Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Appl Lab Med ; 9(3): 493-501, 2024 May 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38384143

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: COVID-19 has had a devastating impact on Black, Hispanic, and other underserved, disadvantaged populations. Here anti-SARS-CoV-2 tests are characterized in disadvantaged patients to examine equivalence in US populations. METHODS: Underserved participant adults (age > 18 years) were enrolled before the availability of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines in Federal Qualified Health Centers in California, Florida, Louisiana, Illinois, and Ohio and contributed samples to the Minority and Rural Coronavirus Insights Study (MRCIS). A subset coined the MRCIS SARS-CoV-2 Antibody Cohort of 2365 participants was tested with the Roche Anti-SARS-CoV-2 assay (Cobas e601). Five hundred ninety-five of these were also tested with the Ortho Clinical Diagnostics VITROS Anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG assay (VITROS-5600); 1770 were also tested with the Abbott ARCHITECT SARS-CoV-2 IgG assay (ARCHITECT-2000). Assay-specific cutoffs classified negative/positive results. RESULTS: Eight point four percent (199/2365) of the MRCIS SARS-CoV-2 Antibody Cohort was SARS-CoV-2 RNA positive at enrollment. Agreement between the Ortho/Roche and the Abbott/Roche antibody testing did not vary by enrollment RNA status. The Ortho (anti-spike protein) vs Roche (anti-nucleocapsid protein) comparison agreed substantially: kappa = 0.63 (95% CI: 0.57-0.69); overall agreement, 83%. However, agreement was even better for the Abbott vs Roche assays (both anti-nucleocapsid protein tests): kappa = 0.85 (95% CI: 0.81-0.87); overall agreement, 95%. Anti-SARS-CoV-2 comparisons stratified by demographic criteria demonstrated no significant variability in agreement by sex, race/ethnicity, or age. CONCLUSIONS: Analytical agreement is 96.4% for anti-spike-protein vs anti-nucleocapsid-protein comparisons. Physiologically, seroreversion of anti-nucleocapsid reactivity after infection occurred in the disadvantaged population similarly to general populations. No anti-SARS-CoV-2 assays included demonstrated a clinically significant difference due to the demographics of the disadvantaged MRCIS SARS-CoV-2 Antibody Cohort.


Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Antivirales , COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Glicoproteína de la Espiga del Coronavirus , Humanos , COVID-19/diagnóstico , COVID-19/inmunología , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/virología , COVID-19/sangre , SARS-CoV-2/inmunología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anticuerpos Antivirales/sangre , Anticuerpos Antivirales/inmunología , Femenino , Adulto , Glicoproteína de la Espiga del Coronavirus/inmunología , Proteínas de la Nucleocápside de Coronavirus/inmunología , Poblaciones Vulnerables/estadística & datos numéricos , Población Rural/estadística & datos numéricos , Prueba Serológica para COVID-19/métodos , Prueba Serológica para COVID-19/estadística & datos numéricos , Anciano , Fosfoproteínas/inmunología , Disparidades en Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Inmunoglobulina G/sangre , Inmunoglobulina G/inmunología , Disparidades en el Estado de Salud
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...