RESUMEN
Background: Preformed donor-specific HLA antibodies (DSA) are a well-known risk factor in kidney transplantation. There is still considerable debate, however, about the optimal risk stratification among patients with preformed DSA. Additionally, data on the prognostic value of different crossmatch assays in DSA-positive patients are scarce. Methods: DSA-positive living kidney transplant recipients were selected from a multicenter study examining 4233 consecutive renal transplants. An additional 7 patients from 2 further centers were included. Flow cytometric crossmatches (FXM), Luminex-based crossmatches, and virtual crossmatches based on C1q- and C3d-binding antibodies (C1qXM and C3dXM) were performed retrospectively using pretransplant sera and lymphocytes isolated from fresh samples. These samples were obtained from 44 donor and recipient pairs from 12 centers. Clinical outcome data and the control group without DSA were compiled from the previous study and were supplemented by data on 10-y death-censored graft survival (10yGS). Results: Between 19% (C3dXM) and 46% (FXM) of crossmatches were positive. Crossmatch-positive patients showed high incidences of antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) within 6 mo (up to 60% in B-cell FXM+ patients). The incidence of AMR in crossmatch-negative patients ranged between 5% (FXM-) and 13% (C1qXM-). 10yGS was significantly impaired in patients with positive T-cell FXM and total FXM compared with both patients without DSA and those with DSA with negative FXM. Conclusions: Especially FXM are useful for risk stratification, as the outcome of DSA-positive, FXM-negative patients is similar to that of DSA-negative patients, whereas FXM-positive patients have both more AMR and decreased 10yGS. Because of their lower sensitivity, the significance of Luminex-based crossmatches, C1qXM, and C3dXM would have to be examined in patients with stronger DSA.
RESUMEN
(1) Background: Compared to medical personnel, SARS-CoV-2mRNA vaccination-related positive immunity rates, levels, and preservation over time in dialysis and kidney transplant patients are reduced. We hypothesized that COVID-19 pre-exposure influences both vaccination-dependent immunity development and preservation in a group-dependent manner. (2) Methods: We evaluated 2- and 9-month follow-up data in our observational Dia-Vacc study, exploring specific cellular (interferon-γ release assay = IGRA) and/or humoral immune responses (IgA/IgG/RBD antibodies) after two SARS-CoV-2mRNA vaccinations in 2630 participants, including medical personnel (301-MP), dialysis patients (1841-DP), and kidney transplant recipients (488-KTR). Study participants were also separated into COVID-19 pre-exposure (hybrid immunity) positive (n = 407) versus negative (n = 2223) groups. (3) Results: COVID-19 pre-exposure improved most vaccination-related positive immunity rates in KTR and DP at 2 months but not in MP, where rates reached almost 100% independent of hybrid immunity. In the COVID-19-negative study, patients' immunity faded between two and nine months, evaluated via the percentage of patients with an RBD antibody decrease >50%, and was markedly group- (MP-17.8%, DP-52.2%, and KTR-38.6%) and vaccine type-dependent. In contrast, in all patient groups with COVID-19, pre-exposure RBD antibody decreases of >50% were similarly rare (MP-4.3%, DP-7.2%, and KTR-0%) but still vaccine type-dependent, with numerically reduced numbers in mRNA-1273- versus BNT162b2mRNA-treated patients. Multivariable regression analysis of RBD antibody changes between two and nine months by interval scale categorization confirmed COVID-19 pre-exposure as a factor in inhibiting strong RBD Ab fading. COVID-19 pre-exposure in MP and DP also numerically reduced T-cell immunity fading. In DP, symptomatic (versus asymptomatic) COVID-19 pre-exposure was identified as a factor in reducing strong RBD Ab fading after vaccination. (4) Conclusions: After mRNA vaccination, immunity positivity rates in DP and KTR but not MP, as well as immunity preservation in MP/DP/KTR, are markedly improved via prior COVID-19 infection. In DP, prior symptomatic compared to asymptomatic COVID-19 disease was particularly effective in blocking immunity fading after mRNA vaccination.
