RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Patients with symptomatic lower extremity arterial disease (LEAD) are recommended to receive antiplatelet therapy, while direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are standard for stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). For patients with concomitant LEAD and AF, data comparing dual antithrombotic therapy (an antiplatelet agent used in conjunction with a DOAC) vs. DOAC monotherapy are scarce. This retrospective cohort study, based on data from the Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database, aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of these antithrombotic strategies. METHODS: Patients with AF who underwent revascularisation for LEAD between 2012 - 2020 and received any DOAC within 30 days of discharge were included. Patients were grouped by antiplatelet agent exposure into the dual antithrombotic therapy and DOAC monotherapy groups. Inverse probability of treatment weighting was used to mitigate selection bias. Major adverse limb events (MALEs), ischaemic stroke or systemic embolism, and bleeding outcomes were compared. Patients were followed until the occurrence of any study outcome, death, or up to two years. RESULTS: A total of 1 470 patients were identified, with 736 in the dual antithrombotic therapy group and 734 in the DOAC monotherapy group. Among them, 1 346 patients received endovascular therapy as the index revascularisation procedure and 124 underwent bypass surgery. At two years, dual antithrombotic therapy was associated with a higher risk of MALEs than DOAC monotherapy (subdistribution hazard ratio [SHR] 1.34, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.15 - 1.56), primarily driven by increased repeat revascularisation. Dual antithrombotic therapy was also associated with a higher risk of major bleeding (SHR 1.43, 95% CI 1.05 - 1.94) and gastrointestinal bleeding (SHR 2.17, 95% CI 1.42 - 3.33) than DOAC monotherapy. CONCLUSION: In patients with concomitant LEAD and AF who underwent peripheral revascularisation, DOAC monotherapy was associated with a lower risk of MALEs and bleeding events than dual antithrombotic therapy.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Hard-to-heal diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) are associated with higher mortality rates and an increased medical burden for patients. ON101, a new topical cream, exhibited better healing efficacy than the control dressing in a Phase III trial. In this post-hoc analysis, we further identify whether ON101 can improve the healing of ulcers with hard-to-heal risk factors in this cohort of DFU patients. APPROACH: To compare the efficacy of ON101 with absorbent dressing among various hard-to-heal wounds in patients with DFU, a post hoc analysis of a randomized phase III trial included 276 DFU patients was performed by subgrouping those patients based on ulcer depth, location, size, duration, and patients' glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) levels and body mass index (BMI). RESULTS: In the full analysis set, the proportion of patients achieving healing was 61.7% in the ON101 group and 37.0% in the comparator (P =0.0001). In sub-group analysis according to risk factors, ON101 demonstrated superior healing capacity on Wagner grade 2 ulcers (P < 0.0001); plantar ulcers (P = 0.0016), ulcers size ≥5 cm² (P = 0.0122), ulcers duration ≥3 months (P = 0.0043); for patients with HbA1c ≥9% (P = 0.0285); and patients with BMI ≥25 (P = 0.0005). INNOVATION: ON101, a novel therapeutic drug, can modulate the functions of macrophages and demonstrate superior healing rates to conventional absorbent dressing in patients with hard-to-heal DFUs. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this post hoc study suggest that ON101 is a better therapeutic option than conventional dressing used in treatment for DFU patients with higher HbA1c, BMI, or ulcers with complex conditions such as longer duration, deeper wounds, larger size, and plantar location.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Peripheral artery disease (PAD) is common and associated with a higher risk of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in dialysis patients. A longer corrected QT (QTc) interval has been associated with adverse cardiovascular events and mortality in the general population and patients with end-stage kidney disease. However, little evidence is available on the predictive value of QTc in dialysis patients with PAD. METHODS: We conducted a prospective cohort study of 356 dialysis patients with symptomatic PAD undergoing endovascular therapy. We performed the resting 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) at baseline. Cox regression analyses were used to assess the association of QTc with all-cause mortality and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs), defined as non-fatal myocardial infarction, non-fatal stroke, and cardiovascular death. RESULTS: The mean age was 67.3 ± 11.5 years; 41.6% of participants were women. The median QTc was 471 (interquartile ranges 448-491) milliseconds (ms). During a median follow-up of 2.2 years, 188 (52.8%) patients died, and MACEs occurred in 119 (33.4%) patients. In multivariable-adjusted models, patients in tertile 3 of QTc levels had a significantly greater risk of all-cause mortality (hazard ratio [HR] 2.41, 95% confidence intervals [CI] 1.58-3.69) and MACEs (HR 1.90, 95% CI 1.15-3.13) than those in tertile 1. Similarly, each 10-ms increase in the baseline QTc predicted a higher risk of all-cause death (HR 1.15, 95% CI 1.09-1.21) and MACEs (HR 1.15, 95% CI 1.07-1.23). CONCLUSIONS: QTc prolongation was independently associated with adverse outcomes among dialysis patients with symptomatic PAD.
