Establishment of predictive model for patients with kidney cancer bone metastasis: a study based on SEER database.

BACKGROUND: Bone is a common metastatic tissue of kidney cancer. Accurate prediction of the prognosis of patients with kidney cancer bone metastasis (KCBM) can help doctors and patients choose a further appropriate treatment. METHODS: During the period from January 1, 2010 to December 31, 2015, screening patients with kidney cancer diagnosed with bone metastases from the SEER database. Summary of demographic, pathology, number of other metastatic organs, and treatment for KCBM patients. All prognostic factors were plotted for Kaplan-Meier survival curves and log-rank test. Prognostic factors of P<0.001 in the log-rank test were chosen and used to establish nomograms of OS and KCSS. We used C-index, ROC curve, and calibration plot to test the prediction accuracy of two nomograms. RESULTS: A total of 4,234 KCBM patients were included in the study, and patients were diagnosed between January 1, 2010 and December 31, 2015. The model establishment group included 2,966 KCBM patients and the validation group included 1,268 KCBM patients. We have established nomograms for OS and KCSS respectively. These two nomograms included factors such as age, marital status, insurance status, histological type, grade, T stage, N stage, number of extra-bone metastatic organs, surgery, RT, and CT. The C-index of nomograms of OS and KCSS was 0.733 and 0.752, respectively. In all ROC curves, all AUC values were greater than 0.7, proving that the nomograms of both OS and KCSS have achieved medium prediction accuracy. The calibration plots of the model establishment group and the validation group showed good consistency between the predicted nomograms of OS and KCSS. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, nomograms of OS and KCSS were established based on the published data of KCBM patients in the SEER database, and the model was validated internally and externally. The prediction accuracy of nomograms of OS and KCSS achieved satisfactory results. At present, this model has the ability to predict the prognosis of KCBM patients and can be used in clinical work.

Assessment of the Defatting Efficacy of Mechanical and Chemical Treatment for Allograft Cancellous Bone and Its Effects on Biomechanics Properties of Bone.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the defatting efficacy of high pressure washing and gradient alcohol and biomechanical properties of defatted bone. METHODS: Fresh cancellous bone was obtained from the femoral condyle and divided into six groups according to different defatting treatments, which were: high pressure washing for 10 s (10S group), 20 s (20S group), and 30 s (30S group), gradient alcohol immersion (Alcohol group), acetone immersion (Acetone group), and non-defatted (Fresh group). The appearance of six groups was observed, and the appearance of defatted bone and fresh bone was compared. The residual lipid content and infrared spectrum were used to compare the efficacy of defatting, the DNA content was used to compare the cell content after defatting, and the maximum stress and elastic modulus were used to compare the effects of defatting treatment on biomechanical properties. RESULTS: The fresh bone was yellow and the pores contained a lot of fat. The defatted bone was white and the porous network was clear. There was no difference in residual lipid content among the three groups with high pressure washing (1.45% ± 0.16%, 1.40% ± 0.13%, and 1.46% ± 0.11%, respectively) (P = 0.828). There was no difference in residual lipid content among the 10S, alcohol, and acetone groups (1.45% ± 0.16%, 1.28% ± 0.07%, and 1.13% ± 0.22%, respectively) (P = 0.125). Infrared spectra showed that the fat content of the five defatting groups was significantly lower than that of the fresh group. There was no difference in residual lipid content among the three groups with high pressure washing (4.53 ± 0.23 ug/mL, 4.61 ± 0.18 ug/mL, and 4.66 ± 0.25 ug/mL, respectively) (P = 0.645). There was no difference in residual lipid content among the 10S, alcohol, and acetone groups (4.53 ± 0.23 ug/mL, 4.29 ± 0.24 ug/mL, and 4.27 ± 0.29 ug/mL, respectively) (P = 0.247). The maximum stress of the bone decreased significantly with the increase of the washing time (9.95 ± 0.31 Mpa, 9.07 ± 0.45 Mpa, and 8.17 ± 0.35 Mpa, respectively) (P = 0.003). The elastic modulus of the bone decreased significantly with the increase of the washing time (116.40 ± 3.54 Mpa, 106.10 ± 5.29 Mpa, and 95.63 ± 4.08 Mpa, respectively) (P = 0.003). There was no statistical difference in the maximum stress between the fresh group, the 10S group, the alcohol group, and the acetone group (10.09 ± 0.67 Mpa, 9.95 ± 0.31 Mpa, 10.11 ± 0.07 Mpa, and 10.09 ± 0.39 Mpa, respectively) (P = 0.963). There was no statistical difference in the maximum stress between the fresh group, the 10S group, the alcohol group and the acetone group (119.93 ± 4.94 Mpa, 116.40 ± 3.54 Mpa, 118.27 ± 0.85 Mpa, 118.10 ± 4.52 Mpa, respectively) (P = 0.737). CONCLUSION: The defatting efficiency was satisfactory at a time of 10 s under high pressure washing. In terms of defatting efficiency and its effect on biomechanical properties of bone, high pressure washing and gradient alcohol were similar to conventional acetone solvent extraction defatting.

