Phase II study of IRInotecan treatment after COmbined chemo-immunotherapy for extensive-stage small cell lung cancer: Protocol of IRICO study.

INTRODUCTION: Combined treatment using anti-programmed death-ligand 1 antibody (anti-PD-L1) and platinum-etoposide is the current standard first-line treatment for patients with extensive-stage (ES) small cell lung cancer (SCLC). However, the best treatment for relapsed ES-SCLC after the first-line treatment remains unclear. There are some approved chemotherapeutic agents that can be used against ES-SCLC, and treatment with irinotecan is well established as both a monotherapy and a combined therapy, in combination with platinum. Therefore, we conduct a phase II study with irinotecan in the second- or later-line setting for patients with ES-SCLC who have been previously treated with combined treatment. METHODS: Our study will enroll total 30 patients who are diagnosed with ES-SCLC and have experienced disease progression after the combined treatment. Patients will receive irinotecan on days 1, 8, and 15, which will be repeated every 4 weeks. Doses of irinotecan (100/80/60 mg/m2 ) will be determined according to the type of UGT1A1 gene polymorphism, and the treatment will be discontinued following disease progression, intolerance, withdrawal of patient consent, and based on the investigator's decision. The primary endpoint of the study is the response rate, and the secondary endpoints are overall survival, progression-free survival, and safety. DISCUSSION: Since the present first-line treatment has been changed to the combined treatment, the second- or later-line treatment should be re-evaluated for patients with relapsed SCLC. Irinotecan is a major chemotherapeutic agent used for SCLC. This study demonstrates and re-evaluates the clinical benefits of irinotecan after combined treatment with anti-PD-L1 and platinum-etoposide for patients with ES-SCLC. REGISTRATION DETAILS: This study was registered in the Japan Registry of Clinical Trials (no. jRCT s071210090) on November 4, 2021.

Clinicogenomic Features and Targetable Mutations in NSCLCs Harboring BRAF Non-V600E Mutations: A Multi-Institutional Genomic Screening Study (LC-SCRUM-Asia).

INTRODUCTION: BRAF non-V600E mutations occur in 1% to 2% of NSCLCs. Because of their rarity, the clinical backgrounds and outcomes of cytotoxic chemotherapy or immunotherapy remain unclear, and no targeted therapies are approved for BRAF non-V600E-mutant NSCLC. METHODS: In this multi-institutional prospective lung cancer genomic screening project (LC-SCRUM-Asia), we evaluated the clinicogenomic characteristics and therapeutic outcomes of BRAF non-V600E-mutant NSCLC. RESULTS: From March 2015 to November 2021, a total of 11,929 patients with NSCLC were enrolled. BRAF mutations were detected in 380 (3.5%), including the V600E (class I) in 119 (31%) and non-V600E in 261; the non-V600E were functionally classified into class II (122, 32%), class III (86, 23%), and non-classes I to III. Smokers and having concurrent RAS gene family or TP53 mutations were more frequently associated with class II or III than with class I. In patients with class III as compared with class I, the progression-free survival in response to platinum-containing chemotherapies (median, 5.3 versus 11.5 mo, p < 0.01) and the overall survival (median, 14.5 versus 34.8 mo, p < 0.02) were significantly shorter. Furthermore, class IIa mutations were significantly more frequent in our Asian cohort than in previously reported cohorts. The clinicogenomic features associated with class IIa were similar to those associated with class I, and one patient with NSCLC with K601E had a good response to dabrafenib plus trametinib. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with NSCLCs with BRAF non-V600E, especially class III, were associated with poorer therapeutic outcomes than those with V600E. Furthermore, patients with NSCLC with class IIa had distinct clinicogenomic features, and further preclinical and clinical studies are needed to evaluate class IIa mutations as a therapeutic target.

Large-scale clinico-genomic profile of non-small cell lung cancer with KRAS G12C: Results from LC-SCRUM-Asia study.