RESUMEN
The Taiwan Society of Cardiology (TSOC) and Taiwan Society of Plastic Surgery (TSPS) have collaborated to develop a joint consensus for the management of patients with advanced vascular wounds. The taskforce comprises experts including preventive cardiologists, interventionists, and cardiovascular and plastic surgeons. The consensus focuses on addressing the challenges in diagnosing, treating, and managing complex wounds; incorporates the perfusion evaluation and the advanced vascular wound care team; and highlights the importance of cross-disciplinary teamwork. The aim of this joint consensus is to manage patients with advanced vascular wounds and encourage the adoption of these guidelines by healthcare professionals to improve patient care and outcomes. The guidelines encompass a range of topics, including the definition of advanced vascular wounds, increased awareness, team structure, epidemiology, clinical presentation, medical treatment, endovascular intervention, vascular surgery, infection control, advanced wound management, and evaluation of treatment results. It also outlines a detailed protocol for assessing patients with lower leg wounds, provides guidance on consultation and referral processes, and offers recommendations for various wound care devices, dressings, and products. The 2024 TSOC/TSPS consensus for the management of patients with advanced vascular wounds serves as a catalyst for international collaboration, promoting knowledge exchange and facilitating advancements in the field of advanced vascular wound management. By providing a comprehensive and evidence-based approach, this consensus aims to contribute to improved patient care and outcomes globally.
RESUMEN
Background: The 10-year atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) risk - as assessed using the Framingham general cardiovascular risk score (FRS-CVD) or pooled cohort equations (PCE) - is commonly used in Western cohorts for the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease (CVD). However, the FRS-CVD and PCE have not been validated in Taiwanese cohorts. Objectives: We aimed to validate the FRS-CVD and PCE for assessing the 10-year ASCVD risk using a Taiwanese community-based population. Methods: We extracted patient data from the Landseed Integrated Outreaching Neighborhood Screening registry, a community-based prospective cohort study established in 2006. Cardiovascular events from 2006 to 2017 were determined from electronic medical records. The discriminative power and calibration of the FRS-CVD and PCE were evaluated. Results: Overall, 5,139 subjects were analyzed; the 10-year follow-up rate was 99.6%. The mean age at baseline was 52.8 ± 13.1 years, and 44.6% of the subjects were male. In total, 430 of 4,631 (9.3%) and 227 of 4,022 (5.6%) of the FRS-CVD- and PCE-like cohorts, respectively, had ASCVD events. The calibration χ2 of the FRS-CVD was 7.0267 (p = 0.6343) in males and 7.8845 (p = 0.5458) in females; the χ2 of PCE was 13.007 (p = 0.1623) in males and 38.785 (p < 0.001) in females. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of the FRS-CVD was 0.76 (0.72-0.79) in males and 0.71 (0.67-0.74) in females; the AUROC of PCE was 0.68 (0.62-0.73) in males and 0.61 (0.56-0.67) in females. Conclusions: Except for PCE in females, the FRS-CVD and PCE provided good calibration and modest discrimination in statin-naïve Taiwanese individuals without prior CVD.
