ERBB2 amplification in gastric cancer: a genomic insight into ethnic disparities.

Overall, gastric adenocarcinoma (GC) incidence rates have declined in recent years, but racial/ethnic disparities persist. Individuals who identify as Hispanic/Spanish/Latino are diagnosed with GC at younger ages and have poorer outcomes than non-Hispanic individuals. However, our understanding of GC biology across racial/ethnic groups remains limited. We assessed tumor genomic patterns by race/ethnicity among 1019 patients with primary GC in the AACR Project GENIE Consortium. Hispanic individuals presented with significantly higher rates of ERBB2/HER2 amplification vs other racial/ethnic groups (Hispanic: 13.9% vs 9.8% non-Hispanic White, 8.1% non-Hispanic Asian, and 11.0% non-Hispanic Black; p < .001, FDR adjusted q < 0.001). Hispanic patients also had higher odds of an ERBB2 amplification vs non-Hispanic whites in adjusted models (OR = 2.52, 95%CI = 1.20-5.33, p = .015). These findings underscore the important role of genomic factors in GC disparities. Ensuring equitable access to genomic profiling and targeted therapies, such as trastuzumab for HER2-overexpressing GC, is a promising avenue to mitigate GC disparities and improve outcomes.

Cancer Cell Small Molecule Secretome Induces the Immune Checkpoint NKG2A and Dysfunction of Human CD8+ T Cells.

PD-1 blockade has been approved for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) patients. However, many HNSCC patients do not respond to this treatment, and other tumor microenvironmental factors may promote resistance to PD-1 blockade. We previously identified increased expression of the inhibitory receptor NKG2A on CD8+ T cells in HNSCC tumors compared with T cells in matching PBMC samples. Mechanisms that promote NKG2A expression and the role of NKG2A on human T cells in the tumor microenvironment, however, are uncertain. In this study, we show that tumor-conditioned media (TCM) of HNSCC cancer cell lines or ascites fluid from colorectal carcinoma patients is sufficient to induce the expression of NKG2A and other inhibitory receptors on activated CD8+ T cells isolated from PBMCs of healthy donors. Boiling or small molecular mass cutoff filtering did not eliminate the effect of TCM, suggesting that a small molecule promotes NKG2A. T cell activation in TCM decreased the basal and maximal mitochondrial respiration to metabolically restrain CD8+ T cells. Functionally, T cell activation in TCM reduced CD8+ T cell cytotoxicity as shown by lower production of cytokines, granzyme B, and perforin. Furthermore, TCM prevented CD8+ T cells from killing cancer cells in response to an anti-CD19/anti-CD3 bispecific T cell engager. Thus, a small secreted molecule from HNSCC cells can induce NKG2A expression and promote T cell dysfunction. Our findings may lead to targets for novel cancer therapies or biomarkers for NKG2A blockade response and provide a model to study T cell dysfunction and impaired metabolism.

Association of Surgical Approaches and Outcomes in Total Mesorectal Excision and Margin Status for Rectal Cancer.