INTRODUCTION: KRAS G12C is an oncogenic driver mutation, accounting for approximately 14% of Caucasian patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Recently, several KRAS G12C-targeted drugs have been developed; however, the clinico-genomic characteristics of NSCLC patients with KRAS G12C remain unclear. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Based on the large-scale prospective lung cancer genomic screening project (LC-SCRUM-Asia) database, the clinico-genomic characteristics and therapeutic outcomes of NSCLC patients with KRAS G12C were evaluated. RESULTS: From March 2015 to March 2021, 10,023 NSCLC patients were enrolled in LC-SCRUM-Asia. KRAS mutations were detected in 1258 patients (14 %), including G12C in 376 (4.0 %), G12D in 289 (3.1 %) and G12V in 251 (2.7 %). The proportions of males and smokers were higher in patients with KRAS G12C than in those with KRAS non-G12C mutations (males: 73 % vs 63 %, p < 0.001; smokers: 89 % vs 76 %, p < 0.001). KRAS G12C-positive tumors showed a higher tumor mutation burden (TMB) (mean, 8.1 mut/Mb, p < 0.001) and a higher percentage of tumors with programmed cell death ligand-1 (PD-L1) expression ≥50 % (52 %, p = 0.08). The overall survival in patients with KRAS G12C (median, 24.6 months) was not different between patients with other mutation subtypes (G12V: 18.2 months, p = 0.23; G12D: 20.6 months, p = 0.65; other KRAS mutations: 18.3 months, p = 0.20). Among KRAS-mutated patients who received immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), the progression-free survival in G12C-positive patients (median, 3.4 months) was similar to that in G12V-positive patients (4.2 months, p = 0.90), but significantly longer than that in G12D- (2.0 months, p = 0.02) and other KRAS mutation-positive patients (2.5 months, p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: The frequencies of KRAS G12C were lower in Asian than in Caucasian NSCLC patients. Among the KRAS-mutated NSCLC patients, G12C-positive tumors showed increased immunogenicity, such as high TMB and high PD-L1 expression, and potential sensitivity to ICIs.

Pharmacokinetic and dose-finding study of osimertinib in patients with impaired renal function and low body weight.

The safety of osimertinib is limited in patients with severe or moderate renal impairment, or low body weight. This study aimed to investigate the safety, pharmacokinetics (PK) and recommended dose (RD) of osimertinib in patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with impaired renal function and low body weight. Thirty-one eligible patients were enrolled and allocated into four cohorts: A, normal renal function (estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR] ≥ 50 mL/min/1.73 m2 ) and normal body weight (≥45 kg); B, moderate renal impairment (eGFR = 30-50 mL/min/1.73 m2 ); C, low body weight (<45 kg); and D, severe renal impairment (eGFR <30 mL/min/1.73 m2 or undergoing dialysis). PK parameters and safety were evaluated with a starting dose of 80 mg osimertinib administered orally once daily in cohorts A, B, and C and 40 mg once daily in cohort D. The PK parameters in cohorts A, B, and C were found to be similar. No dose-limiting toxicity was observed, and the RD was determined to be 80 mg once daily in patients with moderate renal function and low body weight. Four serious adverse events, acneiform rash, diarrhea, QTc prolongation, and interstitial lung disease, were noted. Although the PK parameters of osimertinib were similar across all cohorts, toxicity occurred more frequently in patients with impaired renal function and low body weight. Clinicians should prescribe osimertinib with caution in NSCLC patients with impaired renal function and low body weight.

Phase I study of amrubicin plus cisplatin and concurrent accelerated hyperfractionated thoracic radiotherapy for limited-disease small cell lung cancer: protocol of ACIST study.

BACKGROUND: Etoposide plus cisplatin (EP) combined with concurrent accelerated hyperfractionated thoracic radiotherapy (AHTRT) is the standard treatment strategy for unresectable limited-disease (LD) small cell lung cancer (SCLC), which has remained unchanged for over two decades. Based on a previous study that confirmed the non-inferiority of amrubicin (AMR) plus cisplatin (AP) when compared with EP for extensive-disease (ED) SCLC, we have previously conducted a phase I study assessing AP with concurrent TRT (2 Gy/time, once daily, 50 Gy in total) for LD-SCLC therapy. Our findings revealed that AP with concurrent TRT could prolong overall survival to 39.5 months with manageable toxicities. Therefore, we plan to conduct a phase I study to investigate and determine the effect of AP combined with AHTRT, recommended dose (RD), maximum tolerated dose (MTD), and dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) of AP in patients with LD-SCLC. METHODS: Treatment-naive patients with LD-SCLC, age between 20 and 75 years, who had a performance status of 0 or 1 and adequate organ functions will be enrolled. For chemotherapy, cisplatin 60 mg/m2 /day (day 1) and AMR (day 1 to 3) will be administered with AHTRT (1.5 Gy/time, twice daily, 45 Gy in total). The initial AMR dose is set to 25 mg/m2 /day. RD and MTD will be determined by evaluating toxicities. DISCUSSION: Based on our previous study, the initial dose of AMR 25 mg/m2 is expected to be tolerated and acceptable. Here, we aim to determine whether treatment with AP and concurrent AHTRT would be an optimal choice with manageable toxicities for LD-SCLC.