Treatment method and prognostic factors of chondrosarcoma: based on Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database.

BACKGROUND: Chondrosarcoma is a malignant tumor originating from cartilage tissue. It is the second most malignant bone tumor, accounting for about 10% to 15% of all primary bone tumors. So far, there have been no reports of large-scale clinical statistics on the relationship between non-surgical treatment and prognosis in patients with chondrosarcoma. METHODS: Through the search of the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database, chondrosarcoma patients registered between January 1, 2004 and December 31, 2016 were selected as research goals. Univariate analysis of overall survival (OS) and chondrosarcoma-specific survival (CSSS) by Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and log-rank test. Mapping Kaplan-Meier curves for prognostic factors that are significant for OS and CSSS in patients with chondrosarcoma. After univariate analysis, the prognostic factors that have a significant effect on the prognosis were included in the multivariate Cox regression analysis, and the independent factors that affected the prognosis were screened. RESULTS: A total of 1,128 patients with chondrosarcoma were included in the study. Univariate analysis showed that prognostic factors such as age, gender, primary site, histological type, grade, tumor size, metastasis, surgery, radiotherapy, chemotherapy and treatment method had significant effects on all-cause mortality (ACM) and chondrosarcoma-specific mortality (CSSM). These factors were included in the multivariate Cox regression analysis. The results showed age, primary site, histological type, grade, tumor size, metastasis, and treatment method were independent factors affecting ACM and CSSM. CONCLUSIONS: This study found that although non-surgical treatment of chondrosarcoma has made great progress, at present, it is still not considered that non-surgical treatment can significantly improve the prognosis. There are many factors affecting the prognosis of chondrosarcoma, including age, primary site, histological type, grade, tumor size, distant metastasis and treatment method. In the future, more samples and more detailed data will be needed to study the treatment of chondrosarcoma and to analyze the important factors affecting prognosis through big data analysis.

Demineralized Bone Matrix Carriers and their Clinical Applications: An Overview.

Reconstruction of massive bone defects is challenging for orthopaedic clinicians, especially in cases of severe trauma and resection of tumors in various locales. Autologous iliac crest bone graft (ICBG) is the "gold standard" for bone grafting. However, the limited availability and complications at donor sites resulted in seeking other options like allografts and bone graft substitutes. Demineralized bone matrix (DBM) is a form of allograft using acidic solution to remove mineral components, while leaving much of the proteinaceous components native to bone, with small amounts of calcium-based solids, inorganic phosphates, and some trace cell debris. It is an osteoconductive and osteoinductive biomaterial and is approved as a medical device for use in bone defects and spinal fusion. To pack consistently into the defect sites and stay firmly in the filling parts, DBM products have various forms combined with biocompatible viscous carriers, including sponges, strips, injectable putty, paste, and paste infused with chips. The present review aims to summarize the properties of various kind of viscous carriers and their clinical use combined with DBM in commercially available products. Given DBM'mercially available products. Given DBM;s long clinical track record and commercial accessibility in standard forms, opportunities to further develop and validate DBM as a versatile bone biomaterial in orthopaedic repair and regenerative medicine contexts are attractive.

