Factors associated with pre-treatment hyperferritinemia in patients with chronic hepatitis C virus infection.

Pre-treatment host and viral factors may affect serum ferritin levels in patients with hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. We delineated pre-treatment factors associated with hyperferritinemia in these patients. 1682 eligible patients underwent pre-treatment assessment for serum ferritin and various host/viral factors. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were conducted to evaluate factors associated with hyperferritinemia. Multivariate logistic regression analyses revealed that age > 50 years (adjusted odds ratio [OR]: 1.38 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.09-1.74), p = 0.008), fibrosis stage ≥ F3 (adjusted OR: 1.36 (95% CI 1.04-1.77), p = 0.02), fibrosis index based on four parameters (FIB-4) > 3.25 (adjusted OR: 1.46 (95% CI 1.11-1.92), p = 0.01), presence of metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) (adjusted OR: 1.43 (95% CI 1.21-1.76), p = 0.001), and alanine transaminase (ALT) > 2 folds upper limit of normal (ULN) (adjusted OR: 2.87 (95% CI 2.20-3.75), p < 0.001) were associated hyperferritinemia. The log10 value of HBV or HCV viral load was not associated with the log10 value of ferritin level (Spearman's rank correlation coefficient: - 0.025, p = 0.81 and 0.002, p = 0.92). In conclusion, host factors, rather than viral factors, are associated with hyperferritinemia in patients with HCV.

Serum Mac-2 binding protein glycosylation isomer dynamics in patients achieving sustained virologic response for hepatitis C virus.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Understanding the dynamics of serum Mac-2 binding protein glycosylation isomer (M2BPGi) remains pivotal for hepatitis C virus (HCV) patients' post-sustained virologic response (SVR12) through direct-acting antivirals (DAAs). METHODS: We compared areas under receiver operating characteristic curves (AUROCs) of M2BPGi, FIB-4, and APRI and assess M2BPGi cutoff levels in predicting fibrosis stages of ≥F3 and F4 utilizing transient elastography in 638 patients. Variations in M2BPGi levels from pretreatment to SVR12 and their association with pretreatment alanine transaminase (ALT) levels and fibrosis stage were investigated. RESULTS: The AUROCs of M2BPGi were comparable to FIB-4 in predicting ≥F3 (0.914 vs 0.902, P = 0.48) and F4 (0.947 vs 0.915, P = 0.05) but were superior to APRI in predicting ≥F3 (0.914 vs 0.851, P = 0.001) and F4 (0.947 vs 0.857, P < 0.001). Using M2BPGi cutoff values of 2.83 and 3.98, fibrosis stages of ≥F3 and F4 were confirmed with a positive likelihood ratio ≥10. The median M2BPGi change was -0.55. Patients with ALT levels ≥5 times ULN or ≥F3 demonstrated more pronounced median decreases in M2BPGi level compared to those with ALT levels 2-5 times ULN and <2 times ULN (-0.97 vs -0.68 and -0.44; P < 0.001) or with < F3 (-1.52 vs -0.44; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Serum M2BPGi is a reliable marker for advanced hepatic fibrosis. Following viral clearance, there is a notable M2BPGi decrease, with the extent of reduction influenced by ALT levels and fibrosis stage.

Comparison of diagnostic performance among Abbott RealTime HCV Genotyping II, Abbott HCV Genotype plus RUO, and Roche Cobas HCV Genotyping assays for hepatitis C virus genotyping.

Comparison of diagnostic accuracy for commercial hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotyping (Abbott RealTime HCV Genotyping II, Roche Cobas Genotyping) and investigational Abbott HCV Genotype plus RUO assays designed to discriminate genotype (GT)-1a, 1b or 6 in cases of ambiguous GT from the Abbott commercial assay remains limited. 743 HCV-viremic samples were subjected to analysis using Abbott and Roche commercial as well as Abbott HCV Genotype plus RUO assays. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) targeting core region was employed as the reference standard. Diagnostic accuracy was reported as the number of participants (percentages) along with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Using NGS, 741 samples (99.7%) yielded valid genotyping results. The diagnostic accuracies were 97.6% (95% CI: 96.1%-98.5%) and 95.3% (95% CI: 93.4%-96.6%) using Abbott and Roche commercial assays (p = 0.0174). Abbott commercial assay accurately diagnosed HCV GT-6a and 6w, whereas Roche commercial assay accurately diagnosed HCV GT-6a. Both assays demonstrated low accuracies for HCV GT-6b, 6e, 6g, and 6n. Abbott HCV Genotype plus RUO assay discriminated 13 of the 14 samples (92.9%; 95% CI: 64.2%-99.6%) that yielded ambiguous GT. Both assays were capable of diagnosing mixed HCV infections when the minor genotype comprised >8.4% of the viral load. The diagnostic performance of commercial HCV genotyping assays is commendable. Abbott assay demonstrated superior performance compared to Roche assay in diagnosing HCV GT-6. Abbott HCV Genotype plus RUO assay aids in discriminating ambiguous GT. Both commercial assays are proficient in diagnosing mixed HCV infections at a cut-off viral load of 8.4% in minor genotype.