Immune complexome analysis of serum samples from non-small-cell lung cancer patients identifies predictive biomarkers for nivolumab therapy.

BACKGROUND: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have achieved important outcomes in cancer treatment. However, current clinical biomarker tests are not suitable for some patients because they require tumor tissues and have poor predictive value for treatment responses. Therefore, the identification of biomarkers that enable screening tests in all patients is necessary. METHODS: We performed an immune complexome analysis of non-small cell lung cancer patients treated with nivolumab to comprehensively identify and compare antigens incorporated into immune complexes (IC-antigens) in serum samples from the responders (n = 15) and non-responders (n = 20). Additionally, combinations of IC-antigens characteristic to the responder group were evaluated by logistic regression analysis and receiver operating characteristics curves to examine their predictiveness for ICI treatment responses. RESULTS: The combination of predictive biomarkers detected before treatment was profilin-1, purine nucleoside phosphorylase, alpha-enolase, and nucleoside diphosphate kinase A [p = 0.0043, odds ratio = 2.26, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.19-4.28, area under the curve = 0.76]. The combination of predictive biomarkers detected after treatment was peptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerase A, ubiquitin-like modifier-activating enzyme 1, complement component C8 beta chain, and apolipoprotein L1 (p = 0.0039, odds ratio = 2.56, 95% CI = 1.25-5.23, area under the curve = 0.77). CONCLUSION: Combinations of serum IC-antigens may predict the therapeutic effect of nivolumab in non-small cell lung cancer patients.

Comparison of the efficiency of endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration using a 22G needle versus 25G needle for the diagnosis of lymph node metastasis in patients with lung cancer: a prospective randomized, crossover study.

BACKGROUND: Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) is generally performed for the diagnosis of hilar/mediastinal lymph node metastasis in patients with lung cancer. Recently, a 25-gauge (G) needle became available, but robust evidence of its usefulness in routine clinical practice is still lacking. METHODS: A prospective randomized crossover trial was performed, in which patients with suspected hilar/mediastinal lymph node metastasis of lung cancer underwent EBUS-TBNA. The primary endpoint was the rate of yield histology specimens containing malignant cells. RESULTS: From December 2018 to February 2020, 102 patients were randomly assigned to EBUS-TBNA using a 22G needle first, followed by a 25G needle (n=50) or EBUS-TBNA using a 25G needle first, followed by a 22G needle (n=52). There was no difference in the diagnostic yield of malignancy between the histology specimens obtained by using the 22G and 25G needles (75% vs. 75%, respectively, P=0.37). The sizes of the tissue samples (16.4 vs. 4.9 mm2, respectively) and number of malignant cells in the tissue samples (626 vs. 400, respectively) were both significantly higher when using the 22G needle than when using the 25G needle. CONCLUSIONS: No significant difference in the diagnostic yield between the 22G and 25G needles was observed for the diagnosis of lymph node metastasis of lung cancer, suggesting that needles of either gauge could be used for the biopsy. However, we would recommend use of the 22G needle, because it provided larger specimens and specimens containing larger numbers of malignant cells. TRIAL REGISTRATION: University hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trial Registry (ID: UMIN000036680).

The CLIP1-LTK fusion is an oncogenic driver in non-small-cell lung cancer.

