Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 48
Filtrar
1.
Ann Hematol ; 102(8): 2137-2151, 2023 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37301786

RESUMEN

Ixazomib (IXA) is an oral proteasome inhibitor (PI) used in combination with lenalidomide and dexamethasone (IXA-Rd) for patients with relapsed and/or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). The REMIX study is one of the largest prospective, real-world analysis of the effectiveness of IXA-Rd in the setting of RRMM. Conducted in France between August 2017 and October 2019, the REMIX study, a non-interventional prospective study, included 376 patients receiving IXA-Rd in second line or later and followed for at least 24 months. Primary endpoint was the median progression-free survival (mPFS). Median age was 71 years (Q1-Q3 65.0 - 77.5) with 18.4% of participants older than 80 years. IXA-Rd was initiated in L2, L3 and L4 + for 60.4%, 18.1% and 21.5%, respectively. mPFS was 19.1 months (95% CI [15.9, 21.5]) and overall response rate (ORR) was 73.1%. mPFS was 21.5, 21.9 and 5.8 months in patients receiving IXA-Rd as L2, L3, L4 + respectively. Among patients receiving IXA-Rd in L2 and L3, mPFS was similar for patients previously exposed to lenalidomide (19.5 months) than for those lenalidomide naive (not exposed, 22.6 months, p = 0.29). mPFS was 19.1 months in patients younger than 80 years and 17.4 months in those 80 years or older (p = 0.06) with similar ORR (72.4% and 76.8%) in both subgroups. Adverse events (AEs) were reported in 78.2% of patients including 40.7% of treatment-related AE. IXA discontinuation was due to toxicity in 21% of patients. To conclude, the results of the REMIX study are consistent with the results of Tourmaline-MM1 and confirm the benefit of IXA-Rd combination in real life. It shows the interest of IXA-Rd in an older and frailer population, with an acceptable effectiveness and tolerance.


Asunto(s)
Mieloma Múltiple , Humanos , Anciano , Lenalidomida/efectos adversos , Estudios Prospectivos , Dexametasona/efectos adversos , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos
2.
Ann Oncol ; 27(5): 902-7, 2016 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26787238

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The IFM2009-02 trial studied pomalidomide (4 mg daily, 21/28 versus 28/28) and dexamethasone in very advanced relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). We observed that 40% of patients had a prolonged progression-free survival (PFS) and subsequently overall survival (OS). We sought to analyze the characteristics of these patients and study the effect of long exposure to pomalidomide. DESIGN: We separated the studied population into two groups: 3 months to 1 year (<1 year) and more than 1 year (≥1 year) of treatment with pomalidomide and dexamethasone based on clinical judgment and historical control studies. We then analyzed the characteristics of patients according to duration of treatment. RESULTS: The overall response rate (ORR) for the <1-year group was 43%, the median PFS 4.6 months [95% confidence interval (95% CI) 3.8-6.4] with only 6% at 12 months, and the median OS was 15 months (11.7-20.3) and 40% at 18 months. For the ≥1-year group, the response rate and survival were strikingly different, ORR at 83%, median PFS 20.7 months (14.7-35.4), median OS not reached, and 91% at 18 months. CONCLUSION: Pomalidomide and dexamethasone favored prolonged and safe exposure to treatment in 40% of heavily treated and end-stage RRMM, a paradigm shift in the natural history of RRMM characterized with a succession of shorter disease-free intervals and ultimately shorter survival. Although an optimization of pomalidomide-dexamethasone regimen is warranted in advanced RRMM, we claim that pomalidomide has proven once more to change the natural history of myeloma in this series, which should be confirmed in a larger study.


Asunto(s)
Resistencia a Antineoplásicos/efectos de los fármacos , Mieloma Múltiple/tratamiento farmacológico , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/tratamiento farmacológico , Talidomida/análogos & derivados , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/administración & dosificación , Bortezomib/administración & dosificación , Bortezomib/efectos adversos , Dexametasona/administración & dosificación , Dexametasona/efectos adversos , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Efectos Colaterales y Reacciones Adversas Relacionados con Medicamentos/patología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Mieloma Múltiple/patología , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/patología , Talidomida/administración & dosificación , Talidomida/efectos adversos
3.
J Med Econ ; 19(3): 243-58, 2016.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26517601

