Effects of vitamin D on parathyroid hormone and clinical outcomes in peritoneal dialysis: a narrative review.

Vitamin D deficiency is very prevalent in dialysis and peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients show lower levels of cholecalciferol (25(OH)D3) than hemodialysis patients. We conducted a systematic narrative review to assess the effects of vitamin D therapy on control of secondary hyperparathyroidism and clinical outcomes induced by vitamin D pleiotropic effects. Medline database was searched for cohort and intervention studies reporting data on vitamin D (all sterols including synthetic analogs) and peritoneal dialysis without language restriction. Two authors independently extracted data. Twenty-nine observational and eleven interventional studies were identified for inclusion (1,036 subjects). PTH levels decreased in twenty-nine studies, increased in one study and remained stable in ten studies. Thirty-three studies analyzed the oral route for vitamin D administration, ten the intraperitoneal, one the subcutaneous and one the intravenous. A significant decrease of peritonitis risk was observed in two studies. Proteinuria decreased in four studies and remained stable in one study. Peritoneal protein loss decreased in one study and was stable in two studies. Studies on the therapeutic effects of vitamin D in PD are limited and describe small population samples. Moreover, vitamin D compounds do not consistently reduce PTH levels. The administration of active vitamin D in PD may have interesting pleiotropic effects such as decreasing proteinuria and peritoneal protein loss. According to these effects, vitamin D could help to preserve residual renal function and ensure efficient peritoneal membrane dialysance.

Renal anaemia and EPO hyporesponsiveness associated with vitamin D deficiency: the potential role of inflammation.

Resistance to erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) has been observed in a considerable proportion of patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) and it is reportedly associated with adverse outcomes, such as increased cardiovascular morbidity, faster progression to end-stage renal disease (ESRD) and all-cause mortality. The major causes of ESA resistance include chronic inflammation producing suppressive cytokines of early erythroid progenitor proliferation. In addition, pro-inflammatory cytokines stimulate hepcidin synthesis thus reducing iron availability for late erythropoiesis. Recent studies showing an association in deficiencies of the vitamin D axis with low haemoglobin (Hb) levels and ESA resistance suggest a new pathophysiological co-factor of renal anaemia. The administration of either native or active vitamin D has been associated with an improvement of anaemia and reduction in ESA requirements. Notably, these effects are not related to parathyroid hormone (PTH) values and seem to be independent on PTH suppression. Another possible explanation may be that calcitriol directly stimulates erythroid progenitors; however, this proliferative effect by extra-renal activation of 1α-hydroxylase enzyme is only a hypothesis. The majority of studies concerning vitamin D deficiency or supplementation, and degree of renal anaemia, point out the prevalent role of inflammation in the mechanism underlying these associations. Immune cells express the vitamin D receptor (VDR) which in turn is involved in the modulation of innate and adaptive immunity. VDR activation inhibits the expression of inflammatory cytokines in stromal and accessory cells and up-regulates the lymphocytic release of interleukin-10 (IL-10) exerting both anti-inflammatory activity and proliferative effects on erythroid progenitors. In CKD patients, vitamin D deficiency may stimulate immune cells within the bone marrow micro-environment to produce cytokines, inducing impaired erythropoiesis. Immune activation involves the reticuloendothelial system, increasing hepcidin synthesis and functional iron deficiency. Consequences of this inflammatory cascade are erythropoietin (EPO) resistance and anaemia. Given the key role of inflammation in the response to EPO, the therapeutic use of agents with anti-cytokines properties, such as vitamin D and paricalcitol, may provide benefit in the prevention/treatment of ESA hyporesponsiveness.

[Role of inflammation on renal anaemia]. / Ruolo dell'infiammazione nell'anemia renale.

It is well-known the central role of inflammation in the inhibition of erythropoiesis and iron availability in chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients with erythropoietin (EPO)-resistant anaemia. This inflammatory action is mediated by suppressive cytokines (i.e. IL-6, TNF-, INF-) inhibiting differentiation and proliferation activities of erythroid cells in the EPO-indipendent phase of erythropoiesis and stimulating hepcidin production for iron retention in reticulo-endothelial system and enterocytes. EPO resistance is associated with adverse outcomes, such as cardiovascular disease, faster progression to end stage renal disease and mortality. Treatment of the causes of EPO hyporesponsiveness including chronic inflammation results in an improvement of anaemia and a reduction in EPO requirements.

Divert to ULTRA: differences in infused volumes and clearance in two on-line hemodiafiltration treatments.

