Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33066565

RESUMEN

Globally, cervical cancer constitutes a substantial public health concern. Evidence recommends regular cervical cancer screening (CCS) for early detection of "precancerous lesions."Understanding the factors influencing screening participation among various groups is imperative for improving screening protocols and coverage. This study aimed to explore barriers and facilitators to CCS participation in women of Nigerian, Ghanaian, Cameroonian, and Kenyan origin in Finland. We utilized a qualitative design and conducted eight focus group discussions (FGDs) in English, with women aged 27-45 years (n = 30). The FGDs were tape-recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analyzed utilizing the inductive content analysis approach. The main barriers to CCS participation included limited language proficiency, lack of screening awareness, misunderstanding of screening's purpose, and miscomprehension of the CCS results. Facilitators were free-of-charge screening, reproductive health services utilization, and women's understanding of CCS's importance for early detection of cervical cancer. In conclusion, among women, the main barriers to CCS participation were language difficulties and lack of screening information. Enhancing screening participation amongst these migrant populations would benefit from appropriate information about the CCS. Those women with limited language skills and not utilizing reproductive health services need more attention from healthcare authorities about screening importance. Culturally tailored screening intervention programs might also be helpful.


Asunto(s)
Detección Precoz del Cáncer , Neoplasias del Cuello Uterino , Adulto , Femenino , Finlandia , Grupos Focales , Ghana/etnología , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Humanos , Kenia/etnología , Tamizaje Masivo , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias del Cuello Uterino/diagnóstico
2.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33126544

RESUMEN

Migrant-origin women are less prone to cervical screening uptake compared with host populations. This study examined cervical cancer screening participation and factors associated with it in the Finnish mass screening program during 2008-2012 in women of Russian, Somali and Kurdish origin compared with the general Finnish population (Finns) in Finland. The study population consists of samples from the Finnish Migrant Health and Well-being Study 2010-2012 and Health 2011 Survey; aged 30-64 (n = 2579). Data from the Finnish screening register linked with other population-based registry data were utilized. For statistical analysis we employed logistic regression. Age-adjusted screening participation rates were Russians 63% (95% CI: 59.9-66.6), Somalis 19% (16.4-21.6), Kurds 69% (66.6-71.1), and Finns 67% (63.3-69.8). In the multiple-adjusted model with Finns as the reference; odds ratios for screening were among Russians 0.92 (0.74-1.16), Somalis 0.16 (0.11-0.22), and Kurds 1.37 (1.02-1.83). Among all women, the substantial factor for increased screening likelihood was hospital care related to pregnancy/birth 1.73 (1.27-2.35), gynecological 2.47 (1.65-3.68), or other reasons 1.53 (1.12-2.08). Screening participation was lower among students and retirees. In conclusion, screening among the migrant-origin women varies, being significantly lowest among Somalis compared with Finns. Efforts using culturally tailored/population-specific approaches may be beneficial in increasing screening participation among women of migrant-origin.


Asunto(s)
Detección Precoz del Cáncer , Migrantes , Neoplasias del Cuello Uterino , Adulto , Femenino , Finlandia/epidemiología , Humanos , Irán/etnología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Embarazo , Federación de Rusia/etnología , Somalia/etnología , Neoplasias del Cuello Uterino/diagnóstico , Neoplasias del Cuello Uterino/etnología
3.
Int J Equity Health ; 17(1): 56, 2018 05 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29728104