RESUMEN
Background: Population-based studies have reported the association between prolonged corrected QT (QTc) intervals and an increased risk of adverse cardiovascular events. Data regarding the association between longer QTc intervals and incident cardiovascular outcomes in patients with lower extremity arterial disease (LEAD) are scarce. Objective: To examine the impact of QTc interval on long-term cardiovascular outcomes in elderly patients with symptomatic LEAD. Methods: This cohort study extracted data from the Tzu-chi Registry of ENDovascular Intervention for Peripheral Artery Disease (TRENDPAD) and enrolled 504 patients aged ≥ 70 treated with endovascular therapy for atherosclerotic LEAD from July 1, 2005, to December 31, 2019. The main outcomes of interest were all-cause mortality and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). Multivariate analysis was conducted using the Cox proportional hazard model to determine independent variables. We performed interaction analysis between corrected QT and other covariates and Kaplan-Meier analysis to compare the outcome of interest among the groups stratified by the tercile of QTc intervals. Results: A total of 504 patients [235 men (46.6%); mean age, 79.9 ± 6.2 years; mean QTc interval, 459 ± 33â msec] entered the final data analysis. We categorized the baseline patient characteristics according to terciles of QTc intervals. During the median follow-up time of 3.15 (interquartile ranges, 1.65-5.42) years, we noted 264 deaths and 145 MACEs. The 5-year rates of freedom from all-cause mortality (71% vs. 57% vs. 31%, P < 0.001) and MACEs (83% vs. 67% vs. 46%, P < 0.001) were significantly different among the tercile groups. Multivariate analysis showed that a 1-SD increase in the QTc interval increased the risk of all-cause mortality [hazard ratio (HR) 1.49, P < 0.001] and MACEs (HR 1.59, P < 0.001) after adjusting for other covariates. The interaction analysis showed that QTc interval and C-reactive protein levels were most strongly associated with death (HR = 4.88, 95% CI 3.09-7.73, interaction P < 0.001) and MACEs (HR = 7.83, 95% CI 4.14-14.79, interaction P < 0.001). Conclusions: In elderly patients with symptomatic atherosclerotic LEAD, a prolonged QTc interval is associated with advanced limb ischemia, multiple medical comorbidities, increased risk of MACEs, and all-cause mortality.
RESUMEN
Background: A recent meta-analysis reported late excess mortality in patients treated with paclitaxel-coated devices (PCDs) for symptomatic femoropopliteal disease. However, this finding is controversial. Objectives: To investigate the impact on mortality and predictors of repeat exposure to PCDs in patients with lower extremity peripheral arterial disease (LE-PAD). Methods: We analyzed registry patient-level data from two centers. A total of 214 patients were enrolled, and stratified based on terciles of cumulative dose of paclitaxel. We treated 134 patients with a single PCD exposure and 80 with multiple PCD exposures. We used the follow-up index (FUI) in Kaplan-Meier survival estimates to minimize potential selection bias. We used Cox proportional hazard and splines models to determine the predictors of mortality and assess their relationships with mortality. Results: The mean cumulative dose of paclitaxel was significantly different among groups (6.40 mg vs. 15.06 mg vs. 38.57 mg, p < 0.001). The 5-year FUI (0.93 ± 0.19 vs. 0.94 ± 0.18 vs. 0.95 ± 0.15, p = 0.836) and survival rates were not different (65.4% vs. 51.9% vs. 72.0%, p = 0.148). There was no dose-response association between paclitaxel dosage and death (p = 0.297). The predictors of death were congestive heart failure, stroke, dialysis dependence, neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) > 3, age > 71 years, and body mass index (BMI) < 20 kg/m2. Spline model analysis validated the non-linear associations between mortality, age, BMI, and NLR. Conclusions: Repeated PCD exposure for LE-PAD did not result in excess late mortality. Predictors of mortality might change over time, and continuous variables had non-linear relationships with death.
