return of spontaneous circulation was successfully achieved after 39-minute cardiopulmonary resuscitation and REBOA placement in the ED. The REBOA balloon was deflated after bleeding was stopped during the laparotomy operation. The patient was then transferred to the intensive care unit for postoperative care. Unfortunately, the patient passed away approximately 12 hours after the surgery.

Influence of advanced life support response time on out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patient outcomes in Taipei.

BACKGROUND: The association between out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patient survival and advanced life support response time remained controversial. We aimed to test the hypothesis that for adult, non-traumatic, out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients, a shorter advanced life support response time is associated with a better chance of survival. We analyzed Utstein-based registry data on adult, non-traumatic, out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients in Taipei from 2011 to 2015. METHODS: Patients without complete data, witnessed by emergency medical technicians, or with response times of ≥ 15 minutes, were excluded. We used logistic regression with an exposure of advanced life support response time. Primary and secondary outcomes were survival to hospital discharge and favorable neurological outcomes (cerebral performance category ≤ 2), respectively. Subgroup analyses were based on presenting rhythms of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation, and witness status. RESULTS: A total of 4,278 cases were included in the final analysis. The median advanced life support response time was 9 minutes. For every minute delayed in advanced life support response time, the chance of survival to hospital discharge would reduce by 7% and chance of favorable neurological outcome by 9%. Subgroup analysis showed that a longer advanced life support response time was negatively associated with the chance of survival to hospital discharge among out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients with shockable rhythm and pulse electrical activity groups. CONCLUSIONS: In non-traumatic, adult, out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients in Taipei, a longer advanced life support response time was associated with declining odds of survival to hospital discharge and favorable neurologic outcomes, especially in patients presenting with shockable rhythm and pulse electrical activity.

A multicenter cohort study on the association between prehospital immobilization and functional outcome of patients following spinal injury in Asia.

Prehospital spinal immobilization is a widely used procedure in the emergency medical service (EMS) system worldwide, while the incidence of patients with spinal injury (SI) is relatively low, and unnecessary prehospital spinal immobilization is associated with patient complications. This study aimed to determine the association between prehospital spine immobilization and favorable functional outcomes at hospital discharge among trauma patients with SI. We conducted a retrospective cohort study using the Pan-Asia Trauma Outcomes Study (PATOS) registry data from January 1, 2016, to November 30, 2018. A total of 759 patients with SI were enrolled from 43,752 trauma patients in the PATOS registry during the study period. The subjects had a median age of 58 years (Q1-Q3, 41-72), and 438 (57.7%) patients had prehospital spine immobilization. Overall, prehospital spinal immobilization was not associated with favorable functional outcomes at discharge in multivariable logistic regression (aOR 1.06; 95% CI 0.62-1.81, p = 0.826). However, in the subgroup of cervical SI, prehospital spinal immobilization was associated with favorable functional outcomes at discharge (aOR 3.14; 95% CI 1.04-9.50; p = 0.043). Therefore, we suggest that paramedics should be more careful when determining the presence of a cervical SI and should apply full spine immobilization if possible.