Evaluation of three commercial kits effective identification of menstrual blood based on the D-dimer.

Blood or bloodstains are encountered frequently in forensic investigations. Presumptive and more confirmatory tests for peripheral blood are well established, however, similar methods for menstrual blood identification are less so. D-dimer is a fibrin degradation product that occurs at high concentration in menstrual blood and therefore a potential target to screen for this body fluid. We evaluated three rapid tests to determine if they can discriminate menstrual blood from peripheral remote from a laboratory setting. Their sensitivity, specificity and robustness were also assessed. The assays were: a latex agglutination (Dade Dimertest Latex Assay), SERATEC PMB test and OneStep D-dimer RapidCard InstaTest, both of which are based on lateral flow immunochromatographic analysis. Of the three, greater sensitivity was observed using the OneStep D-dimer RapidCard InstaTest, regardless of whether liquid or a stain was used. This test also detected a result using the smallest volume of menstrual blood, 0.003125 µL. Specificity testing was based on six different body fluids (urine, saliva, peripheral blood, semen, sweats and vaginal fluid) resulting in all 30 samples testing negative for the D-dimer using the OneStep D-dimer RapidCard InstaTest. Mixtures at ratios 1:1, 1:3 and 1:9 (menstrual blood: the other biofluid or PBS) were tested and the results showed that D-dimer could be detected for all samples using either the Dade Dimertest Latex Assay or the OneStep D-dimer RapidCard InstaTest. The body fluids were exposed to environmental stresses such as various temperature (-20 °C, 4 °C, room temperature and 37 °C for 30, 90, 180 and 360 days) and fluctuations in humidity (42%, 76% and 100% humidity at room temperature for 1, 3, 5, 10 and 20 days): all samples were D-dimer positive using the OneStep D-dimer RapidCard InstaTest though the strength decreased relative to the increase of storage time and temperature or humidity. All 6 postmortem blood samples gave a positive result for D-dimer using the OneStep D-dimer RapidCard InstaTest and 2 samples gave a positive response using the Dade Dimertest Latex Assay and the SERATEC PMB test; peripheral blood postmortem samples can show an increase in D-dimer. Menstrual blood was recovered from the pads under the sample wells after testing using the two immunochromatographic assays from which STR alleles could be amplified successfully. The results presented here support the application of these commercial kits for effective identification of menstrual blood.

A novel co-amplification system for simultaneous amplification of 23 Y-STR and identification of spermatozoa.

In alleged sexual assault cases, identification of the presence of spermatozoa at the crime scene, or on items of eventual significance, or associated with the body of the victim, is integral to the forensic investigation to support or refute the proposition that sexual act has occurred. A 3-plex MSRE-PCR (methylation-sensitive restriction enzyme-PCR) system has been developed previously to identify spermatozoa based on the presence or absence of DNA methylation. This assay showed that 0.1 ng of DNA from a semen extract was sufficient to identify the presence of spermatozoa even when there was excessively more DNA isolated from vaginal fluid than DNA from a semen extract (80 ng/0.1 ng) or a mix of the menstrual blood/semen DNA (5 ng/0.1 ng). In this study, we combine spermatozoa detection with co-amplification of 23 Y-STR loci. We perform standard validation steps to present a novel test that saves time and uses the same sample for both DNA typing and spermatozoa detection in the same reaction. The combined assay can identify Y-STR and spermatozoa simultaneously using just 0.1 ng semen DNA, even in the presence of 5 ng of DNA from a female (male/female:1/50). No other body fluid tested, such as saliva, gave a result for the presence of spermatozoa. A total of 9 non-probative forensic samples from 7 sexual assault cases were tested by this co-amplification system. In all cases, the same sperm-positive data were obtained, concordant with our previous study analyzed by only 3-plex MSRE-PCR, and the Y-STR results were also consistent with that analyzed by only PowerPlex® Y23 kit. The co-amplification will be beneficial for the limited samples in many criminal cases.

Spermatozoa identification by the 3-plex MSRE-PCR assay: a collaborative exercise.

Identification of semen and spermatozoa is crucial in the forensic investigation of alleged sexual assault cases. In cases of alleged sexual assault where there is a long time gap between the incident and sample collection, or in cases of low sperm count, current methods have limitations of specificity, in the case of presumptive tests for semen, or the problem of recording spermatozoa by microscopy if they are few in number. A 3-plex MSRE-PCR (methylation-sensitive restriction enzyme-PCR) assay using a spermatozoa-specific DNA methylated marker to identify spermatozoa has been reported previously by our laboratory. A key advantage over current methods is the increased sensitivity and specificity. A transition from a research tool to operational use requires blind trial testing and inter-laboratory trials. We report on a collaborative exercise where reagents of the 3-plex MSRE-PCR were sent to six participating laboratories. Each laboratory used their own equipment, consumables, and the presumptive reagents conventionally for body fluid (such as acid phosphatase or PSA), DNA extraction, and quantification in practical casework. The reagents and protocol for the 3-plex MSRE-PCR assay and 9 samples were provided by the organizing laboratory. The participating laboratories were requested to fill in the questionnaire after testing. The reported results from all the six participating laboratories were concordant and the expected correct results for the presence of spermatozoa. These outcomes verified the reproducibility and feasibility of the 3-plex MSRE-PCR assay. The results also indicated that the 3-plex MSRE-PCR assay was readily accessible to forensic laboratories for integrating it into current forensic casework processes.