Lung cancer is one of the most aggressive tumour types. Targeted therapies stratified by oncogenic drivers have substantially improved therapeutic outcomes in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC)1. However, such oncogenic drivers are not found in 25-40% of cases of lung adenocarcinoma, the most common histological subtype of NSCLC2. Here we identify a novel fusion transcript of CLIP1 and LTK using whole-transcriptome sequencing in a multi-institutional genome screening platform (LC-SCRUM-Asia, UMIN000036871). The CLIP1-LTK fusion was present in 0.4% of NSCLCs and was mutually exclusive with other known oncogenic drivers. We show that kinase activity of the CLIP1-LTK fusion protein is constitutively activated and has transformation potential. Treatment of Ba/F3 cells expressing CLIP1-LTK with lorlatinib, an ALK inhibitor, inhibited CLIP1-LTK kinase activity, suppressed proliferation and induced apoptosis. One patient with NSCLC harbouring the CLIP1-LTK fusion showed a good clinical response to lorlatinib treatment. To our knowledge, this is the first description of LTK alterations with oncogenic activity in cancers. These results identify the CLIP1-LTK fusion as a target in NSCLC that could be treated with lorlatinib.

High proportion of tumor necrosis predicts poor survival in surgically resected high-grade neuroendocrine carcinoma of the lung.

OBJECTIVES: Tumor necrosis is a negative prognostic factor in various cancers. High-grade neuroendocrine carcinomas (HGNEC) of the lung, such as small cell lung cancer (SCLC) and large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC), commonly have histopathological features of tumor necrosis. However, the prognostic value of tumor necrosis remains unknown. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 81 patients with HGNEC (SCLC, n = 42; LCNEC, n = 39) who underwent complete resection were enrolled. The proportion of necrosis in the tumor tissues was quantified using digital image analysis. We analyzed the relationship between the proportion of necrosis, clinicopathological factors, and prognosis. Moreover, we examined the correlation between genomic alterations and proportion of necrosis. RESULTS: The median proportion of necrosis was 10.6 % (range, 0-62.8 %). The proportion of necrosis was not significantly different between SCLC (median, 5.1 %; range, 0-62.8 %) and LCNEC (median: 14.2 %; range, 0-59.3 %) (p =  0.14). The cumulative incidence of recurrence (CIR) and lung cancer-specific cumulative incidence of death (LC-CID) were significantly higher in patients with 10 % or higher necrosis (necrosis ≥ 10 %) than in those with less than 10 % (necrosis < 10 %) (hazard ratio [HR], 2.94; 95 % confidence interval [CI], 1.30-6.64, and HR, 2.87; 95 % CI, 1.13-7.29, respectively). In the bivariate analysis, necrosis ≥ 10 % was independently associated with higher CIR and tended to be associated with higher LC-CID. The frequency of genomic alterations in the PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway, MYC family, MAPK/ERK pathway, and major RTK signaling pathways were not different between the necrosis ≥ 10 % and necrosis < 10 % groups for both SCLC and LCNEC. CONCLUSION: High proportion of tumor necrosis (≥ 10 %) had a negative prognostic value in surgically resected HGNEC.

Impact of concomitant medication on clinical outcomes in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors: A retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: It has recently been suggested that concomitant medication may affect the clinical outcome of patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). However, only a few studies on the impact of concomitant medication on immune-related adverse events (irAEs) have previously been reported. Here, we aimed to determine the impact of concomitant medication on the efficacy and safety of ICIs. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the data of 300 patients treated with nivolumab or pembrolizumab for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) between January 2016 and July 2018. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to assess the effect of concomitant medication on treatment response or irAEs. A multivariate Cox proportional hazards model was used to evaluate concomitant medication-related factors associated with time-to-treatment failure or overall survival (OS). RESULTS: A total of 70 patients responded to treatment and 137 experienced irAEs. The response rate and incidence of irAEs in patients treated with ICIs were not significantly associated with concomitant medication. Multivariate analysis showed that the use of opioids was an independent factor (time-to-treatment failure: hazard ratio 1.39, p = 0.021, OS: hazard ratio 1.54, p = 0.007). CONCLUSIONS: The efficacy and safety of nivolumab or pembrolizumab in the treatment of patients with advanced NSCLC were not significantly influenced by concomitant medication. However, opioid usage might be associated with shorter OS in patients treated with these ICIs. Further mechanistic investigations should explore whether these associations are purely prognostic or contribute to ICI resistance.

