Effectiveness of Current Practices for Disinfecting Medical Equipment in a Radiology Department.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effectiveness of routine, daily disinfection practices on the control of microorganisms on nuclear medicine equipment in a radiology department. METHODS: During phase 1, surface samples were collected from various sites in the nuclear medicine division of a radiology department at a single institution. These samples were transferred onto growth plates for evaluation and speciation by a clinical microbiologist. Collection sites that yielded potentially pathogenic bacteria or high numbers (> 100) of colonies of likely nonpathogenic bacteria were identified for resampling. During phase 2, secondary samples were taken at the resampling sites after disinfection. These secondary samples also were evaluated to determine the efficacy of the departmental disinfection practices on surface cleanliness. RESULTS: Phase 1 sampling identified 10 sites that harbored either potentially pathogenic bacteria or high numbers of likely nonpathogenic bacteria. Evaluation of postdisinfection samples indicated elimination of potentially pathogenic bacteria and reduction of likely nonpathogenic colonies. DISCUSSION: The variety of surfaces and equipment found in radiology departments can present unique challenges for effective disinfection. Porous materials and intricate imaging and peripheral devices require special consideration when designing and maintaining department cleaning policies. CONCLUSION: The disinfection practices in place at the institution were effective in reducing or eliminating bacteria; however, recolonization after cleaning was recognized as a possibility. Educating staff about the value of disinfecting contact surfaces between patients is necessary to achieve optimum sanitization in the radiology department.

Does the preparation and utilization of 99mTc-sulfur colloid affect the outcomes of breast lymphoscintigraphy?

UNLABELLED: The purpose of this study was to determine whether certain factors in the preparation and use of (99m)Tc-sulfur colloid affected the number of sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) detected during SLN mapping and during intraoperative SLN identification. The factors that were investigated included the use of a dry heat block versus a hot water bath to heat the (99m)Tc-sulfur colloid bulk vial, amount of (99m)TcOH4(-) added to form the sulfur colloid particles, time between the unit dose calibration and the injection of the dose, and breast quadrant in which the injection occurred. METHODS: Data were collected retrospectively and quantitatively analyzed from images and reports of 488 patients with breast cancer who had undergone SLN mapping and intraoperative SLN identification from January 1, 2008, to June 30, 2011, inclusive. The dependent variables assessed were the number of SLNs visualized during lymphoscintigraphy, number of radioactive SLNs removed during surgery, and total number of lymph nodes removed intraoperatively. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in outcomes when comparing the amount of (99m)TcOH4(-) added during the preparation process to form the sulfur colloid particles, time between the unit dose calibration time and the time that the unit doses were injected, or location in the breast tissue in which the unit dose was administered. Initially, there were observed significant differences in outcomes when the heating methods used to prepare the (99m)Tc-sulfur colloid were compared. When the increased number of patients who were administered a calibrated unit dose activity of 74 MBq in the group using a dry heat block preparation method was taken into account, however, the findings were not significant. CONCLUSION: The use of a dry heat block versus a hot water bath to heat the (99m)Tc-sulfur colloid bulk vial, amount of (99m)TcOH4(-) added to form sulfur colloid particles, time between the unit dose calibration and the injection of the dose, and breast quadrant in which the injection occurred do not affect the number of SLNs detected during SLN mapping and during intraoperative SLN identification.

The 2011 nuclear medicine technology job analysis project of the American Registry of Radiologic Technologists.

The American Registry of Radiologic Technologists (ARRT) conducts periodic job analysis projects to update the content and eligibility requirements for all certification examinations. In 2009, the ARRT conducted a comprehensive job analysis project to update the content specifications and clinical competency requirements for the nuclear medicine technology examination. ARRT staff and a committee of volunteer nuclear medicine technologists designed a job analysis survey that was sent to a random sample of 1,000 entry-level staff nuclear medicine technologists. Through analysis of the survey data and judgments of the committee, the project resulted in changes to the nuclear medicine technology examination task list, content specifications, and clinical competency requirements. The primary changes inspired by the project were the introduction of CT content to the examination and the expansion of the content covering cardiac procedures.

Position paper on the development of a middle level provider in nuclear medicine: the nuclear medicine practitioner.

The development of an educational program and credentialing structure to support and recognize an advanced level of the practice of nuclear medicine technology is now underway. This work parallels the efforts in many, if not most, health care disciplines as they seek to achieve the twin goals of developing enhanced career paths and providing the best possible patient care in an environment where science and technology can run roughshod over concepts taught in the classroom a mere decade ago. Education is key to both goals. A master's level degree in nuclear medicine technology, coupled with an advanced practice credential recognizing both the educational achievement and a level of clinical expertise, will give nuclear medicine practitioners the knowledge and the right to practice their profession at a high level of autonomy, leading to more efficient and higher quality health care services. To that end the following position paper was prepared by members of the Advance Practice Task Force of the SNMTS and presented to the SNMTS Executive Council and the SNM Board of Directors. In June 2005, the executive council and the board of directors approved a resolution supporting the establishment of a middle level provider in nuclear medicine known as the nuclear medicine practitioner.

Prevalence and patterns of physiologic muscle uptake detected with whole-body 18F-FDG PET.

UNLABELLED: Recently, the use of 18F-FDG PET has progressed rapidly as a standard diagnostic imaging tool in many types of cancer. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the patterns and prevalence of muscle uptake as a result of muscle activity shortly before the 18F-FDG injection or during the uptake phase. METHODS: From October 2002 to October 2003, whole-body 18F-FDG PET scans (4-min emission and 3-min transmission per bed position) were performed on 1,164 patients with known or suspected malignancy. Images were acquired on a dedicated PET scanner 45-60 min after an intravenous injection of a weight-adjusted dose of 7.4 MBq/kg (0.2 mCi/kg) with a maximum of 925 MBq (25 mCi) 18F-FDG. A log of any nonphysiologic muscle activity during the uptake phase or reported excessive muscle activity the day before scanning was kept by the technologists. In addition, PET scans were reviewed retrospectively to evaluate any undesirably increased muscle uptake. RESULTS: A total of 146 of 1,164 patients (12.5%) had excessively increased muscle uptake detected on the PET scan that corresponded to the technologists' notes of muscle activity during the uptake phase or before 18F-FDG injection. Encountered patterns of muscle uptake due to muscle activity included uptake in neck, secondary to neck strain from being on a stretcher; masseter, secondary to chewing gum; vocal cords, secondary to speaking; chest wall, secondary to labored breathing; forearms and hands, secondary to reading; and lower extremities, secondary to nervous tapping of the feet. CONCLUSION: Undesirably increased physiologic muscle uptake is frequently encountered on 18F-FDG PET scans. In this study, 12.5% of patients were affected. It is prudent to instruct the patient to avoid any excessive physical activity at least 48 h before injection as well as to not exert muscle activity during the uptake phase. Furthermore, a record should be kept by the technologist of any observed excessive muscle activity during the uptake phase and reported to the reading physician-thus, eliminating a potential source of false-positive findings on interpreting PET scans.