RESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: Orbital atherectomy (OA) has been shown to be safe and effective in patients with severe calcific coronary artery disease; however, there is a paucity of data on OA use in patients with concomitant severe aortic stenosis (AS). METHODS: A retrospective analysis of consecutive patients undergoing coronary OA treatment of severely calcified lesions, from January 2014 to September 2020 at the Mount Sinai Medical Center, Miami Beach, Florida (MSMCMB), was completed. Data were analyzed to assess rates of angiographic complications, successful stent placement, and in-hospital major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE; defined as the composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction, ischemic cerebrovascular accident [CVA], and hemorrhagic CVA) in AS vs non-AS patients. RESULTS: A total of 609 patients underwent OA; of those, 32 (5.3%) had severe AS. The AS patient cohort was significantly older (80.3 years vs 73.7 years; P<.001), with a significantly higher percentage of Hispanic or Latino individuals (75% vs 56.5%; P=.04) and lower estimated glomerular filtration rate (64.6 mL/min/1.73 m² vs 76.6 mL/min/1.73 m²; P =.03) than the non-AS cohort. Angiographic complication rates were similar and both groups resulted in 100% successful stent placement. There was no difference in MACE rates between the AS and non-AS cohorts (3.1% vs 1.4%; P=.39). CONCLUSIONS: This study represents the largest real-world comparison of OA use in AS vs non-AS patients. OA appears feasible, safe, and effective prior to stent placement in patients with severe AS. Prospective randomized trials are needed to determine the ideal revascularization strategy for AS patients.
Asunto(s)
Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica , Aterectomía Coronaria , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea , Calcificación Vascular , Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica/complicaciones , Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica/diagnóstico , Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica/cirugía , Aterectomía Coronaria/efectos adversos , Aterectomía Coronaria/métodos , Angiografía Coronaria/métodos , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/complicaciones , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/diagnóstico , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/cirugía , Humanos , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/efectos adversos , Estudios Prospectivos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Resultado del Tratamiento , Calcificación Vascular/complicaciones , Calcificación Vascular/diagnóstico , Calcificación Vascular/cirugíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Coronary artery disease (CAD), often with severe calcification, is present in up to 75% of patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS) referred for transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). Management of CAD in such patients is challenging. Orbital atherectomy (OA) is an effective treatment of severely calcified coronary lesions prior to stent implantation. However, there is limited data on the use of OA for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) to treat calcific CAD patients prior to TAVR (OA PCI + TAVR). METHODS: Retrospective analysis of patients with moderate/severe calcific CAD and moderate/severe AS who underwent staged OA PCI + TAVR at one high-volume institution. Data were analyzed to assess the 1-year major adverse cardiac events after index OA PCI [MACE: death, target lesion revascularization (TLR), and myocardial infarction (MI)]. RESULTS: There were 18 patients (mean age of 82) treated with staged OA PCI + TAVR, and of those, 10 (56%) were male, 7 (39%) Caucasian, and 11 (61%) Hispanic/Latino. The average left ventricular ejection fraction was 49% and congestive heart failure was present in 12 patients (67%). There were no angiographic complications (0%), stent thrombosis (0%), or stroke events (0%). The 30-day and 1-year MACE rates were 5.6% (0% death, 0% TLR, 5.6% MI) and 17% (0% death, 11% TLR, and 17% MI [all non-Q-wave MI]), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In this single-center observational cohort series, patients with heavily calcified coronary lesions treated with OA prior to TAVR had low rates of MACE at 30 days and 1 year. The results demonstrate the feasibility and safety of OA for the treatment of complex calcific coronary lesions prior to TAVR. An up-to-date literature review of atherectomy before, during, or after TAVR in patients with concomitant severe AS and calcific CAD is also provided. TABLE OF CONTENTS SUMMARY: There is limited data on the use of orbital atherectomy (OA) for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) to treat calcific coronary artery disease (CAD) patients prior to transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). Our primary aim was to evaluate the feasibility, safety, and 1-year outcome of OA PCI pre-TAVR in patients with complex CAD and severe aortic stenosis (AS). We also aimed to provide a brief up-to-date literature review of atherectomy before, during, or after TAVR in patients with concomitant severe AS and calcific CAD. This retrospective cohort study found that OA is feasible and safe for the treatment of severely calcified coronary lesions before TAVR, resulting in acceptable 30-day and 1-year outcomes.