Morphological, immune and genetic features in biopsy sample associated with the efficacy of pembrolizumab in patients with non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer.

INTRODUCTION: The usefulness of the histopathology of biopsy samples for predicting the efficacy of immunotherapy in non-squamous, non-small cell lung cancer (NSq NSCLC) patients remains unclear. METHODS: We retrospectively investigated the associations between the histopathological features in biopsy samples and survival outcomes in advanced NSq NSCLC patients receiving pembrolizumab. NSq NSCLC was classified histopathologically as morphological adenocarcinoma or non-small cell carcinoma (NSCC: absence of definitive features of either adenocarcinoma or a squamous morphology). We investigated the association between the tumor morphological features and immune/genetic features by examining the tumor PD-L1 expression and tumor mutation burden (TMB). RESULTS: Among 33 advanced NSq NSCLC patients with tumor PD-L1 scores ≥ 50% receiving pembrolizumab as first-line therapy, a biopsy diagnosis of NSCC was associated with a significantly longer progression-free survival [median 16.8 vs. 2.3 months; hazard ratio (HR) 0.26; 95% CI 0.10-0.62, P = 0.01] and overall survival (median NR vs. 10.1 months; HR 0.35; 0.12-0.97, P = 0.04) as compared to that of morphological adenocarcinoma. In an analysis of 367 biopsy samples, the NSCC group showed a higher percentage of samples with PD-L1 scores ≥ 50% than the morphological adenocarcinoma group (35% vs. 10%). The NSCC group (n = 8) also showed a significantly higher TMB than the morphological adenocarcinoma group (n = 7) (median 236 vs. 25 mutations/whole exome, P = 0.01). CONCLUSION: Absence of definitive morphological features in a biopsy sample could be a useful predictor of the efficacy of pembrolizumab in NSq NSCLC patients with tumor PD-L1 scores ≥ 50%, as these tumors are likely to show high tumor PD-L1 expression and high TMB.

Proteasome Inhibition Overcomes ALK-TKI Resistance in ALK-Rearranged/TP53-Mutant NSCLC via Noxa Expression.

PURPOSE: In ALK-rearranged non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), impacts of concomitant genetic alterations on targeted therapies with ALK-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (ALK-TKI) are not yet well understood. Here, we investigated genetic alterations related to ALK-TKI resistance using clinico-genomic data and explored effective therapies to overcome the resistance in preclinical models through the identification of underlying molecular mechanisms. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: We used integrated clinical and next-generation sequencing data generated in a nationwide lung cancer genome screening project (LC-SCRUM-Japan). ALK-rearranged NSCLC cell lines expressing wild-type or mutant TP53 were used to evaluate cellular apoptosis induced by ALK-TKIs. RESULTS: In 90 patients with ALK-rearranged NSCLC who were treated with a selective ALK-TKI, alectinib, TP53 comutated patients showed significantly worse progression-free survival (PFS) than TP53 wild-type patients [median PFS, 11.7 months (95% confidence interval, CI, 6.3-not reached, NR) vs. NR (23.6-NR); P = 0.0008; HR, 0.33 (95% CI, 0.17-0.65)]. ALK-rearranged NSCLC cell lines that lost p53 function were resistant to alectinib-induced apoptosis, but a proteasome inhibitior, ixazomib, markedly induced apoptosis in the alectinib-treated cells by increasing the expression of a proapoptotic protein, Noxa, which bound to an antiapoptotic protein, Mcl-1. In subcutaneous tumor models, combination of ixazomib and alectinib prominently induced tumor regression and apoptosis even though the tumors were generated from ALK-rearranged NSCLC cells with nonfunctional p53. CONCLUSIONS: These clinical and preclinical results indicate concomitant TP53 mutations reduce the efficacy of alectinib for ALK-rearranged NSCLC and the combined use of a proteasome inhibitor with alectinib is a promising therapy for ALK-rearranged/TP53-mutated NSCLC.