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To conduct a cost-effectiveness assessment of lenalidomide plus dexamethasone (Rd) vs bortezomib plus melphalan and prednisone (VMP) as initial treatment for transplant-ineligible patients with newly-diagnosed multiple myeloma (MM), from a U.S. payer perspective. METHODS: A partitioned survival model was developed to estimate expected life-years (LYs), quality-adjusted LYs (QALYs), direct costs and incremental costs per QALY and LY gained associated with use of Rd vs VMP over a patient's lifetime. Information on the efficacy and safety of Rd and VMP was based on data from multinational phase III clinical trials and a network meta-analysis. Pre-progression direct costs included the costs of Rd and VMP, treatment of adverse events (including prophylaxis) and routine care and monitoring associated with MM. Post-progression direct costs included costs of subsequent treatment(s) and routine care and monitoring for progressive disease, all obtained from published literature and estimated from a U.S. payer perspective. Utilities were obtained from the aforementioned trials. Costs and outcomes were discounted at 3% annually. RESULTS: Relative to VMP, use of Rd was expected to result in an additional 2.22 LYs and 1.47 QALYs (discounted). Patients initiated with Rd were expected to incur an additional $78,977 in mean lifetime direct costs (discounted) vs those initiated with VMP. The incremental costs per QALY and per LY gained with Rd vs VMP were $53,826 and $35,552, respectively. In sensitivity analyses, results were found to be most sensitive to differences in survival associated with Rd vs VMP, the cost of lenalidomide and the discount rate applied to effectiveness outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Rd was expected to result in greater LYs and QALYs compared with VMP, with similar overall costs per LY for each regimen. Results of this analysis indicated that Rd may be a cost-effective alternative to VMP as initial treatment for transplant-ineligible patients with MM, with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio well within the levels for recent advancements in oncology.


Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/economía , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Bortezomib/administración & dosificación , Dexametasona/administración & dosificación , Melfalán/administración & dosificación , Mieloma Múltiple/tratamiento farmacológico , Prednisona/administración & dosificación , Talidomida/análogos & derivados , Anciano , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Femenino , Humanos , Lenalidomida , Masculino , Cadenas de Markov , Años de Vida Ajustados por Calidad de Vida , Talidomida/administración & dosificación , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estados Unidos
4.
Rev Med Interne ; 36(9): 613-8, 2015 Sep.
Artículo en Francés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26257103

RESUMEN

Once characterized by a very poor outcome, multiple myeloma (MM) now has a significantly prolonged survival, with major improvements allowed by the use of "novel agents": proteasome inhibitors (first-in-class bortezomib) and immunomodulatory compounds (IMiDs; first-in-class thalidomide and lenalidomide). However, the vast majority - if not all - of patients with MM ultimately end up being refractory to all existing drugs, including these efficient novel agents. There is a clear unmet medical need in this situation, which warrants the development of the next generation of proteasome inhibitors and IMiDs, as well as new drug classes. This review focuses on pomalidomide, the next generation IMiD, recently approved by the US FDA and the EMA for patients with relapsed or refractory MM who have received at least two prior therapies, including lenalidomide and bortezomib, and have demonstrated disease progression on their last therapy.


Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Mieloma Múltiple/tratamiento farmacológico , Talidomida/análogos & derivados , Antineoplásicos/química , Antineoplásicos/farmacocinética , Ensayos Clínicos como Asunto/métodos , Humanos , Conformación Molecular , Mieloma Múltiple/epidemiología , Relación Estructura-Actividad , Talidomida/química , Talidomida/farmacocinética , Talidomida/uso terapéutico
5.
Leukemia ; 28(3): 675-9, 2014 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23892719

RESUMEN

Deletions of the 1p region appear as a pejorative prognostic factor in multiple myeloma patients (especially 1p22 and 1p32 deletions) but there is a lack of data on the real impact of 1p abnormalities on an important and homogeneous group of patients. To address this issue we studied by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) the incidence and prognostic impact of 1p22 and 1p32 deletions in 1195 patients from the IFM (Institut Francophone du Myélome) cell collection. Chromosome 1p deletions were present in 23.3% of the patients (271): 15.1% (176) for 1p22 and 7.3% (85) for 1p32 regions. In univariate analyses, 1p22 and 1p32 appeared as negative prognostic factors for progression-free survival (PFS): 1p22: 19.8 months vs 33.6 months (P<0.001) and 1p32: 14.4 months vs 33.6 months (P<0.001); and overall survival (OS): 1p22: 44.2 months vs 96.8 months (P=0.002) and 1p32: 26.7 months vs 96.8 months (P<0.001). In multivariate analyses, 1p22 and 1p32 deletions still appear as independent negative prognostic factors for PFS and OS. In conclusion, our data show that 1p22 and 1p32 deletions are major negative prognostic factors for PFS and OS for patients with MM. We thus suggest that 1p32 deletion should be tested for all patients at diagnosis.