Asunto(s)
Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica , Aterectomía Coronaria , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria , Infarto del Miocardio , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea , Reemplazo de la Válvula Aórtica Transcatéter , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica/complicaciones , Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica/diagnóstico por imagen , Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica/cirugía , Aterectomía , Aterectomía Coronaria/efectos adversos , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/complicaciones , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/diagnóstico por imagen , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/terapia , Humanos , Masculino , Infarto del Miocardio/etiología , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/efectos adversos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Volumen Sistólico , Reemplazo de la Válvula Aórtica Transcatéter/efectos adversos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Función Ventricular IzquierdaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: There is limited data available on atherectomy usage in hospitals or centers without on-site surgical backup. The purpose of this retrospective analysis was to gain further knowledge by analyzing the in-hospital and 30-day outcomes of complex PCI patients (including diabetics) treated with coronary orbital atherectomy (OA) at centers without on-site surgical back-up. METHODS/MATERIALS: All comers treated with OA at two centers without on-site surgical backup were included. Baseline, procedure, and outcome data were compared in diabetic and non-diabetic patients. The impact of transfemoral (TFA) versus transradial (TRA) vascular access was also assessed. RESULTS: Of the 221 patients treated with OA, 43% were diabetics. The diabetes and no-diabetes groups had similar baseline demographic and lesion characteristics, except for the higher rate of chronic kidney disease seen in the diabetics. Overall, there was a high freedom from major adverse cardiac events (MACE; in-hospital: 99.5%; 30-day: 98.6%), as well as a high success in stent delivery (99.5%) and procedural success (97.3%). The rate of angiographic complications was low in both the diabetes and no-diabetes groups (3.1% vs. 1.6%, p = 0.450). TFA and TRA were used in 36% and 64% of the patients, respectively-resulting in low angiographic complications in both groups (3.8% vs. 1.4%, p = 0.263). CONCLUSIONS: Despite the complexity of patient co-morbidities and the presence of heavily calcified lesions, the results indicate that coronary OA can be used safely and effectively without on-site surgical back-up. OA treatment resulted in a high rate of successful stent delivery and procedural success, as well as low rates of angiographic complications and MACE, in diabetic and non-diabetic patients, regardless of access site. TABLE OF CONTENTS SUMMARY: There is limited data available on atherectomy usage in centers without on-site surgical backup. The purpose of this retrospective analysis was to gain further knowledge by analyzing the outcomes of complex PCI patients (including diabetics) treated with coronary orbital atherectomy (OA) at centers without on-site surgical back-up. The impact of transfemoral (TFA) versus transradial (TRA) vascular access was also assessed. Despite the complexity of patient co-morbidities and the presence of heavily calcified lesions, the results indicate that coronary OA can be used safely and effectively without on-site surgical back-up. OA treatment resulted in a high rate of successful stent delivery and procedural success, as well as low rates of angiographic complications and major adverse cardiac events, in diabetic and non-diabetic patients, regardless of access site (TFA or TRA).