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Cervical cancer is currently ranked as the fourth commonly diagnosed cancer in women globally. A higher incidence has been reported in low- and-middle-income countries, and the disease poses significant public health challenges. Evidence suggests that this disease is preventable by means of regular screening using the Papanicolaou (Pap) test. However, limited knowledge exists about disparities in cervical screening participation among immigrants compared with non-immigrants, in countries with universal cervical screening programmes. We aimed to examine disparities in cervical screening participation among women of Russian, Somali, and Kurdish, origin in Finland, comparing them with the general Finnish population (Finns). We controlled for differences in several socio-demographic and health-related variables as potential confounders. METHODS: We employed data from the Finnish Migrant Health and Well-being Study 2010-2012 and the National Health 2011 Survey. Data collection involved face-to-face interviews. Data on screening participation in the previous five years from women aged 29-60 were available from 537 immigrants (257 Russians, 113 Somalis, 167 Kurds) and from 436 Finns. For statistical analyses, we used multiple logistic regression. RESULTS: Age-adjusted screening participation rates were as follows: Russians 79% (95% CI 72.9-84.4), Somalis 41% (95% CI 31.4-50.1), and Kurds 64% (95% CI 57.2-70.8), compared with 94% (95% CI 91.4-95.9) among Finns. After additionally adjusting for socio-demographic and health-related confounders, all the immigrant groups showed a significantly lower likelihood of screening participation when compared with Finns. The Odds Ratios were as follows: Russians 0.32 (95% CI 0.18-0.58), Somalis 0.10 (95% CI 0.04-0.23), and Kurds 0.17 (95% CI 0.09-0.35). However, when additionally accounting for country of origin-confounder interactions, such differences were attenuated. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate disparities in screening participation among these immigrants and a lower likelihood of screening participation compared with the general Finnish population. To improve equity in cervical cancer screening participation, appropriate culturally tailored intervention programmes for each immigrant group might be beneficial.


Asunto(s)
Detección Precoz del Cáncer/estadística & datos numéricos , Emigrantes e Inmigrantes/estadística & datos numéricos , Disparidades en Atención de Salud/etnología , Prueba de Papanicolaou/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Femenino , Finlandia/epidemiología , Humanos , Irán/etnología , Modelos Logísticos , Tamizaje Masivo/estadística & datos numéricos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Federación de Rusia/etnología , Somalia/etnología , Neoplasias del Cuello Uterino/diagnóstico , Adulto Joven
4.
BMC Womens Health ; 17(1): 19, 2017 03 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28284203

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Previous studies revealed low participation in cervical cancer screening among immigrants compared with non-immigrants. Only a few studies about factors associated with immigrants' lower participation rates have been conducted in European countries that have universal access for all eligible women. Our study aimed to explore factors associated with cervical screening participation among women of Russian, Somali, and Kurdish origin in Finland. METHODS: We used data from the Migrant Health and Well-being Survey, 2010-2012. Structured face-to-face interviews of groups of immigrants aged 25-60 yielded 620 responses concerning screening participation in the previous five years. Statistical analysis employed logistic regression. RESULTS: The age-adjusted participation rates were as follows: among women of Russian origin 73.9% (95% CI 68.1-79.7), for Somalis 34.7% (95% CI 26.4-43.0), and for Kurds 61.3% (95% CI 55.0-67.7). Multiple logistic regressions showed that the most significant factor increasing the likelihood of screening participation among all groups was having had at least one gynecological check-up in the previous five years (Odds ratio [OR] = 6.54-26.2; p < 0.001). Other factors were higher education (OR = 2.63; p = 0.014), being employed (OR = 4.31; p = 0.007), and having given birth (OR = 9.34; p = 0.014), among Kurds; and literacy in Finnish/Swedish (OR = 3.63; p = 0.003) among Russians. CONCLUSIONS: Our results demonstrate that women who refrain from using reproductive health services, those who are unemployed and less educated, as well as those with poor language proficiency, might need more information on the importance of screening participation. Primary and occupational healthcare services may have a significant role in informing immigrant women about this importance.


Asunto(s)
Emigrantes e Inmigrantes/psicología , Tamizaje Masivo/estadística & datos numéricos , Neoplasias del Cuello Uterino/diagnóstico , Adulto , Detección Precoz del Cáncer/estadística & datos numéricos , Emigrantes e Inmigrantes/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Finlandia/etnología , Humanos , Irán/etnología , Irak/etnología , Modelos Logísticos , Tamizaje Masivo/psicología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Federación de Rusia/etnología , Somalia/etnología , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Neoplasias del Cuello Uterino/psicología
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...