Asunto(s)
Deleción Cromosómica , Cromosomas Humanos Par 1 , Mieloma Múltiple/genética , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Humanos , Hibridación Fluorescente in Situ , Masculino , Mieloma Múltiple/patología , Pronóstico
6.
Leukemia ; 27(2): 473-81, 2013 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22874878

RESUMEN

Recent studies have provided direct evidence for genetic variegation in subclones for various cancer types. However, little is known about subclonal evolutionary processes according to treatment and subsequent relapse in multiple myeloma (MM). This issue was addressed in a cohort of 24 MM patients treated either with conventional chemotherapy or with the proteasome inhibitor, bortezomib. As MM is a highly heterogeneous disease associated with a large number of chromosomal abnormalities, a subset of secondary genetic events that seem to reflect progression, 1q21 gain, NF-κB-activating mutations, RB1 and TP53 deletions, was examined. By using high-resolution single-nucleotide polymorphism arrays, subclones were identified with nonlinear complex evolutionary histories. Such reordering of the spectrum of genetic lesions, identified in a third of MM patients during therapy, is likely to reflect the selection of genetically distinct subclones, not initially competitive against the dominant population but which survived chemotherapy, thrived and acquired new anomalies. In addition, the emergence of minor subclones at relapse appeared to be significantly associated with bortezomib treatment. These data support the idea that new strategies for future clinical trials in MM should combine targeted therapy and subpopulations' control to eradicate all myeloma subclones in order to obtain long-term remission.


Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Biomarcadores de Tumor/genética , Aberraciones Cromosómicas , Mieloma Múltiple/tratamiento farmacológico , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/inducido químicamente , Adulto , Anciano , Secuencia de Bases , Ácidos Borónicos/administración & dosificación , Bortezomib , Células Clonales , Dexametasona/administración & dosificación , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Evolución Molecular , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Eliminación de Gen , Perfilación de la Expresión Génica , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Datos de Secuencia Molecular , Mieloma Múltiple/complicaciones , Mieloma Múltiple/genética , Mutación , FN-kappa B/genética , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/diagnóstico , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/genética , Análisis de Secuencia por Matrices de Oligonucleótidos , Polimorfismo de Nucleótido Simple/genética , Pirazinas/administración & dosificación , ARN Mensajero/genética , Reacción en Cadena en Tiempo Real de la Polimerasa , Proteína de Retinoblastoma/genética , Reacción en Cadena de la Polimerasa de Transcriptasa Inversa , Homología de Secuencia de Ácido Nucleico , Proteína p53 Supresora de Tumor/genética
7.
Leuk Lymphoma ; 53(4): 632-4, 2012 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21916831

RESUMEN

One hundred and ten patients with multiple myeloma were treated with bendamustine as part of a French compassionate use program. To receive bendamustine, patients had to present with relapsed or refractory disease after prior therapies that had to include alkylators, steroids, IMiDs and bortezomib. The median number of bendamustine cycles administered was 4 (1-13). The overall response rate (≥ partial response) was 30%, including 2% complete responses. The median progression-free and overall survival for the entire cohort were 9.3 and 12.4 months, respectively. In this series of patients with advanced disease, both the response rate and the duration of response are encouraging and indicate that bendamustine presents a feasible option, which should be considered for the treatment of relapsed/refractory patients.


Asunto(s)
Ensayos de Uso Compasivo , Mieloma Múltiple/tratamiento farmacológico , Compuestos de Mostaza Nitrogenada/uso terapéutico , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Antineoplásicos Alquilantes/uso terapéutico , Clorhidrato de Bendamustina , Estudios de Cohortes , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Esquema de Medicación , Resistencia a Antineoplásicos , Femenino , Francia , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Mieloma Múltiple/patología , Recurrencia , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento
9.
Leukemia ; 26(1): 149-57, 2012 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21799510

RESUMEN

Promising new drugs are being evaluated for treatment of multiple myeloma (MM), but their impact should be measured against the expected outcome in patients failing current therapies. However, the natural history of relapsed disease in the current era remains unclear. We studied 286 patients with relapsed MM, who were refractory to bortezomib and were relapsed following, refractory to or ineligible to receive, an IMiD (immunomodulatory drug), had measurable disease, and ECOG PS of 0, 1 or 2. The date patients satisfied the entry criteria was defined as time zero (T(0)). The median age at diagnosis was 58 years, and time from diagnosis to T(0) was 3.3 years. Following T(0), 213 (74%) patients had a treatment recorded with one or more regimens (median=1; range 0-8). The first regimen contained bortezomib in 55 (26%) patients and an IMiD in 70 (33%). A minor response or better was seen to at least one therapy after T(0) in 94 patients (44%) including ≥ partial response in 69 (32%). The median overall survival and event-free survival from T(0) were 9 and 5 months, respectively. This study confirms the poor outcome, once patients become refractory to current treatments. The results provide context for interpreting ongoing trials of new drugs.


Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Factores Inmunológicos/uso terapéutico , Mieloma Múltiple/tratamiento farmacológico , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Antineoplásicos/administración & dosificación , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Femenino , Humanos , Factores Inmunológicos/administración & dosificación , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Mieloma Múltiple/patología , Recurrencia , Análisis de Supervivencia
10.
Health sci. dis ; 12(3): 1-5, 2012.
Artículo en Francés | AIM (África) | ID: biblio-1262647

RESUMEN

Cette etude retrospective et prospective a pour but de decrire les aspects cliniques; biologiques et evolutifs du lymphome T-NK extra-ganglionnaire de type Nasale de stade I et IV chez 9 patients au CHU de Nancy sur une periode de 4 ans (Decembre 2001 a Avril 2005). Chez ces patients ages de plus de 19 ans (19 et 78 ans); le nasosinus etait la localisation la plus frequente (56). Les signes B rencontres chez 6 patients etaient par contre absents chez les 3 autres patients. On note a l'analyse une mediane du taux serique des LDH a 742 UI/l. La recherche du virus d'Epstein Barr par la methode..montre une positivite a Ig G chez 5 patients soit 56 des cas. Le dosage biochimique de la beta2microglobuline montre un taux moyen de .chez 6 patients tandis que 3 patients affichaient un taux normal moyen de. On note a l'immunophenotypage 8 cas l'antigene CD3+; 4 cas de CD7+; 2 cas de CD45 et 3 cas de CD56+. Plusieurs protocoles therapeutiques de la chimiotherapie avec des methodes d'intensification par autogreffe apres irradiation corporelle totale; a la radiotherapie ont ete utilises. Parmi les 9 patients mis sous traitement; 2 etaient en RC; 6 patients etaient consideres en echec therapeutique; un deces lie a la toxicite medicamenteuse a ete constate. La mediane de survie de nos patients etait de 6 mois avec des extremes de 3 a 15 mois. En date de pointe 100 des patients etaient decedes. La recidive est apparue chez 2 patients. Notre etude suggere que la combinaison de la chimiotherapie a haute dose et les methodes d'intensification therapeutique par autogreffe peut etre salvatrice pour ameliorer la survie des patients


Asunto(s)
Biología , Linfoma Extranodal de Células NK-T , Linfoma Extranodal de Células NK-T/diagnóstico
12.
J Clin Pharm Ther ; 36(1): 19-26, 2011 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21198717

RESUMEN

WHAT IS KNOWN AND BACKGROUND: For relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM), a series of novel agents (thalidomide, bortezomib and lenalidomide) has emerged during the latest decade, but their use in routine clinical practice is not well documented as well as the cost of RRMM. OBJECTIVE: Our aim is to review the therapeutic management of such patients in France and to estimate the associated costs. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study, based on chart reviews, was conducted in French Haematology Departments over the period 2004-2007 and the associated direct costs estimated. RESULTS: One hundred and two patients with a relapse after first-line therapy were selected from five centres. The average follow-up from diagnosis or the date of first relapse to death or to the latest news was respectively 56.25 and 23.53 months. Novel agents were used in 73% of all cases, and in all cases of first relapse. Thalidomide and bortezomib were respectively the most frequently used second-line (57%) and third-line treatments (44%). The average number of lines of treatment received per patient as from first relapse was 2.75 (min 1; max 8) and the mean direct cost per month was estimated at 3130 € after the first relapse. This cost was represented in greater part by the cost of chemotherapy drugs (66%). WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION: The use of novel agents such as thalidomide, bortezomib and lenalidomide for RRMM is highly prevalent in France from the first relapse. The associated medical cost is substantial mainly due to the cost of the new agents.


Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos/economía , Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Costos de la Atención en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Mieloma Múltiple/tratamiento farmacológico , Mieloma Múltiple/economía , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Anciano , Antineoplásicos/administración & dosificación , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/economía , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Ácidos Borónicos/administración & dosificación , Ácidos Borónicos/economía , Ácidos Borónicos/uso terapéutico , Bortezomib , Estudios de Cohortes , Costos de los Medicamentos/estadística & datos numéricos , Resistencia a Antineoplásicos , Utilización de Medicamentos/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Francia , Hospitales Universitarios , Humanos , Lenalidomida , Masculino , Registros Médicos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pirazinas/administración & dosificación , Pirazinas/economía , Pirazinas/uso terapéutico , Recurrencia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Talidomida/administración & dosificación , Talidomida/análogos & derivados , Talidomida/economía , Talidomida/uso terapéutico
14.
Leukemia ; 24(3): 623-8, 2010 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20072152

RESUMEN

This retrospective analysis investigated the prognostic value of del(13) and t(4;14) abnormalities and the impact of prior treatment on outcomes in 207 heavily pretreated patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (MM) treated with lenalidomide plus dexamethasone. Patients with relapsed or refractory MM who had either earlier received thalidomide or bortezomib, or for whom continuation of these agents was contraindicated, and who had fluorescence in situ hybridization data available were included in the analysis. Patients with relapsed or refractory MM who received treatment with lenalidomide plus dexamethasone in the presence of del(13) and t(4;14) chromosomal abnormalities had lower overall response rates (ORRs) and shorter median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) compared with those who did not have these abnormalities. The results also showed that prior treatment with bortezomib was associated with shorter median PFS and OS. Progression during thalidomide therapy was the only significant independent predictor for OS and that the presence of del(13) and hemoglobin levels <10 g per 100 ml were prognostic factors for ORR and PFS, but not OS, in these heavily pretreated relapsed or refractory MM patients treated with lenalidomide plus dexamethasone.


Asunto(s)
Aberraciones Cromosómicas , Dexametasona/administración & dosificación , Mieloma Múltiple/tratamiento farmacológico , Talidomida/análogos & derivados , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Ácidos Borónicos/uso terapéutico , Bortezomib , Quimioterapia Combinada , Femenino , Humanos , Lenalidomida , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Mieloma Múltiple/genética , Mieloma Múltiple/mortalidad , Análisis Multivariante , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Pirazinas/uso terapéutico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Talidomida/administración & dosificación , Talidomida/uso terapéutico , Resultado del Tratamiento
15.
Leukemia ; 21(9): 2020-4, 2007 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17625611

RESUMEN

One hundred de novo multiple myeloma patients with t(4;14) treated with double intensive therapy according to IFM99 protocols were retrospectively analyzed. The median overall survival (OS) and event-free survival (EFS) were 41.4 and 21 months, respectively, as compared to 65 and 37 for patients included in the IFM99 trials without t(4;14) (P<10(-7)). We identified a subgroup of patients presenting at diagnosis with both low beta(2)-microglobulin <4 mg/l and high hemoglobin (Hb) >/=10 g/l (46% of the cases) with a median OS of 54.6 months and a median EFS of 26 months, respectively, which benefits from high-dose therapy (HDT); conversely patients with one or both adverse prognostic factor (high beta(2)-microglobulin and/or low Hb) had a poor outcome. The achievement of either complete response or very good partial response after HDT was also a powerful independent prognostic factor for both OS and EFS.


Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/administración & dosificación , Heterogeneidad Genética , Mieloma Múltiple/tratamiento farmacológico , Mieloma Múltiple/genética , Translocación Genética , Adulto , Anciano , Cromosomas Humanos Par 14 , Cromosomas Humanos Par 4 , Citarabina/administración & dosificación , Dexametasona/administración & dosificación , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Hemoglobinas , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Mieloma Múltiple/mortalidad , Análisis Multivariante , Pronóstico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Vincristina/administración & dosificación , Microglobulina beta-2/sangre
16.
Rev Med Interne ; 28(10): 682-8, 2007 Oct.
Artículo en Francés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17559982