Asunto(s)
Aterectomía Coronaria , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria , Diabetes Mellitus , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea , Calcificación Vascular , Aterectomía Coronaria/efectos adversos , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/diagnóstico por imagen , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/cirugía , Humanos , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/efectos adversos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Calcificación Vascular/diagnóstico por imagen , Calcificación Vascular/terapiaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: Although the incidence of peripheral artery disease (PAD) and amputations is higher in Native Americans (NA) than Caucasians, the study of revascularization NA is limited, resulting in their under representation in clinical studies. Orbital atherectomy (OA) is widely utilized for endovascular revascularization of significantly calcified peripheral arteries and has been shown to improve limb salvage rates. METHODS/MATERIALS: A cohort of 74 consecutive PAD subjects undergoing OA treatment was retrospectively analyzed via Kaplan Meier (KM) and Propensity Score Matched (PSM) analysis. RESULTS: A significant proportion of the subjects were NA (16.2%). Compared to the non-NA, the NA had higher numerical baseline rates of wounds, dialysis, chronic kidney disease (CKD), and critical limb ischemia, but were numerically less likely to smoke and had similar rates of diabetes. There were very high rates of severe calcification (100% vs. 87%) and pre-procedure diameter stenosis (99% vs. 95%) in both groups. The NA and non-NA had good angiographic outcomes, resulting in low rates of post-procedure residual diameter stenosis (10% vs. 11%). Lastly, KM analysis indicated high freedom from amputation in both groups at 1â¯year (89% vs. 95%), as well as in the PSM subjects (89% vs. 100%). CONCLUSIONS: Despite numerically higher rates of co-morbidities at baseline (e.g., CKD, dialysis, and presence of non-healing wounds), the NA underwent successful revascularization with OA, resulting in high freedom from amputation at 1-year. Given the small sample size of NA, these results may not be generalizable-thus, larger studies on NA are warranted.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedad Arterial Periférica , Calcificación Vascular , Amputación Quirúrgica , Aterectomía/efectos adversos , Humanos , Isquemia , Recuperación del Miembro , Oklahoma/epidemiología , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/diagnóstico por imagen , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/epidemiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Calcificación Vascular/diagnóstico por imagen , Calcificación Vascular/epidemiología , Calcificación Vascular/cirugía , Indio Americano o Nativo de AlaskaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: This study evaluated the safety and efficacy of orbital atherectomy (OA) for the treatment of severely calcified coronary artery bifurcation lesions. BACKGROUND: Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of severely calcified coronary artery lesions is associated with lower procedural success and higher rates of target lesion failure compared to non-calcified lesions. OA is an effective treatment for calcified coronary artery lesions prior to stent implantation. However, there is little data regarding the safety and efficacy of OA in patients with coronary artery bifurcation lesions. METHODS: Data were obtained from analysis of patients with severe coronary artery calcification who underwent OA and coronary stent implantation at ten high-volume institutions. Data were pooled and analyzed to assess peri-procedural outcomes and 30-day major adverse cardiac events (MACE). RESULTS: A total of 1156 patients were treated with OA and PCI. 363 lesions were at a coronary artery bifurcation. There were no statistically significant differences in baseline characteristics between the bifurcation and non-bifurcation groups. In the bifurcation group, treatment involved the left anterior descending artery and its branches more frequently and right coronary artery less frequently. After propensity score matching, the 30-day freedom from MACE was not statistically significant between the two groups. CONCLUSION: In this multicenter cohort analysis, patients with severely calcified coronary bifurcation lesions had low rates of MACE and target vessel revascularization at 30 days at rates comparable to non-bifurcation lesions. This analysis demonstrates that OA is safe and effective for complex coronary lesions at both bifurcation and non-bifurcation locations.
Asunto(s)
Aterectomía Coronaria , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea , Calcificación Vascular , Aterectomía , Aterectomía Coronaria/efectos adversos , Angiografía Coronaria , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/diagnóstico por imagen , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/cirugía , Vasos Coronarios/diagnóstico por imagen , Vasos Coronarios/cirugía , Humanos , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/efectos adversos , Estudios Prospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Resultado del Tratamiento , Calcificación Vascular/diagnóstico por imagen , Calcificación Vascular/cirugíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Significant geographical variations exist in amputation rates and utilization of diagnostic and therapeutic vascular procedures before lower extremity amputations in the United States. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the rates of diagnostic and therapeutic vascular procedures in the year prior to amputation in a contemporary population and correlate with pathological findings of the amputation specimens. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted of non-traumatic amputations from 2011 to 2017 at a rural community hospital. We reviewed the proportion of patients undergoing diagnostic (ankle brachial index with duplex ultrasound, computerized tomography angiogram and invasive angiogram) and therapeutic (endovascular and surgical revascularization) vascular procedures in the year prior to amputation. Prevalence of tissue viability and osteomyelitis were evaluated in all amputated specimens and atherosclerotic vascular disease (ASVD) was evaluated in major amputations. We also analyzed primary amputation rates among different subgroups. RESULTS: 698 patients were included with 248 (36%) major amputations and 450 (64%) minor amputations. Any diagnostic procedure was performed in 59% of the major amputations and 49% of the minor amputations (P = 0.01). Any therapeutic revascularization procedure was performed in 34% of the major amputations and 28% of the minor amputations (P = 0.08). The pathology of major amputation specimens revealed severe ASVD in 57% and mild-moderate ASVD in 27% of specimens. Tissue viability was significantly higher in major amputations (90% vs 30%, P = 0.04) and osteomyelitis was significantly higher in minor amputations (50% vs 14%, P = 0.03). Primary amputations were performed in 66% of major amputations, 72% of minor amputations, 81% with mild to moderate ASVD and 54% with severe ASVD. CONCLUSION: Diagnostic and therapeutic vascular procedures appear under-utilized for patients undergoing lower extremity amputations at a rural community hospital. ASVD rates and tissue viability imply that revascularization could be of significant benefit to avoid major amputation.
