Long-term psychiatric inpatients' perspectives on weight gain, body satisfaction, diet and physical activity: a mixed methods study.

BACKGROUND: Obesity is a significant problem for people with serious mental illness. We aimed to consider body size from the perspective of long-stay psychiatric inpatients, focussing on: weight gain and its causes and impacts; diet and physical activity; and the perceived ability to make meaningful change in these domains. METHOD: A mixed methods study with 51 long-term psychiatric forensic and rehabilitation inpatients using semi-structured interviews combined with biometric and demographic data. RESULTS: 94% of participants were overweight or obese (mean BMI 35.3, SD 8.1). They were concerned about their weight, with 75% of them attempting to lose weight. Qualitative responses indicated low personal effectiveness and self-stigmatisation. Participants viewed their weight gain as something 'done to them' through medication, hospitalisation and leave restrictions. A prevailing theme was that institutional constraints made it difficult to live a healthy life (just the way the system is). Many had an external locus of control, viewing weight loss as desirable but unachievable, inhibited by environmental factors and requiring a quantum of motivation they found hard to muster. Despite this, participants were thoughtful and interested, had sound ideas for weight loss, and wished to be engaged in a shared endeavour to achieve better health outcomes. Consulting people as experts on their experiences, preferences, and goals may help develop new solutions, remove unidentified barriers, and improve motivation. CONCLUSIONS: The importance of an individualised, multifactorial approach in weight loss programmes for this group was clear. Patient-led ideas and co-design should be key principles in programme and environmental design.

Discovering stigma through recovery teaching.

OBJECTIVE: From the perspective of the tutor, course coordinators and a clinical supervisor, we describe and reflect on our observations of innovative service-user led tutorials on recovery that were delivered to final year medical students as part of their psychiatric module. CONCLUSIONS: Much to our surprise, and in contrast to observations elsewhere during the module, students openly expressed blatant stigmatising attitudes in the tutorials on recovery, particularly after spending time with inpatient services. More specifically, they were pessimistic about the possibility of recovery and they struggled to accept the service user status of the recovery tutor. This prompted us to reflect on what and how we teach psychiatry.

Hypnosedative prescribing in outpatient psychiatry.

The objective of this study was to describe hypnosedative (HS) prescribing patterns in a typical sample of psychiatric outpatients. Prescription information was extracted from the clinical records of all current outpatients at two New Zealand public mental health centres. This included the type and duration of HS use and documentation of a clinical review of longstanding (>3 months) use, patient sex, age and ICD10 diagnoses. One-third of the patients (35.2%) were prescribed at least one HS; this was longstanding in two-thirds (69%). One in 10 had a coprescription of more than one HS drug. HS use was related to female sex and diagnosis, being more common among patients with nonpsychotic than psychotic disorders and very infrequent in patients on clozapine. In most longstanding cases, a clinical review had been documented. The logistic regression confirmed female sex, diagnosis and clozapine all as independent predictors of HS prescription. HS prescribing in psychiatric illness is more common than in the general population, often longstanding, with polypharmacy being common. The frequent use of antipsychotic drugs as HSs is of concern, given their side-effect profile. As there are risks involved with longstanding HS use, a better rationale for the role of medication in the management of sleep problems in psychiatric disorders is needed.