RESUMEN
Background: Mono and combined reactivation of latent viruses occurs frequently under immunosuppressive therapy in kidney transplant patients. Recently, monitoring torque teno virus (TTV) reactivation came more into focus as a potential biomarker for immune status. The surrogate characteristics of TTV reactivation on acute rejection, and the combined reactivation with other latent viruses such as cytomegalovirus (CMV), human BK virus (BKV), Epstein-Barr virus (EBV), and human herpes virus-6A (HHV-6A) on allograft function, are unknown so far. Methods: Blood samples from 93 kidney transplant recipients obtained during the first post-transplant year were analyzed for TTV/BKV/CMV/EBV/HHV-6A load. Clinical characteristics, including graft function [glomerular filtration rate (GFR)], were collected in parallel. Results: TTV had the highest prevalence and viral loads at 100% and a mean of 5.72â copies/ml (cp/ml) (log10). We found 28.0%, 26.9%, 7.5%, and 51.6% of simultaneous reactivation of TTV with BKV, CMV, EBV, and HHV-6, respectively. These combined reactivations were not associated with a significantly reduced estimated GFR at month 12. Of interest, patients with lower TTV loads <5.0â cp/ml (log10) demonstrated not only a higher incidence of acute rejection, but also an unexpected significantly earlier occurrence and higher incidence of BKV and HHV-6A reactivation. Correlations between TTV loads, other latent viruses, and immunosuppressive medication were only significant from 6â months after transplant. Conclusion: We were able to observe and support previously introduced TTV load thresholds predicting kidney allograft rejection. However, due to a possible delayed relation between immunosuppressive medication and TTV viral load adaptation, the right time points to start using TTV as a biomarker might need to be further clarified by other and better designed studies.
RESUMEN
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) development is associated with altered modifications in DNA methylation, changing transcriptional regulation. Emerging evidence indicates that DNA methyltransferase 1 (DNMT1) plays a key role in the carcinogenesis process. This study aimed to investigate how pirfenidone (PFD) modifies this pathway and the effect generated by the association between c-Myc expression and DNMT1 activation. Rats F344 were used for HCC development using 50 mg/kg of diethylnitrosamine (DEN) and 25 mg/kg of 2-Acetylaminofluorene (2-AAF). The HCC/PFD group received simultaneous doses of 300 mg/kg of PFD. All treatments lasted 12 weeks. On the other hand, HepG2 cells were used to evaluate the effects of PFD in restoring DNA methylation in the presence of the inhibitor 5-Aza. Histopathological, biochemical, immunohistochemical, and western blot analysis were carried out and our findings showed that PFD treatment reduced the amount and size of tumors along with decreased Glipican-3, ß-catenin, and c-Myc expression in nuclear fractions. Also, this treatment improved lipid metabolism by modulating PPARγ and SREBP1 signaling. Interestingly, PFD augmented DNMT1 and DNMT3a protein expression, which restores global methylation, both in our in vivo and in vitro models. In conclusion, our results suggest that PFD could slow down HCC development by controlling DNA methylation.
Asunto(s)
Carcinoma Hepatocelular , ADN (Citosina-5-)-Metiltransferasa 1 , Metilación de ADN , Antígeno Nuclear de Célula en Proliferación , Piridonas , Animales , ADN (Citosina-5-)-Metiltransferasa 1/metabolismo , ADN (Citosina-5-)-Metiltransferasa 1/genética , Metilación de ADN/efectos de los fármacos , Metilación de ADN/genética , Piridonas/farmacología , Ratas , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/tratamiento farmacológico , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/patología , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/genética , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/metabolismo , Humanos , Células Hep G2 , Antígeno Nuclear de Célula en Proliferación/metabolismo , Masculino , Ratas Endogámicas F344 , Neoplasias Hepáticas/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Hepáticas/patología , Neoplasias Hepáticas/genética , Regulación Neoplásica de la Expresión Génica/efectos de los fármacos , Dietilnitrosamina , Neoplasias Hepáticas Experimentales/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Hepáticas Experimentales/patología , Neoplasias Hepáticas Experimentales/metabolismo , Neoplasias Hepáticas Experimentales/genéticaRESUMEN
Small interfering RNAs (siRNAs) are widely used in biomedical research and in clinical trials. Here, we demonstrate that siRNA treatment is commonly associated with significant sensitization to ferroptosis, independently of the target protein knockdown. Genetically targeting mitochondrial antiviral-signaling protein (MAVS) reversed the siRNA-mediated sensitizing effect, but no activation of canonical MAVS signaling, which involves phosphorylation of IkBα and interferon regulatory transcription factor 3 (IRF3), was observed. In contrast, MAVS mediated a noncanonical signal resulting in a prominent increase in mitochondrial ROS levels, and increase in the BACH1/pNRF2 transcription factor ratio and GPX4 up-regulation, which was associated with a 50% decrease in intracellular glutathione levels. We conclude that siRNAs commonly sensitize to ferroptosis and may severely compromise the conclusions drawn from silencing approaches in biomedical research. Finally, as ferroptosis contributes to a variety of pathophysiological processes, we cannot exclude side effects in human siRNA-based therapeutical concepts that should be clinically tested.