INTRODUCTION: Despite being a key metric with a significant correlation with the outcomes of patients with rectal cancer, the optimal surgical approach for total mesorectal excision (TME) has not yet been identified. The aim of this study was to assess the association of the surgical approach on the quality of TME and surgical margins and to characterize the surgical and long-term oncologic outcomes in patients undergoing robotic, laparoscopic, and open TME for rectal cancer. METHODS: Patients with primary, nonmetastatic rectal adenocarcinoma who underwent either lower anterior resection or abdominoperineal resection via robotic (Rob), laparoscopic (Lap), or open approaches were selected from the US Rectal Cancer Consortium database (2007-2017). Quasi-Poisson regression analysis with backward selection was used to investigate the relationship between the surgical approach and outcomes of interest. RESULTS: Among the 664 patients included in the study, the distribution of surgical approaches was as follows: 351 (52.9%) underwent TME via the open approach, 159 (23.9%) via the robotic approach, and 154 (23.2%) via the laparoscopic approach. There were no significant differences in baseline demographics among the three cohorts. The laparoscopic cohort had fewer patients with low rectal cancer (<6 cm from the anal verge) than the robotic and open cohorts (Lap 28.6% versus Rob 59.1% versus Open 45.6%, P = 0.015). Patients who underwent Rob and Lap TME had lower intraoperative blood loss compared with the Open approach (Rob 200 mL [Q1, Q3: 100.0, 300.0] versus Lap 150 mL [Q1, Q3: 75.0, 250.0] versus Open 300 mL [Q1, Q3: 150.0, 600.0], P < 0.001). There was no difference in the operative time (Rob 243 min [Q1, Q3: 203.8, 300.2] versus Lap 241 min [Q1, Q3: 186, 336] versus Open 226 min [Q1, Q3: 178, 315.8], P = 0.309) between the three approaches. Postoperative length of stay was shorter with robotic and laparoscopic approach compared to open approach (Rob 5.0 d [Q1, Q3: 4, 8.2] versus Lap 5 d [Q1, Q3: 4, 8] versus Open 7.0 d [Q1, Q3: 5, 9], P < 0.001). There was no statistically significant difference in the quality of TME between the robotic, laparoscopic, and open approaches (79.2%, 64.9%, and 64.7%, respectively; P = 0.46). The margin positivity rate, a composite of circumferential margin and distal margin, was higher with the robotic and open approaches than with the laparoscopic approach (Rob 8.2% versus Open 6.6% versus Lap 1.9%, P = 0.17), Rob versus Lap (odds ratio 0.21; 95% confidence interval 0.05, 0.83) and Rob versus Open (odds ratio 0.5; 95% confidence interval 0.22, 1.12). There was no difference in long-term survival, including overall survival and recurrence-free survival, between patients who underwent robotic, laparoscopic, or open TME (Figure 1). CONCLUSIONS: In patients undergoing surgery with curative intent for rectal cancer, we did not observe a difference in the quality of TME between the robotic, laparoscopic, or open approaches. Robotic and open TME compared to laparoscopic TME were associated with higher margin positivity rates in our study. This was likely due to the higher percentage of low rectal cancers in the robotic and open cohorts. We also reported no significant differences in overall survival and recurrence-free survival between the aforementioned surgical techniques.

Hepatocellular carcinoma presenting as an extrahepatic mass: A case report and review of literature.

BACKGROUND: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a primary liver tumor generally diagnosed based on radiographic findings. Metastatic disease is typically associated with increased tumor diameter, multifocality, and vascular invasion. We report a case of a patient who presented with extrahepatic HCC metastasis to a portocaval lymph node with occult hepatic primary on computed tomography (CT). We review the literature for cases of extrahepatic HCC presentation without known hepatic lesions and discuss strategies to differentiate between metastatic and ectopic HCC. CASE SUMMARY: A 67-year-old male with remotely treated hepatis C was referred for evaluation of an enlarging portocaval, mixed cystic-solid mass. Serial CT evaluations demonstrated steatosis, but no cirrhosis or liver lesions. Endoscopic ultrasound demonstrated a normal-appearing pancreas, biliary tree, and liver. Fine needle aspiration yielded atypical cells. The differential diagnosis included duodenal or pancreatic cyst, lymphoproliferative cyst, stromal or mesenchymal lesions, nodal involvement from gastrointestinal or hematologic malignancy, or duodenal gastro-intestinal stromal tumor. After review by a multidisciplinary tumor board, the patient underwent open surgical resection of a 5.2 cm × 5.5 cm retroperitoneal mass with pathology consistent with moderately-differentiated HCC. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) subsequently demonstrated a 1.2 cm segment VIII hepatic lesion with late arterial enhancement, fatty sparing, and intrinsic T1 hyperintensity. Alpha fetoprotein was 23.3 ng/mL. The patient was diagnosed with HCC with portocaval nodal involvement. Review: We surveyed the literature for HCC presenting as extrahepatic masses without history of concurrent or prior intrahepatic HCC. We identified 18 cases of extrahepatic HCC ultimately found to represent metastatic lesions, and 30 cases of extrahepatic HCC found to be primary, ectopic HCC. CONCLUSION: Hepatocellular carcinoma can seldomly present with extrahepatic metastasis in the setting of occult primary. In patients with risk factors for HCC and lesions suspicious for metastatic disease, MRI may be integral to identifying small hepatic lesions and differentiating from ectopic HCC. Tumor markers may also have utility in establishing the diagnosis.

Impact of neoadjuvant immunotherapy on postoperative complications after surgery for rectal cancer.