BACKGROUND: Mixed diffusive-convective dialysis therapies offer greater removal capabilities than conventional dialysis. The aim of this study was to compare two different on-line, post-dilution hemodiafiltration (HDF) treatments with regard to achieved convective volume and middle-molecule dialysis efficiency: standard volume control (sOL-HDF) and automated control of the transmembrane pressure (TMP) (UC-HDF). METHODS: We enrolled 30 ESRD patients (55.9 ± 14.0 years, 20/10 M/F) in a randomized, prospective, cross-over study. The patients received a 3-month period of sOL-HDF followed by UC-HDF for a further 3 months, or vice versa, using the same dialysis machine. In sOL-HDF, fixed exchange volumes were set according to a filtration fraction greater than or equal to 25%. In UC-HDF therapy, the exchanged volume was driven by a biofeedback system controlling the TMP and its set point in a double loop. Patients maintained their treatment time, dialyzer, blood flow rate, and anticoagulant regimen unchanged throughout the study. RESULTS: Greater convective volumes were achieved in UC-HDF than in sOL-HDF (23.8 ± 3.9 vs.19.8 ± 4.8 L; p<0.001) with high pre-dialysis Ht value (sOL-HDF 34.0 ± 4.5% and UC-HDF 34.0 ± 4.4%; p = 0.91). The average clearance values of ß2m and P were higher in UC-HDF than in sOL-HDF (respectively 123 ± 24 vs. 111 ± 22 ml/min, p<0.002 and 158 ± 26 vs. 152 ± 25 ml/min, p<0.05). Moreover, the UC-HDF mode led to a significantly increased rate of call-free sessions from 88% to 97% (p<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that the biofeedback module, applied to the automatic control of TMP in on-line HDF, results in higher convective volumes and correspondingly higher ß2m and P clearances. By making the HDF treatment more automated and less complex to perform, it significantly reduced the staff workload.

Long-term intravenous epoetin-alpha / darbepoetin-alpha ratio in iron-replete hemodialysis patients.

BACKGROUND: Equivalence of intravenous (i.v.) and subcutaneous (s.c.) dosage requirements is a notable characteristic of darbepoetin-alpha (DPO), as opposed to other epoetins (EPOs). Currently in Europe, the EPOs/DPO conversion factor (200 IU EPOs = 1 microg DPO) does not take into account the route of drugs administration. To better define this ratio we have conducted a prospective, long-term trial in a group of hemodialysis patients. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: At the start, we evaluated 40 iron-replete hemodialysis patients, but the final study was performed in the remaining 25 patients. During the first 6 months, patients were on i.v. epoetin-alpha (EPOalpha) maintenance therapy (phase 1: T-6 to T0). After conversion to i.v. DPO (initial 200:1 ratio) the observation was prolonged for a period of 12 months (phase 2: T0 to T12). DPO was administered at extended dose intervals and the EPOalpha/DPO rate was adjusted every month to maintain hemoglobin (Hgb) stability. Iron status and factors inhibiting erythropoiesis were continually checked to exclude unstable patients. RESULTS: Phase 1: EPOalpha weekly mean dose showed no significant variation. Phase 2: EPOalpha/DPO conversion factor progressively rose from 200 to 256.7 +/- 86.9 IU/microg at T7 (p<0.005) and 336.8 +/- 104.3 IU/microg at T12 (p<0.0005). DPO weekly mean dosage decreased from 40.0 +/- 12.0 microg/week at T0 to 31.6 +/- 3.7 microg/week at T7 (p<0.005) and 24.6 +/- 7.0 microg/week at T12 (p<0.0005). Mean weekly/patient acquisition cost of EPOalpha was euro 70.6 +/- 21.3 (T-6 to T0); after switching, the cost of DPO was euro 72.4 +/- 22.7 (T0) and fell to euro 53.1 +/- 11.2 during T6 to T12. CONCLUSIONS: The progressive increase of EPOalpha/DPO ratio demonstrated that i.v. DPO requires lower doses compared with i.v. EPOalpha. When drugs are administered i.v., the starting EPOalpha/DPO conversion factor should be increased over the 200:1 ratio, similar to recommendations outlined in the United States and Japan. DPO dose reduction translated to notable cost-savings.

Iron-replete hemodialysis patients do not require higher EPO dosages when converting from subcutaneous to intravenous administration: results of the Italian Study on Erythropoietin Converting (ISEC).

BACKGROUND: Previous studies reported significant increases in epoetin dosages when converting hemodialysis patients from subcutaneous (SC) to intravenous (IV) administration. More recent studies that corrected for iron deficiency found a much lower, if any, increase in epoetin dosage and/or decrease in hemoglobin (Hb) level after conversion from SC to IV epoetin administration. Therefore, the matter is still open for debate. METHODS: This multicenter observational study evaluated stable hemodialysis patients without iron deficiency who had a stable SC epoetin dosage and Hb level of 10 g/dL or greater (> or =100 g/L) at the time of study enrollment. Data for epoetin dosage, anemia, and inflammatory markers were collected retrospectively during the last 6 months of SC epoetin treatment and prospectively for 6 months after conversion to IV administration. The primary efficacy assessment was difference in Hb levels and epoetin dosages between patients administered epoetin SC and IV. Changes in values for iron stores, C-reactive protein, intact parathyroid hormone, and albumin were monitored as control parameters. RESULTS: Data were analyzed for 262 hemodialysis patients from 6 Italian centers. Overall, mean Hb levels were similar with SC and IV epoetin administration (11.49 g/dL [114.9 g/L] and 11.44 g/dL [114.4 g/L]). Mean epoetin dosages also were similar with SC and IV administration (7,185 and 7,270 IU/wk). In patients requiring epoetin dosages of 12,000 IU/wk or greater at study entry, mean dosages tended to decrease after conversion to IV administration. There were no significant changes in control parameters. CONCLUSION: Conversion from SC to IV epoetin administration did not result in changes in Hb levels or epoetin dosage requirements in iron-replete hemodialysis patients.