Pneumonectomy and broncho-pleural fistula: predicting factors and stratification of the risk.

The goal of the study is to evaluate the different risk factors and stratify the patients, before the surgery, into distinct risk classes. We retrospectively reviewed pre, peri, and postoperative outcomes of 366 consecutive patients who underwent pneumonectomy for lung cancer between the last 10 years (2009-2019). We classified the patients into four classes, depending on preoperative assessments. Differences between groups were assessed with the log-rank test. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression analysis was used to assess the independent prognostic significance of the variables associated with the development of BPF at univariate analysis. Finally, we performed non-linear [artificial neural network (ANN)] multiple regression analyses. All tests were two-sided, and p values < 0.05 were considered significant. Fifty-one patients (13.9%) out of 366 developed BPF. Male sex (p = 0.048), right side (p = 0.015), postoperative pulmonary complications (p = 0.0139) and adjuvant treatments (p = 0.0169) were the independent predicting factors of fistulas in multivariate analysis. The right side (p = 0.043) and adjuvant treatments (p = 0.032) were the independent predicting factors of BPF after the ANN analysis. Based on multivariate and artificial neural network analysis and our experience, we observed a trend of growing risk of BPF in the first 4 weeks (early fistula), considering the four classes. Preoperative differentiation of the patients into four risk classes could allow a correct stratification of the growing risk of developing early BPF. This information could be significant to share with patients and the other physicians during the decision-making process, to minimise the risk of BPF.

Preliminary Results of Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Assisted Tracheal Sleeve Pneumonectomy for Cancer.

OBJECTIVE: Tracheal sleeve pneumonectomy is a challenge in lung cancer management and in achieving long-term oncological results. In November 2018, we started a prospective study on the role of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) in tracheal sleeve pneumonectomy. We aim to present our preliminary results. METHODS: From November 2018 to November 2019, six patients (three men and three women; median age: 61 years) were eligible for tracheal sleeve pneumonectomy for lung cancer employing the veno-venous ECMO during tracheobronchial anastomosis. RESULTS: Only in one patient, an intrapericardial pneumonectomy without ECMO support was performed, but cannulas were maintained during surgery. The median length of surgery was 201 minutes (range: 162-292 minutes), and the average duration of the apneic phase was 38 minutes (range: 31-45 minutes). No complications correlated to the positioning of the cannulas were recorded. There was only one major postoperative complication (hemothorax). At the time of follow-up, all patients were alive; one patient alive with bone metastasis was being treated with radiotherapy. CONCLUSION: ECMO-assisted oncological surgery was rarely described, and its advantages include hemodynamic stability with low bleeding complications and a clean operating field. As suggested by our preliminary data, ECMO-assisted could be a useful alternative strategy in select lung cancer patients.

A methodological evaluation of the published consensus statements, recommendations and guidelines about surgical management in the course of coronavirus disease pandemic.

BACKGROUND: A project to benchmark the consensus statements, guidelines, and recommendations on surgical management in the course of the COVID-19 pandemic was developed to assess the methodology used. Standard and practical approaches for COVID-19 management in surgical patients to date are not accessible, despite the magnitude of the pandemic. A plethora of consensus statements, guidelines, and recommendations on surgical management in the course of COVID-19 epidemic have been rapidly published in the last three months. METHODS: Each manuscript was scored on a seven-point scale in the different items and domains with the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II. RESULTS: Nine guidelines that met the inclusion criteria were assessed. Transnational cooperation produced only one guideline. Multivariable analysis showed that improved scores of stakeholders' involvement were related to internationally developed guidelines. Clarity of presentation was related to the contribution of scientific societies due to greater rigor of development. The rigor of development produced guidelines with a high overall value. Higher healthcare expenses did not produce superior guidelines. CONCLUSIONS: Evaluated by the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II, the methodological characteristic of consensus statements, guidelines, and recommendations on surgical management during COVID-19 pandemic was relatively low. International development should be recommended as a model for the development of best methodological quality guidelines.