A systematic review and critical evaluation of quality of clinical practice guidelines on fetal growth restriction.

INTRODUCTION: To systematically identify and critically assess the quality of clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) on management fetal growth restriction (FGR). CONTENT: Medline, Embase, Google Scholar, Scopus and ISI Web of Science databases were searched to identify all relevant CPGs on FGR. SUMMARY: Diagnostic criteria of FGR, recommended growth charts, recommendation for detailed anatomical assessment and invasive testing, frequency of fetal growth scans, fetal monitoring, hospital admission, drugs administrations, timing at delivery, induction of labor, postnatal assessment and placental histopathological were assessed. Quality assessment was evaluated by AGREE II tool. Twelve CPGs were included. Twenty-five percent (3/12) of CPS adopted the recently published Delphi consensus, 58.3% (7/12) an estimated fetal weight (EFW)/abdominal circumference (AC) EFW/AC <10th percentile, 8.3% (1/12) an EFW/AC <5th percentile while one CPG defined FGR as an arrest of growth or a shift in its rate measured longitudinally. Fifty percent (6/12) of CPGs recommended the use of customized growth charts to assess fetal growth. Regarding the frequency of Doppler assessment, in case of absent or reversed end-diastolic flow in the umbilical artery 8.3% (1/12) CPGs recommended assessment every 24-48, 16.7% (2/12) every 48-72 h, 1 CPG generically recommended assessment 1-2 times per week, while 25 (3/12) did not specifically report the frequency of assessment. Only 3 CPGs reported recommendation on the type of Induction of Labor to adopt. The AGREE II standardized domain scores for the first overall assessment (OA1) had a mean of 50%. OUTLOOK: There is significant heterogeneity in the management of pregnancies complicated by FGR in published CPGs.

Adverse intrapartum outcome in pregnancies complicated by small for gestational age and late fetal growth restriction undergoing induction of labor with Dinoprostone, Misoprostol or mechanical methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the outcome of pregnancies with small baby, including both small for gestational age (SGA) and late fetal growth restriction (FGR) fetuses, undergoing induction of labor (IOL) with Dinoprostone, Misoprostol or mechanical methods. STUDY DESIGN: Medline, Embase and Cochrane databases were searched. Inclusion criteria were non-anomalous singleton pregnancies complicated by the presence of a small fetus, defined as a fetus with estimated fetal weight (EFW) or abdominal circumference (AC) <10th centile undergoing IOL from 34 weeks of gestation with vaginal Dinoprostone, vaginal misoprostol, or mechanical methods (including either Foley or Cook balloon catheters). The primary outcome was a composite measure of adverse intrapartum outcome. Secondary outcomes were the individual components of the primary outcome, perinatal mortality and morbidity. All the explored outcomes were reported in three different sub-groups of pregnancies complicated by a small fetus including: all small fetuses (defined as those with an EFW and/or AC <10th centile irrespective of fetal Doppler status), late FGR fetuses (defined as those with EFW and/or AC <3rd centile or AC/EFW <10th centile associated with abnormal cerebroplacental Dopplers) and SGA fetuses (defined as those with EFW and/or AC <10th but >3rd centile with normal cerebroplacental Dopplers). Quality assessment of each included study was performed using the Risk of Bias in Non-randomized Studies-of Interventions tool (ROBINS-I), while the GRADE methodology was used to assess the quality of the body of retrieved evidence. Meta-analyses of proportions and individual data random-effect logistic regression were used to analyze the data. RESULTS: 12 studies (1711 pregnancies) were included. In the overall population of small fetuses, composite adverse intra-partum outcome occurred in 21.2 % (95 % CI 10.0-34.9) of pregnancies induced with Dinoprostone, 18.0 % (95 % CI 6.9-32.5) of those with Misoprostol and 11.6 % (95 % CI 5.5-19.3) of those undergoing IOL with mechanical methods. Cesarean section (CS) for non-reassuring fetal status (NRFS) was required in 18.1 % (95 % CI 9.9-28.3) of pregnancies induced with Dinoprostone, 9.4 % (95 % CI 1.4-22.0) of those with Misoprostol and 8.1 % (95 % CI 5.0-11.6) of those undergoing mechanical induction. Likewise, uterine tachysystole, was recorded on CTG in 13.8 % (95 % CI 6.9-22.3) of cases induced with Dinoprostone, 7.5 % (95 % CI 2.1-15.4) of those with Misoprostol and 3.8 % (95 % CI 0-4.4) of those induced with mechanical methods. Composite adverse perinatal outcome following delivery complicated 2.9 % (95 % CI 0.5-6.7) newborns after IOL with Dinoprostone, 0.6 % (95 % CI 0-2.5) with Misoprostol and 0.7 % (95 % CI 0-7.1) with mechanical methods. In pregnancies complicated by late FGR, adverse intrapartum outcome occurred in 25.3 % (95 % CI 18.8-32.5) of women undergoing IOL with Dinoprostone, compared to 7.4 % (95 % CI 3.9-11.7) of those with mechanical methods, while CS for NRFS was performed in 23.8 % (95 % CI 17.3-30.9) and 6.2 % (95 % CI 2.8-10.5) of the cases, respectively. Finally, in SGA fetuses, composite adverse intrapartum outcome complicated 8.4 % (95 % CI 4.6-13.0) of pregnancies induced with Dinoprostone, 18.6 % (95 % CI 13.1-25.2) of those with Misoprostol and 8.7 (95 % CI 2.5-17.5) of those undergoing mechanical IOL, while CS for NRF was performed in 8.4 % (95 % CI 4.6-13.0) of women induced with Dinoprostone, 18.6 % (95 % CI 13.1-25.2) of those with Misoprostol and 8.7 % (95 % CI 2.5-17.5) of those undergoing mechanical induction. Overall, the quality of the included studies was low and was downgraded due to considerable clinical and statistical heterogeneity. CONCLUSIONS: There is limited evidence on the optimal type of IOL in pregnancies with small fetuses. Mechanical methods seem to be associated with a lower occurrence of adverse intrapartum outcomes, but a direct comparison between different techniques could not be performed.