Amrubicin in previously treated patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma: A phase II study.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of amrubicin for previously treated malignant pleural mesothelioma. METHODS: The eligibility criteria were: previously treated unresectable malignant pleural mesothelioma; performance status 0-1; age ≤ 75; adequate hematological, hepatic, and renal function. The patients were injected with 35 mg/m2 amrubicin on days one, two, and three every 3-4 weeks. The planned number of patients was 32. RESULTS: The study was terminated due to delay in enrollment and 10 patients were subsequently enrolled (nine males and one female; median age 67 [range 49-73]), of which four had epithelioid tumors, three had sarcomatoid tumors and three had biphasic tumors, respectively. According to the International Mesothelioma Interest Group (IMIG), one, four, and four patients had stage II, III, and IV, respectively, and one had postoperative recurrence. There was one (10%) partial response, four (40%) had stable disease, and five (50%) patients exhibited disease progression. The overall response and disease control rates were 10% (95% CI: 0.3-44.5%) and 60% (95% CI: 26.2-87.8%), respectively. The median progression-free survival time was 1.6 months. The median overall survival time was 6.6 months, and the one-, two-, and three-year survival rates were 23%, 23%, and 0%, respectively. The observed grade 3 or 4 toxicities included neutropenia in six (60%) patients; leukopenia in five (50%) patients; and febrile neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, anemia, and pneumonia in one (10%) patient each. CONCLUSIONS: There was not enough data to evaluate the efficacy because the study was terminated early. However, amrubicin showed limited activity and acceptable toxicities when used in previously treated malignant pleural mesothelioma patients.

Phase II study of ramucirumab and docetaxel for previously treated non-small cell lung cancer patients with malignant pleural effusion: Protocol of PLEURAM study.

INTRODUCTION: Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapy has been shown to be effective in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with malignant pleural effusion (MPE); however, there are no data to suggest that ramucirumab has the same effects. METHODS: We therefore decided to conduct a phase II study of ramucirumab plus docetaxel for NSCLC patients with MPE. The MPE control rate at eight weeks after the start of treatment will be the primary endpoint, and the objective response rate, progression-free survival, one-year survival rate, overall survival, and toxicity profile will be secondary endpoints. DISCUSSION: A previous study indicated that administering chemotherapy in combination with bevacizumab was effective at controlling pleural effusion in patients with NSCLC with carcinomatous pleurisy. It is expected that ramucirumab will have a similar effect to the same group.

Dose escalation study of amrubicin and cisplatin with concurrent thoracic radiotherapy for limited-disease small cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: Amrubicin and cisplatin is one of the active regimens used to treat patients with extensive-disease (ED)-small cell lung cancer (SCLC), whereas combined therapy involving chemotherapy and concurrent thoracic radiotherapy is the standard treatment for limited-disease (LD)-SCLC. PURPOSE: This study aimed to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and dose-limiting toxicities (DLT) of amrubicin and cisplatin with concurrent thoracic radiotherapy (TRT) for LD-SCLC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients that fulfilled the following eligibility criteria were enrolled: being aged ≤ 75 years and chemotherapy-naïve and having a performance status (PS) of 0-1, LD-SCLC, and adequate organ function. The patients received escalating doses of amrubicin on days 1, 2, and 3, and a fixed 60-mg/m2 dose of cisplatin on day 1. Four cycles of chemotherapy were administered, with each cycle lasting 4 weeks. TRT involving 2 Gy/day, once daily, commenced on day 2 of the first cycle of chemotherapy. The initial dose of amrubicin was 20 mg/m2 (level 1), and the dose was escalated to 25 mg/m2 (level 2) and then 30 mg/m2 (level 3). RESULTS: Eight patients from three institutions were enrolled at three dose levels. The patients' characteristics were as follows: male/female: 3/5; median age (range): 68.5 (60-73); PS 0/1: 4/4; stage IIIA/IIIB disease: 3/5. Both level 3 patients experienced DLT (grade 4 neutropenia and/or leukopenia lasting > 4 days). Level 3 was defined as the MTD, and level 2 was recommended as the dose for this regimen. Seven patients exhibited partial responses, and 1 displayed progressive disease (response rate: 88%). The median progression-free survival and overall survival periods were 11.1 and 39.5 months, respectively. No treatment-related deaths occurred. CONCLUSIONS: When this regimen was combined with TRT for LD-SCLC, the MTD was 30 mg/m2 for amrubicin and 60 mg/m2 for cisplatin. In addition, neutropenia and leukopenia were DLT, and doses of 25 mg/m2 for amrubicin and 60 mg/m2 for cisplatin are recommended for this regimen.

