Clinical outcomes of the over-the-scope clip closure after duodenal endoscopic submucosal dissection: A multicenter retrospective study.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Prophylactic closure with the over-the-scope clip (OTSC) after endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) of superficial non-ampullary duodenal epithelial tumors (SNADETs) has been reported to reduce postoperative adverse events (AEs). However, there are few evidences regarding AEs-associated factors and long-term outcomes of OTSCs. METHODS: From January 2011 to December 2020, 139 consecutive patients with SNADETs who underwent ESD followed by OTSC closure in five institutions were extracted in this retrospective study. The primary endpoint was the rate of postoperative AEs after prophylactic OTSC closure. The secondary endpoints were the complete closure rate, residual rate, and long-term AEs associated with residual OTSCs. RESULTS: The rate of complete closure of the mucosal defect was 97.3% (142) in 146 SNADETs, which were completely resected by ESD. Postoperative AEs, including delayed bleeding, delayed perforation, and localized peritonitis, occurred in 6.2%, 3.4%, and 2.1% of patients, respectively; however, all of the cases improved without surgical treatment. In the multivariate logistic regression analysis, the use of two or more OTSCs was a significant independent risk factor for postoperative AEs (odds ratio, 2.94; 95% confidence interval, 1.02-8.46; P = 0.046). The residual OTSC rate was 46.4% at 1 year postoperatively, and long-term AEs included duodenal erosions and ulcers associated with residual OTSCs. CONCLUSIONS: Prophylactic closure with OTSCs after duodenal ESD can provide acceptable short-and long-term outcomes for preventing postoperative AEs. However, multiple OTSCs were the independent risk factors of postoperative AEs due to the gaps between and near the OTSCs.

Outcomes of Endoscopic Intervention Using Over-the-Scope Clips for Anastomotic Leakage Involving Secondary Fistula after Gastrointestinal Surgery: A Japanese Multicenter Case Series.

BACKGROUND: The over-the-scope clip (OTSC) is a highly effective clipping device for refractory gastrointestinal disease. However, Japanese data from multicenter studies for anastomotic leakage (AL) involving a secondary fistula after gastrointestinal surgery are lacking. Therefore, this study evaluated the efficacy and safety of OTSC placement in Japanese patients with such conditions. METHODS: We retrospectively collected data from 28 consecutive patients from five institutions who underwent OTSC-mediated closure for AL between July 2017 and July 2020. RESULTS: The AL and fistula were located in the esophagus (3.6%, n = 1), stomach (10.7%, n = 3), small intestine (7.1%, n = 2), colon (25.0%, n = 7), and rectum (53.6%, n = 15). The technical success, clinical success, and complication rates were 92.9% (26/28), 71.4% (20/28), and 0% (0/28), respectively. An age of <65 years (85.7%), small intestinal AL (100%) and colonic AL (100%), defect size of <10 mm (82.4%), time to OTSC placement > 7 days (84.2%), and the use of simple suction (78.9%) and anchor forceps (80.0%) were associated with higher clinical success rates. CONCLUSION: OTSC placement is a useful therapeutic option for AL after gastrointestinal surgery.

A novel partially covered metallic stent with a 20-mm long distal bare portion for EUS-guided hepaticogastrostomy.

Video 1EUS-guided hepaticogastrostomy with a novel partially covered self-expandable metallic stent for a patient with biliary obstruction owing to gallbladder cancer.

Implantation of esophageal cancer onto post-dissection ulcer after gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection.

A case in which implantation of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma onto a post-dissection gastric ulcer was strongly suspected is presented. A 72-year-old man with alcoholic liver cirrhosis underwent esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD). Esophageal cancer (EC) (Mt, 20 mm, 0-Is) and gastric cancer (GC) (antrum, 15 mm, 0-IIc) were identified. Biopsy specimens revealed moderately differentiated squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) and differentiated adenocarcinoma, respectively. The GC was resected by endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) [14 mm × 9 mm, type 0-IIc, tub1, pT1a(M), ly0, v0, HM(-), VM(-)]. Two months after ESD, radiation therapy was started for the EC, and an almost complete response was obtained. Nine months after the ESD, a follow-up EGD showed a submucosal tumor-like lesion with ulceration, located immediately under the post-ESD scar, and biopsy specimens showed moderately differentiated SCC. There were no similar lesions suggesting hematogenous or lymphatic metastasis in the stomach.

Water immersion colonoscopy facilitates straight passage of the colonoscope through the sigmoid colon without loop formation: randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: One of the major causes of pain during colonoscopy is looping of the instrument during insertion through the sigmoid colon, which causes discomfort by stretching the mesentery. There are many studies in colonoscope techniques, but they have not been assessed objectively with respect to colonoscope passage through the sigmoid colon without loop formation. The aim of the present study was to determine whether cap-fitted colonoscopy and water immersion increase the success rate of insertion through the sigmoid without loop formation. METHODS: A total of 1005 patients were randomized to standard colonoscopy, cap-fitted colonoscopy or water immersion technique. All examinations were carried out under a magnetic endoscope imaging device. Main outcome was the success rate of insertion without loop formation. RESULTS: Success rate of insertion without loop formation was 37.5%, 40.0%, and 53.8% in the standard, cap, and water groups, respectively (standard vs water P = 0.00014, cap vs water P = 0.00186). There were no significant differences among the groups regarding cecal intubation rate, cecal intubation time and number of polyps ≥5 mm per patient. CONCLUSIONS: Water immersion increases the success rate of insertion through the sigmoid colon without loop formation. This practical technique, requiring only preparation of a cap and water, is useful without compromising cecal intubation rate, cecal intubation time, or polyp detection rate.