Preparing clinicians for practice: effectiveness and design of on-call simulation.

BACKGROUND: Final year medical students and postgraduate doctors regularly contend with feelings of under-preparedness when transitioning into new areas of clinical practice. This lack of confidence is most evident in the context of on-call work which frequently requires sound clinical prioritisation, rigorous decision making and the management of acutely unwell patients, often with reduced senior support and staffing. This has prompted the emergence of on-call simulation which seeks to enhance participant confidence in performing on-call tasks and facilitate the development of key clinical and non-technical skills. This narrative review examined the use of on-call simulation in medical student and newly qualified doctor cohorts, its effectiveness in achieving its stated outcomes and to identify novel areas for the development of existing models. METHOD: A search strategy was developed in conjunction with a specialist medical librarian. OVID Medline and Embase searches identified articles related to the use and design of on-call simulation in medical education with no restrictions placed upon date or language of publication. Key findings from articles were summarised to develop comprehensive themes for discussion. RESULTS: Twenty Three unique publications were reviewed which unanimously reported that on-call simulation had a positive effect on self-reported participant confidence in performing on-call roles. Furthermore the value on-call simulation when used as an induction activity was also evident. However, there was limited evidence around improved patient and performance outcomes following simulation. It also remains resource intensive as an educational tool and there is a distinct absence of interprofessional education in current models. CONCLUSIONS: We concluded that on-call simulation must adopt an interprofessional educational approach, incorporating other clinical roles. Further studies are needed to characterise the impact on patient outcomes. It remains highly useful as a confidence-boosting induction activity, particularly in specialities where clinical exposure is limited. Virtual and tabletop simulation formats, could potentially address the resource burden of manikin-based models, particularly with ever growing demands on medical educators and the expansion of training posts.

The Hungarian validation of the Brief International Cognitive Assessment for Multiple Sclerosis (BICAMS) battery and the correlation of cognitive impairment with fatigue and quality of life.

BACKGROUND: Multiple Sclerosis (MS) causes not only somatic, but also cognitive impairment regardless of the patients׳ age or the course of the disease. The Brief International Cognitive Assessment for MS (BICAMS) test, published in 2011, is a short cognitive questionnaire: a fast, reliable, sensitive and specific tool for the evaluation of the patients׳ cognitive state. OBJECTIVES: Our primary objective was to assess the validity of the Hungarian version of the BICAMS test. Our secondary objective was to evaluate the impact of the cognitive impairment on the patient׳s quality of life and fatigue׳s impact on the patients׳ cognitive state. METHODS: 65 RR-MS patients and 65 age, sex and education matched healthy control (HC) subjects completed the test and were retested after 3 weeks. The patients also completed the MS Quality of Life 54 (MSQoL54) and the Fatigue Impact Scale (FIS) assessments. Group differences were calculated by paired sample T-tests. The test-retest reliability was measured by intraclass correlation coefficients. To analyze the difference between the test-retest performances of the two groups we used two-way repeated measures ANOVA where the BICAMS battery was the single composite outcome and one-way repeated measures ANOVA. To assess the impact of the cognitive decline on the patients׳ quality of life and fatigue׳s impact on the cognitive state, we examined the correlations between results in the BICAMS and the MSQoL54 and FIS. RESULTS: We found significant difference (p ≤ 0.001, p = 0.017 in the first CVLT-II assessment) between MS patients and members of the HC group in all four evaluated parameters of BICAMS test in both sessions. The correlation coefficients were very strong between the tests and retests (r > 0.8; p < 0.001; r = 0.678, p < 0.001 between the CVLT-II assessments). We found that the HC group performed significantly (p = 0.020) better in the retest sessions as compared to their original performance than the patients did and this difference is solely due to the difference between the CVLT-II performances. We have found significant negative correlation between the patients׳ cognitive function and the fatigue score (r < -0.3, p < 0.05). Seven of the MSQoL-54 subscales correlated with the BICAMS performance (r > 0.3; < 0 .05). CONCLUSIONS: The Hungarian version of the BICAMS test is a valid and reliable method for the evaluation of MS patients׳ cognitive function. It seems that because of the short retest period, the members of the HC group remembered the CVLT-II words thus performed better than the patients did. Also apparently fatigue can have a negative impact on the patients׳ cognitive state, and cognitive impairment could worsen the patients׳ quality of life.