INTRODUCTION: Despite the increasing use of immunotherapy in treating various cancer types, there is still limited understanding of its impact on surgical complications. We used a national database to examine the difference in surgical outcomes for rectal cancer patients who received standard neoadjuvant chemoradiation plus neoadjuvant immunotherapy and patients who received neoadjuvant chemoradiation only. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study used the National Cancer Database (NCDB). We selected patients aged 18-90 with T1-3, N1-2, and M0 rectal cancer who underwent curative-intent surgery between 2010 and 2020. We performed a 1:1 propensity match to control for patient age, sex, Charlson-Deyo comorbidity index, surgical approach, and tumor site. Our primary outcome was difference in surgical outcomes (hospital length of stay, unplanned 30-day readmission, 30-day mortality) between the two groups. Secondary outcomes included days from diagnosis to surgery and pathologic outcomes. RESULTS: Our study included 26 229 patients, of which 126 received immunotherapy in addition to chemoradiation and 26 103 received only chemoradiation. In our matched population of 125 pairs of patients, patients who received immunotherapy and chemoradiation underwent surgery later compared to patients who only received chemoradiation (median 245 vs. 144 days, p < 0.001). There were no significant differences in median length of stay (5 vs. 5 days, p = 0.202), unplanned 30-day readmission (7 vs. 9, p = 0.617), and 30-day mortality (0 vs. 1, p = 1.000) between the two groups. CONCLUSION: Neoadjuvant immunotherapy for rectal cancer is not associated with adverse surgical outcomes. This work can help clinicians optimize treatment protocols and move closer toward strategies tailored to specific patient profiles.

Prophylactic Cholecystectomy is Safe in Patients Undergoing Cytoreductive Surgery With Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy.

BACKGROUND: While cholecystectomy is one of the most common operations performed in the United States, there is a continued debate regarding its prophylactic role in elective surgery. Particularly among patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis who undergo cytoreduction surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS-HIPEC), further abdominal operations may pose increasing morbidity due to intraabdominal adhesions and potential recurrence. This bi-institutional retrospective study aims to assess postoperative morbidity associated with prophylactic cholecystectomy at the time of CRS-HIPEC. METHODS: We performed a bi-institutional retrospective analysis of 578 patients who underwent CRS-HIPEC from 2011 to 2021. Postoperative outcomes among patients who underwent prophylactic cholecystectomy at the time of CRS-HIPEC were compared to patients who did not, particularly rate of bile leak, hospital length of stay, rate of Clavien-Dindo classification morbidity grade III or greater, and number of hospital re-admissions within 30 days. RESULTS: Of the 535 patients available for analysis, 206 patients (38.3%) underwent a prophylactic cholecystectomy. Of the 3 bile leaks (1.5%) that occurred among patients who underwent prophylactic cholecystectomy, all 3 occurred in patients who underwent a concomitant liver resection. There were no significant differences in hospital length of stay, postoperative morbidity, and number of hospital re-admissions among patients who underwent prophylactic cholecystectomy compared to those who did not. CONCLUSION: Prophylactic cholecystectomy in patients undergoing CRS-HIPEC is not associated with increased morbidity or increased bile leak risk compared to historical data. While the benefits of prophylactic cholecystectomy are not yet elucidated, it may be considered to avoid potential future morbid operations for biliary disease.

Preoperative anemia: impact on short- and long-term outcomes following curative-intent resection of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors.