The efficacy and safety of core decompression for the treatment of femoral head necrosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Core decompression (CD) is an important method for the treatment of osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH). Few articles investigate the influence of core decompression on outcomes of ONFH. This study was carried out to observe the safety and effectiveness of core decompression in the treatment of ONFH. METHODS: A comprehensive literature search of databases including PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library was performed to collect the related studies. The medical subject headings used were "femur head necrosis" and "Core decompression." The relevant words in title or abstract included but not limited to "Osteonecrosis of the Femoral Head," "femoral head necrosis," "avascular necrosis of femoral head," and "ischemic necrosis of femoral head." The methodological index for nonrandomized studies was adopted for assessing the studies included in this review. RESULTS: Thirty-two studies included 1865 patients (2441 hips). Twenty-one studies (1301 hips) using Ficat staging standard, 7 studies (338hips) using Association Research Circulation Osseous (ARCO) staging standard, and University of Pennsylvania system for staging avascular necrosis (UPSS) staging criteria for 4 studies (802 hips). All the studies recorded the treatment, 22 studies (1379 hips) were treated with core decompression (CD) alone, and 7 studies (565 hips) were treated with core decompression combined with autologous bone (CD Autologous bone). Nine subjects (497 hips) were treated with core decompression combined with autologous bone marrow (CD Marrow). Twenty-seven studies (2120 hips) documented the number of conversion to total hip replacement (THA), and 26 studies (1752hips) documented the number of radiographic progression (RP). Twenty-one studies recorded the types of complications and the number of cases, a total of 69 cases. The random-effect model was used for meta-analysis, and the results showed that the overall success rate was 65%. The rate of success showed significant difference on the outcomes of different stages. The rate of success, conversion to THA, and radiographic progression showed significant difference on the outcomes of ONFH using different treatments. CONCLUSIONS: Core decompression is an effective and safe method of treating ONFH. The combined use of autologous bone or bone marrow can increase the success rate. For advanced femoral head necrosis, the use of CD should be cautious. High-quality randomized controlled trials and prospective studies will be necessary to clarify the effects of different etiology factors, treatments, and postoperative rehabilitation. Until then, the surgeon can choose core decompression to treat ONFH depending on the patient's condition. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: I Meta-analysis.

Recursive Partitioning Analysis (RPA) of Prognostic Factors for Overall Survival in Patients with Spinal Metastasis: A New System for Stratified Treatment.

BACKGROUND: Accurate survival estimate is necessary when determining the most appropriate treatment modality for metastatic spinal tumor. The main purpose of this study was to identify the prognostic factors of spinal metastasis and establish a decision tree model. METHODS: A consecutive cohort of 507 patients from 3 institutional clinical centers who were treated for metastatic spinal tumor between 2005 and 2015 were retrospectively reviewed. In total, 70% of the participants were randomly selected as a "training sample." The prognostic effect of preoperative factors was evaluated using the "training sample," and a decision tree model was established. Then, the accuracy of the new model, as well as the Tokuhashi and Tomita score, was tested by the "test sample," which consisted of the remaining 30% of participants. RESULTS: A decision tree model was generated based on the significant factors with an order of descending importance on predicting the prognosis. According to the new model, patients were classified into 3 groups, mean survival times of less than 6 months, 6-12 months, and more than 12 months, who were indicated for conservative therapy/palliative operation, palliative operation, and invasive excision, respectively. The newly established model was confirmed to be of high accuracy in predicting overall survival, whereas the Tokuhashi and Tomita scores were of modest accuracy and consistency. CONCLUSIONS: A new decision tree model for prognosis prediction in spinal metastasis was established with a satisfactory accuracy and consistency. However, the Tokuhashi and Tomita systems were presented to be less correlated between the scores and actual survival.

Prognostic Discrepancy on Overall Survival Between Ambulatory and Nonambulatory Patients with Metastatic Spinal Cord Compression.

BACKGROUND: Contradictory results have been reported regarding the prognostic effect of ambulatory status in patients with metastatic spinal cord compression (MSCC). The aim of this study was to investigate whether ambulatory status is a significant predictor of overall survival in patients with MSCC and to distinguish the differences of predictors between patients who were ambulatory and those who were not ambulatory before operation. METHODS: Three clinical centers were retrospectively reviewed to identify patients operated on for MSCC between 2005 and 2015. Fourteen prognostic factors were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier survival curves, univariate log-rank test, and multivariate Cox hazard regression model for the whole cohort and the subgroups of ambulatory and nonambulatory patients. RESULTS: In all, 169 patients were consecutively enrolled. Their mean age was 59.6 ± 10.5 years (range, 18-84 years). The median survival time in the whole cohort was 7.0 ± 0.5 months, whereas it was 7.0 ± 0.8 months and 5.0 ± 1.3 months in ambulatory and nonambulatory patients, respectively. Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that ambulatory status was not a significant predictor of overall survival (P = 0.266), but primary tumor type and Karnofsky performance status were independent predictors of overall survival for the whole cohort. Primary tumor and metastatic site were significantly associated with survival in ambulatory patients. Gender and Karnofsky performance status were associated with survival in nonambulatory patients. CONCLUSIONS: Ambulatory status was not shown to predict the prognosis of patients with MSCC. prognostic factors should be distinguished between ambulatory and nonambulatory patients when choosing a therapeutic modality.