Phase II study of nedaplatin and amrubicin as first-line treatment for advanced squamous cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: The first-line treatment for squamous cell lung cancer (SCC) has not necessarily been established; however, our previous exploratory study suggested that the combination of nedaplatin and amrubicin would be a promising treatment approach for patients with SCC. Therefore, a phase II study of this chemotherapeutic combination was designed to evaluate its efficacy and safety for treatment-naïve patients with advanced SCC. METHODS: A total of 21 treatment-naïve patients with stage IIIB/IV or postoperative recurrent SCC were enrolled from six institutions. Nedaplatin (100 mg/m2 ) on day 1 and amrubicin (25 mg/m2 ) on days 1-3 were administered intravenously every 4 weeks. The primary endpoint was overall response rate (ORR), while the secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and drug toxicities. RESULTS: Partial response was observed in seven of 21 cases (ORR, 33.3%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 14.5-52.2). Disease control rate, which includes stable disease, was 71.4%. Median OS and PFS was 14.6 and 4.1 months, respectively. This regimen did not cause any treatment-related deaths. Grade 3/4 neutropenia developed in 8 of 21 cases (38.1%); however, febrile neutropenia developed in only 9.5% of the cases. Grade 3/4 gastrointestinal or neuromuscular toxicities were not observed. CONCLUSION: The efficacy of the combination of nedaplatin and amrubicin was comparable to that of other conventional chemotherapeutic regimens for treatment-naïve patients with advanced SCC, and no severe gastrointestinal or neuromuscular toxicities were observed. This combination therapy may be an alternative treatment approach, particularly in patients who cannot tolerate gastrointestinal or neuromuscular toxicities.

Randomized phase II study of pemetrexed or pemetrexed plus bevacizumab for elderly patients with previously untreated non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer: Results of the Lung Oncology Group in Kyushu (LOGIK1201).

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the efficacy and safety, we conducted a randomized phase II study of pemetrexed (Pem) versus Pem + bevacizumab (Bev) for elderly patients with non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSqNSCLC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: The eligibility criteria were as follows: NSqNSCLC, no prior therapy, stage IIIB/IV disease or postoperative recurrence, age: ≥75 years, performance status (PS): 0-1, and adequate bone marrow function. The patients were randomly assigned (1:1 ratio) to receive Pem or Pem + Bev. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). The secondary endpoints were the response rate, OS, toxicities, and cost-effectiveness. RESULTS: Forty-one patients were enrolled and 40 (20 from each group) were assessable. Their characteristics were as follows: male/female = 23/17; median age (range) = 78 (75-83); stage IIIB/IV/postoperative recurrence = 1/30/9; PS 0/1 = 11/29. All cases involved adenocarcinoma. There was no significant intergroup difference in PFS and the median PFS (95% confidence interval) values of the Pem and Pem + Bev groups were 5.4 (3.0-7.4) and 5.5 (3.6-9.9) months, respectively (p = 0.66). The response rate was significantly higher in the Pem + Bev group (15% vs. 55%, p = 0.0146), and there was no significant difference in OS (median: 16.0 vs. 16.4 months, p = 0.58). Grade 3 and 4 leukopenia, neutropenia, and thrombocytopenia were seen in 10 and 30, 20 and 55, and 5 and 5 cases, respectively. Drug costs were higher in the Pem + Bev group (median: 1,522,008 vs. 3,368,428 JPY, p = 0.01). No treatment-related deaths occurred. CONCLUSIONS: Adding Bev to Pem did not result in improved survival in the elderly NSqNSCLC patients. Compared with Pem + Bev, Pem monotherapy had similar effects on survival, a more favorable toxicity profile, and was more cost-effective in elderly NSqNSCLC patients. Pem monotherapy might be one of the optional regimen for NSqNSCLC patients aged ≥75 years.

Phase II trial of a non-platinum triplet for patients with advanced non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) overexpressing ERCC1 messenger RNA.