RESUMEN
Peripheral artery disease (PAD) imposes a heavy burden of major adverse cardiovascular events that are associated with considerable mortality and morbidity, and major adverse limb events (e.g., thrombectomy, revascularization, amputation) that can substantially impact patients' daily functioning and quality of life. Global registry data have indicated that PAD is an underdiagnosed disease in Taiwan, and its associated risk factors remain inadequately controlled. This review discusses the burden of PAD in Taiwan, major guidelines on PAD management, and the latest clinical trial outcomes. Practical experience, opinions, and the latest trial data were integrated to derive a series of clinical algorithms - patient referral, PAD diagnosis, and the antithrombotic management of PAD. These algorithms can be adapted not only by physicians in Taiwan involved in the clinical management of patients with PAD but also by general practitioners in local clinics and regional hospital settings, with the ultimate aim of improving the totality of PAD patient care in Taiwan.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Revascularisation for peripheral artery disease (PAD) is increasingly common in dialysis patients. Patients with PAD who have undergone revascularisation are at high risk of subsequent complications. Malnutrition is an important modifiable risk factor for dialysis patients, yet few data exist on the prognostic impact of malnutrition on post-procedure long term outcomes. The objective was to assess the prevalence and prognostic association of malnutrition using the Controlling Nutritional Status (CONUT) score in a prospective cohort of dialysis patients undergoing endovascular therapy (EVT) for PAD. METHODS: A total of 395 consecutive dialysis patients undergoing endovascular revascularisation for lower extremity PAD between 2005 and 2019 were examined for the primary outcome of all cause death. Secondary outcomes included major adverse limb events (MALEs), defined as acute limb ischaemia, major amputation, and clinically driven revascularisation; and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs). Nutritional status was assessed by CONUT score, a screening tool for malnutrition, incorporating albumin, cholesterol, and total lymphocyte count. RESULTS: According to the CONUT score, 40.8% of patients were moderately or severely malnourished. During a median follow up of 2.2 years, 218 (55.2%) patients died; 211 (53.4%) patients had MALEs, and MACEs occurred in 135 (34.2%) patients. Compared with normal nutritional status, severe malnutrition was associated with a significantly increased risk of all cause death (adjusted hazard ration [aHR] 4.83, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.56 - 9.12) and MALEs (aHR 2.42, 95% CI 1.23 - 4.74) but not MACEs (aHR 1.81, 95% CI 0.74 - 4.40). Similar results were observed when the CONUT score was analysed as a continuous variable. CONCLUSION: Malnutrition is common in dialysis patients with PAD requiring endovascular therapy and is strongly associated with increased death and MALEs. Clinical trials are needed to evaluate whether nutritional interventions improve outcomes for dialysis patients after peripheral revascularisation.
Asunto(s)
Anomalías Cardiovasculares , Procedimientos Endovasculares , Desnutrición , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica , Masculino , Humanos , Estudios Prospectivos , Diálisis Renal/efectos adversos , Desnutrición/complicaciones , Desnutrición/diagnóstico , Desnutrición/epidemiología , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/complicaciones , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/diagnóstico , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/cirugía , Factores de Riesgo , Pronóstico , Morbilidad , Anomalías Cardiovasculares/complicaciones , Procedimientos Endovasculares/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Endovasculares/métodos , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
This study evaluated the risk of major bleeding associated with concomitant use of direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) and anticancer drugs (ACDs), which share metabolic pathways, in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and cancer. We performed a retrospective cohort study using Taiwan's National Health Insurance database and included patients with AF and cancer who received DOAC prescriptions from 1 to 2012 to 31 December 2017. The incidence of major bleeding in person-quarters with concomitant use of DOAC and any of 15 ACDs with inhibitory or competitive effects of CYP3A4 or P-gp activity (docetaxel, vinorelbine, methotrexate, irinotecan, etoposide, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, imatinib, nilotinib, abiraterone, bicalutamide, tamoxifen, anastrozole, cyclosporine, tacrolimus) was compared with that in person-quarters with DOAC alone. Adjusted incidence-rate differences between DOAC use with and without concurrent ACDs were estimated using Poisson regression models weighted by the inverse probability of treatment. In 13,158 patients with AF and cancer (76.9 ± 8.9 years; male 60%), 1545 major bleeding events occurred during 90,540 DOAC-exposed person-quarters. Concurrent use of DOAC and any of 15 ACDs occurred in only 18% of patients. Compared with use of DOAC alone, concomitant use of DOAC and these ACDs was not associated with an increased risk of major bleeding. Co-medication with DOAC and ACDs with inhibitory or competitive effects on CYP3A4 or P-gp activity was not associated with a higher risk of major bleeding than DOAC alone. Our findings may provide clinicians with confidence regarding the safety of concurrent use of DOAC and ACDs in patients with AF and cancer.
Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos , Fibrilación Atrial , Neoplasias , Administración Oral , Anticoagulantes/efectos adversos , Antineoplásicos/efectos adversos , Fibrilación Atrial/complicaciones , Citocromo P-450 CYP3A , Hemorragia/inducido químicamente , Hemorragia/tratamiento farmacológico , Hemorragia/epidemiología , Humanos , Masculino , Neoplasias/complicaciones , Neoplasias/tratamiento farmacológico , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
Importance: Delayed healing of diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) is known to be caused by dysregulated M1/M2-type macrophages, and restoring the balance between these macrophage types plays a critical role in healing. However, drugs used to regulate M1/M2 macrophages have not yet been studied in large randomized clinical trials. Objective: To compare the topical application of ON101 cream with use of an absorbent dressing (Hydrofiber; ConvaTec Ltd) when treating DFUs. Design, Setting, and Participants: This multicenter, evaluator-blinded, phase 3 randomized clinical trial was performed in 21 clinical and medical centers across the US, China, and Taiwan from November 23, 2012, to May 11, 2020. Eligible patients with debrided DFUs of 1 to 25 cm2 present for at least 4 weeks and with Wagner grade 1 or 2 were randomized 1:1 to receive ON101 or control absorbent dressings. Interventions: Twice-daily applications of ON101 or a absorbent dressing changed once daily or 2 to 3 times a week for 16 weeks, with a 12-week follow-up. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was the incidence of complete healing, defined as complete re-epithelialization at 2 consecutive visits during the treatment period assessed on the full-analysis set (FAS) of all participants with postrandomization data collected. Safety outcomes included assessment of the incidences of adverse events, clinical laboratory values, and vital signs. Results: In the FAS, 236 eligible patients (175 men [74.2%]; mean [SD] age, 57.0 [10.9] years; mean [SD] glycated hemoglobin level, 8.1% [1.6%]) with DFUs classified as Wagner grade 1 or 2 (mean [SD] ulcer area, 4.8 [4.4] cm2) were randomized to receive either the ON101 cream (n = 122) or the absorbent dressing (n = 114) for as long as 16 weeks. The incidence of complete healing in the FAS included 74 patients (60.7%) in the ON101 group and 40 (35.1%) in the comparator group during the 16-week treatment period (difference, 25.6 percentage points; odds ratio, 2.84; 95% CI, 1.66-4.84; P < .001). A total of 7 (5.7%) treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in the ON101 group vs 5 (4.4%) in the comparator group. No treatment-related serious adverse events occurred in the ON101 group vs 1 (0.9%) in the comparator group. Conclusions and Relevance: In this multicenter randomized clinical trial, ON101 exhibited better healing efficacy than absorbent dressing alone in the treatment of DFUs and showed consistent efficacy among all patients, including those with DFU-related risk factors (glycated hemoglobin level, ≥9%; ulcer area, >5 cm2; and DFU duration, ≥6 months). Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01898923.
Asunto(s)
Fármacos Dermatológicos/uso terapéutico , Pie Diabético/tratamiento farmacológico , Extractos Vegetales/uso terapéutico , Cicatrización de Heridas , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Vendajes , China , Fármacos Dermatológicos/administración & dosificación , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Femenino , Humanos , Macrófagos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Extractos Vegetales/administración & dosificación , Método Simple Ciego , Taiwán , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estados Unidos , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Two-year longevity is a crucial consideration in revascularization strategies for patients with symptomatic lower extremity arterial disease (LEAD). However, factors associated with 2-year longevity and risk stratification in octogenarians or nonagenarians have been underreported. OBJECTIVE: This paper aims to investigate the associated variables and stratify the 2-year prognosis in older patients with LEAD. METHODS: We performed logistic regression and association rule mining based on the Apriori algorithm to discover independent variables and validate their associations with 2-year longevity. Malnutrition, inflammation, and stroke factors were identified. C statistics and Kaplan-Meier analysis were used to assess the impact of different numbers of malnutrition, inflammation, and stroke factors on 2-year longevity. RESULTS: We recruited a total of 232 octogenarians or nonagenarians (mean age 85 years, SD 4.2 years) treated with endovascular therapy. During the study period, 81 patients died, and 27 of those (33%) died from a cardiac origin within 2 years. Association rules analysis showed the interrelationships between 2-year longevity and the neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and nutritional status as determined by the Controlling Nutritional Status (CONUT) score or Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index (GNRI). The cut-off values of NLR, GNRI, and CONUT were ≥3.89, ≤90.3, and >3, respectively. The C statistics for the predictive power for 2-year longevity were similar between the CONUT score and the GNRI-based models (0.773 vs 0.760; P=.57). The Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that 2-year longevity was worse as the number of malnutrition, inflammation, and stroke factors increased from 0 to 3 in both the GNRI-based model (92% vs 68% vs 46% vs 12%, respectively; P<.001) and the CONUT score model (87% vs 75% vs 49% vs 10%, respectively; P<.001). The hazard ratio between those with 3 factors and those without was 18.2 (95% CI 7.0-47.2; P<.001) in the GNRI and 13.6 (95% CI 5.9-31.5; P<.001) in the CONUT score model. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated the association and crucial role of malnutrition, inflammation, and stroke factors in assessing 2-year longevity in older patients with LEAD. Using this simple risk score might assist clinicians in selecting the appropriate treatment.
