Sentinel node biopsy for axillary management after neoadjuvant therapy for breast cancer: a single-center retrospective analysis with long follow-up.

PURPOSE: Sentinel node biopsy (SNB) after neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) for breast cancer remains controversial. We conducted a retrospective study of patients who underwent SNB after NAT to evaluate the effectiveness of this procedure. METHODS: A consecutive 105 women with locally advanced breast cancer (cT1-4, cN0-3, M0) were treated with NAT between 2006 and 2015. The subjects were 80 of these patients who became or remained clinically node-negative after NAT, 53 of whom had axillary management determined by SNB (group A) and the other 27 underwent axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) without SNB (group B). SNB was performed using a modified dye method. RESULTS: The sentinel node (SN) identification rate was 94.3% and the mean number of removed SNs was 2.4. ALND was avoided in 33 patients, who were confirmed as SN-negative. There was no difference in recurrence-free and overall survival rates between groups A and B (p = 0.71 and p = 0.46, respectively) during the median follow-up time of 63 months. Of the 33 patients who did not undergo ALND, 10 suffered recurrence (33%). One patient (3%) had recurrence in an axillary lymph node and four had recurrence in a supraclavicular lymph node. CONCLUSION: Axillary SNB after NAT did not affect the axillary failure rate or the prognosis. SNB may be a reliable procedure, even after NAT.

Imaging findings of primary hepatic carcinoid tumor with an emphasis on MR imaging: case study.

Carcinoid tumors are slow-growing tumors originating in the neuroendocrine cells, and occur most frequently within the gastrointestinal tract. Although the liver is the most common site for metastatic carcinoid tumors, primary hepatic carcinoid tumors are exceedingly rare and reports of the imaging findings have been very scarce. We herein report imaging findings with an emphasis on magnetic resonance imaging in two cases of primary hepatic carcinoid tumors. In both cases, the tumors showed cystic areas with hemorrhagic components and early enhanced solid areas.

First indicators of relapse in breast cancer: evaluation of the follow-up program at our hospital.

BACKGROUND: Guidelines for breast cancer patient follow-up have not been widely adopted in Japan. To assess our intensive follow-up program, we evaluated first relapse and its indicators in patients with breast cancer. PATIENTS: Of 964 patients, 126 relapsed and 43 died in the median follow-up term of 45 months. Follow-ups were scheduled every 6-12 months for imaging and tumor marker (TM) evaluation. RESULTS: Of 126 relapsed patients, 30 (23.8%) had symptoms of relapse. First indicators of relapse in 96 asymptomatic patients were physical examination in 24 patients (19%); imaging, 57 patients (45.3%); and TMs, 15 patients (11.9%). The most sensitive indicators were physical examination for local relapse, ultrasonography for regional lymph nodes, scintigraphy for bone, computed tomography for lung, and TMs for liver metastasis. During intensive follow-up, 43% of relapsed patients were identified by symptoms or physical examination. These patients had poor prognosis compare to patients identified by imaging or TMs in overall survival and post-relapse survival (p = 0.009 and 0.019, respectively). In all 964 patients, the relapse rates for stage I, IIA, IIB, and III tumors were 7.4, 7.9, 19.9, and 43.5%, respectively. The percentage of first relapse detected by imaging or TMs for stage I, IIA, IIB, and III were 4.7, 5.1, 11.8, and 19.8%, respectively. The cost of our follow-up program for 10 years was approximately 290,000 yen per patient. CONCLUSION: A routine intensive follow-up program involving imaging and evaluation of TMs in all patients has low efficacy and high expenditure.