Severe maternal morbidity in a tertiary care centre of northern Italy: a 5-year review.

OBJECTIVE: To assess prevalence and causes of severe acute maternal morbidity cases and evaluate their impact on feto-maternal wellbeing and on facility resources. STUDY DESIGN: Observational retrospective study adopting management-based criteria in a tertiary care public hospital during a 5-year period. Criteria adopted were: intensive care unit admission, blood transfusion ≥ 4 units, emergency peripartum hysterectomy and arterial embolization at any time during pregnancy. RESULTS: A total of 80 cases were identified, most of them (97.5%) through a combination of two criteria, ICU admission and blood transfusion. Commonest severe obstetric morbidities were major obstetric haemorrhage (48.8%) and hypertensive disorders (27.5%). Immigrant status (OR 1.68, 95% CI 1.03-2.7), pre-term birth (OR 4.15, 95% CI 2.5-6.8), Caesarean section (OR 7.74,95% CI 4.2-14.3) were factors significantly associated with SAMM cases. Major abdominal surgery was necessary in 26 women (32.5%), with emergency peripartum hysterectomy in 11 (13.5%). These events led to an average blood consumption per woman of 6.5 ± 12.8 units and a mean hospital stay of 8.9 ± 5.0 days, significantly longer (p < 0.001) than the average duration of post-delivery care. Maternal mortality to morbidity ratio was 1:80. CONCLUSIONS: An integrated intervention-based approach proved to be effective in finding severe acute maternal morbidity cases. Information on underlying causes and associated risk factors may improve prevention and treatment of obstetric morbidities, thus reducing feto-maternal adverse effects and hospital expenditures.

Pregnancy outcome of migrant women delivering in a public institution in northern Italy.

BACKGROUND/AIM: European societies are facing a wave of incoming immigrants and the needs of a new multiethnic obstetrical population. It remains controversial whether native and immigrant women have equivalent pregnancy outcomes. METHODS: Perinatal indicators of the obstetric outcome were monitored in all delivering women during a 5-year period in a large academic public general hospital. We compared rates of preterm deliveries, low birth weight, cesarean section during labor, perineal tears, and fetal acidemia in the native and immigrant parturients. RESULTS: Immigrant women experienced very low birth weight (p < 0.005) and preterm deliveries (p < 0.05), more often than natives did. Among ethnic groups, data singled out Sub-Saharan African women to be at a higher risk for very small premature babies and cesarean section during labor. CONCLUSIONS: There are differences in perinatal outcome between immigrant and Italian woman; within the large migrant population, ethnic groups show wide disparities and challenge the health provider differently. Special attention to women at a higher risk may reduce fetal-maternal morbidities.

Clinicopathological evaluation of 59 cases of fetal death.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study has been assessing the determinants of stillbirth among the newborns of the Verona University Obstetrics Department. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 59 stillbirth cases, observed between January 2000 and June 2006, were retrospectively studied. WHO definition for stillbirth was adopted as the inclusion criterion. Clinical files, feto-maternal laboratory data, feto-placental pathology findings as well as delivery mode and circumstances were all systematically reviewed. RESULTS: The 59 observed cases correspond to an incidence of 9.8 stillbirths/year, which, considering the institutional delivery rate, correspond to 5.4 cases per 1000 births. Frequent relevant conditions associated with stillbirth were intrauterine growth restriction (15.2%), congenital fetal anomalies (13.5%), various maternal diseases (21.0%); no cause of fetal demise could be found in 10/59 (17.0%) cases, which were classified as unexplained. Most deliveries were successfully induced with prostaglandins except 11 cases (19.0%) which required a C-section due to severe maternal conditions associated with the fetal loss. CONCLUSION: Thorough investigation of each individual stillbirth case, by means of an integrated study protocol, along with the Pathologist's close collaboration, allows identification of a likely cause in the majority of cases. Better knowledge of unexpected fetal loss is the premise for better parental counselling and for prevention of recurrences.