Asunto(s)
Minería de Datos/métodos , Procedimientos Endovasculares/métodos , Evaluación Geriátrica/métodos , Extremidad Inferior/patología , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/terapia , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Humanos , Longevidad , Masculino , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/mortalidad , Pronóstico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Análisis de Supervivencia , Factores de TiempoRESUMEN
Peripheral artery disease (PAD) is highly prevalent among patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) and portends a very poor prognosis. Indoxyl sulfate has been shown to induce atherothrombosis and impaired neovascularization in uremic mice. However, there is no clinical evidence regarding the role of indoxyl sulfate in PAD associated with CKD. We examined associations between indoxyl sulfate and incident symptomatic lower extremity PAD events as well as major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and all-cause mortality using Cox proportional hazards models in a prospective cohort of 200 hemodialysis patients free of PAD at baseline. Patients were considered as having PAD if they developed PAD symptoms confirmed by an ankle-brachial index with waveforms, duplex ultrasound or angiography, and/or major adverse limb events including revascularization and amputation. During a median follow-up of 6.5 years, 37 patients (18.5%) experienced incident symptomatic PAD. MACE occurred in 52 patients, and a total of 85 patients died. After adjusting for traditional risk factors for PAD, including age, current smoking, diabetes, and cardiovascular disease, indoxyl sulfate was significantly associated with the risk of PAD (hazard ratio (HR), 1.19 for every 10-µg/mL increase in indoxyl sulfate; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.05-1.35). However, indoxyl sulfate was not associated with risk of MACE (HR, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.90-1.12) or death from any cause (HR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.90-1.07). Indoxyl sulfate was associated with incident symptomatic PAD but not with MACE or all-cause mortality, suggesting that indoxyl sulfate toxicity may be unique to PAD among hemodialysis patients.
Asunto(s)
Indicán/sangre , Fallo Renal Crónico/terapia , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/epidemiología , Diálisis Renal/efectos adversos , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Biomarcadores/sangre , Causas de Muerte , Femenino , Humanos , Incidencia , Fallo Renal Crónico/sangre , Fallo Renal Crónico/diagnóstico , Fallo Renal Crónico/mortalidad , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/diagnóstico , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/mortalidad , Pronóstico , Estudios Prospectivos , Diálisis Renal/mortalidad , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Taiwán/epidemiología , Factores de Tiempo , Regulación hacia ArribaRESUMEN
With technological improvements in the endovascular armamentarium, there have been tremendous advances in catheter-based femoropopliteal artery intervention during the last decade. However, standardization of the methodology for assessing outcomes has been underappreciated, and unvalidated peak systolic velocity ratios (PSVRs) of 2.0, 2.4, and 2.5 on duplex ultrasonography have been arbitrarily but routinely used for assessing restenosis. Quantitative vessel analysis (QVA) is a widely accepted method to identify restenosis in a broad spectrum of cardiovascular interventions, and PSVR needs to be validated by QVA. This multidisciplinary review is intended to disseminate the importance of QVA and a validated PSVR based on QVA for binary restenosis in contemporary femoropopliteal intervention.