Asunto(s)
Amputación Quirúrgica/tendencias , Procedimientos Endovasculares/tendencias , Disparidades en Atención de Salud/tendencias , Hospitales Comunitarios/tendencias , Hospitales Rurales/tendencias , Extremidad Inferior/irrigación sanguínea , Evaluación de Procesos y Resultados en Atención de Salud/tendencias , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/cirugía , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/tendencias , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Vasculares/tendencias , Anciano , Índice Tobillo Braquial/tendencias , Angiografía por Tomografía Computarizada/tendencias , Femenino , Mal Uso de los Servicios de Salud/tendencias , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/diagnóstico por imagen , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/patología , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Ultrasonografía Doppler Dúplex/tendenciasRESUMEN
Purpose: To examine whether the combination of orbital atherectomy (OA) and drug-coated balloons (DCB) can lead to superior procedural and 2-year outcomes compared with DCB only in heavily calcified femoropopliteal (FP) lesions. Materials and Methods: A retrospective chart review was conducted to identify patients treated with DCB only or OA+DCB for de novo FP lesions at a single center over a 4-year period (2014-2017). In the observation period, 113 patients met the inclusion criteria: 63 treated with DCB only (mean age 69.0±8.6 years; 62 men) vs 50 treated with OA+DCB (mean age 70.3±7.1 years; 48 men). The OA+DCB group had higher calcification rates (78% with severe calcification vs 37% in the DCB only group). Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to adjust for baseline differences between the 2 groups. Cox regression analysis was used to compare the follow-up outcomes between lesions treated with OA+DCB vs DCB only. Results: No difference in procedural complications or success was found. After PSM adjustment, the OA+DCB group was associated with lower bailout stenting rates (39.4% vs 66.7% in the DCB only group; p=0.026). The 2 groups had similar long-term outcomes, although the OA+DCB arm had a trend toward reduced TLR rates that did not reach statistical significance. The Kaplan-Meier estimates for 2-year freedom from TLR were 76.1% for the OA+DCB group vs 55.5% for the DCB only group (p=0.109). Conclusion: OA+DCB is a safe and effective combination for the treatment of calcified FP lesions. The combined therapy decreased the bailout stenting rates in the adjusted analysis. Larger cohorts and randomized trials are needed to examine OA efficacy in FP lesions.
Asunto(s)
Angioplastia de Balón/instrumentación , Aterectomía , Materiales Biocompatibles Revestidos , Arteria Femoral , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/terapia , Arteria Poplítea , Dispositivos de Acceso Vascular , Calcificación Vascular/terapia , Anciano , Angioplastia de Balón/efectos adversos , Terapia Combinada , Femenino , Arteria Femoral/diagnóstico por imagen , Arteria Femoral/fisiopatología , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/diagnóstico por imagen , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/fisiopatología , Arteria Poplítea/diagnóstico por imagen , Arteria Poplítea/fisiopatología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Calcificación Vascular/diagnóstico por imagen , Calcificación Vascular/fisiopatología , Grado de Desobstrucción VascularRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: High-risk patients with advanced peripheral artery disease (PAD), including critical limb ischemia (CLI), are often excluded from peripheral endovascular device intervention clinical trials, leading to difficulty in translating trial results into real-world practice. There is a need for prospectively assessed studies to evaluate peripheral endovascular device intervention outcomes in CLI patients. METHODS: LIBERTY 360 is a prospective, observational, multi-center study designed to evaluate the procedural and long-term clinical outcomes of peripheral endovascular device intervention in real-world patients with symptomatic lower-extremity PAD. One thousand two hundred and four patients were enrolled and stratified based on Rutherford Classification (RC): RC2-3 (N=501), RC4-5 (N=603), and RC6 (N=100). For this sub-analysis, RC5 and RC6 patients (RC5-6; N=404) were pooled and 1-year outcomes were assessed. RESULTS: Procedural complications rarely (1.7%) resulted in post-procedural hospitalization and 89.1% of RC5-6 patients were discharged to home. Considering the advanced disease state in RC5-6 patients, there was a high freedom from 1-year major adverse event rate of 65.5% (defined as target vessel revascularization, death to 30 days, and major target limb amputation). At 1 year, freedom from major amputation was 89.6%. Wounds identified at baseline on the target limb had completely healed in 172/243 (70.8%) of the RC5-6 subjects by 1 year. Additionally, the overall quality of life, as measured by VascuQoL, improved from baseline to 1 year. CONCLUSION: LIBERTY investigated real-world PAD patients with independent oversight of outcomes. This analysis of LIBERTY RC5-6 patients demonstrates that peripheral endovascular device intervention can be successful in CLI patients, with low rates of major amputation and improvement in wound healing and quality of life through 1-year follow-up.LIBERTY 360, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01855412, ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01855412.