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: After decades of minimal progress, two new classes of drugs with novels mechanisms of action: immunomodulatory drugs (thalidomide and lenalidomide) and proteasome inhibitors (bortezomib) have shown great activity for the treatment of multiple myeloma. CURRENT KNOWLEDGE AND KEY POINTS: Thalidomide acts by a variety of mechanisms; its efficacy is well known in disease relapse especially associated with dexamethasone. Recent results prove that combination of thalidomide with melphalan and prednisone should be considered as the first line standard of care in elderly patient. The main side effects are peripheral neuropathy and deep-vein thrombosis. Bortezomib is the first proteasome inhibitor. It is approved for the treatment in first disease relapse. The combination with glucocorticoids is synergistic. This combination in induction treatment before autologous stem cell transplantation is promising, as well as the combination with melphalan and prednisone in elderly patient. The main toxicities are fatigue and peripheral neuropathy. Lenalidomide is a structural analogue of thalidomide. Its efficacy in combination with dexamethasone has been proved in relapsing patients. The main toxicity is hematologic. Utilisation as first line treatment is also promising. FUTURE PROSPECTS AND PROJECTS: These three drugs have toxicities predictable and manageable and can be used successively or in combination for greater effectiveness. They have an impact on the multiple myeloma treatment strategies and on the disease course itself.


Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Mieloma Múltiple/tratamiento farmacológico , Antineoplásicos/administración & dosificación , Antineoplásicos Alquilantes/administración & dosificación , Antineoplásicos Alquilantes/uso terapéutico , Antineoplásicos Hormonales/administración & dosificación , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Ácidos Borónicos/administración & dosificación , Ácidos Borónicos/uso terapéutico , Bortezomib , Humanos , Inmunosupresores/administración & dosificación , Inmunosupresores/uso terapéutico , Lenalidomida , Melfalán/administración & dosificación , Melfalán/uso terapéutico , Inhibidores de Proteasas/administración & dosificación , Inhibidores de Proteasas/uso terapéutico , Pirazinas/administración & dosificación , Pirazinas/uso terapéutico , Talidomida/administración & dosificación , Talidomida/análogos & derivados , Talidomida/uso terapéutico
19.
Rev Neurol (Paris) ; 158(11): 1121-3, 2002 Nov.
Artículo en Francés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12451348

RESUMEN

A 74-year- man was hospitalized for subacute aphasia and right hemiparesis. He had had chronic lymphoid leukemia for 11 years and had been treated 5 months earlier with 3 courses of fludarabine. Magnetic resonance imaging showed lesions of the temporo-occipital white matter compatible with progressive multifocal leukoencephalitis (PML). The presence of JC virus was demonstrated first by in situ hybridation after a brain biopsy and second with polymerase chain reaction on CSF. The diagnosis of PML was confirmed. The causality of fludarabine treatment is discussed.


Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos/efectos adversos , Leucemia Linfocítica Crónica de Células B/tratamiento farmacológico , Leucoencefalopatía Multifocal Progresiva/inducido químicamente , Vidarabina/análogos & derivados , Vidarabina/efectos adversos , Anciano , Biopsia , Encéfalo/patología , Enfermedad Crónica , Humanos , Leucoencefalopatía Multifocal Progresiva/líquido cefalorraquídeo , Leucoencefalopatía Multifocal Progresiva/diagnóstico , Masculino , Reacción en Cadena de la Polimerasa
20.
Presse Med ; 31(22): 1024-6, 2002 Jun 22.
Artículo en Francés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12148256

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Granulocyte sarcoma (GS), also known as chloroma, is a localized malignant tumor composed of myeloid cells, the diagnosis of which is difficult. The pancreatic location and recurrence, aside from any context of malignant hemopathy, are exceptional. OBSERVATION: A 31-year-old woman developed an isolated and recurrent granulocyte sarcoma of the pancreas, without any context of a malignant hemopathy. The diagnosis retained on extemporaneous examination was an adenocarcinoma of the pancreas, because of the non-specific necrotic nature of the tumor. The immuno-histochemical exploration corrected the diagnosis. Despite local surgery, an isolated tumor recurred 6 months later. This relapse was treated with radiotherapy followed by heavy chemotherapy, identical to that applied in acute myeloblastic leukemia (AML). Ten months later, remission was stable and complete. COMMENTS: Isolated granulocyte sarcomas located in the pancreas are exceptional and have often led to initial erroneous diagnosis. Immuno-histochemical methods are essential in order to obtain correct diagnosis. Despite the localized nature of the tumor, intensive AML-type chemotherapy is necessary.


Asunto(s)
Adenocarcinoma/patología , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/patología , Sarcoma Mieloide/patología , Adenocarcinoma/radioterapia , Adenocarcinoma/cirugía , Adulto , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Terapia Combinada , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Femenino , Humanos , Inmunohistoquímica , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/radioterapia , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/cirugía , Radioterapia , Sarcoma Mieloide/radioterapia , Sarcoma Mieloide/cirugía
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...