Prognostic effect of factors involved in revised Tokuhashi score system for patients with spinal metastases: a systematic review and Meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Cancer patients' survival time has obviously improved, with the development of systemic treatment techniques. However, the probability of metastases to the vertebrae has also been increased which makes some adverse effects on patients' quality of life. The prediction of survival plays a key role in choosing therapeutic modality, and Tokuhashi Score was established as one of the most commonly used predictive systems for spinal metastases. Thus, this study was conducted to identify the prognostic effect of factors involved in revised Tokuhashi Score (RTS). METHODS: Two investigators independently retrieved relevant literature on platforms of PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library. We identified eligible studies through title/abstract and full-text perusing. Data was extracted including general information of studies, participants' characteristics, therapeutic modality, overall survival and prognostic effect of factors. Hazard ratio (HR) for each factor was synthesized if available through fixed- or random-effect models as appropriate. RESULTS: A total of 63 eligible studies with 10,411 participants were identified. Overall, cases with thyroid cancer had the highest survival rate, while the ones with non-small cell lung cancer and hepatocellular carcinoma lived for the shorted survival time. Performance status, bone metastasis, number of involved vertebrae, visceral metastasis, primary tumor and neurological status were regarded as significant predictors in 71.4, 40.0, 18.2, 63.4, 73.1 and 44.7% of the involved studies respectively. Thirty-eight articles were included in meta-analysis, and prognostic effects of five factors (apart from primary tumor) were analyzed. Factors were all proved to be significant except comparisons between KPS (Karnofsky Performance Status) 10-40 VS. 50-70 and single VS. multiple spinal metastases. CONCLUSION: All factors of RTS were significant on prognosis predicting and should be considered when choosing therapeutic modality for spinal metastases. What's more, we believe that more accurate prognosis may be obtained after removal of the cut-offs for KPS 10-40 VS. 50-70 and single VS. multiple involved vertebrae.

Is Ambulatory Status a Prognostic Factor of Survival in Patients with Spinal Metastases? An Exploratory Meta-analysis.

This study was conducted to identify the influence of ambulatory status prior to treatment on survival of patients with spinal metastases. Two investigators independently retrieved relevant electronic literature in PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases, to identify eligible studies. Effect estimates for hazard risk (HR) were extracted and synthesized through fixed-effects or random-effects models as appropriate. A total of 17 eligible studies were identified, with an accumulated number of 3962 participants. HR from 14 studies regarding comparison between ambulatory versus non-ambulatory groups were pooled using a random-effects model, and statistical significance was presented for the pooled HR (HR = 1.96; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.65-2.34). In subgroups of mixed primary tumor and lung cancer, ambulatory status was considered to be a significant prognostic factor (P < 0.05), while in the subgroup of prostate cancer it was not (HR = 1.72; 95% CI, 0.79-3.74). HR from 4 studies related to comparison between Frankel E versus Frankel C-D were pooled using a fixed-effects model, which revealed statistical significance (HR = 1.73; 95% CI, 1.27-2.36). Ambulatory status is a significant prognostic factor in patients with spinal metastases. However, in patients with primary prostate cancer, the prognostic effect of ambulatory status has not yet been confirmed to be significant.

Prognostic Factors of Ambulatory Status for Patients with Metastatic Spinal Cord Compression: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to identify prognostic factors for functional outcome of metastatic spinal cord compression (MSCC). METHODS: All full texts in English regarding the prognostic factors for functional outcome of MSCC, published between January 2007 and October 2017, were identified using the electronic databases PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library. An exploratory meta-analysis was also conducted when appropriate data were available. RESULTS: A total of 25 studies, involving 4897 patients, met the inclusion criteria. Overall, 69.7% of patients across all studies were able to walk postoperatively compared with 49.0% preoperatively. Moreover, 84.7% of the patients maintained ambulation after treatment. Motor function was significantly associated with ambulatory status before treatment, time of developing motor deficits, interval from symptom to surgery, and preoperative performance status. CONCLUSIONS: Ambulatory status before treatment, interval from symptom to treatment, and time of developing motor deficits can be considered as the most significant prognostic factors for posttreatment ambulatory status. Spinal metastasis should have a higher priority, and immediate intervention should be started before the development of irreversible neurologic deficits. Moreover, short-course radiotherapy might be a good option for patients with a limited life span. Consequently, the identified prognostic factors can be regarded as a preoperative assessment tool to predict neurologic outcome and guide clinical treatment for individual patients with MSCC. However, the retrospective nature of this study with low-quality evidence must be taken into account when interpreting these results, and further research is needed to identify prognostic factors.