Asunto(s)
Procedimientos Endovasculares/instrumentación , Isquemia/terapia , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/terapia , Anciano , Amputación Quirúrgica , Enfermedad Crítica , Procedimientos Endovasculares/efectos adversos , Femenino , Humanos , Isquemia/diagnóstico , Isquemia/fisiopatología , Recuperación del Miembro , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/diagnóstico , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/fisiopatología , Supervivencia sin Progresión , Estudios Prospectivos , Recuperación de la Función , Factores de Tiempo , Estados Unidos , Cicatrización de HeridasRESUMEN
Calcified lesions in below-the-elbow (BTE) arteries are common in patients with diabetes or end-stage renal disease and can lead to critical hand ischemia (CHI). Treatment of calcified lesions with atherectomy has proved useful in the lower extremities, however, atherectomy in the upper extremities and especially BTE, is not typically considered due to the small vessel size. We review and discuss these studies along with other CHI-related articles and also present a case of a severely calcified ulnar artery lesion treated with orbital atherectomy and plain Chocolate balloon angioplasty.
Asunto(s)
Angioplastia de Balón , Aterectomía , Mano/irrigación sanguínea , Isquemia/terapia , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/terapia , Arteria Cubital , Calcificación Vascular/terapia , Enfermedad Crítica , Humanos , Isquemia/diagnóstico por imagen , Isquemia/fisiopatología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/diagnóstico por imagen , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/fisiopatología , Flujo Sanguíneo Regional , Resultado del Tratamiento , Arteria Cubital/diagnóstico por imagen , Arteria Cubital/fisiopatología , Calcificación Vascular/diagnóstico por imagen , Calcificación Vascular/fisiopatología , Grado de Desobstrucción VascularRESUMEN
BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: Critical hand ischemia (CHI) can be devastating and may result in amputation. Distal vessel calcification has been shown to be a major factor in causing CHI. Atherectomy in the upper extremities is not typically considered due to the small anatomy; however, the Diamondback 360° Peripheral Orbital Atherectomy System (OAS) (Cardiovascular Systems, Inc.) can access treatment areas with a reference vessel diameter of 1.5mm. METHODS/MATERIALS: A retrospective, observational, single center (Merit Health Center, Jackson, MS) analysis of 11 CHI patients with calcific disease of the radial artery treated with orbital atherectomy (OAS) was completed. Demographics and procedural to 30-day outcomes were assessed. RESULTS: All patients had good blood flow to the hand after intervention and none experienced complications during or immediately post-procedure. At 30-days the freedom from revascularization and amputation was 100%, and all the wounds were healed. The following important principles were followed during the use of OAS for CHI: (1) ACT was therapeutic (~250s); (2) Gentle wire manipulation; (3) Utilization of a small OAS crown (1.25mm); (4) Aggressive vasodilator use-given through the exchange catheter; (5) Angioplasty balloon was matched to the size of the vessel and long and low pressure inflations were completed. CONCLUSIONS: Critical hand ischemia can be treated with endovascular techniques. Obtaining good outflow to the fingers is critical for wound healing and preventing amputation. Orbital atherectomy is a useful tool in preparing vessels for balloon angioplasty; particularly in cases where calcification is present.