Asunto(s)
Ferroptosis , Transducción de Señal , Humanos , ARN Interferente Pequeño/genética , Ferroptosis/genética , Regulación hacia Arriba , Factores de Transcripción/metabolismoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: SARS-CoV-2mRNA vaccination related seroconversion rates are reduced in dialysis and kidney transplant patients. METHODS: We evaluated nine months follow up data in our observational Dia-Vacc study exploring specific cellular (interferon-γ release assay) or/and humoral immune responses after 2x SARS-CoV-2mRNA vaccination in 880 participants including healthy medical personnel (125-MP), dialysis patients (595-DP), kidney transplant recipients (111-KTR), and apheresis patients (49-AP) with positive seroconversion (de novo IgA or IgG antibody positivity by ELISA) after eight weeks. FINDINGS: Nine months after first vaccination, receptor binding domain (RBD) antibodies were still positive in 90 % of MP, 86 % of AP, but only 55 %/48 % of DP/KTR, respectively. Seroconversion remained positive in 100 % of AP and 99·2 % of MP, but 86 %/81 % of DP/KTR, respectively. Compared to MP, DP but not KTR or AP were at risk for a strong RBD decline, while KTR kept lowest RBD values over time. By multivariate analysis, BNT162b2mRNA versus 1273-mRNA vaccine type was an independent risk factor for a strong decline of RBD antibodies. Within the DP group, only time on dialysis was another (inverse) risk factor for the DP group. Compared to humoral immunity, T-cell immunity decline was less prominent. INTERPRETATION: While seroconverted KTR reach lowest RBD values over time, DP are at specific risk for a strong decline of RBD antibodies after successful SARS-CoV-2mRNA vaccination, which also depends on the vaccine type being used. Therefore, booster vaccinations for DP should be considered earlier compared to normal population.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Trasplante de Riñón , Vacunas , Humanos , SARS-CoV-2 , Diálisis Renal , COVID-19/prevención & control , Vacunación , Anticuerpos , Inmunidad Humoral , Anticuerpos Antivirales , Receptores de TrasplantesRESUMEN
Background: Optimal initial tacrolimus dosing and early exposure of tacrolimus after renal transplantation is not well studied. Methods: In this open-label, 6 months, multicenter, randomized controlled, non-inferiority study, we randomly assigned 432 renal allograft recipients to receive basiliximab induction, mycophenolate and steroids and either standard prolonged-release tacrolimus (trough levels: 7-9 ng/ml; Standard Care arm), or an initial 7-day fixed 5 mg/day dose of prolonged-release tacrolimus followed by lower tacrolimus predose levels (trough levels: 5-7 ng/ml; Slow & Low arm). The primary end point was the combined incidence rate of biopsy-proven acute rejections (BPAR; including borderline), graft failure, or death at 6 months with a non-inferiority margin of 12.5%. (EudraCT-Nr: 2013-001770-19. Findings: The combined primary endpoint in the Slow & Low arm was non-inferior compared to the Standard Care arm (22.1% versus 20.7%; difference: 1.4%, 90% CI -5.5% to 8.3%). The overall rate of BPAR including borderlines was similar (Slow & Low 17.4% versus Standard Care 16.6%). Safety parameters such as delayed graft function, kidney function, donor specific HLA-antibodies, infections, or post-transplantation diabetes mellitus did not differ. Interpretation: This is the first study to show that an initial fixed dose of 5 mg per day followed by lower tacrolimus exposure is non-inferior compared to standard tacrolimus therapy and equally efficient and safe within 6 months after renal transplantation. These data suggest that therapeutic drug monitoring for prolonged release tacrolimus can be abandoned until start of the second week after transplantation. Funding: Investigator-initiated trial, financial support by Astellas Pharma GmbH.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Excess aldosterone accelerates chronic kidney disease progression. This phase 2 clinical trial assessed BI 690517, an aldosterone synthase inhibitor, for efficacy, safety, and dose selection. METHODS: This was a multinational, randomised, controlled, phase 2 trial. People aged 18 years or older with an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) of 30 to less than 90 mL/min/1·73 m2, a urine albumin to creatinine ratio (UACR) of 200 to less than 5000 mg/g, and serum potassium of 4·8 mmol/L or less, taking an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor or angiotensin receptor blocker, were enrolled. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to 8 weeks of empagliflozin or placebo run-in, followed by a second randomisation (1:1:1:1) to 14 weeks of treatment with once per day BI 690517 at doses of 3 mg, 10 mg, or 20 mg, or placebo. Study participants, research coordinators, investigators, and the data coordinating centre were masked to treatment assignment. The primary endpoint was the change in UACR measured in first morning void urine from baseline (second randomisation) to the end of treatment. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05182840) and is completed. FINDINGS: Between Feb 18 and Dec 30, 2022, of the 714 run-in participants, 586 were randomly assigned to receive BI 690517 or placebo. At baseline, 33% (n=196) were women, 67% (n=390) were men, 42% (n=244) had a racial identity other than White, and mean participant age was 63·8 years (SD 11·3). Mean baseline eGFR was 51·9 mL/min/1·73 m2 (17·7) and median UACR was 426 mg/g (IQR 205 to 889). Percentage change in first morning void UACR from baseline to the end of treatment at week 14 was -3% (95% CI -19 to 17) with placebo, -22% (-36 to -7) with BI 690517 3 mg, -39% (-50 to -26) with BI 690517 10 mg, and -37% (-49 to -22) with BI 690517 20 mg monotherapy. BI 690517 produced similar UACR reductions when added to empagliflozin. Investigator-reported hyperkalaemia occurred in 10% (14/146) of those in the BI 690517 3 mg group, 15% (22/144) in the BI 690517 10 mg group, and 18% (26/146) in the BI 690517 20 mg group, and in 6% (nine of 147) of those receiving placebo, with or without empagliflozin. Most participants with hyperkalaemia did not require intervention (86% [72/84]). Adrenal insufficiency was an adverse event of special interest reported in seven of 436 study participants (2%) receiving BI 690517 and one of 147 participants (1%) receiving matched placebo. No treatment-related deaths occurred during the study. INTERPRETATION: BI 690517 dose-dependently reduced albuminuria with concurrent renin-angiotensin system inhibition and empagliflozin, suggesting an additive efficacy for chronic kidney disease treatment without unexpected safety signals. FUNDING: Boehringer Ingelheim.
Asunto(s)
Compuestos de Bencidrilo , Glucósidos , Hiperpotasemia , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Compuestos de Bencidrilo/administración & dosificación , Compuestos de Bencidrilo/efectos adversos , Compuestos de Bencidrilo/uso terapéutico , Citocromo P-450 CYP11B2 , Método Doble Ciego , Glucósidos/administración & dosificación , Glucósidos/efectos adversos , Glucósidos/uso terapéutico , Antagonistas de Receptores de Mineralocorticoides/administración & dosificación , Antagonistas de Receptores de Mineralocorticoides/efectos adversos , Antagonistas de Receptores de Mineralocorticoides/uso terapéutico , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica/complicaciones , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica/tratamiento farmacológico , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
Human herpesvirus 6 (HHV-6) is a common opportunistic pathogen in kidney transplant recipients. Two distinct species of HHV-6, HHV-6A and HHV-6B, have been identified, of which the latter seems to be dominant. However, it is unclear whether they increase the likelihood of other viral reactivations. We characterized a multi-centre cohort of 93 patients along nine study visits for viral load. We tested for the following viruses: HHV-6A and HHV-6B, the herpesviruses cytomegalovirus (CMV) and Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) and the polyomavirus BK (BKV). We detected HHV-6A viral load in 48 (51.6%) patients, while the incidence of HHV-6B was much lower, being detected in 6 (6.5%) patients. The incidence of HHV-6A was higher than of BKV, CMV and EBV. HHV-6A also demonstrated higher viral loads than the rest of viruses. There was a non-significant trend of association between HHV-6A and HHV-6B as co-infection, whereas no increased incidence of other viruses among patients with HHV-6A reactivation was observed. There was no negative effect of high HHV-6A (>10,000â copies/ml) load on markers of renal graft and hepatic function or blood count twelve months post-transplant. In contrast to previously published data, our results show a clear dominance of HHV-6A in peripheral blood when compared to HHV-6B, with higher incidence and viral load levels. Despite the high HHV-6A loads observed, we did not identify any negative effects on posttransplant outcome.