Identification of spermatozoa using a novel 3-plex MSRE-PCR assay for forensic examination of sexual assaults.

Identification of semen and then spermatozoa is essential to verify that sexual activity has occurred in alleged cases of sexual assault. Microscopic examination commonly used for spermatozoa identification is however time-consuming and can often lead to false-negative results for samples with deformed and, or, limited number of spermatozoa. To address this limitation, we report on a novel 3-plex MSRE-PCR (methylation-sensitive restriction enzyme-PCR) assay to specifically identify spermatozoa. This assay is comprised of 3 markers: a digestive control marker (DC), sperm-specific marker (SP), and Y chromosome marker (SRY). A total of 214 samples from 10 body fluids or tissues were analyzed. Specificity testing showed that all the normal semen samples were unambiguously identified as being sperm-positive, and no other body fluid (or tissues) showed a sperm-specific signal in the electropherogram. Testing for sensitivity showed that 0.1 ng of DNA from a semen extract was sufficient to identify the presence of spermatozoa by this assay. Mixture analyses illustrated the sensitivity of the assay when the vaginal/semen DNA ratio (80/0.1) was under 800 or the menstrual blood/semen DNA ratio (5/0.1) was under 50, the trace amounts (approximately 0.1 ng) of DNA from semen can still be identified by this 3-plex MSRE-PCR assay. This assay was also applied to the identification of 31 non-probative forensic samples from 18 sexual assault cases. The case studies showed that the 3-plex MSRE-PCR assay was an improvement in the sensitivity of spermatozoa detection.

The Influence of Selected Fingerprint Enhancement Techniques on Forensic DNA Typing of Epithelial Cells Deposited on Porous Surfaces.

Fingerprints deposited at crime scene can be a source of DNA. Previous reports on the effects of fingerprint enhancement methods have focused mainly on fingermarks deposited in blood or saliva. Here, we evaluate the effects of fingerprint enhancement methods on fingerprints deposited on porous surfaces. We performed real-time quantification and STR typing, the results of which indicated that two methods (iodine fuming and 1,2-indanedione in ethyl acetate enhancement) had no effect on the quantity of DNA isolated and resultant STR alleles when compared to control samples. DNA quantities and allele numbers were lower for samples enhanced with silver nitrate and 1,2-indanedione in acetic acid when compared to control samples. Based on DNA quantity, quality, and observable stochastic effects, our data indicated that iodine fuming and 1,2-indanedione in ethyl acetate were the preferred options for the enhancement of fingerprints on porous surfaces.

The strategies to DVI challenges in Typhoon Morakot.

Small village populations in which there is a high amount of kinship can cause complications in cases of disaster victim identification. This problem was highlighted by the loss of life after Typhoon Morakot struck Taiwan where over 500 people from small isolated communities lost their lives. Most of the victims were buried by landslides in the remote mountainous areas of southern Taiwan. Only 146 pieces of human remains were recovered after searching for 4 months. Most of the human remains were received for examination as severely damaged fragments prevented possible identification by morphological features. DNA testing using the traditional duo parent/child or sibling screening by STR data opens the possibility of including not only the actual victim but also false positives. Variable likelihood ratios were obtained when comparing DNA types from human remains to those from potential relatives; however, with the DNA typing of numerous members of the same living family, multiple matches to potential families were avoided. Of the 146 samples obtained and collapsed to 130 victims, they were linked to 124 individuals resulting in their identification when compared to a pool of 588 potential relatives. Six of the human remains could not be linked to any living relative and remain unknown.

Modulation of YY1 activity by SAP30.

Yin Yang 1 (YY1) is a highly conserved and multifunctional transcription factor. The diverse activities of YY1 are regulated and sometimes modified by interaction with various other proteins. By using a yeast two-hybrid screening system, SAP30 was identified as a protein that associates with YY1 and it is able to enhance YY1-mediated repression in a dose-dependent manner. SAP30 is a 30kDa nuclear protein and is a component of the human histone deacetylase complex. In this study, the interaction of SAP30 and YY1 was confirmed both by in vitro and in vivo assays. The interaction domains between YY1 and SAP30 were mapped to the C-terminal segment of YY1 (295-414) and the C-terminal 91 amino acid region of SAP30. The observation that YY1, SAP30, and HDAC1 form a complex in vivo provides evidence that YY1 also recruits HDAC1 indirectly via its binding to SAP30. These results describe a novel mechanism for YY1-mediated repression.