BACKGROUND: We prospectively evaluated the efficacy and toxicity of a non-platinum triplet regimen for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) expected to be platinum-resistant. METHODS: Patients were diagnosed with NSCLC using endobronchial ultrasonography with a guide sheath as a core biopsy. RNA was immediately isolated from unfixed biopsy specimens, and quantitative real-time reverse transcription-PCR assays were performed to determine ERCC1 messenger RNA expression. Patients with advanced, untreated NSCLC showing high ERCC1 levels (ΔCt ≧ 6.5) were assigned a non-platinum triplet regimen of irinotecan and paclitaxel plus bevacizumab. The primary end point was the objective response rate (ORR). RESULTS: A total of 141 untreated patients were evaluated and 30 patients were entered into this phase II trial. The ORR was 66.7% (95% confidence interval [CI] 47.2-82.7) and median progression-free survival (PFS) was 215 days. Grade 4 thrombosis occurred in one patient, but other toxicities were mild and controllable. Fifty-six patients were treated with platinum-containing regimens and 24 patients responded (ORR 42.8%, 95% CI 29.7-56.7). Twenty-nine of these patients had high ERCC1 levels, of which 6 patients responded; 27 patients had low ERCC1 levels, 18 patients responded (P = 0.0053 by Fisher's exact test). CONCLUSION: The triplet combination might be effective for patients with advanced, untreated NSCLC overexpressing ERCC1. ERCC1 messenger RNA levels may be a predictive factor for response to platinum-containing regimens.

Diffuse alveolar hemorrhage with pseudoprogression during nivolumab therapy in a patient with malignant melanoma.

Nivolumab, an anti-PD-1 antibody, has been shown to be effective in many cancers, such as malignant melanoma and lung cancer; however, nivolumab therapy can result in pseudoprogression. Diffuse alveolar hemorrhage (DAH) is persistent or recurrent pulmonary hemorrhage as a result of drugs, autoimmune diseases, or infections. DAH with pseudoprogression during nivolumab administration has rarely been reported. Herein, we describe our experience with one such case. A 41-year-old woman exhibited bloody sputum and ground glass opacities in the lungs along with tumor growth during nivolumab therapy for multiple lung metastases of malignant melanoma. We diagnosed DAH with pseudoprogression as a result of nivolumab and administered steroid therapy. The DAH subsequently improved and the tumor shrank. This case illustrates that nivolumab can cause DAH with pseudoprogression, which can be controlled by steroid therapy. Thus, if bloody sputum and ground glass opacities in the lungs are observed with tumor growth during nivolumab administration, steroid therapy should be considered to control DAH with pseudoprogression.

Relationship between UGT1A1*27 and UGT1A1*7 polymorphisms and irinotecan-related toxicities in patients with lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of gene polymorphisms, including UGT1A1*7, *27, and *29, on the safety of irinotecan therapy. METHODS: The eligibility criteria were: lung cancer patients scheduled to undergo irinotecan therapy, aged ≥ 20 years, with a performance status of 0-2. Thirty-one patients were enrolled and their blood was collected and used to examine the frequency of UGT1A1*6, *7, *27, *28, and *29 polymorphisms and the concentrations of irinotecan, SN-38, and SN-38G after irinotecan therapy. RESULTS: The patients' characteristics were as follows: male/female 25/6, median age 71 years (range 55-84), stage IIB/IIIA/IIIB/IV 2/6/11/12, and adenocarcinoma/squamous cell carcinoma/small cell carcinoma/other 14/10/3/4, respectively. The -/-, *6/-, *7/-, *27/-, *28/-, and *29/- UGT1A1 gene polymorphisms were observed in 10 (32%), 10 (32%), 2 (6%), 2 (6%), 7 (23%), and 0 (0%) cases, respectively. The UGT1A1*27 polymorphism occurred separately from the UGT1A1*28 polymorphism. The lowest leukocyte counts of the patients with the UGT1A1*27 and UGT1A1*6 gene polymorphisms were lower than those observed in the wild-type patients. SN-38 tended to remain in the blood for a prolonged period after the infusion of irinotecan in patients with UGT1A1*27 or UGT1A1*28 polymorphisms. No severe myelotoxicity was seen in the patients with UGT1A1*7. CONCLUSION: UGT1A1*27 can occur separately from UGT1A1*28 and is related to leukopenia during irinotecan treatment. UGT1A1*7 is less relevant to irinotecan-induced toxicities, and UGT1A1*29 seems to have little clinical impact.