Riga-Fede disease: A systematic review and report of two cases.

AIM: The term Riga-Fede disease has been used historically to describe traumatic ulceration that occurs on the ventral surface of tongue, buccal mucosa, gum or floor of the tongue in newborns and infants. It is most often associated with natal and neonatal teeth in newborns. The painful symptoms may be absent or acute, up to the point of preventing the baby from feeding. The aim of this work is to offer a description of the therapeutic solutions for the treatment of this pathological condition, with a review of the literature and the report of two cases. MATERIALS: A systematic review of the literature of articles presenting Riga-Fede Disease associated with natal and neonatal teeth was performed following the PRISMA protocol (Prefered Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses). This bibliographic search was performed through two databases, PubMed and Google Scholar. CONCLUSION: Extraction and ameloplasty are the most effective treatments in the resolution of the Riga-Fede disease associated with natal/neonatal teeth. In the case of high dental mobility, resulting in an increased risk of exfoliation and possible tooth ingestion/inhalation, extraction is the therapeutic treatment of choice. When nutrition is not compromised, ameloplasty is the treatment of choice, as it is less invasive and more conservative.

Thermafil: A New Clinical Approach Due to New Dimensional Evaluations.

BACKGROUND: There are a lot of techniques to obturate the root canals, but lateral condensation of gutta-percha is the most used one. An important aspect of thermafil is the error margin tolerated by the manufacturer in the production of plastic carriers. In literature, there is no evidence about discrepancy percentage between different carriers. It is demonstrated that the error margin of gutta-percha is 0.5% and is 0.2% for metal files (ISO standards). OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the real dimensions of thermafil plastic carriers observed by the stereo microscope measuring the dimensional discrepancy between them. METHODS: For this study, 80 new thermafil (Dentsply Maillefer) have been selected. 40 thermafil 0.25 and 40 thermafil 0.30. Through 60X stereo microscope, the dimensions of the plastic carrier tips have been measured. The dimensions of the plastic carrier were also measured after a heating cycle. ZL GAL 11TUSM (Zetaline stereo evolution) microscope was used to observe the samples. Measurements were made through a dedicated software (Image Focus). All samples were analysed at 60X. RESULTS: A non-parametric paired test (Wilcoxon test) was used to compare baseline and after heating values; p-values ≤ 0.05 were assumed to be statistically significant. CONCLUSION: The samples we measured showed a mean value of the diameters in Thermafil 25 that was 0.27 mm, for Thermafil 30 the mean value was 0.33 mm.We have measured a dimensional variable of 8% in the 25 group while in group 30 the maximum possible variation found was 4%, that's why we propose a new protocol of obturation with thermafil. We can also conclude that a single heating process does not affect clinically the plastic carrier dimensions.