Improving Patient Safety Through Proper Ordering and Administration of Andexanet Alfa.

Objective: To evaluate prescribing practices for the anti-Xa reversal agent, andexanet alfa, to identify challenges in ordering and administering this medication, and to offer recommendations to improve patient safety. Patients and Methods: This retrospective study reviewed all adult patients treated with andexanet alfa (AA) at a single institution between January 1, 2018, and March 31, 2020. We identified ordering and administration benchmarks based on recommendations from previous clinical trials on AA. We then reviewed these medical records to determine compliance with these benchmarks. We also collected data related to thrombotic complications and mortality. Results: Twenty-two AA dosing sets (loading and infusion dose) were given to 20 patients. Eight (36%) dosing sets met our ordering benchmarks regarding appropriate dose, time since last direct oral anticoagulants, urgency of administration, and documentation. Three (14%) dosing sets met the administrative benchmarks of being started within 30 minutes of the initial order, and 13 (59%) dosing sets had timely infusion of the infusion dose after the loading dose. No dosing set met all our administration benchmarks. There was 1 thrombotic event within 24 hours of the correct AA dose and 1 potential death related to AA. Conclusion: This study highlights challenges in ordering and administering AA at our institution and brings awareness to potential similar concerns at other institutions. These challenges also identified the need for optimized order sets, a streamlined administration process, and frequent provider education to improve patient safety.

Acute Limb Ischemia Complicated by Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia in an Asymptomatic COVID-19 Patient.

Acute limb ischemia (ALI) is the sudden decrease in limb perfusion caused by embolism secondary to many blood stasis conditions. Treatment commences with intravenous (IV) unfractionated heparin infusion. Individuals can have an immune-mediated reaction to heparin products which results in heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT). Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has added to the difficulty of treating patients with ALI due to increasing the likelihood of HIT via the virus's ability to manipulate the coagulation parameters. We present a case of ALI complicated by HIT in a 49-year-old male with a confirmed asymptomatic COVID-19. The patient initially presented with progressive pain, coldness, and tingling in the right foot. He was treated with a tissue plasminogen activator (TPA) and a heparin drip. The occlusion persisted despite medical intervention leading to right below-knee amputation. The patient returned to the emergency department (ED) 13 days later with massive intracranial hemorrhage and subsequently expired. This case study demonstrates the significance of COVID-19 diagnostic testing due to the possibility of developing blood clots and potential complications, including HIT.

Feasibility and safety of quantitative adenosine stress perfusion cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in pediatric heart transplant patients with and without coronary allograft vasculopathy.

BACKGROUND: Pediatric heart transplant patients require cardiac catheterization to monitor for coronary allograft vasculopathy. Cardiac catheterization has no safe and consistent method for measuring microvascular disease. Stress perfusion cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) assessing microvascular disease has been performed in adults. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the feasibility and safety of performing cardiac MRI with quantitative adenosine stress perfusion testing in pediatric heart transplant patients with and without coronary allograft vasculopathy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All pediatric heart transplant patients with coronary vasculopathy at our institution were asked to participate. Age- and gender-matched pediatric heart transplant patients without vasculopathy were recruited for comparison. Patients underwent cardiac MRI with adenosine stress perfusion testing. RESULTS: Sixteen pediatric heart transplant patients, ages 6-22 years, underwent testing. Nine patients had vasculopathy by angiography. No heart block or other complications occurred during the study. The myocardial perfusion reserve for patients with vasculopathy showed no significant difference with comparison patients (median: 1.43 vs. 1.48; P=0.49). Values for both groups were lower than expected values based on previous adult studies. The patients were also analyzed for time after transplant and the number of rejection episodes. Patients within 6 years of transplantation had a nonsignificant trend toward a higher myocardial perfusion reserve (median: 1.57) versus patients with older transplants (median: 1.47; P=0.46). Intra- and interobserver reproducibility were 97% and 92%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Myocardial perfusion reserve is a safe and feasible method for estimating myocardial perfusion in pediatric heart transplant patients. There is no reliable way to monitor microvascular disease in pediatric patients. This method shows potential and deserves investigation in a larger cohort.