Asunto(s)
Velocidad del Flujo Sanguíneo/fisiología , Procedimientos Endovasculares/métodos , Arteria Femoral/fisiopatología , Oclusión de Injerto Vascular/fisiopatología , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/cirugía , Arteria Poplítea/fisiopatología , Grado de Desobstrucción Vascular/fisiología , Asia , Arteria Femoral/diagnóstico por imagen , Arteria Femoral/cirugía , Oclusión de Injerto Vascular/diagnóstico , Oclusión de Injerto Vascular/cirugía , Humanos , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/fisiopatología , Arteria Poplítea/diagnóstico por imagen , Arteria Poplítea/cirugía , Recurrencia , Sístole , Ultrasonografía Doppler DúplexRESUMEN
BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: To investigate contemporary cardiovascular (CV) outcomes in Taiwanese patients with symptomatic low extremity peripheral artery disease treated with endovascular therapy. METHODS: An observational cohort study with up to 155 months of follow-up was conducted using a single-center registry database between July 2005 and June 2017. Long-term outcomes and predictors of future CV events were analyzed in 936 patients with 1246 affected legs. RESULTS: This study cohort comprised 21% claudicants and 79% critical limb ischemia (CLI) patients. Compared with claudicants, CLI patients had higher rates of medical comorbidities, tissue inflammation, and lesion complexities. During the study period, 349 patients died (130 CV deaths and 219 non-CV deaths), 306 had non-fatal CV events. The rates of 5-year freedom from all-cause mortality, major CV events (MACEs), and non-fatal CV events were 54.9%, 67.1%, and 56.6% respectively. For CLI patients, independent factors for all-cause mortality were age (odds ratio [OR] 1.03), atrial fibrillation (OR 1.79), albumin (OR 0.62), hematocrit (OR 0.96), body mass index (OR 0.94), C-reactive protein (OR 1.18), dialysis (OR 2.16), and non-ambulance (OR 2.05). Congestive heart failure, dialysis, and non-ambulance independently predicted the MACEs (OR 2.04, 1.93, and 1.67, respectively). For claudicants, coronary artery disease (CAD) was the essential factor for all-cause mortality (OR 2.24), MACE (OR 2.76) and non-fatal CV events (OR 1.82). CONCLUSION: Long-term survival and MACE-free rates were significantly worse in CLI patients than in claudicants. Malnutrition and inflammation were associated with long-term survival. CAD, low hematocrit, dialysis, CHF, and ambulatory status predicted future CV events.
Asunto(s)
Procedimientos Endovasculares , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica , Amputación Quirúrgica , Estudios de Cohortes , Humanos , Isquemia/cirugía , Recuperación del Miembro , Extremidad Inferior , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/epidemiología , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/cirugía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
Patients with peripheral artery disease (PAD) are a heterogeneous population and differ in risk of mortality and low extremity amputation (LEA), which complicates clinical decision-making. This study aimed to develop a simple risk scale using decision tree methodology to guide physicians in managing critical limb ischemia (CLI) patients who will benefit from endovascular therapy (EVT).A total of 736 patients with CLI, Rutherford classification (RC) stage ≥4, and prior successful EVT were included. Variables significantly associated with LEA by univariate analysis (Pâ<â.05) were selected and put into classification tree analysis using the Classification and Regression Tree (CART) model with a dependent variable, amputation, and depth of tree = 3. Four risk groups were generated according to the order of amputation rate. The amputation-free survival (AFS) times between groups were compared using the Kaplan-Meier curve with the log-rank test.Patients were classified as high risk for amputation (G4) (WBC counts ≥10,000/µl, and platelet-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) ≥130.337); intermediate risk group 1 (G3) (WBC < 10,000/µl and RC stage before EVT > 5); intermediate risk group 2 (G2) (WBC count ≥ 10,000/µl, and PLR < 130.337) and low-risk group (G1) (WBC < 10,000/µl, RC before EVT ≤ 5). G2, G3, and G4 risk groups had shorter AFS time (range, 58.7 to 65.5 months) than the G1 risk group (100 months) (Pâ<â.05). Risk of LEA was significantly higher in the G4, G3, and G2 groups than in the G1 group (Pâ≤â.05). The G4 group had the highest risk of amputation (odds ratio = 6.84, Pâ<â.001).This simple risk scale model can help healthcare professionals more easily identify and appropriately treat patients with CLI who are at different levels of risk for LEA following endovascular revascularization.