The Role of NCS1 in Immunotherapy and Prognosis of Human Cancer.

The Neural Calcium Sensor1 (NCS1) is a crucial protein that binds to Ca2+ and is believed to play a role in regulating tumor invasion and cell proliferation. However, the role of NCS1 in immune infiltration and cancer prognosis is still unknown. Our study aimed to explore the expression profile, immune infiltration pattern, prognostic value, biological function, and potential compounds targeting NCS1 using public databases. High expression of NCS1 was detected by immune histochemical staining in LIHC (Liver hepatocellular carcinoma), BRCA (Breast invasive carcinoma), KIRC (Kidney renal clear cell carcinoma), and SKCM (Skin Cutaneous Melanoma). The expression of NCS1 in cancer was determined by TCGA (The Cancer Genome Atlas Program), GTEx (The Genotype-Tissue Expression), the Kaplan-Meier plotter, GEO (Gene Expression Omnibus), GEPIA2.0 (Gene Expression Profiling Interactive Analysis 2.0), HPA (The Human Protein Atlas), UALCAN, TIMER2.0, TISIDB, Metascape, Drugbank, chEMBL, and ICSDB databases. NCS1 has genomic mutations as well as aberrant DNA methylation in multiple cancers compared to normal tissues. Also, NCS1 was significantly different in the immune microenvironment, tumor mutational burden (TMB), microsatellite instability (MSI), and immune infiltrate-associated cells in different cancers, which could be used for the typing of immune and molecular subtypes of cancer and the presence of immune checkpoint resistance in several cancers. Univariate regression analysis, multivariate regression analysis, and gene enrichment analysis to construct prognostic models revealed that NCS1 is involved in immune regulation and can be used as a prognostic biomarker for SKCM, LIHC, BRCA, COAD, and KIRC. These results provide clues from a bioinformatic perspective and highlight the importance of NCS1 in a variety of cancers.

A Nomogram for Optimizing Sarcopenia Screening in Community-dwelling Older Adults: AB3C Model.

OBJECTIVES: Sarcopenia is associated with significantly higher mortality risk, and earlier detection of sarcopenia has remarkable public health benefits. However, the model that predicts sarcopenia in the community has yet to be well identified. The study aimed to develop a nomogram for predicting the risk of sarcopenia and compare the performance with 3 sarcopenia screen models in community-dwelling older adults in China. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: A total of 966 community-dwelling older adults. METHODS: A total of 966 community-dwelling older adults were enrolled in the study, with 678 participants grouped into the Training Set and 288 participants grouped into the Validation Set according to a 7:3 randomization. Predictors were identified in the Training Set by univariate and multivariate logistic regression and then combined into a nomogram to predict the risk of sarcopenia. The performance of this nomogram was assessed by calibration, discrimination, and clinical utility. RESULTS: Age, body mass index, calf circumference, congestive heart failure, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease were demonstrated to be predictors for sarcopenia. The nomogram (named as AB3C model) that was constructed based on these predictors showed excellent calibration and discrimination in the Training Set with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.930. The nomogram also showed perfect calibration and discrimination in the Validation Set with an AUC of 0.897. The clinical utility of the nomogram was supported by decision curve analysis. Comparing the performance with 3 sarcopenia screen models (SARC-F, Ishii, and Calf circumference), the AB3C model outperformed the other models regarding sensitivity and AUC. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: AB3C model, an easy-to-apply and cost-effective nomogram, was developed to predict the risk of sarcopenia, which may contribute to optimizing sarcopenia screening in community settings.

Effect of Anti-HBs on Mortality Among Resolved HBV Infection: a Population-Based Prospective Cohort Study.

INTRODUCTION: Surveillance programs after hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) loss are not yet well established, and the role of hepatitis B surface antibodies (anti-HBs) remains controversial. We aimed to evaluate the risk factors for increased mortality and the association between anti-HBs and all-cause and cause-specific mortality in a representative US (United States) population of patients with resolved HBV (Hepatitis B virus) infections. METHODS: Data were taken from the US National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 1999-2018. A total of 3455 US adults with resolved HBV infection [defined as hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) negative/anti-hepatitis B core antigen (anti-HBc) positive] were enrolled in this study. The primary outcome measures were all-cause and cause-specific mortality from baseline until 31 December 2019. RESULTS: During a mean follow-up of 10.3 years, 741 deaths occurred. Age, race, marital status, smoking status, physical activity level, and presence of cirrhosis, diabetes, cardiovascular diseases, chronic obstructive pulmonary diseases, cancer, and anti-HBs were significant factors for increased mortality, and a nomogram tool was developed and validated for the risk stratification of mortality. Compared with participants who were anti-HBs positive, those who were anti-HBs negative had a 23% (hazard ratio 1.23, 95% CI 1.02-1.46) higher risk of all-cause mortality in NHANES 1999-2018. For cause-specific mortality, the fully adjusted hazard ratios of participants who were anti-HBs negative were 0.71 (95% CI 0.48-1.06) for heart disease, 1.44 (95% CI 1.01-2.05) for cancer, and 1.44 (95% CI 1.13-1.83) for other conditions, compared to those of participants who were anti-HBs positive. CONCLUSIONS: Among US adults with resolved HBV infections, anti-HBs-negative status was associated with an increased risk of death from all causes and cancer, implying that the role of anti-HBs in resolved HBV infection should not be ignored. On the public health level, more rigorous surveillance was needed for populations of individuals who were isolated anti-HBc positive.

Prevalence of Cirrhosis/Advanced Fibrosis Among HBsAg-Negative and HBcAb-Positive US Adults: A Nationwide Population-Based Study.

INTRODUCTION: Evaluation of cirrhosis appears to be easily overlooked in the clinic for the HBsAg-negative (hepatitis B surface antigen-negative) and HBcAb-positive (hepatitis B core antibody-positive) population. Herein, we determine the prevalence of cirrhosis/advanced fibrosis among HBsAg-negative/HBcAb-positive US adults. METHODS: Data came from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2001-2018. A total of 3115 HBsAg-negative/HBcAb-positive US adults were enrolled in this study. We assessed cirrhosis by using the Fibrosis-4 (FIB-4) and aspartate aminotransferase to platelet ratio index (APRI) score. RESULTS: Out of 50,201 NHANES adults, 45,087 were tested for HBcAb/HBsAg, of whom 3115 met the inclusion criteria (HBsAg-negative/HBcAb-positive with available data for FIB-4/APRI). The weighted proportion of HBsAg-negative/HBcAb-positive among US adults was 4.46% (95% CI 4.17-4.75%), affecting 9.87 million US adults. According to the results of the FIB-4, the weighted prevalence of cirrhosis/advanced fibrosis among HBsAg-negative/HBcAb-positive US adults was 3.76% (95% CI 2.80-4.72%), which corresponds to 371,112 (95% CI 276,360-465,864) HBsAg-negative/HBcAb-positive American adults who had already developed cirrhosis. Among those, cirrhosis/advanced fibrosis in the HBsAb-negative (hepatitis B surface antibody) group (6.28%, 95% CI 4.10-8.45%) was significantly higher than in the HBsAb-positive group (3.08%, 95% CI 2.07-4.08%). Results were similar when APRI was used. CONCLUSION: According to the FIB-4, 3.76% of HBsAg-negative and HBcAb-positive US adults had cirrhosis/advanced fibrosis, much higher than in the general population of the USA. Our data highlight the importance of cirrhosis screening in the HBsAg-negative/HBcAb-positive population to prevent advanced liver disease, especially in those who are HBsAb-negative.