BACKGROUND: The effect of preoperative anemia on clinical outcomes of patients undergoing resection of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs) has not been previously investigated. This study aimed to characterize how preoperative anemia affected short- and long-term outcomes of patients undergoing curative-intent resection of GEP-NETs. METHODS: Patients who underwent curative-intent resection for GEP-NETs between January 1990 and December 2020 were identified from 8 major institutions. The last preoperative hemoglobin level was recorded; anemia was defined as <13.5 g/dL in males or <12.0 g/dL in females based on the guides of the American Society of Hematology. The effect of anemia on postoperative outcomes was assessed on uni- and multivariate analyses. RESULTS: Among 1559 patients, the median age was 58 years (IQR, 48-66), and roughly one-half of the cohort was male (796 [51.1%]). Most patients had a pancreatic tumor (1040 [66.7%]), followed by small bowel (259 [16.6%]), duodenum (103 [6.6%]), stomach (66 [4.2%]), appendix (53 [3.4%]), and other locations (38 [2.6%]). The median preoperative hemoglobin level was 13.4 g/dL (IQR, 12.2-14.5). Overall, 101 (6.7%) and 119 (8.5%) patients received an intra- or postoperative packed red blood cell (pRBC) transfusion, respectively. A total of 972 patients (44.5%) experienced a postoperative complication. Although the overall incidence of complications was no different among patients who did (anemic: 48.7%) vs patients who did not (nonanemic: 47.3%) have anemia (P = .597), patients with preoperative anemia were more likely to develop a major (Clavien-Dindo grade ≥IIIa: 48.9% [anemic] vs 38.0% [nonanemic]; P = .006) and multiple (≥3 types of complications: 32.2% [anemic] vs 19.7% [anemic]; P < .001) complications. Of note, 1-, 3-, and 5-year overall survival (OS) rates were 96.7%, 90.5%, and 86.6%, respectively. On multivariable analysis, anemia (hazard ratio, 2.0; 95% CI, 1.2-3.2; P = .006) remained associated with worse OS; postoperative pRBC transfusion was associated with an OS (5-year OS: 75.0% vs 87.7%; P = .017) and recurrence-free survival (RFS; 5-year RFS: 66.9% vs 76.5%; P = .047). CONCLUSION: Preoperative anemia was commonly identified in roughly 1 in 3 patients who underwent curative-intent resection for GEP-NETs. Preoperative anemia was strongly associated with a higher risk of postoperative morbidity and worse long-term outcomes.

Survival disparities in rural versus urban patients with pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor: A multi-institutional study from the US neuroendocrine tumor study group.

BACKGROUND: Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors (PNETs) are indolent malignancies that often have a prolonged clinical course. This study assesses disparities in outcomes between PNET patients who live in urban (UA) and rural areas (RA). METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was performed using the US Neuroendocrine Tumor Study Group database. PNET patients with a home zip code recorded were included and categorized as RA or UA according to the Federal Office of Rural Health Policy. Overall survival (OS) was analyzed by Kaplan-Meier method, log-rank test, and logistical regression. RESULTS: Of the 1176 PNET patients in the database, 1126 (96%) had zip code recorded. While 837 (74%) lived in UA, 289 (26%) lived in RA. RA patients had significantly shorter median OS following primary PNET resection (122 vs 149 months, p â€‹= â€‹0.01). After controlling for income, local healthcare access, distance from treatment center, ASA class, BMI, and T/N/M stage, living in a RA remained significantly associated with worse OS (HR 1.60, 95%CI 1.08-2.39, p â€‹= â€‹0.02). CONCLUSION: Rural patients have significantly shorter OS following PNET resection compared to their urban counterparts.

Accuracy and Prognostic Impact of Nodal Status on Preoperative Imaging for Management of Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors: A Multi-Institutional Study.

BACKGROUND: We sought to define the accuracy of preoperative imaging to detect lymph node metastasis (LNM) among patients with pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (pNETs), as well as characterize the impact of preoperative imaging nodal status on survival. METHODS: Patients who underwent curative-intent resection for pNETs between 2000 and 2020 were identified from eight centers. Sensitivity and specificity of computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), positron emission tomography (PET)-CT, and OctreoScan for LNM were evaluated. The impact of preoperative lymph node status on lymphadenectomy (LND), as well as overall and recurrence-free survival was defined. RESULTS: Among 852 patients, 235 (27.6%) individuals had LNM on final histologic examination (hN1). The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) were 12.4%, 98.1%, 71.8%, and 74.4% for CT, 6.3%, 100%, 100%, and 80.1% for MRI, 9.5%, 100%, 100%, and 58.7% for PET, 11.3%, 97.5%, 66.7%, and 70.8% for OctreoScan, respectively. Among patients with any combination of these imaging modalities, overall sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV was 14.9%, 97.9%, 72.9%, and 75.1%, respectively. Preoperative N1 on imaging (iN1) was associated with a higher number of LND (iN1 13 vs. iN0 9, p = 0.003) and a higher frequency of final hN1 versus preoperative iN0 (iN1 72.9% vs. iN0 24.9%, p < 0.001). Preoperative iN1 was associated with a higher risk of recurrence versus preoperative iN0 (median recurrence-free survival, iN1→hN1 47.5 vs. iN0→hN1 92.7 months, p = 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Only 4% of patients with LNM on final pathologic examine had preoperative imaging that was suspicious for LNM. Traditional imaging modalities had low sensitivity to determine nodal status among patients with pNETs.