Pandemic Care Through Collaboration: Lessons From a COVID-19 Field Hospital.

During the surge of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) infections in March and April 2020, many skilled-nursing facilities in the Boston area closed to COVID-19 post-acute admissions because of infection control concerns and staffing shortages. Local government and health care leaders collaborated to establish a 1000-bed field hospital for patients with COVID-19, with 500 respite beds for the undomiciled and 500 post-acute care (PAC) beds within 9 days. The PAC hospital provided care for 394 patients over 7 weeks, from April 10 to June 2, 2020. In this report, we describe our implementation strategy, including organization structure, admissions criteria, and clinical services. Partnership with government, military, and local health care organizations was essential for logistical and medical support. In addition, dynamic workflows necessitated clear communication pathways, clinical operations expertise, and highly adaptable staff.

Development of Rapid Response Capabilities in a Large COVID-19 Alternate Care Site Using Failure Modes and Effect Analysis with In Situ Simulation.

Preparedness measures for the anticipated surge of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) cases within eastern Massachusetts included the establishment of alternate care sites (field hospitals). Boston Hope hospital was set up within the Boston Convention and Exhibition Center to provide low-acuity care for COVID-19 patients and to support local healthcare systems. However, early recognition of the need to provide higher levels of care, or critical care for the potential deterioration of patients recovering from COVID-19, prompted the development of a hybrid acute care-intensive care unit. We describe our experience of implementing rapid response capabilities of this innovative ad hoc unit. Combining quality improvement tools for hazards detection and testing through in situ simulation successfully identified several operational hurdles. Through rapid continuous analysis and iterative change, we implemented appropriate mitigation strategies and established rapid response and rescue capabilities. This study provides a framework for future planning of high-acuity services within a unique field hospital setting.

Napping in college students and its relationship with nighttime sleep.

UNLABELLED: Abstract. OBJECTIVE: To examine the habit of napping and its relationship with nighttime sleep in college students. PARTICIPANTS: Four hundred and forty undergraduate students who responded to an anonymous online survey in April 2010. METHODS: Three questions were asked to determine the frequency, length, and timing of napping during the past month. Sleep quality was measured by the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI). RESULTS: The PSQI score significantly differed among self-reported nap-frequency (p=.047) and nap-length (p=.017) groups, with those who napped more than 3 times per week and those who napped more than 2 hours having the poorest sleep quality. Students who napped between 6 and 9 pm had shorter sleep on school nights compared with students in other nap-timing groups (p=.002). CONCLUSIONS: College students who are self-reported frequent, long, and late nappers may have a higher risk of poor nighttime sleep quality and more severe sleep deprivation.

How do clinicians assess, communicate about, and manage patient sleep in the hospital?

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to characterize how clinicians assess, communicate about, and manage patient sleep, with the focus on identifying existing barriers and facilitators to sleep promotion in clinical practice. BACKGROUND: Sleep is a critical need for improving for hospitalized patients. METHODS: Content analysis was used to interpret descriptive data from 4 group interviews with a total of 62 clinicians. RESULTS: Clinicians reported they did not formally assess for patient sleep, which led to largely unmanaged sleep disruption during hospitalization. Major barriers to effective sleep management were limited understanding of the importance of sleep, lack of a standardized tool for assessment, and inadequate communication. Facilitators included collaborative communication with patients and the healthcare team and customized patient-centered interventions. CONCLUSIONS: It is critical to inform clinicians on the importance of sleep, to standardize sleep assessment, and to facilitate collaboration among caregivers to promote sleep for hospitalized patients.