Iritis presumed as secondary to disseminated coccidioidomycosis.

BACKGROUND: Coccidioidomycosis is a systemic disease caused by a fungus found in soil and transmitted through inhalation. It is prevalent in western and southwestern United States, Mexico, and South and Central America. Results of skin testing, serologic testing, and tissue cultures confirm the diagnosis. Coccidioidomycosis can manifest in various ways: the infected individual may present asymptomatically, with an acute respiratory infection, or, in more severe or chronic cases, with a multiorgan presentation. Ocular involvement may include anterior segment, posterior segment, or extraorbital involvement. CASE REPORT: A case concerning a patient with iritis presumed as secondary to disseminated coccidioidomycosis is discussed. The patient initially presented to our clinic with signs and symptoms of acute, unilateral iritis and a recent history of iritis in the contralateral eye. The active inflammation was treated topically with Pred Forte and cyclopentolate and resolved without sequelae. Because the presentation was bilateral with an asymmetric timecourse, laboratory tests were ordered to rule out systemic association. Because all tests yielded negative results, the known history of disseminated coccidioidomycosis was presumed to be the etiology of this iritis. CONCLUSION: Although eye findings are rare, disseminated coccidioidomycosis is an important differential to consider when a patient presents with uveitis. For this reason, awareness and recognition of ocular signs and symptoms of this disease is significant in proper patient care and management.

Breast conserving surgery and accelerated partial breast irradiation using the MammoSite system: initial clinical experience.

HYPOTHESIS: Balloon catheter-based accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) may result in desirable short-term outcomes in patients undergoing breast conserving surgery. DESIGN: Prospective consecutive case series. SETTING: Tertiary multidisciplinary referral center. PATIENTS: Forty selected patients with invasive breast carcinoma undergoing breast conserving surgery and MammoSite device placement. INTERVENTIONS: Breast conserving surgery, sentinel and/or axillary node dissection, placement of the new balloon catheter applicator (MammoSite device), and APBI. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Infection, early and late seroma, device explantation, time to initiating APBI, acute toxic effects on the skin, and cosmesis using the Harvard Scale. RESULTS: Thirty-nine patients underwent MammoSite device placement at the time of lumpectomy; 1 patient underwent percutaneous device placement after lumpectomy. Nineteen patients (49%) had drainage catheters placed in the breast cavity at the time of lumpectomy. Wound infection developed in 3 patients (8%). Five devices (12%) were explanted because of unfavorable final pathological findings or infection. The mean time to the start of APBI in patients who did not undergo simultaneous drain placement was 7.2 days (range, 5-12 days), compared with 5.1 days (range, 3-8 days) in patients who did (P = .008). With a mean follow-up of 13.3 months (range, 2-28 months), patients completing APBI had limited toxic effects on the skin, with excellent or good cosmetic results in 39 patients (97%). CONCLUSIONS: Use of the MammoSite system in APBI has favorable short-term outcomes. Infection and radiation treatment delay are common and may warrant use of perioperative antibiotics and drain placement, respectively. A small number of patients who have device placement at the time of lumpectomy will require explantation because of unfavorable final pathological findings. Short-term outcomes of MammoSite brachytherapy support further studies comparing APBI with standard whole breast irradiation in patients undergoing breast conserving surgery.

Treatment of T3 and T4 anal carcinoma with combined chemoradiation and interstitial 192Ir implantation: a 10-year experience.

PURPOSE: To report our experience in treating T3 and T4 anal carcinoma with combined external beam (EBRT) and chemotherapy, followed by interstitial (192)Ir implant boost. METHODS AND MATERIALS: From 1990 to 2000, 31 patients with T3 and T4 anal carcinoma were treated with: 30 Gy EBRT (2 Gy fractions, 5 days/week) + 5-fluorouracil + mitomycin-C. Median implant dose was 31.3 Gy at 0.5 cm, delivered at a mean rate of 0.52 Gy/h. RESULTS: Six patients had local persistence and 4 eventually developed local-regional recurrence. Eight underwent abdomino-perineal resection (APR). With the addition of APR in selected cases, the ultimate local-regional control after initial treatment was 84%. Distant metastases occurred in 10. Of the initial cohort, 55% is still alive and NED. Eight had radiation proctitis and 7 developed postimplant ulceration. Only 1 required surgical intervention. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment of T3 and T4 anal cancer with combined chemotherapy and EBRT, followed by interstitial implant results in an ultimate local-regional control of 84%, after the inclusion of selected APR. It is well tolerated, with acceptable toxicity.